Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T18:57:28.294Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Herodas. Mimiambi. Ed. I. C. Cunningham. Oxford: the Clarendon Press. 1971. Pp. x + 248. £4·00.

Review products

Herodas. Mimiambi. Ed. I. C. Cunningham. Oxford: the Clarendon Press. 1971. Pp. x + 248. £4·00.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2013

Frederick Williams
Frederick Williams
Affiliation:
University of Southampton
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notices of Books
Information
The Journal of Hellenic Studies , Volume 92 , November 1972 , pp. 201 - 202
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Cf. Kirk, G. S.: Heraclitus, The Cosmic Fragments (Cambridge 1954), pp. 130–1Google Scholar.

2 I hope shortly to deal with such questions in a monograph on the Kunstsprache of Theocritus.

3 Quintilian's precept (Inst. Or. X i 26) applies as much to textual as to literary criticism.

4 C. modestly cedes this task to W. G. Arnott (p. v); but Arnott's perceptive and entertaining paper (G & R xviii (1971), 121–32) is only a sample of what could be done. C. has neglected an excellent opportunity here.

5 Cf. now Killeen, J. F.'s note (JHS xci (1971) 139–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar): his interpretation of ii 12 is far superior to C.'s.

6 This occurrence is not noted in Wellauer's Index Verborum to his 1828 edition (reprinted separately 1970): a full and accurate index to Apollonius is a desideratum in Alexandrian studies.

7 Despite Headlam, 's warning (CR xviii (1904) 311Google Scholar, n. 2): ‘in Liddell and Scott nothing is surprising’.

8 Ep. xviii 4; Id. i 120–1 (bis); iii 53; iv 51; v 33–4 (bis), 55; xi 38, 64; xxv 11, 14 (I believe Id. xxv to be genuinely Theocritean; see Frohn, E.: De Carmine XXV Theocriteo Quaestiones Selectae (Halle 1908).Google Scholar)