Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T02:56:49.550Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Applying an aggregative dispersive dichotomy (ADD) model to parasitic infections in host populations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2008

P. Pal ,
M.A. Abu-Madi  and
J.W. Lewis
P. Pal*
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, SurreyTW20 OEX, UK
M.A. Abu-Madi
Affiliation:
Department of Health Sciences, College of Arts and Sciences, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar
J.W. Lewis
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, SurreyTW20 OEX, UK
*
*E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An aggregative dispersive dichotomy (ADD) model is presented to describe the distribution of parasites in host populations. The ADD model is a mathematical construct which provides two complementary measures extracted from a reformulated negative binomial (NBD) and an inequality model, which combine to capture observed patterns of a parasitic infection. The dispersion element is modelled using the NBD with the threshold set at a parasite level above zero. By applying binomial dichotomy, the host community is divided into two sub-populations, one including hosts harbouring parasites up to the threshold and the other with parasites above the threshold level. The k parameter, derived from the NBD, provides a cumulative probability. However, k is relatively insensitive to variations in the degree of aggregation, a known feature of the NBD model. The aggregation of parasites above the threshold in the host sub-population is evaluated by using an inequality model which is indexed by a scale-free parameter δ(δ ≥ 1) and provides an accurate measure of parasite aggregation. Applications of this model are made from field and simulated data in wood mouse populations infected with the trichostrongylid nematode Heligmosomoides polygyrus from a woodland site in Surrey.

Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 82 , Issue 3 , September 2008 , pp. 187 - 192
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abu-Madi, M.A., Behnke, J.M., Lewis, J.W. & Gilbert, F.S. (2000) Seasonal and site specific variation in the component community structure of intestinal helminths in Apodemus sylvaticus from three contrasting habitats in south-east England. Journal of Helminthology 74, 7–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, R.M. (1993) Epidemiology. pp. 75–116in Cox, F.E.G. (Ed.) Modern parasitology. Oxford, Blackwell Scientific Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, R.M. & May, R.M. (1978) Regulation and stability of host–parasite population interactions. I. Regulatory Processes. Journal of Animal Ecology 47, 219–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, R.M. & May, R.M. (1991) Macroparasites. Infectious diseases of humans: dynamics and control. pp. 469–480. Oxford, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bliss, C.A. & Fisher, R.A. (1953) Fitting the negative binomial to biological data and a note on the efficient fitting of the negative binomial. Biometrics 9, 176–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gini, C. (1910) Indici diconcentrazio e di dependenza, Atti dell III. Att Riunione della Siocieta Italiano per il Progresso della Sciencze 3–55.Google Scholar
Gini, C. (1912a) Variabilita e mutabilita, Studi econimico-giuridici. Universita di Cagliari III 2a, 211–382.Google Scholar
Gini, C. (1912b) Intorno alle-curve di Concentrazione. Metrone 9, 651–724.Google Scholar
Hudson, P.J. & Dobson, A.P. (2005) Macroparasites: observed patterns in naturally fluctuating animal populations. pp. 52–89in Grenfell, B.T. & Dobson, A.P. (Eds) Ecology of infectious diseases in natural populations. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hudson, P.J., Cattadori, J.M., Boag, B. & Dobson, A.P. (2006) Climate disruption and parasite-host dynamic patterns and processes associated with warming and the frequency of extreme climatic events. Journal of Helminthology 80, 179–182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kakwani, N. (1980) Income inequality and poverty: methods of estimation and policy applications. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lorenz, M.O. (1905) Methods of measuring concentration of wealth. Journal of the American Statistical Assocation 9, 209–219.Google Scholar
May, R.M. & Anderson, R.M. (1978) Regulations and stability of host-parasite population interactions, II. Destabilising processes. Journal of Animal Ecology 47, 249–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pacala, S.W. & Dobson, A.P. (1988) The relation between the number of parasites/host and host age: population dynamic causes and maximum likelihood estimations. Parasitology 96, 197–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pal, P. & Lewis, J.W. (2004) Parasite aggregations in host populations using a reformulated negative binomial model. Journal of Helminthology 78, 57–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pielou, E.C. (1977) Mathematical ecology. New York, John Wiley.Google Scholar
Sen, A.K. (1976) Poverty: an ordinal approach to measurement. Econometrica 44, 219–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, G., Basanez, M.-G., Dietz, K., Gemmell, M.A., Grenfell, B.T., Gulland, F.M.D., Hudson, P.J., Kennedy, C.R., Lloyd, S., Medley, J., Nassel, I., Randolph, S.E., Roberts, M.G., Shaw, D.J. & Woolhouse, M.E. (1991) Macroscopic group report: problems in modelling the dynamics of macroscopic systems. pp. 209–229in Grenfell, B.T. & Dobson, A.P. (Eds) Ecology of infectious diseases in natural populations. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar