Hostname: page-component-669899f699-8p65j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-04T15:18:58.745Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Narrowing gender gap in the research on echinococcosis and editorial contribution of women in parasitology journals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2024

R. Kaveh ,
N. Ashrafhesari ,
S.M. Mousavi  and
M. Fasihi Harandi Open the ORCID record for M. Fasihi Harandi [Opens in a new window]
R. Kaveh
Affiliation:
Student Research Committee, Afzalipour School of Medicine, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran Research Center for Hydatid Disease in Iran, Afzalipour School of Medicine, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
N. Ashrafhesari*
Affiliation:
Research Center for Hydatid Disease in Iran, Afzalipour School of Medicine, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
S.M. Mousavi
Affiliation:
Research Center for Hydatid Disease in Iran, Afzalipour School of Medicine, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
M. Fasihi Harandi*
Affiliation:
Research Center for Hydatid Disease in Iran, Afzalipour School of Medicine, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
*
Corresponding authors: N. Ashrafhesari and M. Fasihi Harandi; Emails: [email protected]; [email protected]
Corresponding authors: N. Ashrafhesari and M. Fasihi Harandi; Emails: [email protected]; [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Gender equity and authorship diversity are believed to be the essential parts of building a dynamic scientific atmosphere. The purpose of the present study was to determine the status of gender equity in research on echinococcosis and the editorial diversity in major parasitology journals over the past four decades. All articles were retrieved from major databases from the years 1980, 2000, 2010, 2015, and 2020. Journals belonging to the four quartiles of parasitology journals listed in the Journal Citation Report were selected, and the gender and region of each editorial member were identified. Among the 3583 first authors of the articles published in all selected years, 2236 (62.4%) were men, whereas 1040 (29%) were women. There was a significant increase in women’s contributions as the first author, from 6.8% in 1980 to 35.8% in 2020 (P < .001). A greater gender gap was found for the senior authors, showing 2391 (66.7%) men and 837 (23.4%) women. The gender gap has been narrowed in most of the six regions of the world, particularly for the Western Pacific region, where the gender inequity had almost diminished in 2020; i.e. the man-woman ratios of the first and last authors from this region were 2.25 and 1.75 in 1980, reaching 1.04 and 0.97, in 2020, respectively. Our findings also indicated that articles authored by men received 2.5 to 3.1 times more citations than women authors. Gender distribution of the editors-in-chief, associate editors, and editorial board members across all quartiles showed that 78.7%, 69.5%, and 72.7% were men, respectively, and mostly affiliated with the European and American regions. Findings of the present study showed that gender inequity is still present and women researchers continue to be the minority in the field of parasitology, particularly in the research on echinococcosis.

Keywords

Gender inequityinequalitywomenacademic publishinghydatid disease
Type
Research Paper
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 98 , 2024 , e66
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Anonymous (2023) Editorial. Our efforts to diversify Nature’s journalism are progressing, but work remains. Nature 614(7948), 389–389. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00399-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) (1994) AAMC Data Book: Statistical Information Related to Medical Schools and Teaching Hospitals. AAMC.Google Scholar
Ayada, G., Huttner, A., Avni-Nachman, S., Karny-Epstein, N., Matsri, S., Buchrits, S., Atamna, A., Yahav, D., and Tau, N. (2022). Representation of women in editorial boards of infectious disease and microbiology journals–cross-sectional study. Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 28(7), 1017–1021.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Budke, C.M., White, A.C. Jr, and Garcia, H.H. (2009) Zoonotic larval cestode infections: neglected, neglected tropical diseases? PLoS neglected tropical diseases 3(2), e319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Calvani, N.E.D., Verissimo, C.M., Cantacessi, C., Clark, E., and Kanduma, E. (2023) Herminthology: promoting gender equity in science and parasitology. Trends Parasitol 39(2), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2022.11.013.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Catalyst (2020) Women in management: quick take. Catalyst New York, NY.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, P., and Werner, R. M. (2021). Gender disparity in citations in high-impact journal articles. JAMA Network Open, 4(7), e2114509–e2114509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deplazes, P., Rinaldi, L., Rojas, C.A., Torgerson, P., Harandi, M., Romig, T., Antolova, D., Schurer, J., Lahmar, S., and Cringoli, G. (2017) Global distribution of alveolar and cystic echinococcosis. Advances in Parasitology 95, 315–493.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elsevier. (2020) The researcher journey through a gender lens. https://www.elsevier.com/insights/gender-and-diversity-in-research/researcher-journey-2020.Google Scholar
Engels, D. and Zhou, X.-N. (2020) Neglected tropical diseases: an effective global response to local poverty-related disease priorities. Infectious Diseases of Poverty 9(01), 9–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
English, E.D., Power, B.J. and Gómez-Díaz, E. (2020) Building parasitology communities to promote gender equality. Trends Parasitol 36(6), 495–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2020.03.007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geraci, L., Balsis, S., and Busch, A. J. B. (2015). Gender and the h index in psychology. Scientometrics, 105, 2023–2034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gmeiner, A., Trimmel, M., Gaglia-Essletzbichler, A., Schrank, B., Süßenbacher-Kessler, S., and Amering, M. (2022) Diversity in high-impact psychiatric publishing: gender parity within reach? Archives of Women’s Mental Health 25(2), 327–333.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grinnell, M., Higgins, S., Yost, K., Ochuba, O., Lobl, M., Grimes, P., and Wysong, A. (2020). The proportion of male and female editors in women’s health journals: A critical analysis and review of the sex gap. International Journal of Women’s Dermatology, 6(1), 7–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gupta, A.K., Ovenden, C.D., Nathin, K., Aujayeb, N., Hewitt, J.N., Kovoor, J.G., Chan, J.C., and Wells, A. (2022) Geographical distribution of authorship for leading cardiothoracic surgery journals. Journal of Cardiac Surgery 37(12), 4465–4473.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanfei, P. (2022) Gender differences in STEM education in China. In: Proceedings of the 2022 6th International Seminar on Education, Management and Social Sciences (ISEMSS 2022). Atlantis Press.Google Scholar
Holman, L., Stuart-Fox, D., and Hauser, C.E. (2018) The gender gap in science: how long until women are equally represented? PLoS Biology 16(4), e2004956.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hornstein, P., Tuyishime, H., Mutebi, M., Lasebikan, N., Rubagumya, F., and Fadelu, T. (2022) Authorship equity and gender representation in global oncology publications. JCO Global Oncology 8, e2100369.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hotez, P.J., Aksoy, S., Brindley, P.J., and Kamhawi, S. (2020) What constitutes a neglected tropical disease? Public Library of Science San Francisco, CA USA.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
International Labour Organization (2000) ABC of Women Workers’ Rights and Gender Equality. International Labour Office.Google Scholar
Landhuis, E. (2016) Scientific literature: information overload. Nature 535(7612), 457–458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lingyu, L., Wenqin, S., and Chao, L. (2021) The Rise of Women in STEM Higher Education in China. Routledge, 27–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Llorens, A., Tzovara, A., Bellier, L., Bhaya-Grossman, I., Bidet-Caulet, A., Chang, W.K., Cross, Z.R., Dominguez-Faus, R., Flinker, A., Fonken, Y., Gorenstein, M.A., Holdgraf, C., Hoy, C.W., Ivanova, M.V., Jimenez, R.T., Jun, S., Kam, J.W.Y., Kidd, C., Marcelle, E., Marciano, D., Martin, S., Myers, N.E., Ojala, K., Perry, A., Pinheiro-Chagas, P., Riès, S.K., Saez, I., Skelin, I., Slama, K., Staveland, B., Bassett, D.S., Buffalo, E.A., Fairhall, A.L., Kopell, N.J., Kray, L.J., Lin, J.J., Nobre, A.C., Riley, D., Solbakk, A.-K., Wallis, J.D., Wang, X.-J., Yuval-Greenberg, S., Kastner, S., Knight, R.T., and Dronkers, N.F. (2021) Gender bias in academia: a lifetime problem that needs solutions. Neuron 109(13), 2047–2074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2021.06.002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ma, X., Zhang, L., Wang, J., and Luo, Y. (2019) Knowledge domain and emerging trends on echinococcosis research: a scientometric analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16(5), 842.