Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T19:19:10.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Morphological comparison of in ovo derived and naturally occurring flukes using Microphallus similis, M. pygmaeus and Maritrema arenaria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

L.C. Strain  and
S.W.B. Irwin
L.C. Strain
Affiliation:
School of Applied Biological and Chemical Sciences, University of Ulster at Jordanstown, Shore Road, Newtownabbey, Co. Antrim, BT37 0QB, Northern Ireland
S.W.B. Irwin*
Affiliation:
School of Applied Biological and Chemical Sciences, University of Ulster at Jordanstown, Shore Road, Newtownabbey, Co. Antrim, BT37 0QB, Northern Ireland
*
*Author for correspondence.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This investigation deals with the evaluation of the in ovo technique for the cultivation of trematodes. The technique has previously been used for the maturation of digenetic flukes and the establishment of life cycles in the laboratory but it was not known if the adult flukes produced were morphologically comparable to those found in their natural hosts. Three species of microphallids, Microphallus similis, M. pygmaeus and Maritrema arenaria were used. Metacercariae of each species were inoculated into fertile hen's eggs which were incubated at 41°C for 120 hours. The adult flukes recovered were stained and mounted and morphonietric measurements obtained were compared to definitive descriptions of the three microphallid species. The results showed that the in ovo technique provided adult flukes which were indistinguishable from those occurring in natural hosts.

Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 69 , Issue 2 , June 1995 , pp. 155 - 158
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Basch, P.F., DiConza, J.J. & Johnson, B.E. (1973) Strigeid trematodes (Cotylurus lutzi) cultured in vitro: production of normal eggs with continuance of life cycle. Journal of Parasitology 59, 319–322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berntzen, A.K. & Macy, R.W. (1969) In vitro cultivation of the digenetic trematode Sphaeridiotrema globulus (Rudolphi) from the metacercarial stage to egg production. Journal of Parasitology 55, 136–139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berrie, A.D. (1960) The influence of various definitive hosts on the development of Diplostomum phoxini (Strigeida, Trematoda). Journal of Helminthology 34, 205–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, C. & Smyth, J.D. (1979) The development of the metacercariae of Microphallus similis in vitro and in the mouse. International Journal for Parasitology 9, 261–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franco, J., Huffman, J.E. & Fried, B. (1988) The effects of crowding on adults of Echinstoma revolutum (Digenea: Echinostomidae) in experimently infected golden hamsters Mesocricetus auratus. Journal of Parasitology 74, 240–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fried, B. (1989) Cultivation of trematodes in chick embryos. Parasitology Today 5, 3–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fried, B. & Gainsburg, D.M. (1980) Concurrent infections of cecal trematodes Zygocotyle lunata, and Notocotylus sp., in the domestic chick and observations on host-parasite relationships. Journal of Parasitology 66, 502–505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fried, B. & Stableford, L.T. (1991) Cultivations of helminths in chick embryos. Advances in Parasitology 30, 107–165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hadley, C.E. & Castle, R.M. (1940) Description of a new species of Maritrema Nicoll 1907, M.arenaria, with studies of the life history. Biological Bulletin 78, 338–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huffman, J.E., Alcaide, A. & Fried, B. (1988) Single and concurrent infections of the golden hamster, Mesocricetus auratus, with Echinstoma revolutum and Echinostoma liei (Trematoda: Digenea). Journal of Parasitology 74, 604–608.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Irwin, S.W.B. & Saville, D.H. (1988) An alternative method for the culture of Diplostomum spathaceum (Trematoda) in chick embryos. Journal of Parasitology 74, 504–505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Irwin, S.W.B., McKerr, G., Judge, B.C. & Moran, I. (1984) Studies on metacercarial excystment in Himasthla leptosoma (Trematoda: Echinostomatidae) and newly emerged metacercariae. International Journal for Parasitology 14, 415–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, B.L. (1968) Studies on the life cycle of Microphallus pygmaeus (Levinsen, 1881) (Trematoda: Microphallidae). Journal of Natural History 2, 155–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leno, G.H. & Holloway, H.L. (1986) The culture of Diplostomum spathaceum metacercariae on the chick chorioallantois. Journal of Parasitology 72, 555–558.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saville, D.H. & Irwin, S.W.B. (1991) In ovo cultivation of Microphallus primas (Trematoda: Microphallidae) metacercariae to ovigerous adults and the establishment of the life cycle in the laboratory. Parasitology 103, 479–484.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stunkard, H.W. (1957) The morphology and life history of the digenetic trematode, Microphallus similis (Jägerskiöld, 1900) Baer, 1943. Biological Bulletin 112, 254–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar