No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
On Some Works of the School of Scopas
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 December 2013
Extract
Of one of the greatest masters of the great age of Greek sculpture nothing certain or satisfactory was known until three fragments found at Piali were proved in 1880 to belong to the sculpture that filled the pediment of the temple of Athene Alea at Tegea. These fragments—the helmed head of a youthful warrior much defaced, another youthful head with nearly all the features preserved, and the head of a boar—can be as directly traced to the hand of Scopas as the figures of the Parthenon pediment to the hand of Pheidias. The recent handbooks and histories of Greek sculpture have not taken them sufficiently into account; and yet they are our sole material for an immediate study of Scopas, and having been brought to the Central Museum of Athens are now fairly accessible, and have been minutely examined and scientifically estimated by Dr. Treu, who has endeavoured to affix their place in the development of style, and has shown their relations to other works. But his employment of them as criteria has chiefly a negative result. He finds in them certain characteristics which speak against the claims sometimes advanced of the Niobid figures, of the Ephesian Alcestis relief, of the Vatican Apollo Citharoedus, and of the Munich relief of Amphitrite's marriage, to represent the style of Scopas and his school. The main object of this paper is to notice a few works in which a more or less close resemblance to the Tegean heads is discernible. For this purpose it is necessary to briefly examine the account given by Dr. Treu, an account to which—as he admits—he is assisted chiefly by drawings, and not by the immediate observation of the originals.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies 1886
References
page 114 note 1 Mittheil. d. deut. Inst. 1881.
page 115 note 1 Mitth. d. deut. Inst. 1881, pl. xiv.
page 117 note 1 As Dr. Treu points out, the two heads come from the pediment in which the combat between the Greeks and Telephos was represented.
page 118 note 1 The architectural remains do not seem to give very exact evidence, but vide Milchhöfer, , Mitth. d. deut. Inst. V. p. 61, 66.Google Scholar
page 118 note 2 Berichte d. Königl. baier. Acad. d. Wiss. 1882, 2, p. 114.
page 119 note 1 It is curious that Mr.Murray, , Hist. of Greek Sculp. vol. ii. p. 300Google Scholar, regards one of the slabs, which if not actually part of Brunn's ‘fourth series’ is on Brunn's own statement very closely related to it, as one of the worst in the frieze.
page 119 note 2 Three are reproduced very unsatisfactorily in Overbeck (Gesch. d. griech. Plast. ii. fig. iii. l n m); another in Newton, , Hist. of Discov. pl. ix. 1.Google Scholar
page 119 note 3 In the youthful warrior who has sunk on his knee and is feeling for his sword.
page 120 note 1 The numbers are those attached to the slab in the Mausoleum room in the British Museum.
page 120 note 2 For instance, in the Amazon and Greek on the left half of the Genoese slab.
page 121 note 1 Very well reproduced in Mr.Newton, 's Travels in the Levant, pl. 16.Google Scholar
page 123 note 1 Published in the Bulletin de Correspondance Hellénique 1879, p. 327, and described ibid. 1880, p. 38.
page 124 note 1 The same female type is seen in some of the Amazons' heads on the frieze, e.g. the Amazon in slab 3 near Herakles and the fallen Amazon in the Genoese slab.