Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:23:29.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lack of preference for infective faeces in Hymenolepis diminuta-infected beetles (Tenebrio molitor)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2007

John F. Shea
John F. Shea*
Affiliation:
Department of Evolution, Ecology and Organismal Biology, The Ohio State University, 300 Aronoff Laboratory, 318 West 12th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA
*
*Fax: +1 773-508-3646, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The beetle–tapeworm life cycle provides a convenient system to study how host behaviour influences the probability of re-infection because initial and secondary infections can be tracked. The beetle, Tenebrio molitor, is infected with the tapeworm Hymenolepis diminuta when it ingests rat faeces containing tapeworm eggs, which upon hatching undergo five morphologically distinct stages while developing inside the beetle. In a series of preference trials, both individual and groups of previously infected beetles were exposed to baits of infective (faeces with eggs) and uninfective faeces. Beetles did not differ in the amount of time spent or in the number of occurrences at each bait type, suggesting that infected beetles show no preference for infective faeces. This may be a host adaptation to avoid further infection, parasite manipulation to avoid competition for host resources, or both. Further, once infected, beetles are no more or no less likely to become re-infected than uninfected beetles. An analysis of the mean and variance of infection suggests that some individuals are highly susceptible to and some are highly resistant to infection, with males being more variable than females. This could explain the higher load of cysticercoids observed in males.

Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 81 , Issue 3 , September 2007 , pp. 293 - 299
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bhattacharya, A.K., Ameel, J.J. & Waldebauer, G.P. (1970) A method for sexing living pupal and adult yellow mealworms. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 63, 1783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, W.S., Hardy, M.C., Singh, R., Moodie, G.E. & Cote, J.J. (1992) Effect of the rat tapeworm, Hymenolepis diminuta, on the coprophagic activity of its intermediate host, Tribolium confusum. Canadian Journal of Zoology 70, 2311–2314.Google Scholar
Evans, W.S., Wong, A., Hardy, M., Currie, R.W. & Vanderwel, D. (1998) Evidence that the factor used by the tapeworm, Hymenolepis diminuta, to direct the foraging behavior of its intermediate host, Tribolium confusum, is a volatile attractant. Journal of Parasitology 84, 1098–1101.Google Scholar
Hollander, M. & Wolfe, D.A. (1999) Nonparametric statistical methods. 2nd edn. 787 pp. New York, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Holmes, J.C. & Bethel, W.M. (1972) Modification of intermediate host behavior by parasites. pp. 123–149 in Canning, E.U. & Wright, C.A. (Eds) Behavioral aspects of parasite transmission. New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hurd, H. & Arme, C. (1987) Hymenolepis diminuta (Cestoda): the role of intermediate host sex in the establishment, growth and development of metacestodes in Tenebrio molitor (Coleoptera). Helminthologia 24, 23–31.Google Scholar
McCurdy, D.G., Forbes, M.R. & Boates, J.S. (1999) Testing alternative hypotheses for variation in amphipod behavior and life history in relation to parasitism. International Journal for Parasitology 29, 1001–1009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, J. (2002) Parasites and the behavior of animals. 315 pp. Oxford, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pappas, P.W. & Leiby, D.A. (1986) Variation in the sizes of eggs and oncospheres and the numbers and distributions of testes in the tapeworm. Hymenolepis diminuta. Journal of Parasitology 72, 383–391.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pappas, P.W., Marschall, E.A., Morrison, S.E., Durka, G.M. & Daniel, C.S. (1995) Increased coprophagic activity of the beetle, Tenebrio molitor, on feces containing eggs of the tapeworm, Hymenolepis diminuta. International Journal for Parasitology 25, 1179–1184.Google Scholar
Rau, M.E. (1979) The frequency distribution of Hymenolepis diminuta cysticercoids in natural, sympatric populations of Tenebrio molitor and T. obscurus. International Journal for Parasitology 9, 85–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shea, J.F. (2005) The effect of Hymenolepis diminuta (Cestoda) cysticercoids on the weight change, frass production, and food intake of the intermediate host, Tenebrio molitor (Coleoptera). Parasitology Research 98, 1–4.Google Scholar
Shostak, A.W. & Smyth, K.A. (1998) Activity of flour beetles (Tribolium confusum) in the presence of feces from rats infected with rat tapeworm (Hymenolepis diminuta). Canadian Journal of Zoology 76, 1472–1479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokal, R.R. & Rohlf, F.J. (1995) Biometry: The principles and practice of statistics in biological research. 3rd edn. 887 pp. New York, W.H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
Voge, M. & Heyneman, D. (1957) Development of Hymenolepis nana and Hymenolepis diminuta (Cestoda: Hymenolepididae) in the intermediate host Tribolium confusum. University of California Publications in Zoology 59, 549–580.Google Scholar