Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T21:08:17.722Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of temperature on infection, development and reproduction of heterorhabditids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

J.M. Mason
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Imperial College of Science Technology and Medicine, Silwood Park, Ascot, Berkshire, SL5 7PY, UK
W.M. Hominick
Affiliation:
International Institute of Parasitology, 395A Hatfield Road, St. Albans, Hertfordshire, AL4 OXU, UK

Abstract

The effect of temperature on infection, development and reproduction of five Heterorhabditis isolates was examined in Galleria mellonella larvae. Infectivity was examined at six temperatures (5,10, 15,20,25 and 30°C). The proportion of Galleria infected remained relatively constant, only dropping at extremes of the temperature range tested. However, the mean number of nematodes per host produced a different trend, with each isolate displaying optimal infectivity at 25°C. The temperature range over which the juveniles could infect differed between the isolates. This is thought to be related to the geographic origins of the species. Development and reproduction occurred over a slightly narrower temperature range than that allowing infection to occur. Differences between the isolates at which development and reproduction occurred were noted. There were also differences in the mean number of juveniles produced per cadaver following either infection in sand (10 nematodes/larva) or the injection of one juvenile per larva, suggesting that reproduction is tightly regulated by density-dependent constraints.

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aitken, M., Anderson, B., Francis, B. & Hinde, J. (1989) Statistical modelling in GLIM. 374 pp. Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Akhurst, R.J., & Bedding, R.A. (1978)A simple cross-breeding technique to facilitate species determination in the genus Neoaplectana. Nematologica 24, 328330.Google Scholar
Bedding, R.A., & Akhurst, R.J., (1975) A simple technique for the detection of insect parasitic rhabditoid nematodes in soil. Nematologica 21, 109116Google Scholar
Bedding, R.A., & Molyneux, A.S., (1982) Penetration of insect cuticle by infective juveniles of Heterorhabditis spp. Nematologica 28, 354359.Google Scholar
Blackshaw, R.P., & Newell, C., (1987) Studies on temperature limitations to Heterorhabditis heliothidis activity. Nematologica 33, 180185.Google Scholar
Boemare, N.E., Akhurst, R.J. & Mourant, R.G., (1993) DNA relatedness between Xenorhabdus spp. (Enterobacteriaceae) symbiotic bacteria of entomopathogenic nematodes, and a proposal to transfer Xenorhabdus luminescens to a new genus, Photorhabdus gen.nov. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology 43, 249255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fan, X., & Hominick, W.M., (1991) Efficiency of the Galleria (wax moth) baiting technique for recovering infective stages of entomopathogenic rhabditids (Steinernematidae or Heterorhabditidae) from sand and soil. Revue de Nematologie 14, 381387.Google Scholar
Grewal, P.S., Lewis, E.E., Gaugler, R., & Campbell, J.F., (1994a) Host finding behaviour as a predictor of foraging strategy in entomopathogenic nematodes. Parasitology 108,207215.Google Scholar
Grewal, P.S., Selvan, S., & Gaugler, R., (1994b) Thermal adaptation of entomopathogenic nematodes: niche breadth for infection, establishment, and reproduction. Journal of Thermal Biology 19, 245253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanks, R.J., (1992) Applied soil physics. 176 pp. Second Edition. New York, Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hominick, W.M., & Briscoe, B.R., (1990) Occurrence of entomopathogenic nematodes (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae and Heterorhabditidae) in British soils. Parasitology 100, 295302.Google Scholar
Klein, M.G., (1990)Efficacy against soil-inhabiting insect pests. pp. 195214 in Gaugler, R., & Kaya, H.K., (Eds) Entomopathogenic nematodes in biological control. Boca Raton, Florida, CRC Press.Google Scholar
Molyneux, A.S., (1986) Heterorhabditis spp. and Steinernema spp.: temperature, and aspects of behaviour and infectivity. Experimental Parasitology 62, 169180.Google Scholar
Poinar, G.O. (1975) Description and biology of a new parasitic rhabditid, Heterorhabditis bacteriophora n.gen., n.sp. (Rhabditidae: Heterorhabditidae n.fam.). Nematologica 21,463470.Google Scholar
Poinar, G.O., (1979) Nematodes for biological control of insects. 277 pp. Boca Raton, Florida. CRC Press.Google Scholar
Smits, P.H., Groenen, J.T.M., & de Raay, G., (1991) Characterisation of Heterorhabditis isolates using DNA restriction length polymorphism. Revue de Nematologie 14,445453.Google Scholar
Southey, J.F., (1986) Laboratory methods for work with plant and soil nematodes. MAFF/ADAS Reference Book 402.202 pp. London, HMSO.Google Scholar
White, G.F., (1927)A method for obtaining infective nematode larvae from cultures. Science 66, 302303.Google Scholar
Wouts, W.M., (1979) The biology and life-cycle of a New Zealand population of Heterorhabditis heliothidis (Heterorhabditidae). Nematologica 25, 191202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, P.J., (1992) Cool temperature reproduction of steinernematid and heterorhabditid nematodes. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 60, 148151.Google Scholar
Zervos, S., Johnson, S.C. & Webster, J.M., (1991) Effect of temperature and inoculum size on reproduction and development of Heterorhabditis heliothidis and Steinernema glaseri (Nematoda: Rhabditoidea) in Galleria mellonella. Canadian Journal of Zoology 69, 12611264.Google Scholar
Zioni (Cohen-Nissan), S., Glazer, I., & Segal, D., (1992) Life cycle and reproductive potential of the nematode Heterorhabditis bacteriophora strain HP88. Journal of Nematology 24, 352358Google Scholar