Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:48:44.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Echinococcus granulosus from Mexican pigs is the same strain as that in Polish pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2007

A. Cruz-Reyes ,
C.C. Constantine ,
A.C. Boxell ,
R.P. Hobbs  and
R.C.A. Thompson
A. Cruz-Reyes
Affiliation:
Instituto de Biologia, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Ap. Postal 70-153, C. P. 04510, Mexico
C.C. Constantine
Affiliation:
Division of Genetics and Bioinformatics, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC 3050, Australia
A.C. Boxell
Affiliation:
World Health Organisation Collaborating Centre for the Molecular Epidemiology of Parasitic Infections, School of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
R.P. Hobbs
Affiliation:
World Health Organisation Collaborating Centre for the Molecular Epidemiology of Parasitic Infections, School of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
R.C.A. Thompson*
Affiliation:
World Health Organisation Collaborating Centre for the Molecular Epidemiology of Parasitic Infections, School of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
*
*Fax: +61 89310 4144 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Samples of Echinococcus granulosus from seven pigs from Mexico were compared with isolates of the parasite from pigs in Poland and representative strains and species of Echinococcus. Isolates from pigs in Mexico were found to be genetically identical to E. granulosus from Polish pigs and distinct from other major genotypes by sequencing part of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase I (COI) mtDNA locus, restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplified rDNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS) 1 using five different enzymes, and random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis. These results were complemented by data on hook morphology and together strengthen the view that Echinococcus maintained in a cycle involving pigs and dogs is a distinct strain that is conserved genetically in different geographical areas. The present study supports the close relationship of the cervid, camel and pig strains and raises the question of their taxonomic status.

Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 81 , Issue 3 , September 2007 , pp. 287 - 292
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bowles, J. & McManus, D.P. (1993) Rapid discrimination of Echinococcus species and strains using a polymerase chain reaction-based RFLP method. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 57, 231–240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bowles, J., Blair, D. & McManus, D.P. (1992) Genetic variants within the genus Echinococcus identified by mitochondrial DNA sequencing. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 54, 165–174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cruz-Reyes, A. & Martinez-Lopez, A. (1990) Desarrollo de Echinococcus granulosus a partir de quistes de cerdos infectados naturalmente, Zacatecas, Mexico. Revista Mexicana de Parasitologia 3, 359.Google Scholar
Eckert, J., Thompson, R.C.A., Michael, S.A., Kumaratilake, L.K. & El-Sawah, H.M. (1989) Echinococcus granulosus of camel origin: development in dogs and parasite morphology. Parasitology Research 75, 536–544.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eckert, J., Schantz, P.M., Gasser, R.B., Torgerson, P.R., Bessonov, A.S., Movsessian, S.O., Thakur, A., Grimm, F. & Nikogossian, M.A. (2001) Geographic distribution and prevalence. pp. 101–143 in Eckert, J., Gemmell, M.A., Meslin, F.-X. & Pawlowski, Z.S. (Eds) Manual on Echinococcus in humans and animals a public health problem of global concern. Paris, WHO/OIE; Geneva, World Health Organisation.Google Scholar
Harandi, F.M., Hobbs, R.P., Adams, P.J., Mobedi, I., Morgan-Ryan, U.M. & Thompson, R.C.A. (2002) Molecular and morphological characterisation of Echinococcus granulosus of human and animal origin in Iran. Parasitology 125, 367–373.Google Scholar
Hobbs, R.P., Lymbery, A.J. & Thompson, R.C.A. (1990) Rostellar hook morphometry of Echinococcus granulosus (Batsch, 1786) from natural and experimental Australian hosts, and its implications for strain recognition. Parasitology 101, 273–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumaratilake, L.M., Thompson, R.C.A. & Eckert, J. (1986) Echinococcus granulosus of equine origin from different countries possess uniform morphological characteristics. International Journal for Parasitology 16, 529–540.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lavikainen, A., Lehtinen, M.J., Meri, T., Hirvelä-Koski, V. & Meri, S. (2003) Molecular genetic characterisation of the Fennoscandian cervid strain, a new genotypic group (G10) of Echinococcus granulosus. Parasitology 127, 207–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavikainen, A., Lehtinen, M.J., Laakonen, S., Agren, E., Oksanen, A. & Meri, S. (2006) Molecular characterisation of Echinococcus isolates of cervid origin from Finland and Sweden. Parasitology 133, 565–570.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lopez-Neyra, C.R. & Soler Planas, M.A. (1943) Revision del genero Echinococcus Rud y description de una especie nuéva Parasita intestinal del porro en Almeria. Revista Ibérica Parasitologia 3, 169–194.Google Scholar
