Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T18:50:14.246Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Characterisation and serodiagnostic evaluation of a recombinant 22.6-kDa tegument protein of Schistosoma spindale

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 December 2024

M.N. Priya*
Affiliation:
Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University (KVASU), Pookode, Wayanad, Kerala, India
L. Bindu
Affiliation:
Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University (KVASU), Pookode, Wayanad, Kerala, India
M.A. Pradeep
Affiliation:
ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Kerala, India
E.A. Nisha
Affiliation:
ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Kerala, India
A. Amrutha
Affiliation:
Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University (KVASU), Pookode, Wayanad, Kerala, India
S. Nikitha
Affiliation:
Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University (KVASU), Pookode, Wayanad, Kerala, India
R. Asha
Affiliation:
Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University (KVASU), Pookode, Wayanad, Kerala, India
M. Shynu
Affiliation:
Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University (KVASU), Pookode, Wayanad, Kerala, India
K. Devada
Affiliation:
Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University (KVASU), Pookode, Wayanad, Kerala, India
*
Corresponding author: M.N. Priya; Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Schistosomosis in animals due to Schistosoma spindale significantly burdens India’s livestock economy because of high prevalence and morbidity and is mostly underdiagnosed from the lack of sensitive tools for field-level detection. This study aimed to clone, express the 22.6-kDa tegument protein of S. spindale (rSs22.6kDa) and to utilise it in a dot enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for serodiagnosis. RNA was extracted from adult worms recovered from the mesenteries of slaughtered cattle to amplify the gene encoding the 22.6-kDa protein. In silico analysis revealed the protein’s secondary structure, consisting of 190 amino acids forming alpha helices (47.89%), extended strands (17.37%), beta turns (8.95%), and random coils (25.79%), with α helices and β sheets in the tertiary structure. Two conserved domains were noted: an EF-hand domain at the N-terminus and a dynein light-chain domain at the C-terminus. Phylogenetic studies positioned the S. spindale sequence as a sister clade to Schistosoma haematobium and Schistosoma bovis. The gene was cloned into a pJET vector and transformed into Escherichia coli Top 10 cells, with expression achieved using a pET28b vector, BL21 E. coli cells, and induction with 0.6 mM isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside. The protein’s soluble fraction was purified using nickel-chelating affinity chromatography, confirmed by sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and immunoblotting, identifying a distinct immunodominant 22.6-kDa protein. The diagnostic utility was validated using a dot enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay which demonstrated a of sensitivity of 89.47% and specificity of 100%. The study records for the first time the prokaryotic expression and evaluation of the 22.6-kDa tegumental protein of S. spindale, highlighting its potential as a diagnostic antigen for seroprevalence studies in bovine intestinal schistosomosis.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

Schistosomosis, a significant snail-borne blood fluke infection, affects approximately 200 million people and 165 million cattle across tropical and subtropical regions (Torre-Escudero et al., Reference Torre-Escudero, Román, Sánchez, Barrera, Siles-Lucas and Oleaga2012; Colley et al., Reference Colley, Bustinduy, Secor and King2014; Frahm et al., Reference Frahm, Anisuzzaman, Prodjinotho, Vejzagic, Verschoor and Prazeres da Costa2019; Anisuzzaman and Tsuji, Reference Anisuzzaman and Tsuji2020; Hossain et al., Reference Hossain, Hatta, Labony, Kwofie, Kawada, Tsuji and Alim2023). Within Asia, the species Schistosoma spindale, S. indicum, S. nasalis, and S. japonicum predominantly affect cattle (De Bont and Vercruysse, Reference De Bont and Vercruysse1997; Labony et al., Reference Labony, Hossain, Hatta, Dey, Mohanta, Islam, Shahiduzzaman, Hasan, Alim, Tsuji and Anisuzzaman2022; Anisuzzaman et al., Reference Anisuzzaman, Hossain, Hatta, Labony, Kwofie, Kawada, Tsuji and Alim2023). Particularly in India, S. spindale leads to substantial economic losses in livestock in terms of animal health and productivity due to visceral schistosomosis in ruminants (Sumanth et al., Reference Sumanth, D’Souza and Jagannath2004). Despite its prevalence, infections often remain undetected in field conditions due to factors such as the low fecundity of female schistosomes, the trapping of eggs in tissues, the masking of eggs by mucus, the uneven egg distribution in faeces, and the low egg output during mild infections (Lakshmanan et al., Reference Lakshmanan, Devada, Joseph, Gleeja, Aravindakshan, Himachala and Sankar2018). The infection exacerbates economic burdens by reducing growth, conception, and pregnancy rates in cattle, increasing vulnerability to other diseases and necessitating liver condemnation post-slaughter (McCauley et al., Reference McCauley, Majid and Tayeb1984; De Bont and Vercruysse, Reference De Bont and Vercruysse1997). Given these challenges, there is an urgent need for the development of enhanced and sensitive diagnostic methods that can detect low-intensity infections and facilitate widespread screening (Torre-Escudero et al., Reference Torre-Escudero, Román, Sánchez, Barrera, Siles-Lucas and Oleaga2012; Xu et al., Reference Xu, Zhang, Lin, Zhang, Xu, Liu, Hu, Qing, Xia and Pan2014). Current diagnostics rely heavily on crude schistosome antigens, like egg and somatic antigens, which often suffer from specificity issues because of cross-reactivity linked to glycoprotein presence (Alarcon de Noya et al., Reference Alarcon, Colmenares, Lanz, Caracciolo, Losada and Noya2000). Consequently, research has shifted towards more reliable alternatives such as purified and recombinant antigens, which demonstrate greater diagnostic efficacy (Doenhoff et al., Reference Doenhoff, Chiodini and Hamilton2004; Li et al., Reference Li, Wang, Fang, Nie, Zhou and Zhao2012). This focus highlights the potential of these innovations to significantly improve disease control strategies.

Approximately 43 tegumental proteins have been identified in schistosomes, most of which show no sequence similarity to proteins from other parasites (Fonseca et al., Reference Fonseca, Carvalho, Alves and DeMelo2012). The distinctiveness of these schistosome proteins, which are primarily located at the tegument—the initial point of contact with the host—plays a crucial role in the survival of the parasite (van Balkom et al., Reference van Balkom, van Gestel, Brouwers, Krijgsveld, Tielens, Heck and Van Hellemond2005; Hellemond et al., Reference Hellemond, Retra, Brouwers, van Balkom, Yazdanbakhsh, Shoemaker and Tielens2006). Additionally, the schistosome tegument is vital for host interaction, signal transduction, nutrition, excretion, osmoregulation, immune evasion, and modulation (Han et al., Reference Han, Brindley, Wang and Chen2009; Mulvenna et al., Reference Mulvenna, Moertel, Jones, Nawaratna, Lovas, Gobert, Colgrave, Jones, Loukas and McManus2010; Fonseca et al., Reference Fonseca, Carvalho, Alves and DeMelo2012; Anisuzzaman et al., Reference Anisuzzaman, Prodjinotho, Bhattacharjee, Verschoor and Prazeres da Costa2021). The antigenic properties of various schistosome tegumental proteins have been confirmed. Recently, a number of recombinant peptide antigens, including rSj23, rSm21.6, rSj29, and rSb22.6, have been developed to diagnose both animal and human schistosomosis (Li et al., Reference Li, Wang, Fang, Nie, Zhou and Zhao2012; Torre-Escudero et al., Reference Torre-Escudero, Román, Sánchez, Barrera, Siles-Lucas and Oleaga2012; Ren et al., Reference Ren, Liu, Liu, Zhu, Cui, Liu, Gao, Liu, Ji and Shen2017; Lv et al., Reference Lv, Hong, Fu, Lu, Cao, Wang, Zhu, Li, Xu, Jia, Han, Dou, Shen, Zhang, Zai, Feng and Lin2016). The 22.6-kDa tegument protein from S. bovis and S. mansoni has been evaluated and recognised as a promising tool for epidemiological surveillance. This protein has been noted to delay clotting by inhibiting thrombin, thereby altering host haemostasis. It is also unique in that it is non-glycosylated, reducing the likelihood of cross-reactions with related helminths (Pacifico et al., Reference Pacifico, Fonseca, Chiari and Oliveira2006; Torre-Escudero et al., Reference Torre-Escudero, Román, Sánchez, Barrera, Siles-Lucas and Oleaga2012).

Diagnosis of S. spindale in India has traditionally relied on whole worm antigens and excretory-secretory antigens (Sumanth et al., Reference Sumanth, D’Souza and Jagannath2003; Divya et al., Reference Divya, Lakshmanan and Subramanian2012; Murthy et al., Reference Murthy, D’Souza and Isloor2013; Lakshmanan et al., Reference Lakshmanan, Devada, Joseph and Radhika2016). Given the high prevalence of S. spindale in Indian dairy cattle, there is a need to identify, produce, and characterise a suitable diagnostic protein candidate and analyse its immunogenicity. This study was therefore designed to clone, express, purify, and assess the diagnostic potential of the recombinant 22.6-kDa tegument protein of S. spindale (rSs22.6).

Materials and Methods

Sample collection and RNA isolation

Adult schistosome worms were recovered from the mesentery samples of cattle slaughtered and were morphologically identified as S. spindale as per Kumar (Reference Kumar1999). The worms were washed several times in phosphate-buffered saline and were kept in RNA later solution at -20°C. RNA was isolated from S. spindale worms using TRI reagent (Sigma-Aldrich, Bangalore) according to the standard protocol suggested by the manufacturer. Reverse transcription was performed from total RNA extracted using Revert Aid First strand cDNA synthesis kit (Thermo Scientific, USA).

Amplification and cloning of 22.6-kDa tegument protein coding gene of S. spindale

The sequence of 22.6-kDa tegument protein coding gene of S. spindale (Ss22.6) was not available in GenBank and hence degenerate primers viz. ATGKCAACCGARACGARATTRAG (SS F), TTACTGAGATGGTGTTCTCC (SS R) used by Torre-Escudero et al. (Reference Torre-Escudero, Román, Sánchez, Barrera, Siles-Lucas and Oleaga2012) for amplifying corresponding gene of S. bovis was used. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed in 25 μL of the reaction mix at an annealing temperature of 50°C for 30 sec. The amplified products were electrophoresed in 2% agarose gel and purified by elution method using GeNei TM Gel Extraction Kit according to the manufacturer’s protocol and was confirmed by dideoxy Sanger’s sequencing at AgriGenome Labs Private Limited, Cochin. The sequences were aligned and blasted using NCBI BLASTn tool for further confirmation.

The eluted product was then cloned into pJET cloning vector using cloneJET cloning kit (Thermo Scientific, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions where blunt-end ligation was carried out. The transformation was then done in competent E. coli Top10 cells (Sambrook and Russell, Reference Sambrook and Russell2001). Appropriate negative controls with unligated vector were also processed simultaneously. After ascertaining the presence of positive clone by colony PCR using pJET primers, the positive clones were grown in Luria Bertani (LB) tubes containing LB broth with ampicillin (100 mg/ mL). The cloned plasmids were isolated using kit (Thermo Scientific, USA) and sequenced at AgriGenome Labs Private Limited, Cochin. The sequences were aligned using the BioEdit sequence alignment editor and blasted using NCBI BLASTn tool for further confirmation.

In silico analysis of 22.6-kDa tegument protein coding gene of S. spindale

The nucleotide sequences obtained was first subjected to BLAST analysis (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast) to ascertain the similarities of Ss22.6 sequences with the nucleotide sequences of the corresponding genes of different schistosomes. ’Translate’ tool (http://web.expasy.org/translate/) was used to translate the rSs22.6 coding genes to predicted amino acid sequences. The predicted protein sequences obtained from translate tool were then aligned with those of other schistosomes using BLASTp to assess interspecies similarity. The protein’s secondary structure and key characteristics were predicted using the self-optimised prediction method (SOPMA), which evaluated the proportions of alpha helices, beta turns, random coils, and extended strands in the rSs22.6 protein.

Parameters such as molecular weight and theoretical isoelectric point (pI) were predicted using the ProtParam tool (http://web.expasy.org/protparam/). The tool predicted the molecular weight of the protein theoretically by adding the average isotopic masses of amino acids in the protein sequence with the average isotopic mass of one molecule of water. The pI was calculated using previously described pK values of the amino acids. The SignalP 5.0 server (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/SignalP/) predicted the presence and location of signal peptide cleavage sites in the amino acid sequences. The TMHMM Server v. 2.0, a membrane protein topology prediction method based on a hidden Markov model, was used to predict transmembrane helices and discriminate between soluble and membrane proteins with high accuracy. The Immune Epitope Database and Analysis Resource tool (www.iedb.org) was employed for linear epitope prediction, listing the possible number and composition of epitopes. The NCBI conserved domain search (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/cdd/cdd.shtml) identified conserved domains in the rSs22.6 protein sequences, providing insights into the structure, sequence, and function relationships (Marchler-Bauer et al., Reference Marchler-Bauer, Derbyshire, Gonzales, Lu, Chitsaz, Geer, Geer, He, Gwadz, Hurwitz, Lanczycki, Lu, Marchler, Song, Thanki, Wang, Yamashita, Zhang, Zheng and Bryant2015). The tertiary structure was predicted using the SWISS MODEL Prot Param based on amino acid sequences (https://swissmodel.expasy.org/interactive) and the Pymol package was utilised for visualising the three-dimensional models generated (DeLano, Reference DeLano2002). The model developed in SWISS MODEL, available in pdb format, was utilised to predict parameters related to the protein’s geometry and stability. A Ramachandran plot of the predicted protein structure was generated using the PROCHECK tool in SAVES v 6.0 (https://saves.mbi.ucla.edu/). The MolProbity bioinformatics server validated three-dimensional atomic models of macromolecules, providing essential information on the Ramachandran plot and the protein’s geometric parameters such as favourable angles and bonds (http://molprobity.biochem.duke.edu/) offering insights into their conformational stability and overall quality.

A phylogenetic tree was constructed to elucidate evolutionary relationships between various schistosome species, based on multiple sequence alignment. The length of each pair of branches in the tree indicates the distance between sequence pairs, and the units at the bottom specify the number of substitution events. The evolutionary history was inferred using the maximum likelihood method based on the Tamura-Nei model in Mega 5.2 (Tamura and Nei, Reference Tamura and Nei1993; Tamura et al., Reference Tamura, Nei and Kumar2004; Tamura et al., Reference Tamura, Peterson, Peterson, Stecher, Nei and Kumar2011). The tree with the highest log likelihood (-1659.3968) was displayed, showing the percentage of trees in which the associated taxa clustered together, with standard error estimates obtained by a bootstrap procedure (1000 replicates).

Recombinant protein expression and purification

The amplification of the confirmed sequence of Ss22.6 for protein expression was carried out by PCR using primers which was custom designed to introduce a restriction site for BbsI restriction enzyme at its 5′ end. The primer sequences were designed such that BbsI digestion would create a staggered cut compatible with NcoI restriction digestion in the forward primer (5′-AATATTCTTATGAAGACACCATGGCAACCGAGACGAAATTAAGTTCAA-3′) and a staggered cut compatible with XhoI restriction digestion in the reverse primer (5′- TTAAAGTTTTGAAGACACTCGAGCTGAGATGGTGTTCTCCATGCT-3′). Amplification and purification were done per the previous protocol adopted for amplification of Ss22.6. The gel eluted PCR product was digested with the restriction enzyme, Bbs1 (New England BioLabs, USA). The expression vector, pET 28b (Novagen) was digested with the restriction enzymes NcoI and XhoI (Thermo Scientific, USA).

The digested Ss22.6 and the pET28b vector were ligated using T4 DNA Ligase (MBI Fermentas). Transformation was then carried out by mixing 5 μL of ligation reaction mixture with 50 μL of E. coli BL-21 competent cells that was prepared by CaCl2 method (Sambrook and Russell, Reference Sambrook and Russell2001). Colony PCR followed by agarose gel electrophoresis was done to confirm the presence of positive colonies.

The bacterial clones with the insert were grown in LB - Kanamycin (100 mg/ mL) broth overnight at 37°C under constant shaking and 1 mL was inoculated in 50 mL of LB medium and incubated until an OD600 of 0.6 was attained. Recombinant protein (rSs22.6) expression was then optimised with different concentrations (0.2 mM, 0.4 mM, 0.6 mM, 0.8 mM and 1.0 mM) of isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) (Sigma-Aldrich) for a period of 1 to 5 h. The induced BL21 cells were pelleted and lysed using cell lytic B-cell reagent (Sigma) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The lysate was centrifuged, and the supernatant containing the soluble fraction of the expressed recombinant protein was collected for further purification using His-affinity chromatography. The pellet which contained the insoluble fraction of the expressed protein was resuspended in 50 μL of distilled water and kept at -20°C until use. Further, all the four portions (uninduced, induced, induced soluble, and induced insoluble) were analysed by sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). The supernatant containing the soluble fraction of expressed protein was loaded onto a Ni-NTA agarose column (Qiagen, Germany). The recombinant protein was then eluted under native conditions using a step gradient of increasing imidazole concentrations (20 mM to 250 mM).

Immunodiagnostic analysis of rSs22.6

The purity of the newly expressed rSs22.6 was analysed using SDS-PAGE (Laemmli, Reference Laemmli1970) in a vertical electrophoresis apparatus (Biorad, USA) followed by silver staining using kit (BioLit, Sisco Research Laboratories, Mumbai). The protein concentration of the most pure elute was estimated by spectrophotometer (Nanodrop 2000, Thermo Scientific, USA). Immunoprofiling was conducted using the Western blotting technique as described by Towbin et al. (Reference Towbin, Staehelint and Gordon1979), with slight modifications. Primary antibodies (known schistosome positive and negative bovine serum samples) were used at a dilution of 1:20 in blocking buffer, whereas rabbit anti-bovine IgG HRP conjugate was used as the secondary antibody at a dilution of 1:10,000 with blocking buffer. Sera from animals harbouring adult amphistomes in the rumen were used to verify the specificity of the antigen by Western blotting.

Evaluation of diagnostic potential of rSs22.6 using dot ELISA

Standardisation of rSs22.6 based dot ELISA was carried out using different dilutions of rSs22.6 antigen in carbonate bicarbonate buffer (500 ng/μL, 250 ng/μL, 100 ng/μL) and three different dilutions of bovine sera in blocking buffer (1:20, 1:50, and 1:100). Antibovine IgG-HRP conjugate at a dilution of 1:5000 was used as the secondary antibody and then subjected for chromogenic visualisation. Development of brown-coloured spots indicated a positive reaction. Further, the specificity and sensitivity of the assay were determined using the optimum dilutions of antigen and sera from specificity controls. Known schistosome positive, known schistosome negative, and amphistome positive sera available in the Department of Veterinary Parasitology, CVAS, Mannuthy were utilised as controls. Further field validation was done using the sera from cattle that harboured schistosomes in the mesentery (n = 50), known schistosome-negative animals using the sera from cattle that did not harbour schistosomes in the mesentery (n = 30) and from animals in which rumen harboured adult amphistomes (n = 30).

Results

Amplification of 22.6-kDa tegument protein coding gene of S. spindale

Amplification of the Ss22.6 produced a 541 bp product at an annealing temperature of 50°C. The nucleotide sequence displayed 96% similarity with the corresponding tegument protein coding gene of other schistosomes, as determined by the BLASTn tool (AB114680.1; EU595756.1; AY851615.1; XM_018788634.1). Further cloning of the sequence in pJET 1.2 blunt cloning vector resulted in approximately 10 colonies. Colony PCR and sequencing of these amplicons revealed a product size of 573 bp (Figure 1). BLASTn analysis of these amplicon sequences (accession number MN534767) showed 91 to 96% similarity with the tegument protein coding gene of other schistosomes (EU595756.1; AB114680.1; XM_051209117.1; AY851615.1; XM_018788634.1).

Figure 1. Amplicons of Ss22.6 gene. Agarose (2%) gel electrophoresis of colony PCR products of Ss22.6 gene (573 bp) of S. spindale isolated from bovine mesentery samples. M: 100-bp ladder, L1 and L2 amplicons.

In silico analysis of 22.6-kDa tegument protein coding gene of S. spindale

Nucleotide sequence analysis using BLASTn indicated a maximum similarity of 95.81% with the S. bovis 22.6-kDa protein mRNA and a similarity of about 95% and 91% with S. haematobium and S. mansoni sequences, respectively. Protein sequence prediction tools deduced 190 amino acids and the predicted protein sequence revealed structural similarity to S. bovis, S. mansoni, and S. haematobium 22.6 kDa sequences.(ACC78608.1; XP_018654157.1; XP_051074544.1). The predicted secondary structure showed that among the 190 amino acids majority formed alpha helices (47.89 %) involving 91 amino acids, 17 amino acids (8.95%) involved in the formation of beta turns, and 33 amino acids (17.37%) formed extended strands; the remaining 49 (25.79%) were associated with random coil structures (Figure 2). The molecular weight and pI of the rSs22.6 protein were determined to be 22628.92 Da and 6.76, respectively. The analysis of predicted amino acid composition highlighted lysine as the most common amino acid, constituting 10% of primary structure of the protein, followed by glutamate (9.5%), and isoleucine (7.9%). Histidine was the least prevalent amino acid accounting for 1.1% of the composition. The calculated grand value of hydropathy (GRAVY) score of -0.651 indicated the non-polar nature of the protein. Additionally, both the aliphatic index (71.84) and instability index (36.88) suggested the protein is stable. Subcellular location of rSs22.6 could not be confirmed as signal peptides or transmembrane helices were not detected (Supplementary file 1). Three possible linear antigenic epitopes were predicted out of which, one (having a score >0.8) was recommended by the server. The sequence that had the highest possibility to become a linear antigenic epitope was a 20 amino acid long sequence which obtained a score of 1.00. The protein exhibited two conserved domains, an EF-hand, a calcium binding domain at the N-terminus (residues 12–71) and a dynein light-chain domain at the C-terminus (residues 99–186) (Supplementary file 2). Analysis of the tertiary structure showed the presence of α helices and β sheets, with an EF-hand forming a helix-loop-helix domain (Figure 3). Of the total 168 residues in the selected model on the Ramachandran plot, 156 (92.9 %) were found in the most favoured regions, 10 residues (6.0 %) in additional allowed regions, and two serene residues in generously allowed regions and no residues in the disallowed regions (Figure 4).

Figure 2. Predicted secondary structure of rSs 22.6 protein. The predicted secondary structure of rSs22.6 with 190 amino acids, the majority of which formed alpha helices (47.89%) involving 91 amino acids, 17 amino acids (8.95%) involving in the formation of beta turns, 33 amino acids (17.37%) forming extended strands, and the remaining 49 (25.79%) involving in the formation of random coil structures.

Figure 3. Tertiary structure of rSs22.6 protein. Amino acid sequence and molecular modelling of the 22.6 kDa antigen from Schistosoma spindale (Ss22.6). One EF-hand motif highlighted in gold yellow and the dynein light-chain motif highlighted in olive green.

Figure 4. Ramachandran plot of predicted rSs22.6. Ramachandran plot of the selected model of predicted rSs22.6. Of the total 168 residues, 156 (92.9%) were in the most favoured regions (marked as A, B, L), 10 residues (6.0%) in additional allowed regions (marked as a, b, l, p), and two residues (1.2%) in generously allowed regions (marked as -a, -b, -l, -p) without any residues in the disallowed regions.

Phylogenetic analysis of the 22.6-kDa coding region of the newly expressed protein, using 1000 bootstraps, identified a sister clade to S. haematobium and S. bovis, and distinct from the clade containing S. japonicum. The phylogenetic tree showed robust bootstrap support, with values ranging from 70 to 100 (Figure 5). The distance matrix used to estimate evolutionary divergence between sequences indicated that the analysed sequence of S. spindale was closest to the gene sequence of S. bovis and most distant from S. japonicum.

Figure 5. Phylogenetic analysis of Ss22.6 gene. Phylogenetic tree using maximum likelihood method of S. spindale based on the analysis of 22.6-kDa coding gene sequences of the newly expressed protein. Haemonchus contortus is the outgroup. Bootstrap values (ranging from 70 to 100) are indicated in each node after 1000 replicates. GenBank accession numbers are given in front of each entry.

Expression of 22.6-kDa tegument protein coding gene of S. spindale

Expression of the confirmed sequence in E. coli BL21 cells resulted in the development of about 100 colonies. Colony PCR of these samples revealed a distinct band of approximately 573 bp, indicating the presence of the confirmed sequences after expression. The optimal induction of the rSs22.6 occurred with 0.6 mM IPTG over 4 h and hence the harvesting of the induced recombinant cells was done after 4 h of incubation.

Analysis of the newly expressed protein

The SDS-PAGE analysis confirmed the expression of rSs22.6 in the induced cells, whereas no expression was detected in the uninduced cells. The presence of the protein was detected in both insoluble and soluble fractions after centrifugation of the cell lysate. The soluble fraction was further subjected to purification. The most pure and concentrated fraction of rSs22.6 was observed in the elute with 150-mM concentration of imidazole buffer (Figure 6). A bright single band of approximately 22.6-kDa size without any nonspecific bands in silver-stained gels indicated the high purity of the protein (Figure 6). The concentration of rSs22.6 was estimated to be 2.5 mg/mL. Upon Western blotting with known schistosome positive sera, a single immunogenic band of 22.6-kDa size was observed. The absence of reactivity with known amphistome positive sera and known schistosome negative sera confirmed the specificity of rSs22.6 (Figure 7).

Figure 6. Antigen analysis by SDS PAGE and silver staining. (A) SDS-PAGE analysis of soluble fractions of rSs22.6 protein resolved in 12% gel after Coomassie Brilliant Blue Staining. Presence of the most pure and concentrated fraction of rSs22.6 in the elute with 150-mM concentration of imidazole buffer. M, Broad range protein marker. (B) SDS-PAGE analysis of most pure soluble fraction rSS22.6 protein resolved in 12% gel after silver staining. A bright single band of approximately 22.6-kDa size without any nonspecific bands indicating the high purity of the expressed protein. M, Broad range protein marker; L1, S. spindale sample.

Figure 7. Western blotting and dot ELISA of rSs 22.6 protein. (A) Immunoprofiling of rSs22.6 protein using the western blotting technique. L1, The absence of reactivity with known amphistome positive serum showing the specificity of rSs22.6. Lane M, Broad range protein marker. (B) Immunoprofiling of rSs22.6 protein using the western blotting technique. L2, A single immunogenic band of 22.6-kDa size showing reactivity of the protein with known schistosome positive serum. Lane M, Broad range protein marker. (C) Evaluation of diagnostic potential of rSs22.6 using dot ELISA. Known schistosome positive, known schistosome negative, and amphistome positive sera were utilized as controls. Development of brown-coloured spots in reaction with known schistosome positive serum indicated a positive result whereas absence of development of brown spots in reaction with known schistosome negative and amphistome positive sera samples indicated the absence of cross-reaction and specificity of the protein.

Diagnostic performance of rSS22.6 dot-ELISA

To further validate the diagnostic utility the protein was employed in dot ELISA for antibody detection from field samples. Antigen concentration of 500 ng/μL and sera dilution of 1:100 were found to be optimum for dot-ELISA using rSs22.6. Of the 50 known positive samples, rSs22.6 dot-ELISA revealed positive signals in 45, indicating a sensitivity of 90%. All the known schistosome-negative sera samples (n = 30) collected from cattle that did not harbour schistosomes in the mesentery were detected as negative by rSs22.6 dot-ELISA, indicating a 100% specificity for the diagnostic assay. In addition, rSs22.6 did not show any cross reaction with amphistome positive sera samples (Figure 7).

Discussion

Animal schistosomosis, a highly prevalent blood fluke infection caused by S. spindale, imposes significant financial burden on livestock farmers in India. The lack of sensitive parasitological techniques highlights the urgent need to develop improved diagnostics for this schistosome species. Among an array of immunogenic proteins, 22.6-kDa tegument protein is unique to the genus Schistosoma. Besides its homologues in S. mansoni (Sm22.6), S. japonicum (Sj22.6), and S. bovis (Sb22.6) have been shown to play a crucial role in resistance to reinfection in endemic areas, thus offering promise as an epidemiological tool for monitoring these infections (Dunne et al., Reference Dunne, Webster and Smith1997; Santiago et al., Reference Santiago, Hafalla and Kurtis1998; Torre-Escudero et al., Reference Torre-Escudero, Román, Sánchez, Barrera, Siles-Lucas and Oleaga2012). Functionally, 22.6-kDa tegument protein was reported to delay clotting by inhibiting thrombin, thus modulating haemostasis of the host. Additionally, the protein’s non-glycosylated nature reduced the likelihood of cross-reactions with related helminths. However, its presence and potential as a recombinant diagnostic antigen had not been previously explored in Indian schistosome species. In this study, the 22.6-kDa tegument protein of S. spindale (Ss22.6) was expressed in a prokaryotic system, characterised, and its diagnostic potential was validated through dot-ELISA for the first time

A 573-bp region corresponding to 22.6-kDa tegument protein coding gene of S. spindale amplified using cDNA of S. spindale was ascertained to be similar to the corresponding gene of other schistosomes. Further, in silico analysis was done to predict the characteristics of protein including pI, amino acid composition, functional properties, structural stability, secretory nature etc. Similarity analysis of nucleotide sequence and the predicted protein sequences of rSs22.6 confirmed the identity of this sequence with that of the related schistosomes viz. S. haematobium, S. bovis, and S. japonicum. Analysis of the secondary structure of rSs22.6 revealed high percentage of alpha helices suggestive of the involvement of hydrogen bonds in folding, stabilisation, and functioning of protein. The pI is an important factor that estimates the protein solubility, its electrophoresis, and electrophoretic separation. Proteins with a pI near the pH of their environment are typically electrically neutral and demonstrate reduced aggregation and precipitation. The pI of the rSs22.6 was determined to be 6.76, suggesting an average protein solubility and electrophoretic separation (Sawal et al., Reference Sawal, Nighat, Safdar and Anees2023). The predicted aliphatic index of rSs22.6 suggested that this protein could remain stable across a wide range of temperatures (Sivakumar et al., Reference Sivakumar and Balaji2018). A GRAVY score of -0.651 indicated the non-polar nature of rSs22.6, suggesting increased hydrophilic interactions (Magdeldin et al., Reference Magdeldin, Yoshida, Li, Maeda, Yokoyama, Enany, Zhang, Xu, Fujinaka, Yaoita, Sasaki and Yamamoto2012). Antigenic epitopes are specific regions on the protein surface preferentially recognized by B-cell antibodies. Predicting these antigenic epitopes provide critical insights for designing vaccine components and immunodiagnostic candidates (Ponomarenko and Regenmortel, Reference Ponomarenko and Regenmortel2009). One potential epitope within the rSs22.6 protein was identified by the server suggesting its suitability as diagnostic/vaccine candidate.

Analysis of the rSs22.6 using Signal P 5.0 indicated the absence of signal peptides. Typically, molecules that possess signal peptides or anchors are either excreted, secreted, membrane-anchored, or may interact directly with the host immune system (Dias et al., Reference Dias, Boroni, Rocha, Dias, Souza, Oliveira, Bitar, Macedo, Machado, Caliari and Franco2014). The lack of a signal peptide in the newly expressed protein implies that it is likely not secreted. Proteins lacking signal peptides might be secreted through alternate pathways like exosome release and direct translocation across the plasma membrane (Samoil et al., Reference Samoil, Dagenais, Ganapathy, Aldridge, Glebov, Jardim and Ribeiro2018). Consistent with this, Zhang et al. (Reference Zhang, Xu, Gan, Zeng and Hu2012) noted the absence of a signal peptide in the SjTP22.4 tegumental protein, suggesting its role as a transmembrane protein at the tegument surface. Analysis using TMHMM Server v. 2.0 confirmed the absence of transmembrane helices in the predicted protein sequence. The absence of a signal peptide and membrane anchoring motifs in rSs22.6 indicated that it might be a soluble cytoplasmic protein as was previously observed in its orthologues of Schistosoma spp., other schistosome tegument protein sequences viz. of Sm21.6 and Sb22.6 (Lopes et al., Reference Lopes, Paiva, Martins, Cardoso, Rajão, Pinho, Caliari, Oliveira, Mello, Leite and Oliveira2009; Torre-Escudero et al., Reference Torre-Escudero, Román, Sánchez, Barrera, Siles-Lucas and Oleaga2012) and in tegumental calcium-binding proteins in other trematodes (Vichasri-Grams et al., Reference Vichasri-Grams, Subpipattana, Sobhon, Viyanant and Grams2006).

The presence of an EF-hand domain, a calcium-binding domain, and a dynein light-chain domain in the conserved region of rSs22.6 allows for the modulation of protein conformation and activity in response to calcium signalling. Proteins with EF-hand domains are involved in various biological processes, including signal transduction, muscle contraction, and calcium homeostasis. Similarly, dynein light-chain motifs are crucial for protein-protein interactions, facilitating intracellular transport, cytoskeletal organisation, and vesicle trafficking. These motifs can impart specific functional properties to recombinant proteins, such as calcium sensitivity or interactions with cytoskeletal components (O’Connell et al., Reference O’Connell, Bauer, O’Brien, Johnson, Divizio and O’Kane2018; Struk et al., Reference Struk, Boer and Rigden2019). The presence of dynein-related proteins such as Sm21.7 and Sm22.6 primarily localised just beneath the plasma membrane forming a macromolecular complex were documented in tegument extracts (Braschi et al., Reference Braschi, Curwen, Ashton, Verjovski-Almeida and Wilson2006). These proteins provide structural scaffolding for the parasite tegument and play a crucial role in vesicle transport to the plasma membrane surface. Observations of the EF-hand domain and dynein light chain in various protein molecules of other schistosomes (Lopes et al., Reference Lopes, Paiva, Martins, Cardoso, Rajão, Pinho, Caliari, Oliveira, Mello, Leite and Oliveira2009; Torre-Escudero et al., Reference Torre-Escudero, Román, Sánchez, Barrera, Siles-Lucas and Oleaga2012; Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Xu, Gan, Zeng and Hu2012) are consistent with those in rSs22.6.

Structural validation of the structure of rSs22.6 predicted using Ramachandran plot illustrated the statistical distribution of ϕ (phi) and ψ (psi) dihedral angles in a protein backbone. These angles, along with the omega angle formed by peptide bonds, characterise each residue in a polypeptide chain. This plot classifies regions into generously allowed, moderately allowed, and disallowed regions. A large number of dihedral angles found in the disallowed regions would indicate structural instability in the model. A good quality theoretically rendered protein structure would be expected to have over 90% of its residues in generously allowed region (Motamedi et al, Reference Motamedi, Alvandi, Fathollahi, Ari, Moradi, Moradi and Abiri2023; Sawal et al, Reference Sawal, Nighat, Safdar and Anees2023). The presence of a high % (92.9%) of amino acid residues in the most favoured regions without any residues in the disallowed region of Ramachandran plots and those geometrical parameters predicted by molprobity revealed that the constructed model of rSS22.6 is a structurally stable good quality model.

The evolutionary history deduced through phylogenetic analysis using the maximum likelihood method showed that a coding region of the rSS22.6 occurred as a sister clade to S. haematobium and S. bovis and was distinct from the clade containing S. japonicum. The phylogenetic analysis of mitochondrial gene sequences from a Kerala isolate of S. spindale had been previously reported to be distantly related to S. japonicum (Lakshmanan, Reference Lakshmanan2014). Barker and Blair (Reference Barker and Blair1996) had documented through phylogenetic analysis that S. spindale may have been brought to India and Southeast Asia from Africa by early humans.

After in silico characterisation of the coding sequences and ascertaining its structural stability, it was cloned initially in a cloning vector and then in expression vector. Although many expression studies opt to clone sequences directly into expression vectors (Peng et al., Reference Peng, Lee, Tsaihong, Cheng and Fan2008; Lopes et al., Reference Lopes, Paiva, Martins, Cardoso, Rajão, Pinho, Caliari, Oliveira, Mello, Leite and Oliveira2009; Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, He, He, Zong and Cai2015a), we cloned the rSs22.6 sequence initially in pJET cloning vector using Top10 E.coli cells (Torre-Escudero et al., Reference Torre-Escudero, Román, Sánchez, Barrera, Siles-Lucas and Oleaga2012; Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Xu, Gan, Zeng and Hu2012). The robust transcription and translation of E. coli machinery supports the high-level production of heterologous proteins, with the system’s simplicity enabling rapid screening of expression constructs and optimisation of culture conditions (Rosano and Ceccarelli, Reference Rosano and Ceccarelli2014). Despite these benefits, challenges such as protein misfolding, aggregation, and host cell toxicity from overexpression of foreign proteins can affect yield and solubility. Strategies to address these challenges include the use of fusion tags, co-expressing chaperones, optimising culture conditions, and exploring alternative E. coli strains (Baneyx and Mujacic, Reference Baneyx and Mujacic2004). Alternative expression systems such as mammalian vectors (e.g., pCMV-Myc), eukaryotic HeLa cells, and yeast cells (e.g., Pichia pastoris) also provide options, although they come with challenges like instability and protein overexpression (Andrell and Tate, Reference Andrell and Tate2013; Qiu et al., Reference Qiu, Fu, Shi, Hong, Liu and Lin2013; Damasceno et al., Reference Damasceno, Ritter and Batt2017).

The expressed protein was purified using nickel affinity chromatography. The versatility of nickel affinity chromatography allows for the efficient purification of a broad spectrum of recombinant proteins from complex mixtures, including bacterial lysates and cell culture supernatants (Vieira Gomes et al., Reference Vieira Gomes, Souza Dias, Felli Venancio and Vicentini2014). Factors such as resin selection, buffer composition, pH, and the concentration of imidazole in the elution buffer significantly influences the efficiency of purification. Imidazole based elution buffers are widely adopted for purification of soluble fractions (Cai et al., Reference Cai, Bu, Wang, Wang, Zhong and Wang2008; Lopes et al., Reference Lopes, Paiva, Martins, Cardoso, Rajão, Pinho, Caliari, Oliveira, Mello, Leite and Oliveira2009; Qiu et al., Reference Qiu, Fu, Shi, Hong, Liu and Lin2013; Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, He, He, Zong and Cai2015a; Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Fu, Li, Han, Cao, Han, Liu, Lu, Hong and Lin2015b; Lv et al., Reference Lv, Hong, Fu, Lu, Cao, Wang, Zhu, Li, Xu, Jia, Han, Dou, Shen, Zhang, Zai, Feng and Lin2016). In the present study, 2.5 mg/mL of protein was obtained using induction with 0.6 mM IPTG over 4 h followed by purification with 150 mM of imidazole-based buffer. Purification of proteins in their insoluble form requires denaturing conditions using either urea-based or guanidine hydrochloride-based elution buffers (Bornhorst and Falke, Reference Bornhorst and Falke2000). Besides, the design of the histidine tag, including its length and position within the protein sequence, can affect binding affinity and specificity. Optimisation of cell lysis conditions, including the selection of detergents and protease inhibitors, is also critical for minimising non-specific binding and maximising recovery of the target protein (Shi et al., Reference Shi, Yin, Guo, Guo, Liu and Li2018).

Accurate characterisation of expressed proteins was done by SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis (Laemmli, Reference Laemmli1970; Towbin et al., Reference Towbin, Staehelint and Gordon1979; Sharma et al., Reference Sharma, Kaur, Goyal, Nisha and Vyas2020). The production of high-quality immunogenic rSs22.6 was indicated by the presence of single specific band by Western blotting using known schistosome positive and the absence of reactivity negative sera. This ensured the repeatability of methodological standardisation and ascertained the immunogenicity of the protein. Cross-reactivity between Schistosoma antigens and other trematode antigens is a significant issue in diagnosing various schistosome infections (Raso et al., Reference Raso, Vounatsou, Singer, N’Goran, Tanner and Utzinger2006; Brooker and Clements, Reference Brooker and Clements2009; Clements et al., Reference Clements, Deville, Ndayishimiye, Brooker and Fenwick2010). Here, the absence of reactivity with sera of amphistome positive animals ascertained the specificity of newly expressed protein. This study forms the first documentation of cloning and expression of 22.6 kDa tegumental protein in S. spindale and its utility as a diagnostic candidate.

