Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 December 2013
This paper does not profess to give anything more than a brief account of the important results obtained by the German and Austrian excavators up to the time of my visit to these sites in June. I should like in particular to direct the attention of English archaeologists to Western Asia Minor as a field of research that is practically untouched, especially as regards remains of the Hellenistic period. Brilliant results await the scientific explorer of important sites such as Sardis, Tralies, Laodicea, and Apamea, and all these are extremely easy of access. The English traveller cannot help feeling ashamed of English archaeology when he sees the unintelligible mass of ruins and brushwood that covers the site of the Artemisium at Ephesus.
1 Ath. Mitt. 1902, p. 1 seqq.
2 v. Jahreshefte V, Beiblatt, p. 58.
3 v. Jahreshefte V, Beiblatt, p. 59.
4 Jahreshefte I, Beiblatt, p. 74.
4a Figs. 4, 5, and 7 are after drawings by Prof. Niemann, and fromi clichés sent by Dr. von Schneider.
4b Jahreshefte 1899, Beiblatt, p. 19.
5 This was the end of the road from the ‘Agora.’
6 Jahreshefte I, Beiblatt, 1899, p. 79.
7 Jahreshefte I. Beiblatt, p. 56.
8 v. Arch. Anz. 1903, p. 77.
9 Bosanquet, R. C., ‘Archaeology in Greece’ Vol, xx. p. 179.Google Scholar
10 v. Ausstellung von Fundstücken aus Ephesos, p. 3.
11 Joubin, Catalogue des Bronzes, Nos. 4 and 5. The working of the bronze is much nearer (though of course not half so thick or clumsy) that of the bronze boy (Joubin, op. cit. No. 6) from Selefkeh.
12 There is in the Museum at Cairo a piece of a Roman mould for casting a Polycleitan bronze; v. Edgar, Cat. of Moulds.
13 op. cit. loc. cit.
14 op. cit. p. 10. The numbers cited are also those of the official catalogue.
15 Arch. Anz. 1902, p. 147 seq.
16 See plan, Arch. Anz. 1901, p. 196.