Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-26T01:33:31.903Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Amplicaecum iguanae n.sp. with Notes on Hexametra sewelli, Kalicephalus micrurus and Viguiera euryoptera*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

S. Wahid
S. Wahid
Affiliation:
From the Department of Parasitology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

One male and three female specimens belonging to the genus Amplicaecum were present in a collection of nematodes in the British Museum, Natural History, made available to me through the courtesy of Dr. W. G. Inglis.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 35 , Issue 3-4 , September 1961 , pp. 353 - 360
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ali, S. M., 1954.—“On a new species of the nematode genus Viguiera from the paradise fly-catcher”. Proc. Indian Sci. Congr., 41, 32. (W.L. 16755)Google Scholar
Baylis, H. A., 1920.—“On the classification of the Ascaridae. 1. The Systematic value of certain characters of the alimentary canal”. Parasitology, 12, 253–264. (W.L. 16035)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baylis, H. A., 1921.—“On the classification of the Ascaridae. II. The Polydelphis group with some account of other Ascarids parasitic in snakes”. Parasitology, 12, 411–426. (W.L. 16035)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baylis, H. A., 1936.—Nematoda, Vol. I (Ascaroidea and Strongyloidea). The Fauna of British India. London. 408 pp. (Taylor and Francis).Google Scholar
Baylis, H. A., 1940.—“On a further collection of parasitic worms from the Belgian Congo”. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., ser. 11, 29, 401–417. (W.L. 1050)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baylis, H. A., and Daubney, R., 1922.—“Report on the Parasitic Nematodes in the Collection of the Zoological Survey of India”. Mem. Indian Mus., 7, 263–347. (W.L. 13401)Google Scholar
Chatterji, R. C., 1936.—“On a new species of nematode Amplicaecum cacopi n.sp. from Cacopus systoma.”. Ann. trop. Med. Parasit., 30, 41–44. (W.L. 1063)Google Scholar
Daubney, R. 1923.—“Note on the genus Diaphanocephalus (Nematoda: Strongylidae) parasitic in Reptiles, with a description of three new species”. Parasitology, 15, 67–74. (W.L. 16035)Google Scholar
Gupta, S. P., 1959.—“Nematode parasites of vertebrates of East Pakistan. II. Amplicaecum ranae n.sp. (Heterocheiliidae Railliet & Henry, 1915) from Amphibia”. Canad, J. Zool., 37, 477–479. (W.L. 5898c)Google Scholar
Khera, S. 1954.—“Nematode parasites of some Indian vertebrates”. Indian J. Helminth., 6, 27–113. (W.L. 9939g)Google Scholar
Singh, S. N., 1949.—“Studies on the helminth parasites of Birds in Hyderabad State. Nematoda III”. J. Helminth., 23, 25–58. (W.L. 11224c)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yorke, W. and Maplestone, P. A., 1926. The Nematode Parasites of Vertebrates. London. 536 pp.Google Scholar