For further validation, we utilised this rSs22.6 in a dot ELISA contemplating the possibility of developing a rapid and field-suitable antibody detection method for diagnosing bovine intestinal schistosomosis. A review of the existing literature revealed that recombinant antigens of S. spindale are yet to be employed in a suitable diagnostic assay. Pinto et al. (Reference Pinto, Kanamura, Silva, Rossi, de Andrade Júnior and Amato1995) conducted comparative studies using IgM and IgG dot-ELISA with egg and somatic antigens of S. mansoni and noted significant sensitivity and specificity, recommending dot ELISA for epidemiological studies to identify specific antibodies against schistosomes. Mafuyai et al. (Reference Mafuyai, Uneke, Njoku and Chuga2006) favoured dot ELISA over conventional parasitological methods for epidemiological studies of S. mansoni infection in humans in Nigeria. Similarly, Lakshmanan et al. (Reference Lakshmanan, Devada, Joseph and Radhika2016) endorsed ESA-based IgG dot-ELISA as a specific and sensitive assay for diagnosing S. spindale infections in cattle, suggesting that the use of highly purified antigens could reduce cross-reactivity with other helminths. Dot ELISA employing whole worm antigen has been reported to be less specific in diagnosing visceral schistosomosis in cattle and buffaloes due to potential cross-reactivity (Mott et al., Reference Mott, Dixon, Carter, Garcia, Ishi, Matsuda, Mitchell, Owhashi, Tanaka and Tsang1987; Montenegro et al., Reference Montenegro, Silva, Brito and Caravalho1999; Noya et al., Reference Noya, de Noya, Losada, Colmenares, Guzman, Lorenzo and Bermudez2002; Sudhakar et al., Reference Sudhakar, Murthy and Rajeshwari2017). In the current study, a recombinant form of the S. spindale antigen was used, offering a more purified version that exhibited no cross-reactivity with amphistome-positive sera, thereby potentially enhancing diagnostic accuracy.

Conclusion

This study documents the expression and evaluation of a novel recombinant immunogenic antigen of S. spindale (rSs22.6). The newly expressed protein demonstrated immunodiagnostic properties in both immunoblotting and in silico analyses. The diagnostic potential of rSs22.6 antigen was also effectively validated using dot ELISA, which showed high sensitivity and specificity, highlighting its suitability for diagnosing bovine intestinal schistosomosis under field conditions. Given these attributes, it is reasonable to conclude that rSs22.6 is a promising candidate antigen for the serodiagnosis of bovine intestinal schistosomosis.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at http://doi.org/10.1017/S0022149X24000695.

Declaration of Competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the technical support of Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Pookode, Kerala, India, for conducting the research. The authors are also grateful to The Director of CMFRI, Kochi, for permitting the authors to utilise the facilities of the institute. The financial assistance of Kerala State Council for Science Technology and Environment as SRS project granted to the second author (Grant file no. KSCSTE/2270/2018-SRS-LS) is acknowledged.

