Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-l9twb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-11T22:10:51.368Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Observations on a case of Endogenous Budding in Cysticercus tenuicollis Rudolphi

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2009

Hilary Crusz
Hilary Crusz
Affiliation:
From the Department of Parasitology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A specimen of Cysticercus tenuicollis is described, which contained many daughter cysts in various stages of development. One of these cysts was a well developed daughter cysticercus.

The daughter cysts at all stages of development, are lined internally by a distinct cuticle, and have no scolices. The daughter cysticercus, like the parent bladder, has an outer cuticle and a well developed scolex and receptacular appendage.

There is evidence for regarding the daughter cysticercus as having been formed from a daughter cyst by a process of evagination of the latter in such a way that the cuticle has come to lie on the outside, rather than by a process of vesiculation of a scolex.

The daughter cysts appear to be homologous with the brood-capsules of Echinococcus. They are not strictly homologous with daughter hydatids or daughter coenuri.

Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , June 1948 , pp. 63 - 72
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1948

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bott, A., 1897.— “Über einen durch Knospung sich vermehrenden Cysticercus aus dem Maulwurf.” Z. wiss. Zool, LXIII, 115–140. (W.L. 23636.)Google Scholar
Braun, M., 1896.— “Über einen proliferierenden Cysticercus aus dem Ziesel.” Zool. Anz., XIX, No. 614. 1–4. (W.L. 23833.)Google Scholar
Bremser, J. G., 1824.— Icones Helminthum. Wien.Google Scholar
Clapham, P. A., 1940.— “Further studies on Coenurus glomeralus.” J. Helminth., XVIII, 95–102. (W.L. 11224b.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coutelen, F., 1927.— “Sur I'évolution vésiculaire in vitro des scolex échino-cocciques.” Ann. Parasit. hum. comp., V, 230–242. (W.L. 899a.)Google Scholar
1946.— “Les modes de formation des vésicules filles externes et internes du Cénure sérial.” C.R. Soe. Biol., CXL, 258–259. (W.L. 6630.)Google Scholar
Dévé, F., 1927.— “La cuticulisation des capsules proligères échinococciques.” Ann. Parasit. hum. comp., V, 310–328. (W.L. 899a.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1946.—L'Échinococcose secondaire. Paris.Google Scholar
Goeze, J. A. E., 1782.— Versuch einer Naturgeschichte der Eingeweidewürmer thierischer Körper. Blankenburg.Google Scholar
Korschelt, & Heidbr, , 1936.— Vergleichende Entwicklungsgeschichte der Tiere. Erster Band. Jena.Google Scholar
Leuckart, R., 1848.— “Beobachtungen und Reflexionen über die Naturgeschichte der Blasenwürmer.”. in: Troschel's Archiv.Google Scholar
1886.— The Parasites of Man and the diseases which proceed from them. Translated by Hoyle, W.. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Southwell, T., 1930.— The Fauna of British India. Cestodes. II. London.Google Scholar
Tschudi, A., 1837.— Die Blasenwürmer. Freiburg.Google Scholar