Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T18:52:02.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effect of Repeated Anthelmintic Treatment with Phenothiazine on the Faecal Egg Counts of Housed Horses, with Some Observations on the Life Cycle of Trichonema spp. in the Horse

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

T. E. Gibson
T. E. Gibson
Affiliation:
Veterinary Laboratory, Ministry of Agriculture, Weybridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It was found that in six aged horses after treatment with 30 grammes of phenothiazine the faecal egg count fell to zero but had returned to a high level after some live or six weeks. Examination of the faeces at the time of treatment showed that many worms were eliminated. Repetition of the treatment several times produced a similar result on each occasion, but there was a tendency for the egg count not to rise so high as it was before treatment, for fewer worms to be eliminated at each treatment, and for the time before the egg count reached a high level after treatment to lengthen with each successive treatment. Many treatments had to be given over a period of some three years before the egg counts of the horses were reduced permanently to a low level. Post-mortem examination of three of the horses at this stage showed their worm burdens to be low.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 27 , Issue 1-2 , August 1953 , pp. 29 - 40
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrews, G. S., 1939.—“Life History of the nematode Curticei curticci and development of resistance in sheep.” J. agric. Res., 58, 771–785 (W.L. 10965.)Google Scholar
Gibson, T. E., 1945.—“The effect of small repeated doses of Phenothiazine on strongylid infestation in the horse.” Vet. Rec, 57, 301–303. (W.L. 22523.)Google Scholar
Gibson, T. E., 1949.—“Further observations on the effect of small repeated doses of phenothiazine on strongylid infestation in the horse.” Vet. Rec., 61, 451–5. (W.L. 22523.)Google Scholar
Gibson, T. E., 1950.—“Critical tests of phenothiazine as an anthelmintic for horses.” Vet. Rec., 62, 341–343. (W.L. 22523.)Google Scholar
Knowles, R. H. and Blount, W. P., 1941.—“Experimental observations on phenothiazine relative to the treatment of equine strongylosis” J. R. Army vet. Cps., 12, 51–55.Google Scholar
Kotlan, A., 1952.—“The developmental and pathological significance of the histotropic phase in parasitic nematodes.” Rep. XI Vth Int. Vet. Cons. 1949, 2, 61–64.Google Scholar
Russell, A. F., 1948.—“Development of helminthiasis in thoroughbred foals.” J. comp. Path., 58, 107–127. (W.L. 11136.)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sarles, M. P., 1944.—“Effects of experimental nodular worm (Oesophagostomum columbianum) in sheep.” Tech. Bull. U.S. Dept. Agric, No. 875. (W.L.20938J.)Google Scholar