References

Alarcon, de Noya, Colmenares, C, Lanz, H, Caracciolo, MA, Losada, S and Noya, O (2000). Schistosoma mansoni: immunodiagnosis is improved by sodium metaperiodate which reduces cross-reactivity due to glycosylated epitopes of soluble egg antigen. Experimental Parasitology 95, 106112. doi:10.1006/expr.2000.4515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anisuzzaman, MD, Hossain, S, Hatta, T, Labony, SS, Kwofie, KD, Kawada, H, Tsuji, N and Alim, MA (2023). Chapter Two - Food- and vector-borne parasitic zoonoses: Global burden and impacts. Adv. Parasitol. 120, 87136. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.apar.2023.02.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrell, J and Tate, CG (2013). Overexpression of membrane proteins in mammalian cells for structural studies. Molecular Membrane Biology 30, 5263. doi: 10.3109/09687688.2012.703703CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anisuzzaman, and Tsuji, N (2020) Schistosomiasis and hookworm infection in humans: disease burden, pathobiology and anthelmintic vaccines. Parasitology International 75, 102051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parint.2020.102051CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anisuzzaman, Frahm S, Prodjinotho, UF, Bhattacharjee, S, Verschoor, A and Prazeres da Costa, C (2021). Host-specific serum factors control the development and survival of Schistosoma mansoniFrontiers in Immunology 12: 635622.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baneyx, F and Mujacic, M (2004). Recombinant protein folding and misfolding in Escherichia coli. Nature Biotechnology 22, 13991408. doi:10.1038/nbt1029CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barker, SC and Blair, D (1996). Molecular phylogeny of Schistosoma species supports traditional groupings within the genus. Journal of Parasitology 82, 292298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bornhorst, JA and Falke, JJ (2000). Purification of proteins using polyhistidine affinity tags. Methods in Enzymology 326, 245254. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(00)26058-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braschi, S, Curwen, RS, Ashton, PD, Verjovski-Almeida, S and Wilson, A (2006). The tegument surface membranes of the human blood parasite Schistosoma mansoni: a proteomic analysis after differential extraction. Proteomics 5, 14711482. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200500368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooker, S and Clements, AC (2009). Spatial heterogeneity of parasite coinfection: determinants and geostatistical prediction at regional scales. International Journal for Parasitology 39, 591597. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2008.10.014CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cai, P, Bu, L, Wang, J, Wang, Z, Zhong, X and Wang, H (2008). Molecular characterization of Schistosoma japonicum tegument protein tetraspanin-2: sequence variation and possible implications for immune evasion. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 327, 197202. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.05.042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clements, AC, Deville, MA, Ndayishimiye, O, Brooker, S and Fenwick, A (2010). Spatial co-distribution of neglected tropical diseases in the east African great lakes region: revisiting the justification for integrated control. Tropical Medicine & International Health 15, 198207. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2009.02440.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Colley, DG, Bustinduy, AL, Secor, WE and King, CH (2014). Human schistosomiasis. Lancet 383, 22532264. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61949-2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Damasceno, L, Ritter, G and Batt, CA (2017). Process development for production and purification of the Schistosoma mansoni Sm14 antigen. Protein Expression and Purification 134, 7281. doi: 10.1016/j.pep.2017.04.002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Bont, J and Vercruysse, J (1997). The epidemiology and control of cattle schistosomiasis. Parasitology Today 13, 255262. doi: 10.1016/s0169-4758(97)01057-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeLano, WL (2002). The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System. DeLano Scientific, Palo Alto, CA, USA.Google Scholar
Dias, SRC, Boroni, M, Rocha, EA, Dias, TL, Souza, DL, Oliveira, FMS, Bitar, M, Macedo, AM, Machado, CR, Caliari, MV and Franco, GR (2014). Evaluation of the Schistosoma mansoni Y-box-binding protein (SMYB1) potential as a vaccine candidate against schistosomiasis. Frontiers in Genetics 5, 174. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2014.00174.Google ScholarPubMed
Divya, SP, Lakshmanan, B, Subramanian, H (2012). Prevalence of schistosomosis in cattle. The Indian Veterinary Journal 89, 8182.Google Scholar
Doenhoff, MJ, Chiodini, PL and Hamilton, JV (2004). Specific and sensitive diagnosis of schistosome infection: can it be done with antibodies? Trends in Parasitology 20, 3539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2003.10.019CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunne, DW, Webster, M and Smith, P (1997). The isolation of a 22 kDa band after SDS-PAGE of Schistosoma mansoni adult worms and its use to demonstrate the IgE responses against the antigen(s) it contains are associated with human resistance to reinfection. Parasite Immunology 19, 7989. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3024.1997.d01-186.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fonseca, CT, Carvalho, GBF, Alves, CC and DeMelo, TT (2012). Schistosoma tegument proteins in vaccine and diagnosis development: an update. Journal of Parasitology Research doi:10.1155/2012/541268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frahm, S, Anisuzzaman, A, Prodjinotho, UF, Vejzagic, N, Verschoor, A and Prazeres da Costa, C (2019). A novel cell-free method to culture Schistosoma mansoni from cercariae to juvenile worm stages for in vitro drug testing. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases 13, e0006590. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006590CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Han, ZG, Brindley, PJ, Wang, SY and Chen, Z (2009). Schistosoma genomics: new perspectives on schistosome biology and host-parasite interactionAnnual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics 10, 211240. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genom-082908-150036CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hellemond, JV, Retra, K, Brouwers, JFHM, van Balkom, BWM, Yazdanbakhsh, M, Shoemaker, CB and Tielens, AGM (2006). Functions of the tegument of schistosomes: clues from the proteome and lipidome. International Journal for Parasitology 36, 691699. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2006.01.007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hossain, MS, Hatta, T, Labony, SS, Kwofie, KD, Kawada, H, Tsuji, N and Alim, MA (2023). Food-and vector-borne parasitic zoonoses: global burden and impactsAdvances in Parasitology120, 87136.Google Scholar
Kumar, V (1999). Trematode infections and diseases of man and animals. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labony, SS, Hossain, MS, Hatta, T, Dey, AR, Mohanta, UK, Islam, A, Shahiduzzaman, M, Hasan, MM, Alim, MA, Tsuji, N and Anisuzzaman, A (2022). Mammalian and avian larval schistosomatids in Bangladesh: molecular characterization, epidemiology, molluscan vectors and occurrence of human cercarial dermatitis. Pathogens 11, 1213. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11101213CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laemmli, UK (1970). Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227, 680685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lakshmanan, B (2014). Development of improved diagnostics for the detection of bovine intestinal schistosomosis. PhD Thesis, Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Pookode.Google Scholar
Lakshmanan, B, Devada, K, Joseph, S, Gleeja, VL, Aravindakshan, TV, Himachala, K and Sankar, S (2018). Seroprevalence of bovine intestinal schistosomosis in different agroecological zones of south India using excretory-secretory antigen based ELISA. Veterinary Parasitology 262, 5155. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2018.09.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakshmanan, B, Devada, K, Joseph, S and Radhika, R (2016). Immunoblot analysis of Schistosoma spindale excretory–secretory antigens with sera from naturally infected bovines. Journal of Applied Animal Research 44, 210214. https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2015.1031770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Y, Wang, L, Fang, R, Nie, H, Zhou, Y and Zhao, J (2012). Establishment and evaluation of an iELISA using the recombinant membrane protein LHD-Sj23for the serodiagnosis of Schistosoma japonicum infection in cattle in China. Veterinary Parasitology 188, 247254. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.03.047CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lopes, DO, Paiva, LF, Martins, MA, Cardoso, FC, Rajão, MA, Pinho, JM, Caliari, MV, Oliveira, RC, Mello, SM, Leite, LCC and Oliveira, SC (2009). Sm21.6 a novel EF-hand family protein member located on the surface of Schistosoma mansoni adult worm that failed to induce protection against challenge infection but reduced liver pathology. Vaccine 27, 41274135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lv, C, Hong, Y, Fu, Z, Lu, K, Cao, X, Wang, T, Zhu, C, Li, H, Xu, R, Jia, B, Han, Q, Dou, X, Shen, Y, Zhang, Z, Zai, J, Feng, J and Lin, J (2016). Evaluation of recombinant multi-epitope proteins for diagnosis of goat schistosomiasis by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Parasites Vectors 9, 135145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mafuyai, HB, Uneke, CJ, Njoku, MO and Chuga, G (2006). Dot-ELISA and parasitological examination for diagnosis of S. mansoni infection in Nigeria. Helminthology 43, 1115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magdeldin, S, Yoshida, Y, Li, H, Maeda, Y, Yokoyama, M, Enany, S, Zhang, Y, Xu, B, Fujinaka, H, Yaoita, E, Sasaki, S and Yamamoto, T (2012). Murine colon proteome and characterization of the protein pathways. BioData Mining 5, 11. doi: 10.1186/1756-0381-5-11CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marchler-Bauer, A, Derbyshire, MK, Gonzales, NR, Lu, S, Chitsaz, F, Geer, LY, Geer, RC, He, J, Gwadz, M, Hurwitz, DI, Lanczycki, CJ, Lu, F, Marchler, GH, Song, JS, Thanki, N, Wang, Z, Yamashita, RA, Zhang, D, Zheng, C and Bryant, SH (2015). CDD: NCBI’s conserved domain database. Nucleic Acids Research 43, D222D226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCauley, EH, Majid, AA and Tayeb, A (1984). Economic evaluation of the production impact of bovine schistosomiasis and vaccination in Sudan. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 6, 735754. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-5877(84)90030-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montenegro, SML, Silva, JDB, Brito, MEF and Caravalho, LB (1999). Dot ELISA for schistosomosis using Dacron as solid base. Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical 32, 139143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Motamedi, H, Alvandi, A, Fathollahi, M, Ari, MM, Moradi, S, Moradi, J and Abiri, R (2023). In silico designing and immunoinformatics analysis of a novel peptide vaccine against metallo-betalactamase (VIM and IMP) variants. PLoS ONE 18, e0275237. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mott, KE, Dixon, H, Carter, CE, Garcia, E, Ishi, A, Matsuda, H, Mitchell, G, Owhashi, M, Tanaka, H and Tsang, VC (1987). Collaborative study on antigens for immunodiagnosis of Schistosoma japonicum infection. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 65, 233244.Google Scholar
Mulvenna, J, Moertel, L, Jones, MK, Nawaratna, S, Lovas, EM, Gobert, GN, Colgrave, M, Jones, A, Loukas, A and McManus, DP (2010). Exposed proteins of the Schistosoma japonicum tegumentInternational Journal for Parasitology 40, 543554. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2009.10.002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murthy, GSS, D’Souza, PE and Isloor, KS (2013). Evaluation of a polyclonal antibody based sandwich ELISA for the detection of faecal antigens in Schistosoma spindale infections in bovines. Journal of Parasitic Diseases 37, 4751. doi: 10.1007/s12639-012-0129-9Google Scholar
Noya, O, de Noya, B, Losada, S, Colmenares, C, Guzman, C, Lorenzo, MA and Bermudez, H (2002). Laboratory diagnosis of Schistosomiasis in areas of low transmission. A review of a line of research. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 97, 167169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Connell, DJ, Bauer, MC, O’Brien, J, Johnson, WM, Divizio, CA and O’Kane, SL (2018). Protein engineering of Cas9 for improved function. Methods in Enzymology 609, 139163. doi:10.1016/bs.mie.2018.08.001Google Scholar
Pacifico, LG, Fonseca, CT, Chiari, L and Oliveira, SC (2006). Immunization with Schistosoma mansoni 22.6 kDa antigen induces partial protection against experimental infection in a recombinant protein form but not as DNA vaccineImmunobiology 211, 97104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, SY, Lee, KM, Tsaihong, JC, Cheng, PC and Fan, PC (2008) Evaluation of recombinant fructose-1,6-bisphosphate aldolase ELISA test for the diagnosis of Schistosoma japonicum in water buffaloes. Research in Veterinary Science 85, 527533. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2008.02.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinto, PL, Kanamura, HY, Silva, RM, Rossi, CR, de Andrade Júnior, HF and Amato, NV (1995). Dot-ELISA for the detection of IgM and IgG antibodies to Schistosoma mansoni worm and egg antigens, associated with egg excretion by patients. Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical 37, 109–15.Google ScholarPubMed
Ponomarenko, J, Regenmortel, MHV (2009) B cell epitope prediction. Structural Bioinformatics 2, 849879.Google Scholar
Qiu, C, Fu, Z, Shi, Y, Hong, Y, Liu, S and Lin, J (2013). A retinoid X receptor (RXR1) homolog from Schistosoma japonicum: Its ligand-binding domain may bind to 9-cis-retinoic acid. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 188, 4050.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raso, G, Vounatsou, P, Singer, BH, N’Goran, EK, Tanner, M and Utzinger, J (2006). An integrated approach for risk profiling and spatial prediction of Schistosoma mansoni – hookworm coinfection. PNAS USA 103, 69346939. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0601559103CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ren, CP, Liu, Q, Liu, FC, Zhu, FY, Cui, SX, Liu, Z, Gao, WD, Liu, M, Ji, YS and Shen, JJ (2017). Development of monoclonal antibodies against Sj29 and its possible application for schistosomiasis diagnosis. The International Journal of Infectious Diseases 61, 7478. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2017.04.009CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosano, GL and Ceccarelli, EA (2014). Recombinant protein expression in Escherichia coli: advances and challenges. Frontiers in Microbiology 5, 173. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00172CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sambrook, J and Russell, DW (2001). Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. (3rd Ed), Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York.Google Scholar
Samoil, V, Dagenais, M, Ganapathy, V, Aldridge, J, Glebov, A, Jardim, A and Ribeiro, P (2018). Vesicle-based secretion in schistosomes: analysis of protein and microRNA (miRNA) content of exosome-like vesicles derived from Schistosoma mansoni. Scientific Reports 8: 3286. DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-21587-4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Santiago, ML, Hafalla, JCR and Kurtis, JD (1998). Identification of the Schistosoma japonicum 22.6-kDa antigen as a major target of the human IgE response: similarity of IgE-binding epitopes to allergen peptides. International Archives of Allergy and Immunology 117, 94104. doi: 10.1159/000023995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawal, HA, Nighat, S, Safdar, T and Anees, L (2023). Comparative in silico analysis and functional characterization of TANK-Binding Kinase 1–Binding Protein 1. Bioinformatics and Biology Insights 17, 15. doi:10.1177/11779322231164828Google ScholarPubMed
Sharma, G, Kaur, A, Goyal, D, Nisha, N and Vyas, M (2020). Western blotting: an introduction. Biotechnology Journal International 24, 2738. doi:10.9734/bji/2020/v24i330118Google Scholar
Shi, D, Yin, J, Guo, R, Guo, L, Liu, Y and Li, L (2018). Optimization of histidine-tagged protein purification by high-performance immobilized metal affinity chromatography. Journal of Chromatography B: Analytical Technologies in the Biomedical and Life Sciences 1074-1075, 3338. doi:10.1016/j.jchromb.2018.01.029Google Scholar
Sivakumar, K and Balaji, S (2018). In silico characterization of antifreeze proteins using computational tools and servers. Journal of Chemical Sciences 16, 721730. doi:10.1016/j.jgeb.2018.08.004Google Scholar
Struk, A, Boer, DR and Rigden, DJ (2019). Can dynein light chains help elucidate the evolutionary history of cytoplasmic dynein intermediate chains? Trends in Cell Biology 29, 875878. doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2019.08.005Google Scholar
Sudhakar, K, Murthy, GSS and Rajeshwari, G (2017). An abattoir study of bovine visceral schistosomiasis in Telengana state, India. International Journal of Agricultural Sciences 8, 32053208.Google Scholar
Sumanth, S, D’Souza, PE and Jagannath, MS (2003). Immunodiagnosis of nasal and visceral schistosomosis in cattle by Dot-ELISA. The Indian Veterinary Journal 80, 495498.Google Scholar
Sumanth, S, D’Souza, PE and Jagannath, MS (2004). A study of nasal and visceral schistosomosis in cattle slaughtered at an abattoir in Bangalore, South India. Revue scientifique et technique/ Office international des epizooties 23, 937942. doi: 10.20506/rst.23.3.1537Google Scholar
Tamura, K and Nei, M (1993). Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzeesMolecular Biology and Evolution 10, 512526. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040023Google ScholarPubMed
Tamura, K, Nei, M and Kumar, S (2004). Prospects for inferring very large phylogenies by using the neighbor-joining methodPNAS 101, 1103011035. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0404206101CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tamura, K, Peterson, D, Peterson, N, Stecher, G, Nei, M and Kumar, S (2011). MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methodsMolecular Biology and Evolution 28, 27312739. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr121CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Torre-Escudero, E, Román, RM, Sánchez, RP, Barrera, I, Siles-Lucas, M and Oleaga, A (2012). Molecular cloning, characterization and diagnostic performance of the Schistosoma bovis 22.6 antigen. Veterinary Parasitology 190, 530540. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.06.023CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Towbin, H, Staehelint, T and Gordon, J (1979). Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets: procedure and some applications. PNAS 76, 43504354. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.9.4350CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Balkom, BW, van Gestel, RA, Brouwers, JFHM, Krijgsveld, J, Tielens, AGM, Heck, AJ and Van Hellemond, JJ (2005). Mass spectrometric analysis of the Schistosoma mansoni tegumental sub-proteome. Journal of Proteome Research 4, 958966. doi: 10.1021/pr050036wCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vichasri-Grams, S, Subpipattana, P, Sobhon, P, Viyanant, V and Grams, R (2006). An analysis of the calcium-binding protein 1 of Fasciola gigantica with a comparison to its homologs in the phylum Platyhelminthes. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 146, 1023.Google ScholarPubMed
Vieira Gomes, AM, Souza Dias, DC, Felli Venancio, K, Vicentini, R (2014). Purification of recombinant proteins: nickel affinity chromatography. Methods Mol Biol 1129, 7187.Google Scholar
Xu, X, Zhang, Y, Lin, D, Zhang, J, Xu, J, Liu, YM, Hu, F, Qing, X, Xia, C and Pan, W (2014). Serodiagnosis of Schistosoma japonicum infection: genome-wide identification of a protein marker, and assessment of its diagnostic validity in a field study in ChinaThe Lancet Infectious Diseases 14, 489497. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(14)70067-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, M, Fu, Z, Li, C, Han, Y, Cao, X, Han, H, Liu, Y, Lu, K, Hong, Y, Lin, J (2015b). Screening diagnostic candidates for schistosomiasis from tegument proteins of adult Schistosoma japonicum using an immunoproteomicn approach. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases 9. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0003454.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, Y, He, Y, He, L, Zong, HY and Cai, GB (2015a). Molecular cloning and characterization of a phospholipidhydroperoxide glutathione peroxidase gene from a blood fluke Schistosoma japonicum. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 203, 513. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2015.10.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Z, Xu, H, Gan, W, Zeng, S and Hu, X (2012). Schistosoma japonicum calcium-binding tegumental protein SjTP22.4 immunization confers praziquantel schistosomulumicide and antifecundity effect in mice. Vaccine 30, 51415150. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.05.056CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Figure 1. Amplicons of Ss22.6 gene. Agarose (2%) gel electrophoresis of colony PCR products of Ss22.6 gene (573 bp) of S. spindale isolated from bovine mesentery samples. M: 100-bp ladder, L1 and L2 amplicons.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Predicted secondary structure of rSs 22.6 protein. The predicted secondary structure of rSs22.6 with 190 amino acids, the majority of which formed alpha helices (47.89%) involving 91 amino acids, 17 amino acids (8.95%) involving in the formation of beta turns, 33 amino acids (17.37%) forming extended strands, and the remaining 49 (25.79%) involving in the formation of random coil structures.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Tertiary structure of rSs22.6 protein. Amino acid sequence and molecular modelling of the 22.6 kDa antigen from Schistosoma spindale (Ss22.6). One EF-hand motif highlighted in gold yellow and the dynein light-chain motif highlighted in olive green.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Ramachandran plot of predicted rSs22.6. Ramachandran plot of the selected model of predicted rSs22.6. Of the total 168 residues, 156 (92.9%) were in the most favoured regions (marked as A, B, L), 10 residues (6.0%) in additional allowed regions (marked as a, b, l, p), and two residues (1.2%) in generously allowed regions (marked as -a, -b, -l, -p) without any residues in the disallowed regions.

