Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T04:11:01.883Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Development of Acquired Resistance by Sheep to Infestation with the Nematode Trichostrongylus axei

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2009

T. E. Gibson
T. E. Gibson
Affiliation:
Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, Veterinary Laboratory, Weybridge.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

An experiment on six pairs of twin lambs earned out in 1946–6 was repeated in 1946–7, comparable results being obtained in the two years. One of each pair of twins was given 10,000, 15,000 or 20,000 infective larvae of Trichostrongylus axei when one month old; and four months later all the lambs were given 40 daily doses of 4,000 infective larvae of Trichostrongylus axei. Egg counts and weight gains were recorded weekly and when they were nine months old the surviving lambs were killed and examined post-mortem. The results show that the smaller doses of larvae given to lambs one month old increased their resistance to the second infestation but that the high doses (20,000 or more) decreased the resistance. There was an intermediate dosage level at which no effect, either of increased or decreased resistance, was observed.

The results of this experiment are discussed in relation to the work of other authors on resistance in animals to superinfection with parasites. It is suggested that the resistance to parasitic gastritis developed by sheep in the field may be partly a result of the intake of small numbers of larvae early in life and that it may actually be beneficial to expose young lambs to light infestations. It is, however, dangerous to expose them to a high level of infestation at an early age and because of the difficulty of assessing the dose of larvae necessary to stimulate resistance in a particular lamb, even by artificial infestation, it is impossible to make precise practical recommendations.

Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , June 1952 , pp. 43 - 54
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1952

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrews, J. S., 1937.—“Acquired resistance in sheep to superinfection with the nematode Cooperia curticei.” J. Parasit., 23, 559. (W.L. 11428.)Google Scholar
Andrews, J. S., 1939.—“Life History of the nematode Cooperia curticei and the development of resistance in sheep.” J. agric. Res., 58, 771–785. (W.L. 10965.)Google Scholar
Gordon, H. Mcl., 1948.—“The epidemiology of parasitic diseases, with special references to studies with nematode parasites of sheep.” Aust. Vet. J., 24. 17–45. (W.L. 2254a.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mccov, O. K., 1931.—“Immunity reactions of the dog against hookworm (Ancylostomum caninum) under conditions of repeated infection.” Amer. J. Hyg., 14, 268–303. (W.L. 600.)Google Scholar
Sarlks, M. P., 1932.—“Development of an acquired resistance in rabbits by repeated infection with an intestinal nematode, Trichostrongylus calcaratus Ransom. 1911.” J. Parasit., 19. 61–82. (W.L. 11428.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarlks, M. P. and Stoll, N. R., 1935.—“On the resistance of the cat to superimposed infection with the ascarid, Taxocara cati.” J. Parasit., 21, 277–291. (W.L. 11428.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoll, N. R., 1932.—“Note on reinfection under natural conditions with a gut nematode of the rabbit.” J. Parasit., 19. 54–60. (W.L. 11428.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamafbrro, W. H., 1940.—“The mechanism of acquired immunity in infections with parasitic worms.” Physiol. Rev., 20. 469–492. (W.L. 16263.)Google Scholar