Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-01T04:50:19.043Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A longitudinal study of porcine serological responses to experimental infections with T-1 and T-3 Spanish Trichinella isolates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

F. Bolas ,
E. Albarran ,
T. Garate ,
R. M. E. Parkhouse  and
A. R. Martinez
F. Bolas
Affiliation:
Departmento de Parasitologia, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad Complutense, 28040-Madrid, Spain
E. Albarran
Affiliation:
Departmento de Parasitologia, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad Complutense, 28040-Madrid, Spain
T. Garate
Affiliation:
Centro Nacional de Biotecnología, cl Serrano 115-bis, 28006-Madrid, Spain
R. M. E. Parkhouse
Affiliation:
Institute for Animal Health, Pirbright Laboratory, Ash Road, Pirbright, Woking, GU24 0NF, England
A. R. Martinez
Affiliation:
Departmento de Parasitologia, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad Complutense, 28040-Madrid, Spain
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Comparison of antibody response and antigen recognition was made by ELISA and western-blot analysis in pig experimental infections by T-l and T-3 Spanish Trichinella isolates. Two groups of Iberian pigs were experimentally infected with 150 larvae/kg body weight of GM-1 and C-76 Spanish Trichinella isolates as representatives of T-1 and T-3 gene pools respectively. Antibody levels and antigen recognition were measured on days –14, 0, 6, 16, 20, 27, 34, 49, 63 and 82 after infection by ELISA and western-blotting assays. Antibody response against C-76 infection was significantly delayed and lower than against GM-1. The two Trichinella isolates were indistinguishable, however, by western blotting analysis, although recognition of larval antigens was quantitatively higher than adult ones. Interestingly, the principle larval antigenic components recognized by pigs were those recognized by the monoclonal antisera NIM-M1. Finally, there were no serological patterns indicative of the stage of infection (“antibody windows”) discriminating, for example between early versus late infections.

Keywords

TrichinellapigWestern-blottingserological responseSpainNematoda
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 66 , Issue 3 , September 1992 , pp. 231 - 237
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Almond, N. M., Mclaren, D. J. & Parkhouse, R. M. E (1986) A comparison of the surface and secretions of Trichinella pseudospiralis and Trichinella spiralis. Parasitology, 93, 163–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armas, C., Gomez Barrio, A., Bolas, F. & Martinez Fernandez, A. R. (1989) Multifactorial analysis of morpho-biological parameters in Spanish Trichinella isolates. In: Trichinellosis (Editors, Tanner, C. E., Martínez, A. R. & Bolás, F.) pp. 102–106. C.S.I.C.: Madrid, Spain.Google Scholar
Belosevic, M. & Dick, T. A. (1980) Trichinella spiralis: Comparison with an Arctic isolate. Experimental Parasitology, 49, 266–276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boev, S. N., Britov, V. A. & Orlov, J. V. (1979) Species composition of Trichinella. Wiadomosci Parazytologiczne, 25, 495–503.Google Scholar
Dame, J. B., Murrell, K. D., Worley, D. E. & Schad, G. A. (1987) Trichinella spiralis: Genetic evidence for synanthropic subspecies in sylvatic hosts. Experimental Parasitology, 64, 195–203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Denham, D. A. & Martinez-Fernandez, A. R. (1970) Studies on methyridine and Trichinella spiralis. II. The use of the drug to study the rate of larval production in mice. Journal of Helminthology, 44, 357–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dick, T. A. & Chadee, K. (1981) Biological characterization of some North American isolates of Trichinella spiralis. In: Trichinellosis (Editors Kim, C. W., Ruitenberg, E. J. & Teppema, J. S.) pp. 23–27. Reedbooks Ltd: Surrey, England.Google Scholar
Flockhart, H. A., Harrison, S. E., Dobinson, A. R. & James, E. R. (1982) Enzyme polymorphism in Trichinella. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 76, 541–545.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gamble, H. R., Anderson, W. R., Graham, C. E. & Murrell, K. D. (1983) Diagnosis of swine trichinellosis by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using excretory-secretory antigen. Veterinary Parasitology, 13, 349–361.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garate, T., Albarran, E., Bolas, F., Martinez Fernandez, A. R. & Parkhouse, M. (1991) DNA polymorphism within Spanish Trichinella isolates. Parasitology Research, 77, 602–605.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garate, T. & Rivas, L. (1987) Comparative study on polypeptide patterns of larvae of Trichinella isolates by two-dimensional electrophoresis. Journal of Helminthology, 61, 225–228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Homan, W. L., Derksen, A. & Van Knapen, F. (1989) Characterization of diagnostic antigens from Trichinella spiralis muscle larvae. In: Trichinellosis (Editors, Tanner, C. E., Martinez, A. R. & Bolas, F.) pp. 176–181. C.S.I.C.: Madrid, Spain.Google Scholar
Martinez-Fernandez, A. R., Armas, C., Gomez-Barrio, A. & Bolas, F. (1989) Single-pair cross-hybridization tests among Spanish Trichinella isolates. In: Trichinellosis (Editors, Tanner, C. E., Martínez, A. R. & Bolás, F.) pp. 96–102. C.S.I.C.: Madrid, Spain.Google Scholar
Mclaren, D., Ortega-Pierres, G. & Parkhouse, R. M. E (1987) Trichinella spiralis: Immunocytochemical localisation of surface and intracellular antigens using monoclonal antibody probes. Parasitology, 94, 101–114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ortega-Pierres, G., Chayen, A., Clark, N. W. T. & Parkhouse, R. M. E. (1984) The occurrence of antibodies to hidden and exposed determinants of surface antigens of Trichinella spiralis. Parasitology, 88, 359–369.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parkhouse, R. M. E., Philipp, M. & Ogilvie, B. M. (1981) Characterization of surface antigens of Trichinella spiralis infective larvae. Parasite Immunology, 3, 339–352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Philipp, M., Parkhouse, R. M. & Ogilvie, B. M. (1980) Changing proteins of the surface of a parasitic nematode. Nature, 287, 538–540.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pozio, E. (1987) Isoenzymatic typing of 23 Trichinella isolates. Tropical Medicine and Parasitology, 38, 111–116.Google ScholarPubMed
Pozio, E., La Rosa, G. & Rossi, P. (1989) Trichinella Reference Center. Parasitology Today, 5, 169–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pozio, E., La Rosa, G. & Verster, A. (1991) Identification by isoenzyme patterns of two gene pools of Trichinella nelsoni in Africa. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology, 85, 281–283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roach, T., Wakelin, D., Else, K. & Bundy, D. A. P. (1988) Antigenic cross-reactivity between the human whipworm Trichuris trichura and the mouse trichuroids Trichuris muris and Trichinella spiralis. Parasite Immunology, 10, 279–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar