Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T18:59:48.977Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Identification of Infective Filarial Larvae in Mosquitoes: with a Note on the Species Found in “Wild” Mosquitoes on the Kenya Coast

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2009

G. S. Nelson
G. S. Nelson
Affiliation:
From the Division of Insect Borne Diseases, Medical Research Laboratory, Kenya
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. At least twenty-two species of filarial worms are known to develop in mosquitoes. Filarial larvae of non-human origin must often be present in mosquitoes dissected during filariasis surveys yet the larvae seen are commonly assumed to be of human origin.

2. On Pate island off the Kenya coast where bancroftian filariasis is prevalent, several distinct species of infective larvae were found in mosquitoes both in the houses and in the bush. Seven species of filarial worms were found in the local animals and a collection of known infective larvae was made by feeding mosquitoes on these different infections. A study of the material in this “reference collection” showed that many of the larvae in “wild” mosquitoes could be identified with confidence.

3. A technique has been developed for the dissection of preserved and stained mosquitoes; this method has many advantages and can be used in routine filariasis surveys.

4. The characters which were most useful in differentiating the infective larvae were: the length; the position of the anus; and the shape of the caudal extremity. Eight species of infective larvae were available for study, these are described and illustrated: W. bancrofti, W. malayi, W. pahangi, W. patei, D. corynodes, D. repens, D. immitis and S. equina. The literature dealing with a further fourteen species is reviewed.

5. A simple key has been produced to help identify the species of infective larvae found in mosquitoes.

6. On the Kenya coast W. bancrofti infective larvae have been found only in C. fatigans, A. gambiae and A. funestus. Infective larvae of animal origin which might easily be mistaken for those of W. bancrofti have been found in Ae. pembaensis, Ae. aegypti, M. uniformis and M. africanus.

7. Formulae for transmission indices based on infection rates in insect vectors are of little value unless there is confidence in specific identification.

8. A study of the infective larvae in Simulium neavei from an onchocerciasis area in Uganda has shown that not all the larvae are of human origin. A closer examination of the morphology of infective larvae in the vectors of filarial parasites of man in other areas will almost certainly show that the interpretation of infection rates may be complicated by the presence of infections of nonhuman origin.

9. Feeding experiments were carried out with Aedes pembaensis and Ac. aegypti on a donkey infected with Setaria equina; both of these mosquitoes proved to be suitable vectors of this filarial worm.

Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 33 , Issue 2-3 , October 1959 , pp. 233 - 256
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1959

