Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:08:59.827Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Statue from an Attic Tomb

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2013

Extract

The reliefs upon the tombstones of the Attic cemetery of the Ceramicus have long been among the most familiar of the products of Greek art, and have enjoyed a popularity, even beyond their artistic merit, because of their direct appeal to a common basis of human sentiment—mentem mortalia tangunt. The sculptors who made these reliefs did not probably, for the most part, enjoy any very exalted position in their profession. The artistic quality of the work varies greatly; while some of it preserves the best traditions of the school that made the Parthenon frieze, some is comparatively commonplace and mechanical. There is little reason to suppose that any of the extant reliefs are from the hands of a distinguished sculptor. We know, however, that well known sculptors were sometimes employed on works to be set up over tombs. Pliny expressly says of Praxiteles ‘opera sunt eius in Ceramico’, and Pausanias mentions a statue by Praxiteles of a soldier standing beside his horse, set up just outside the Dipylon Gate. There is therefore good reason for looking for statues of the highest artistic value among those set up as monuments over tombs. The reason why they have not hitherto attracted the same general interest as the reliefs that served the same purpose is partly their much more limited number, partly the difficulty of recognising them with certainty.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies 1908

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See J.H.S. xii. p. 389; σῖτος 1890.

2 It has also been suggested that the Hermes typifies a dead man or ‘hero’ just as the female figure typifies a dead woman. See Gardner, P., Sculptured Tombs of Hellas, p. 138Google Scholar. The discussion does not really concern us here, as the female statue certainly represents the deceased.

3 Athens, , National Museum Cat. 218 and 219Google Scholar.

4 Athens, , Nat. Mus. Cat. 241 and 242Google Scholar; Ath. Mitth. 1878, Pls. 6 and 6.

5 Athens, , Nat. Mus. Cat. 779Google Scholar.

6 Revue Arch. 1900, ii. Pl. XX.

7 B.C.H. 1895, Pl. VII.

7a This statue has already been published by Mr.Smith, Cecil in tho Burlington Magazine for March, 1908Google Scholar. The photogravure accompanying his article, here repeated, gives two rather unsatisfactory aspects; but the other illustrations show the character of the work.

8 For this information I am indebted to Mr. Alexander Simpson, whom I wish also to thank for his help during my visit to Trentham to examine the sculptures.

9 Mr. Cecil Smith-suggests that this basis was originally larger, and has been cut down; but I see no sufficient evidence for this.

10 Ep. ad. Att. vi. 1.

11 Nat. Mus. Cat. No. 742.

12 This was suggested to me in conversation by Mr. Cecil Smith; but he has not mentioned it in his article.

13 They are more regular than they appear in the photograph, many apparent breaks in the lines being due to damage of the surface.