Martinez-Lopez, A., Jaramillo, C. & Cruz-Reyes, A. (1990) Equinococcosis/hidatidosis, un estudio retrospectivo en Mexico. Revista Mexicana de Parasitologia 3, 362.Google Scholar
Maravilla, P., Thompson, R.C.A., Palacios-Ruiz, J.A., Estcourt, A., Ramirez-Solis, E., Mondragon-de-la-Pena, C., Moreno-Miller, M., Cardenas-Mejia, A., Mata-Miranda, P., Aguirre-Alcantara, M-T., Bonilla-Rodriguez, C. & Flisser, A. (2004) Echinococcus granulosus cattle strain identification in an autochthonous case of cystic echinococcosis in central Mexico. Acta Tropica 92, 231–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McManus, D.P. & Thompson, R.C.A. (2003) Molecular epidemiology of cystic echinococcosis. Parasitology 127, S37–S51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Obwaller, A., Schneider, R., Walochnik, J., Gollackner, B., Deutz, A., Janitschke, K., Aspöck, H. & Auer, H. (2004) Echinococcus granulosus strain differentiation based on sequence heterogeneity in mitochondrial genes of cytochrome c oxidase-1 and NADH dehydrogenase-1. Parasitology 128, 569–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salinas-López, N., Jiménez-Guzmán, F. & Cruz-Reyes, A. (1996) Presence of Echinococcus oligarthrus (Diesing, 1863) Lühe, 1910 in Lynx rufus texensis Allen, 1895 from San Fernando, Tamaulipas State, in North-East Mexico. International Journal for Parasitology 26, 793–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schantz, P.M., Chai, J., Craig, P.S., Eckert, J., Jenkins, D.J., Macpherson, C.N.L. & Thakur, A. (1995) Epidemiology and control of hydatid disease. pp. 233–331 in Thompson, R.C.A. & Lymbery, A.J. (Eds) Echinococcus and hydatid disease. CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon, UK.Google Scholar
Sweatman, G.K. & Williams, R.J. (1963) Comparative studies on biology and morphology of. Echinococcus granulosus from domestic livestock, moose and reindeer. Parasitology 53, 339–390.Google ScholarPubMed
Tajima, F. & Nei, M. (1984) Estimation of evolutionary distance between nucleotide sequences. Molecular Biology and Evolution 1, 269–285.Google ScholarPubMed
Thompson, J.D., Higgins, D.G. & Gibsan, T.J. (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight martix choice. Nucleic Acids Research 22, 4673–4680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, R.C.A. (2001) Echinococcosis. pp. 595–612in Gillespie, S.H. & Pearson, R.D. (Eds) Principles and practices of clinical parasitology. Wiley, Sussex, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, R.C.A. & Lymbery, A.J. (1988) The nature, extent and significance of variation within the genus Echinococcus. Advances in Parasitology 27, 210–263.Google ScholarPubMed
Thompson, R.C.A. & McManus, D.P. (2001) Aetiology: parasites and life cycles. pp. 1–19 in Eckert, J., Gemmell, M.A., Meslin, F.-X. & Pawlowski, Z.S. (Eds) Manual on Echinococcus in humans and animals a public health problem of global concern. Paris, WHO/OIE; Geneva, World Health Organisation.Google Scholar
Thompson, R.C.A. & McManus, D.P. (2002) Towards a taxonomic revision of the genus Echinococcus. Trends in Parasitology 18, 452–457.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, R.C.A., Lymbery, A.J. & Constantine, C.C. (1995) Variation in Echinococcus: towards a taxonomic revision of the genus. Advances in Parasitology 35, 145–176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, R.C.A., Boxell, A.C., Ralston, B.J., Constantine, C.C., Hobbs, R.P., Shury, T. & Olson, M.E. (2006) Molecular and morphological characterisation of Echinococcus in cervids from North America. Parasitology 132, 439–447.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van De Peer, Y. & De Wachter, R. (1993) TREECON: a software package for the construction and drawing of evolutionary trees. Computational Applications for Biosciences 9, 177–182.Google ScholarPubMed
Vargas-Rivera, I., Martinez-Maya, J.J. & Jaramillo-Arango, C.J. (1995) Epidemiology of porcine hydatidosis at the abattoir of Los Paz in Mexico. Veterinaria Mexico 26, 365–368.Google Scholar
Xiao, N., Qiu, J., Nakao, M., Tiaoying, L., Yang, W., Chen, X., Schautz, P.M., Craig, P.S. & Ito, A. (2005) Echinococcus shiquicus n. sp., a taeniid cestode from Tibotan fox and plateau pika in china. International Journal for Parasitology 35, 693–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar