Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:51:03.410Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Determinants of parasite species richness on small taxonomical and geographical scales: Lamellodiscus monogeneans of northwestern Mediterranean sparid fish

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2024

Y. Desdevises
Y. Desdevises*
Affiliation:
Université Pierre et Marie Curie (Paris VI), UMR 7628, Laboratoire Arago, BP 44, F-66651, Banyuls-sur-Mer Cedex, France
*
*Fax: (33) (0)4 68 88 16 99 Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Determinants of parasite species richness have been investigated in a host–parasite system comprising fish of the family Sparidae and their monogenean gill ectoparasites of the genus Lamellodiscus. This study was carried out on a small geographical scale in the northwestern Mediterranean Sea. Host phylogenetic relationships were taken into account by phylogenetic eigenvector regression which required the reconstruction of a phylogenetic tree for the sparid fish species using mtDNA sequences. Several ecological variables potentially acting on Lamellodiscus species richness were considered. Host body size and host migratory behaviour appeared to be the main determinants of parasite species richness in this system. It is concluded that structuring of monogenean communities is controlled more by ecological than evolutionary factors.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 80 , Issue 3 , September 2006 , pp. 235 - 241
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2006

References

Bakke, T.A., Harris, P.D., Jansen, P.A. & Hansen, L.P. (1992) Host specificity and dispersal strategy in gyrodactylid monogeneans, with particular reference to Gyrodactylus salaris (Platyhelminthes, Monogenea). Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 13, 63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, G. & Burt, A. (1991) The comparative biology of parasite species diversity: internal helminths of freshwater fish. Journal of Animal Ecology 60, 1047–1063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, D.R. & McLennan, D.A. (1991) Phylogeny, ecology, and behavior. A research program in comparative biology. 441 pp.Chicago, Illinois University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Caro, A., Combes, C. & Euzet, L. (1997) What makes a fish a suitable host for Monogenea in the Mediterranean?. Journal of Helminthology 71, 203–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desdevises, Y. (2001) The phylogenetic position of Furnestinia echeneis (Monogenea Diplectanidae) based on molecular data: a case of morphological adaptation?. International Journal for Parasitology 31, 205–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desdevises, Y., Jovelin, R., Jousson, O. & Morand, S. (2000) Comparison of ribosomal DNA sequences of Lamellodiscus spp. (Monogenea, Diplectanidae) parasitizing Pagellus (Sparidae, Teleostei) in the north Mediterranean Sea: species divergence and coevolutionary interactions. International Journal for Parasitology 30, 741–746.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Desdevises, Y., Morand, S., Jousson, O. & Legendre, P. (2002a) Coevolution between Lamellodiscus (Monogenea) and Sparidae (Teleostei): the study of a complex host–parasite system. Evolution 56, 2459–2471.Google Scholar
Desdevises, Y., Morand, S. & Legendre, P. (2002b) Evolution and determinants of specificity in the genus Lamellodiscus (Monogenea). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 77, 431–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diniz-Filho, J.A.F., de Sant'Ana, C.E.R. & Bini, L.M. (1998) An eigenvector method for estimating phylogenetic inertia. Evolution 52, 1247–1262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Esch, G.W., Bush, A.O. & Aho, J.M. (1990) Parasite communities: patterns and processes. 304 pp.London, England, Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Euzet, L. (1984) Diplectanidae (Monogenea) parasites de poissons des Iles Kerkennah (Tunisie). Archives de l'Institut Pasteur de Tunis 61, 463–474.Google ScholarPubMed
Euzet, L. & Oliver, G. (1966) Diplectanidae (Monogenea) des Téléostéens de la Méditerranée occidentale. III. Quelques Lamellodiscus Jonhston et Tiegs, 1922, parasites de poissons du genre Diplodus (Sparidae). Annales de Parasitologie 41, 573–598.Google Scholar
Euzet, L. & Oliver, G. (1967) Diplectanidae (Monogenea) de Téléostéens de la Méditerranée occidentale. IV. Quelques Lamellodiscus Jonhston et Tiegs, 1922, parasites de poissons du genre Pagellus Cuvier, 1829 (Sparidae). Annales de Parasitologie 42, 407–425.Google Scholar
Euzet, L., Combes, C. & Caro, A. (1993) A check list of monogenea of Mediterranean fish. Second International Symposium on MonogeneaMontpellier/Sète, France.Google Scholar
Farris, J.S., Kallersjo, M., Kluge, A.G. & Bult, C. (1994) Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10, 315–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felsenstein, J. (1985) Phylogenies and the comparative method. American Naturalist 125, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiedler, K. (1991) Familie Sparidae. pp.354–355 in Starck, D. (Ed.) Lehbruch der Speziekken Zolologie. Tejl 2: Fishe. Jena, Gustav Fisher Verlag.Google Scholar
Gregory, R.D. (1990) Parasites and host geographic range as illustrated by waterfowl. Functional Ecology 4, 645–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, R.D., Keymer, A.E. & Harvey, P.H. (1991) Life history, ecology and parasite community structure in Soviet birds. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 43, 249–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guégan, J.F., Lambert, A., Lévêque, C., Combes, C. & Euzet, L. (1992) Can host body size explain the parasite species richness in tropical freshwater fishes?. Oecologia 90, 197–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanel, R. & Sturmbauer, C. (2000) Multiple recurrent evolution of trophic types in northeastern Atlantic and Mediterranean seabreams (Sparidae Percoidei). Journal of Molecular Evolution 50, 276–283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harvey, P.H. & Pagel, M.D. (1991) The comparative method in evolutionary biology. 248 pp. Oxford, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, J.C. (1973) Site selection by parasitic helminths: interspecific interactions, site segregation and the importance to development of helminth communities. Canadian Journal of Zoology 51, 333–347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jousson, O., Bartoli, P. & Pawlowski, J. (2000) Cryptic speciation among intestinal parasites (Trematoda: Digenea) infecting sympatric host fishes (Sparidae). Journal of Evolutionary Biology 13, 778–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lapointe, F.-J. (1998) How to validate phylogenetic trees? A stepwise procedure pp. 71–88 in Hayashi, C., Ohsumi, N., Yajima, K., Tanaka, Y., Bock, H.H. & Baba, Y. (Eds) Studies in classification, data analysis, and knowledge organization: data science, classification, and related methods. Tokyo, Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legendre, P. & Legendre, L. (1998) Numerical ecology. 2nd English edn. Development in Environmental Modelling, 20. 870 pp. Amsterdam, Elsevier.Google Scholar
Marcogliese, D.J. (2001) Pursuing parasites up the food chain: implications of food web structure and function on parasite communities in aquatic system. Acta Parasitologica 46, 82–93.Google Scholar
Martins, E.P., Diniz-Filho, J.A. & Housworth, E.A. (2002) Adaptation and the comparative method: a computer simulation study. Evolution 56, 1–13.Google Scholar
Morand, S. & Harvey, P.H. (2000) Mammalian metabolism, longevity and parasites species richness. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 267, 1999–2003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morand, S. & Poulin, R. (1998) Density, body mass and parasite species richness of terrestrial mammals. Evolutionary Ecology 12, 717–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morand, S., Cribb, T.H., Kulbicki, M., Rigby, M.C., Chauvet, C., Dufour, V., Faliex, E., Galzin, R., Lo, C.M., Lo-Yat, A., Pichelin, S. & Sasal, P. (2000) Endoparasite species richness of New Caledonian butterfly fishes: host density and diet matter. Parasitology 121, 65–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morand, S., Simkova, A., Matejusova, I., Plaisance, L., Verneau, O. & Desdevises, Y. (2002) Investigating patterns may reveal processes: evolutionary ecology of ectoparasitic monogeneans. International Journal for Parasitology 32, 111–119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oliver, G. (1969a) Recherches sur les Diplectanidae (Monogenea) parasites de Téléostéens du Golfe du Lion. II. Lamellodiscinae nov. sub. fam. Vie et Milieu 20, 43–72.Google Scholar
Oliver, G. (1969b) Recherches sur les Diplectanidae (Monogenea) parasites de Téléostéens du Golfe du Lion. III. Biologie. Vie et Milieu 20, 397–419.Google Scholar
Oliver, G. (1973) Lamellodiscus obeliae, n. sp. une nouvelle espèce de Diplectanidae (Monogenea, Monopisthocotylea) parasite de Pagellus centrodontus (Delaroche, 1809) (Pisces, Sparidae). Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde 41, 103–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, G. (1974) Nouveaux aspects du parasitisme des Diplectanidae Bychowsky, 1957 (Monogenea, Monopisthocotylea) chez les Téléostéens Perciformes des côtes de France. Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences de Paris 279, 803–805.Google Scholar
Orrell, T.M. & Carpenter, K.E. (2004) A phylogeny of the fish family Sparidae (porgies) inferred from mitochondrial sequence data. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 32, 425–434.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Page, R.D.M. & Charleston, M.A. (1998) Trees within trees–phylogeny and historical associations. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13, 356–359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Posada, D. & Crandall, K.A. (1998) Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14, 817–818.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poulin, R. (1991a) Group-living and infestation by ectoparasites in passerines. Condor 93, 418–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulin, R. (1991b) Group-living and the richness of the parasite fauna in Canadian freshwater fishes. Oecologia 86, 390–394.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poulin, R. (1995) Phylogeny, ecology, and the richness of parasite communities in vertebrates. Ecological Monographs 65, 283–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulin, R. (1997) Parasite faunas of freshwater fish: the relationship between richness and the specificity of parasites. International Journal for Parasitology 27, 1091–1098.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poulin, R. & Morand, S. (1999) Geographical distances and the similarity among parasite communities of conspecific host populations. Parasitology 119, 369–374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ranta, E. (1992) Gregariousness versus solitude: another look at parasite faunal richness in Canadian freshwater fishes. Oecologia 89, 150–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohde, K. (1979) A critical evaluation of intrinsic and extrinsic factors responsible for niche restriction in parasites. American Naturalist 114, 648–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohde, K. (1994) Niche restriction in parasites: proximate and ultimate causes. Parasitology 109, S69–S84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saitou, N. & Nei, M. (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution 4, 406–425.Google Scholar
Schmidt, G.D. & Roberts, L.S. (1989) Foundations of parasitology. 4th edn. 750 pp. St Louis/Toronto/Boston/Los Altos Times Mirror/Mosby College Publishing.Google Scholar
Simkova, A., Desdevises, Y., Gelnar, M. & Morand, S. (2000) Coexistence of nine gill ectoparasites (Dactylogyrus: Monogenea) parasitising the roach (Rutilus rutilus, L.): history and present ecology. International Journal for Parasitology 30, 1077–1088.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swofford, D.L. (2002) PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony and other methods. Version 4.0d10. Champaign, Illinois, Illinois Natural History Survey.Google Scholar
Thompson, J.D., Gibson, T.J., Plewniak, F., Jeanmougin, F. & Higgins, D.G. (1997) The ClustalX Windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research 24, 4876–4882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, P.J.P., Bauchot, M.L., Hureau, J.C., Nielsen, J. & Tortonese, E. (1986) Fishes of the North-eastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean. vol III. pp. 1008–1473 Paris UNESCO.Google Scholar