Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T04:29:53.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Biological Investigation of Sewage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2009

B. G. Peters
B. G. Peters
Affiliation:
From the Department of Helminthology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A biological study of the fauna of sewage-treatment plants was pursued by the writer for two years, from June 1927, thanks to the generosity of the Grocers' Company. The programme laid down included a qualitative and quantitative survey of the fauna and a collection of data on such physico-chemical factors as hydrogen ion concentration and oxygen requirement, with a view to seeking correlations between the two groups of phenomena.

Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 8 , Issue 3 , September 1930 , pp. 133 - 164
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1930

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bell, H. D., 1922.—“The Maintenance of Clean Filtering Medium in Sewage Filters.” Trop. Dis. Bull., Suppl. I, p. 29. (W.L. 21797.)Google Scholar
Bell, H. D., 1927.—“Research on the Composition of the Grey Slimy Growth on the Surface of Sewage Filters.” Surveyor Lond., LXX, 561–565. (W.L. 20782.)Google Scholar
Buswell, A. M., 1928.—“The Chemistry of Water and Sewage Treatment.” 1–362. (New York.)Google Scholar
Clark, W. M., 1925.—“The Determination of Hydrogen Ions.” 1–480, 2nd Edit. (Baltimore.)Google Scholar
Cohn, M. M., 1925.—“Lime Hypochlorite lowers Psychoda Flies at Sewage Works.” Eng. News Rec., XCIV, 684–685. (W.L. 7842.)Google Scholar
Enslow, L. H., 1927.—“Recent Developments in Sewage Chlorination,” from “Fly Nuisance and Filter Pooling.” (Texas.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fair, G. M., ——“Hydrogen Ion Control of Sludge Digestion.” Eng. News Rec., XCIX, 881–883.Google Scholar
Greer, F. E., 1926.—“Anaerobes in Sewage.” Amer. J. Publ. Hlth., XVI, 500–501. (W.L. 617.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heukelekian, H., 1927.—“The Fate of B. coli and B. aerogenes in Sewage Purification.” J. Bact., XIV, 55–67. (W.L. 11056.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kershaw, G. B., 1925.—“Sewage Purification and Disposal.” 2nd Edit., xii + 364. (Cambridge.)Google Scholar
Kolkwitz, R., & Marsson, M., 1909.—“Œkologie der tierischen Saprobien.” Int. Rev. Hydrobiol., II, 126–152. (W.L. 10162.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, A. J., 1927.—“The Activated Sludge Process.” XIV + 415. (London.)Google Scholar
Mitchell, W. A., 1928.—“Glossop—Sewerage and Sewage Disposal.” Proc. Insin. Munic. Co. Eng. Lond., LV, 266. (W.L. 16771.)Google Scholar
New Jersey, 1923.—“Studies on the Biology of Sewage Disposal.” Bull. New Jers. Agric. Expt. Stas., No. 390, 1–78. (W.L. 4634.)Google Scholar
New Jersey 1924.—“A Bacteriological Study of a Sewage Disposal Plant.” Bull. New Jers. Agric. Expt. Stas., No. 394, 1–24.Google Scholar
New Jersey 1925.—“Studies on the Biology of Sewage Disposal.” Bull. New Jers. Agric. Expt. Stas., No. 417, 1–39.Google Scholar
New Jersey 1926.—“Studies on the Biology of Sewage Disposal.” Bull. New Jers. Agric. Expt. Stas., No. 427, 1–103.Google Scholar
Peters, B. G., 1928.—“Some Nematodes of a Sewage-disposal Plant,” an otherwise unpublished section of a Thesis, “Saprophytic Eelworms,” submitted to the University of London, 20 pp.Google Scholar
Peters, B. G., 1929.—“A New Wedge-colorimeter used in a Biological Investigation of Sewage.” J. Helm., VII, 202–214.Google Scholar
Purdy, W. C., 1926.—“The Biology of Polluted Water.” J. Amer. Wat. Wks. Ass., XVI, 45–54. (W.L. 11023.)Google Scholar
Purvis, J. E., 1926.—“The Influence of Hard and of Soft Waters on the Decomposition of Sewage.” Surveyor Lond., LXIX, 277–278.Google Scholar
Rothamsted Experimental Station, 1927.—“Abridged Report for 1925 and 1926.” pp. 39 and 40.Google Scholar
Ruchhoft, C. C. and Watkins, J. H., 1928.—“Bacteriological Isolation and Study of the Filamentous Organisms in the Activated Sludge of the Des Plaines River Sewage Treatment Works.” Sewage Wks. J., I, 52.Google Scholar
Rudolfs, W., 1927.—“Sewage Investigation at the New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station.” Proc. 9th Texas Wat. Wks. Short School, 352–355.Google Scholar
Saunders, J. T., 1924.—“The Effect of the Hydrogen Ion Concentration on the Behaviour, Growth and Occurrence of Spirostomum.” Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. (Biol. Sci.), I, 189–203.Google Scholar
Whipple, G. C., 1927.—“The Microscopy of Drinking Water.” 4th Edition Revised, XIX + 586, 19 plates. (New York.)Google Scholar
Wigley, C. G., 1926.—“Progress Report of the Special Committee of the Sanitary Engineering Division on Co-operation with the New Jersey Sewage Experiment Station.” Proc. Amer. Soc. Civ. Eng., LII, 306–310. (W.L. 16634.)Google Scholar
Wilson, J. A., 1924.—“Colloid Chemistry as Applied to Activated Sludge.” Intern. Conf. Sanit. Eng., London: quoted in Johnston, 1924.—“Reports of the Progress of Applied Chemistry.” Soc. Chem. Ind., IX, 1–20 (W.L. 1465.)Google Scholar
Zimmermann, A., 1921.—“Recherches expérimentales sur l'Elevage aseptique de l'Anguillule du Vinaigre.” Rev. suisse Zool., XXVIII, 357–380. (W.L. 19288.)Google Scholar