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mahdjoub, H., Maas, B., Nuñez, M.A., and Khelifa, R. (2022) Recommendations for making editorial boards diverse and inclusive. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 37(12), 1021–1024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2022.09.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McManus, D.P., Zhang, W., Li, J., and Bartley, P.B. (2003) Echinococcosis. Lancet 362(9392), 1295–1304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Metz, I. (2011) Women leave work because of family responsibilities: fact or fiction? Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources 49(3), 285–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narasimhan, S.D. (2019) A commitment to gender diversity in peer review. Cell 179(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2019.08.043.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nonnemaker, L. (2000) Women physicians in academic medicine—new insights from cohort studies. New England Journal of Medicine 342(6), 399–405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parandin, F., Heydarpour, F., Mohebali, M., Hanafi-Bojd, A.A., Sari, A.A., Zeynali, M., Alizadeh, A., Nazari, N., Kaveh, F., and Rokni, M.B. (2021) Estimation of burden of cystic echinococcosis in Iran using disability adjusted life years (DALYs) in 2018. Iranian Journal of Public Health 50(11), 2302.Google ScholarPubMed
Poulin, R., McDougall, C., and Presswell, B. (2022) What’s in a name? Taxonomic and gender biases in the etymology of new species names. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 289(1974), 20212708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richter, K.P., Clark, L., Wick, J.A., Cruvinel, E., Durham, D., Shaw, P., Shih, G.H., Befort, C.A., and Simari, R.D. (2020) Women physicians and promotion in academic medicine. New England Journal of Medicine 383(22), 2148–2157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rioux, C., Paré, A., London-Nadeau, K., Juster, R.-P., Weedon, S., Levasseur-Puhach, S., Freeman, M., Roos, L.E., and Tomfohr-Madsen, L.M. (2022) Sex and gender terminology: a glossary for gender-inclusive epidemiology. J Epidemiol Community Health 76(8), 764–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sebo, P., and Clair, C. (2023) Gender inequalities in citations of articles published in high-impact general medical journals: a cross-sectional study. Journal of General Internal Medicine 38(3), 661–666.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sudbeck, K. (2012) The effects of China’s one-child policy: the significance for Chinese women. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebanthro/179/Google Scholar
Tran, T.B., Wong, P., Raoof, M., Melstrom, K., Fong, Y., and Melstrom, L.G. (2022) The evolving gender distribution in authorship over time in American surgery. The American Journal of Surgery 224(5), 1217–1221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
UNDP (2019) Human Development Report 2019. UNDP (United Nations Development Programme).Google Scholar
UNESCO (2019) Women in science. https://uis.unesco.org/en/topic/women-scienceGoogle Scholar
UNICEF (2017) Gender equality: glossary of terms and concepts. Available at https://www.unicef.org/rosa/media/1761/file/Genderglossarytermsandconcepts.pdfGoogle Scholar
Vranas, K.C., Ouyang, D., Lin, A.L., Slatore, C.G., Sullivan, D.R., Kerlin, M.P., Liu, K.D., Baron, R.M., Calfee, C.S., and Ware, L.B. (2020) Gender differences in authorship of critical care literature. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 201(7), 840–847.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wagner, C.S., Park, H.W., and Leydesdorff, L. (2015) The continuing growth of global cooperation networks in research: a conundrum for national governments. PloS One 10(7), e0131816.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
WHO (2021) Echinococcosis. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/echinococcosisGoogle Scholar
Xu, R. F., Varady, N. H., Chen, A. F., and Earp, B. E. (2022). Gender disparity trends in authorship of hand surgery research. The Journal of Hand Surgery, 47(5), 420–428.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, Y., Tian, T.Y., Woodruff, T.K., Jones, B.F., and Uzzi, B. (2022) Gender-diverse teams produce more novel and higher-impact scientific ideas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119(36), e2200841119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Kaveh et al. supplementary material

Kaveh et al. supplementary material
Download Kaveh et al. supplementary material(File)
File 35.6 KB