No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 December 2013
Mr. A. D. Trendall 's welcome publication (JUS liv, 175) of a volute crater in the Taranto Museum brings to light the second of two very important early South Italian vases. The other was published two years ago by Wuilleumier in RA 1933. ii, 3, and now that they have both been revealed it is time for them to sever partnership. Theyhave long left a gap in the history of South Italian vase painting, and have not unnaturally been usually classed together as the two important unpublished Taranto craters. One began to think of them automatically as companion pieces, probably by the same hand. But this they are now shewn not to be. This conclusion, which I can base on a study of photographs only, is confirmed by Mr. Trendall. His vase, with the Birth of Dionysos on the obverse, and an Amazonomachy on the reverse, is so like the well-known volute crater Naples 2411 (Sacrifice to Dionysos and a Centauromachy), as he has already indicated,8 that I do not hesitate to say that they are by the same hand, and to suggest that a name must be found for this important artist, whom I still disassociate from the Sisyphus painter, though he follows closely in his tradition. He also painted the Brussels volute crater A1018 with the Apotheosis of Heracles.
page 231 note 1 FR pls. 175–76.
page 231 note 2 **JHS liv, 179Google Scholar.
page 231 note 3 CVA Brussels 1, IV Db, pl. 1; Moon, , PBSR 1929, 39–4Google Scholar.
page 231 note 4 In the upper register a central motive flanked by single figures or groups at a slightly higher level. In the lower register a recumbent figure flanked by standing figures or groups.
page 232 note 1 The reverse is remarkably like the style of the painter of Munich 3269. Trendall attributed this vase to his hand (JHS lv. 52Google Scholar, n. 50), but has now revised this view and believes that Munich 3269 is by a pupil of the painter of BM F275.
page 232 note 2 Neugebauer, Führer, Pl. 70.
page 232 note 3 CVA Lecce 1, IV Dr, Tav. 1; see Moon, op. cit. p. 36.
page 232 note 4 FR III, p. 347.