Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:47:07.616Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Orders of Gods in Greece and Egypt (According to Herodotus)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2013

J. Gwyn Griffiths
J. Gwyn Griffiths
Affiliation:
University College, Swansea
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Herodotus has several references to the orders or companies of gods in Greece and Egypt, and they involve a comparison and a contrast.

They may be arranged, in translation, as follows:

(1) II, 4, 2. ‘They say that the Egyptians first used the names of the twelve gods, and that the Greeks adopted them from them.’

(2) II, 7, 2 mentions ‘the altar of the twelve gods at Athens’.

(3) II, 43, 2. ‘Concerning Heracles I heard this account, that he was one of the twelve gods.’

(4) II, 43, 4. ‘But to the Egyptians Heracles is an ancient god; and as they say themselves, there were seventeen thousand years to the reign of Amasis since the eight gods produced the twelve, of whom they consider Heracles to be one.’

(5) II, 46, 2. ‘The Mendesians hold Pan to be one of the eight gods, and they say that these eight gods came into existence before the twelve.’

(6) II, 145, 1. ‘Among the Greeks Heracles and Dionysus and Pan are considered to be the youngest of the gods, but among the Egyptians Pan is considered very ancient and one of the eight gods said to be the earliest, while Heracles is one of the second group, and Dionysus one of the third group, who were produced by the twelve.’

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Hellenic Studies , Volume 75 , November 1955 , pp. 21 - 23
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies 1955

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 C.I.G. (ed. Boeckh) i. 525 (quoted Waddell, W. G., Herodotus Book II (London, 1939), 134).Google Scholar [Cf. IG I2 761—Ed.]

2 Pindar, fr. 63; Xenophon, , Hipparch., iii, 2Google Scholar advises this route.

3 Olymp. X, 49.

4 Guthrie, W. K. C., The Greeks and their Gods (London, 1950), 110.Google Scholar

5 In Roscher's Lexikon der Gr. u. Röm. Mythologie s.v. Zwölfgötter.

6 Griechische Alterthümer 4, II (Berlin, 1902), 142, n. 1 (end).

7 Laws 828. Cf. Phaedrus 246e.

8 H. G. Woods, G. Rawlinson, A. H. Sayce, F. LI. Griffith, E. H. Blakeney, and W. G. Waddell either deny or do not mention the existence of an Egyptian group of eight. Wiedemann mentions cycles of eight or nine. How and Wells refer to Brugsch's explanation of the ‘eight’ as corresponding to the eight original cosmogonie deities, but without further elucidation. Godley talks of ‘eight (or nine) gods’ as forming the first order of the Egyptian pantheon.

9 The Ancient Empire of the East (London, 1883), 150, n. 6, and 151, n. 9.

10 Cf. also his Urgeschichte und älteste Religion der Ägypter (Leipzig, 1930), 133–4 and Vandier, J., La Religion Égyptienne 2 (Paris, 1949), 33–4.Google ScholarH., and Frankfort, H. A. in Before Philosophy (Pelican Books, 1949), 18Google Scholar, consider the Ogdoad an example of ‘speculative thought in mythological guise’.

11 For a representation in Ptolemaic times (from Philae) of the Hermopolitan Ogdoad see Maspero, G., The Dawn of Civilization: Egypt and Chaldaea 5 (London, 1910), 148.Google Scholar

12 Blakeney, E. H., The Egypt of Herodotus, 111Google Scholar; How, and Wells, , A Commentary on Herodotus, I, 239Google Scholar; W. G. Waddell, 121.

13 See further the writer's forthcoming article on ‘The Egyptian Enneads’ in the Annales du Service des Antiquités de l'Egypte.

14 Herodots Zweites Buch (Leipzig, 1890), 216–19.

15 Op. cit. 218. Cf. the god's role in The Contendings of Horus and Sēth.

16 Egypt in the Classical Geographers (Cairo, 1942), 26.

17 Sourdille, , Hérodote et la Religion de l'Egypte (Paris, 1910), 166Google Scholar, following Meyer, makes the very unlikely suggestion that the Egyptian monuments erroneously show a ram instead of a goat. Cf. How and Wells, 189, ‘Perhaps the monuments are wrong …’ If this is so, how can we explain the fact that the Egyptian texts invariably refer to the animal as a ram, as in the name Ba-neb-Djedet? Lawrence, A. W., by the way, The History of Herodotus (London, 1935), 169Google Scholar, wrongly gives the city-name as ‘Banebṭet’. He apparently takes over this error, and others, from Sourdille. There is an Assyrian form Binṭeṭi see Ranke, , Keilschriftliches Material (Berlin, 1910), 49.Google Scholar

18 Op. cit. 219.

19 Wilkinson in Rawlinson ad II, 42 (pp. 76–7, n. 7); Sayce, op. cit. 153; Baumgartel, E. J., ‘Herodotus on Min’, Antiquity XXI (1947), 146.Google Scholar How and Wells, 189, wrongly state that ‘Min of Chemmis … is goat-headed’. So, too, Lawrence, p. 169.

20 See J. G. Milne (in an essay on Graeco-Egyptian Religion) in Hastings', Encyclopaedia of Religion and Ethics, VI, 382b.Google Scholar

21 See Sourdille, op. cit. 173.

22 Erman-Blackman, , The Literature of the Ancient Egyptians (London, 1927), 47.Google ScholarCf. Wilkinson, , Manners and Customs of the Ancient Egyptians (2nd Series, London, 1841), II, 16–18.Google Scholar

23 Vandier, op. cit. 66.