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, R. C., 1950.—“The life cycle and seasonal transmission of Oniithofilaria fallisensis Anderson, a parasite of domestic and wild ducks.” Canad. J. Zool., 34, 485–525. (W.L. 5898c).Google Scholar
Bertram, D. S., McGregor, I. A. and McFadzean, J. A., 1958.—“Mosquitoes of the Colony and Protectorate of tho Gambia.” Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg., 52, 135–151. (W.L. 21671.)Google Scholar
Brug, S. L., 1931.—“Filariasis in the Dutch East Indies.” Proc. R. Soc. Med., 24, 663–674. (W.L. 16916.)Google Scholar
Buckley, J. J. C., 1938.—“On Culicoides as a vector of Onchoccrca gibsoni (Cleland and Johnston, 1910.)” J. Helminth., 16, 121–158. (W.L. 11224c.)Google Scholar
Buckley, J. J. C. and Edeson, J. F. B., 1950.—“On the adult morphology of Wuchereria sp. (malayi?) from a monkey (Macaca irus) and from cats in Malaya and on Wuchereria pahangi n.sp. from a dog and a cat.” J. Helminth., 30, 1–20.Google Scholar
Buckley, J. J. C., Nelson, G. S. and Heisch, R. B., 1958.—“On Wuchereria patei n.sp. from the lymphatics of cats, dogs and genet cats on Pate Island, Kenya.” J. Helminth., 32, 73–80.Google Scholar
Carter, H. F., 1948.—“Records of Filaria infections in mosquitoes in Ceylon”. Ann. trop. Med. Parasit., 42, 312–321. (W.L. 1063.)Google Scholar
Causey, O. R., 1939a.—“Aēdes and Culex mosquitoes as intermediate hosts of frog filaria, Foleyella sp.” Amer. J. Hyg., 29, C, 79–81. (W.L. 600a.)Google Scholar
Causey, O. R., 1939b.—“The development of frog filaria Foleyella larvae in Aēdes and Culex mosquitoes”. Amer. J. Hyg., 29, D, 131–132.Google Scholar
Causey, O. R., 1939c.—“Development of the larval stages of Foleyella brachyoptera in mosquitoes. Amer. J. Hyg., 30, D, 69–71.Google Scholar
Chandler, A. C., 1955.—“Introduction to parasitology” 9th Edition, John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
David, A., 1955.—“Microfilaria (sp.?) in grey partridge.” Bull. Nat. Soc. India Malar. Mosq. Dis., 3, 69.Google Scholar
Edeson, J. F. B. and Wharton, R. H., 1957.—“The transmission of Wuchereria malayi from man to the domestic cat.” Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg., 51, 300–370. (W.L. 21671).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faust, E. C., 1949.—“Human Helminthology” 3rd Edition pp. 744, Henry Kimpton, London.Google Scholar
Feng, L. C., 1936.—“The Development of Microfilaria malayi in A. hyrcanus var. sinensis Wied.” Chin. med. J., 50, Supplement pp. 345–367. (W.L. 6177g.)Google Scholar
Fülleborn, F., 1908.—“Über Versuche an Hundefilaricn und dercn Übertragung durch Muccken. Arch. Schisff-u. Tropen hyg., 12, Supplement No. 8 pp. 48 (W.L. 1804.)Google Scholar
Galliard, H., Golvan, V. J. and Brygoo, P., 1955.—“Description de la microfilairo do Wuchereria bancrofli var. vauceli Galliard et Brygoo, 1955.” Ann. Parasit. hum. comp., 30, 481–487. (W.L. 899a.)Google Scholar
Gordon, R. M., 1958.—“Symposium on Onchocerciasis, Discussion.” Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg., 52, 130. (W.L. 21671.)Google Scholar
Grassi, B. and Noé, G., 1900.—“Propagazionc della filariac del sangue csclusivamente per mezzo della puntura di pcculiari zanzare. Nota prcliminairc.” R. C. Accad. Lincei, 9, 157–162. (W.L. 2118).Google Scholar
Gunbwardene, K., 1956.—“Observations on tho development of Dirofilaria repens in Aedes (Stcgomyia) albopictus and other common mosquitoes of Ceylon.” Ceylon J. Sci. (D). 9, 45–53. (W.L. 6067d.)Google Scholar
Halcrow, J. G., 1954.—“The vectors of Filariasis in Mauritius.” Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg., 48, 411–413. (W.L. 21671.)Google ScholarPubMed
Heisch, R. B., Goiny, H. H. and Ikata, M., 1950.—“A new vector of Filariasis in East Africa.” Correspondence. Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg., 50, 421–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heisch, R. B., Nelson, G. S. and Furlong, M., 1959.—“Studies on Filariasis in East Africa I. Filariasis on the Island of Pate.” Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg., 53, 41–53.Google Scholar
Henrard, C., Peel, E. and Wanson, M., 1946.—“Quelques localisations de Wuchereria bancrofti, Cobbold au Congo Beige. Cycle de developpement chez Culex fatigans Wied., Anopheles funestus Giles, Aedes aegypti Linnaeus et Anopheles gambiae Giles.” Rec. Sci. méd. Congo beige, 5, 212–232. (W.L. 17775b.)Google Scholar
Highby, P. R., 1939.—“The development of Dipetalonema diacantha and Dirofilaria spinosa in mosquitoes.” J. Parasit., Suppl., 25, 15. (W.L. 11428.)Google Scholar
Highby, P. R., 1943a.—“Mosquito vectors and larval development of Dipetalonema arbuta Highby (Nematoda) from the porcupine Erethizon dorsatum.” J. Parasit., 29, 243–252. (W.L. 11428.)Google Scholar
Highby, P. R., 1943b.—“Vectors, transmission, development and incidence of Dirofilaria scapiceps” (Leidy, 1886). (Nematoda) from the Snowshoe Hare in Minnesota.” J. Parasit. 29, 253–259.Google Scholar
Innes, J. R. M. and Shoho, C., 1953.—“Cerebrospinal nematodiasis”. Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., Chicago, 70, 325–349. (W.L. 1878a).Google Scholar
Iyengar, R., 1956.—“Développement de Wuchereria bancrofti (Cobbold) et de Wuchereria malayi (Brug.).” Ann. Parasit. hum. comp., 31, 99–138, and 266–287. (W.L. 899a.)Google Scholar
Iyengar, M. O. T., 1957.—“Development stages of filariae in mosquitoes” South Pacific Commission. Technical Paper No. 104, 11 pp.Google Scholar
Johnston, T. H. and Mawson, P. M., 1943.—“Remarks on some nematodes from some Australian reptiles.” Trans, r. Soc. S. Aust., 67, 183–186. (W.L. 21654.)Google Scholar
Kadenatsh, A. N., 1956.—(Setariasis in Sheep: Biology of the causal parasites) C. R. Acad. Sei. U.R.S.S., 107, 191–192. (W.L. 7450.) (In Russian.)Google Scholar
Kartman, L., 1953.—“Factors influencing infection of mosquitoes with Dirofilaria immitis (Leidy 1856).” Experimental Parasilology, 2, 27–78.Google Scholar
Kershaw, W. E., Lavoipierre, M. M. J. and Chalmers, T. A., 1953.—“Studies on the intake of microfilariae by their insect vectors, their survival, and their effect on the survival of their vectors. 1. Dirofilaria immitis and Aedes aegypti.” Ann. trop. Med. Parasit., 47, 207–224. (W.L. 1063).Google Scholar
Kessel, J. F., 1957.—“Disabling effects and control of filariasis”. Amer. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 6, 402–414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kobayashi, H., 1940.—“On the development of Microfilaria bancrofti in the body of the mosquito {Culex fatigans).” Acta jap. med. trop., 2, 63–85. (W.L. 112k.)Google Scholar
Kotcher, E., 1941.—“Studies on the development of frog filariae.” Ameer. J. Hyg., 34, D.36–64. (W.L. 600a.)Google Scholar
Lapage, G., 1950.—“Monnig's Veterinary Helminthology & Entomology” 4th Edn. pp. 511. Ballidre, Tindall and Cox, London.Google Scholar
Ledied, B., 1950.—“Unc nouvelle théorie endémiologique.” Dijon: 54 pp.Google Scholar
Lebredo, M. G., 1905.—“Metamorphosis of Filaria in the body of the mosquito (Culex pipiens).” J. infect. Dis.—Suppl. 1, 332–352. (W.L. 11250.)Google Scholar
Levashov, M. M., 1946.(Observations on setariasis in horses used as serumproducers.) Collected papers on helminthology dedicated by his pupils to K. I. Skrjabin in his 40th year of scientific, educational and adviinistrative achievement. pp. 154–158. (In Russian.)Google Scholar
Mackerras, M. J., 1953.—“Lizard Filaria: Transmission by mosquitoes of Oswaldofilaria chlamydosauri (Breinl) (Nematoda: Filariodea.)” Parasitology, 43, 1–3. (W.L. 16035.)Google Scholar
Manson, P., 1878.—“On the development of Filaria sanguinis hominis and on the mosquito considered as a nurse.” Trans. Linn. Soc. Lond. {Zool.), 14, 304–311. (W.L. 21544.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manson, P., 1917.—“Tropical Diseases.” 6th Edn. pp. 968. Casscl & Co. London.Google Scholar
Nelson, G. S., 1958.—“Staining of Filarial larvae in insects before dissection.” Bull. World Health Org. 19, (p. 204).Google Scholar
Nelson, G. S. and Heisch, R. B., 1957.—“Microfilariac like those of Wuchereria malayi, in dogs and cats in East Africa.” Trans. It. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg., 51, 90–91. (W.L. 21071.)Google Scholar
Newton, W. L. And Pratt, I., 1945.—“Experiments To Determine Whether Infective Larvaoof Wuchereria Bancrofti Can Migrate From The Abdomen Of The Mosquito Intermediate host.” J. Parasit., 31, 206–268. (W.L. 11428.)Google Scholar
Noé, G., 1901.—“Sul ciclo evolutivo della Filaria bancrofti (Cobbold) e della Filaria immitis (Leidy).” Ric.Lab. Anal. norm. Univ. Roma, 8, 275–353. (W.L. 10353.)Google Scholar
Pandit, C. G., Pandit, S. R. and Iyer, P. V., 1929.—“The Development of the Filaria, Conispicuhim guindiensis (1920) in C. faligans, with a note on the transmission of the infection.” Indian J. med. Res. 17, 421–429. (W.L. 0940.)Google Scholar
Pistey, W. R., 1950.—“Studies on the mosquito transmission of Dirofilaria tennis Chandler, 1942.” J. Parasit., Suppl., 42, 16. (W.L. 11420.)Google Scholar
Poynton, J. O. and Hodgkin, E. P., 1938.—“Endemic Filariasis in the Federated Malay State.” Bull. Inst. med. Res. F.M.S., No. 1 pp. 67. (W.L. 4342c.)Google Scholar
Raghavan, N. G. S. and David, A., 1955.—“Filarial infection in the grey partridge Francolinus pondicerianus.” Bull. Nat. Soc. India Malar. Mosq. Dis. 3, 96.Google Scholar
Raghavan, N. G. S., Misra, B. G. and Roy, R., 1952.—“Filarial infections in mosquitoes.” Nature, Lond., 170, 253. (W.L. 14900.)Google Scholar
Roubaud, E., 1937.—“Nouvelles rcchcrches sur l'infection du moustique de la fièvre jaune par Dirofilaria immitis Leidy. Les races biologiqued' Aёdes aegypti et l'infection filarienne.” Bull. Soc. Path, exot., 30, 511–519. (W.L.5310.)Google Scholar
Shoho, C., 1958.–Personal communication.Google Scholar
Stueben, E. B., 1954.—“Larval development of Dirofilaria immitis (Leidy) in fleas.” J. Parasit., 40, 580–580. (W.L. 11428.)Google Scholar
Summers, W. A., 1943.—“Experimental studies on the larval development of Dirofilaria immitis in certain insects.” Amer. J. Hyg., 37, 173–178. (W.L. 600a.)Google Scholar
Webber, W. A. F., 1955.—“Dirofilaria aelhiops Webber, 1055, a filarial parasite of monkeys. III. The larval development in mosquitoes.” Parasitology, 45, 388–399. (W.L. 16035.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webber, W. A. F. and Hawking, F., 1955.—“Experimental maintenance of Dirofilaria repens and Dirofilaria immitis in dogs.” Exper. Parasitology, 4, 143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wharton, R. H., 1957.—“Studies on Filariasis in Malaya. Observations on the development of Wuchereria malayi in Mansonia (Mansonoides) tongipalpis.” Ann. trop. Med. Parasit., 51, 278–290. (W.L. 1063.)Google Scholar
Witenberg, G. and Gerichter, C. L.—1944.—“The morphology and life history of Foleyella duboisi with remarks on allied Filariids of Amphibia. J. Parasit., 30, 245–250. (W.L. 11428.)Google Scholar
World Health Organisation, 1957.““Report of Study Group on Filariasis.” P. 43.Google Scholar
Yeh, L. S., 1958.—Personal communication.Google Scholar