No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 December 2013
As Overbeck in the fourth edition of his Geschichte der Plastik has recanted his doubts as to the period and authenticity of the sculptures of the Basis of Mantineia, it is fair to regard them as undoubted works of about B.C. 370, and as coming at all events from the workshop of the master whose statues stood above them. Thus the discovery of this basis must be regarded as a very fortunate addition to our sources of knowledge, both of the art of Praxiteles, and of the types of the Muses in the fourth century. Fig. 3 gives these slabs in what I hold to be the true arrangement.
page 280 note 1 Mynno, , Attische Grabreliefs pl. xvii.Google Scholar; Tito, ibid. pl. xviii, cf. pl. xxv. etc.
page 281 note 1 Waldstein, Am. Journ. Arch. vii. pl. 1. Overbeck, , Plastik, ed. 4, ii. p. 61Google Scholar.
page 281 note 2 Paus. i. 44. 2 cf. Numism. Comment. on Pausanias, Pl. A. x. p. 7.
page 282 note 1 Klein, in Arch. Epigraph. Mittheil. iv. 16Google Scholar: Overbeck, in Griech. Plastik (4 ed.) i. p. 600Google Scholar.
page 282 note 2 Meisterwerke, p, 538.
page 282 note 3 Kunstmythol. Apollon, p. 182.
page 282 note 4 Ibid.Münztafel v. 39.
page 282 note 5 So Schreiber, in Roscher, 's Lexikon, p. 606Google Scholar.
page 282 note 6 Numism. Comm. on Pausanias, Pl. K. 36–38.
page 283 note 1 Anthol. Palat. xvi. 220.
page 283 note 2 Die Musen, p. 22.
page 283 note 3 ix. 30, 1.