Figure 4

Figure 5. Phylogenetic analysis of Ss22.6 gene. Phylogenetic tree using maximum likelihood method of S. spindale based on the analysis of 22.6-kDa coding gene sequences of the newly expressed protein. Haemonchus contortus is the outgroup. Bootstrap values (ranging from 70 to 100) are indicated in each node after 1000 replicates. GenBank accession numbers are given in front of each entry.

Figure 5

Figure 6. Antigen analysis by SDS PAGE and silver staining. (A) SDS-PAGE analysis of soluble fractions of rSs22.6 protein resolved in 12% gel after Coomassie Brilliant Blue Staining. Presence of the most pure and concentrated fraction of rSs22.6 in the elute with 150-mM concentration of imidazole buffer. M, Broad range protein marker. (B) SDS-PAGE analysis of most pure soluble fraction rSS22.6 protein resolved in 12% gel after silver staining. A bright single band of approximately 22.6-kDa size without any nonspecific bands indicating the high purity of the expressed protein. M, Broad range protein marker; L1, S. spindale sample.

Figure 6

Figure 7. Western blotting and dot ELISA of rSs 22.6 protein. (A) Immunoprofiling of rSs22.6 protein using the western blotting technique. L1, The absence of reactivity with known amphistome positive serum showing the specificity of rSs22.6. Lane M, Broad range protein marker. (B) Immunoprofiling of rSs22.6 protein using the western blotting technique. L2, A single immunogenic band of 22.6-kDa size showing reactivity of the protein with known schistosome positive serum. Lane M, Broad range protein marker. (C) Evaluation of diagnostic potential of rSs22.6 using dot ELISA. Known schistosome positive, known schistosome negative, and amphistome positive sera were utilized as controls. Development of brown-coloured spots in reaction with known schistosome positive serum indicated a positive result whereas absence of development of brown spots in reaction with known schistosome negative and amphistome positive sera samples indicated the absence of cross-reaction and specificity of the protein.

Supplementary material: File

Priya et al. supplementary material 1

Priya et al. supplementary material
Download Priya et al. supplementary material 1(File)
File 518.8 KB
Supplementary material: File

Priya et al. supplementary material 2

Priya et al. supplementary material
Download Priya et al. supplementary material 2(File)
File 886.3 KB