Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T08:49:12.331Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Working together: new directions in global labour history*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2016

Leo Lucassen
Leo Lucassen*
Affiliation:
International Institute for Social History, Cruquiusweg 31, 1019AT Amsterdam, The Netherlands E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The aim of this article is to show the added value of global history that puts labour and labour relations as independent variables in the centre and uses structured long-term data by collaborating closely with historians in various parts of the world. The first part focuses primarily on the global labour relations approach, within the broader debate on social inequality and migration. The second part illustrates the potential of labour as an independent variable by reflecting on recent innovative work pertaining to labour-intensive industrializations in East Asia and Europe. The third part employs the perspective of migration to show the interrelated nature of labour relations and labour. Using the insights from the global labour relations approach and by taking labour seriously, the article will help to address core questions in labour history in a more structural way: why has work been valued and compensated in very different ways over the past five centuries? And how have people individually or collectively influenced these conditions? To find answers, it is crucial to make use of standardized empirical data, structured global comparisons, and more intensive collaborations.

Keywords

big datalabourlabour relationsmigrationskillssocial inequality
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Global History , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , March 2016 , pp. 66 - 87
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I thank Ulbe Bosma, Tamira Combrink, Ewout Frankema, Marjolein ’t Hart, Manon van der Heijden, Karin Hofmeester, Gijs Kessler, Jaap Kloosterman, Marcel van der Linden, Jan Lucassen, Patrick Manning, David Mayer, Elise van Nederveen Meerkerk, Matthias van Rossum, Christian de Vito, Henk Wals, Jan Luiten van Zanden, Pim de Zwart, and the editors and anonymous readers of this Journal for their comments on an earlier version.

References

1 Guldi, J. and Armitage, D., The history manifesto, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 The authors pay little attention to the field of social and economic history. See also the critique in Annales: histoire, sciences sociales, 70, 2, 2015, esp. Lamouroux, Christian, ‘Longue durée et profondeurs chronologiques’, Annales, 70, 2, 2015, pp. 359–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 Piketty, T., Capital in the twenty-first century, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2014CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Acemoglu, D. and Robinson, J. A., Why nations fail: the origins of power, prosperity and poverty, London: Profile Books, 2012Google Scholar, although, given their determinist assumptions, one might argue that the latter study is to some extent ‘ahistorical’.

4 Linden, M. van der and Lucassen, J., Prolegomena for a global labour history, Amsterdam: IISH, 1999Google Scholar; Lucassen, J., ed., Global labour history: a state of the art, Bern: Peter Lang, 2006Google Scholar; Hanagan, M. P., ‘An agenda for transnational labor history’, International Review of Social History, 49, 3, 2004, pp. 455–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Linden, M. van der, Workers of the world: essays toward a global labor history, Leiden and Boston, MA: Brill, 2008CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Linden, M. van der, ‘The promise and challenges of global labor history’, International Labor and Working-Class History, 82, Fall 2012, pp. 52–76Google Scholar; Lucassen, J., Outlines of a history of labour, Amsterdam: IISH Research Paper 51, Amsterdam, IISH, 2013Google Scholar; Austin, G. and Sugihara, K., eds., Labour-intensive industrialization in global history, Abingdon: Routledge, 2013Google Scholar.

5 On the limits of macro approaches and the importance of micro studies in global labour history, see de Vito, C. G., ‘New perspectives on global labour history: introduction’, Workers of the World, 1, 3, 2013, pp. 7–31Google Scholar.

6 The collab is at present run by Karin Hofmeester, Jan Lucassen, Richard Zijdeman, and Rombert Stapel and collaborates with researchers in other parts of the world, among whom are Paolo Teodoro de Matos, Raquel Varela et al. (Portugal and colonies), Dmitry A. Khitrov and Gijs Kessler (Russia), Marcelo Badaró Mattos, Tarcisio Botelho et al. (Brazil), Rossana Barragán (Bolivia), Filipa Ribeiro da Silva, Jelmer Vos, Gareth Austin, Shiferaw Bekele et al. (Africa), Hülya Çanbakal, Erdem Kabadayı et al. (Turkey), Shireen Moosvi (India), and Christine Moll-Murata (Far East). For joint publications see, among others, Karin Hofmeester and Christine Moll-Murata, eds., The joy and pain of work: global attitudes and valuations, 1500–1650, International Review of Social History, 56, special issue 19, 2011; Marcelo Badaró Mattos et al., eds., Relações laborais em Portugal e no mundo lusófono. Historia e demografia, Lisbon: Edições Colibri, 2014; and Hofmeester, K. and da Silva, Filipa Ribeiro, eds., ‘Labor history in Africa’, History in Africa: A Journal of Method, 41, 2014, pp. 249–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 ‘Labour relations worldwide: the taxonomy of the global collaboratory on the history of labour relations’, https://collab.iisg.nl/c/document_library/get_file?p_l_id=273223&folderId=277142&name=DLFE-197301.pdf (consulted 9 November 2015). See also Hofmeester and Moll-Murata, Joy and pain of work, pp. 5–7.

8 Lucassen, J., Migrant labour in Europe, 1600–1900: the drift to the North Sea, London: Routledge, 1987Google Scholar; Hufton, O., The poor of eighteenth-century France 1750–1789, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1974Google Scholar; Benson, J., The penny capitalists; a study of nineteenth-century working-class entrepreneurs, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1983Google Scholar; Smart, A. and Smart, J., Petty capitalists and globalization. Flexibility, entrepreneurship, and economic development, New York: State University of New York Press, 2005Google Scholar.

9 The collab is also interested in how contemporaries perceived and valued labour and work (Hofmeester and Moll-Murata, Joy and pain of work; see also Lis, C. and Soly, H., Worthy efforts: attitudes to work and workers in pre-industrial Europe, Leiden and Boston, MA: Brill, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, but the primary focus is on concrete labour relations.

10 On women in the labour market, see Lucassen, Outlines, p. 28; this situation is, of course, not new: see de Vries, J., The industrious revolution: consumer behavior and the household economy, 1650 to the present, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008CrossRefGoogle Scholar. On flexibilization, see Weil, D., The fissured workplace: why work became so bad for so many and what can be done to improve it, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2014CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 Hofmeester and Moll-Murata, Joy and pain of work, p. 20. On slavery in Asia, see e.g. Arasaratnam, S., ‘Slave trade in the Indian Ocean in the seventeenth century’, in K. S. Mathew, Mariners, merchants and oceans: studies in maritime history, New Delhi: Manohar Publications, 1995, pp. 195–208Google Scholar; Chatterjee, L. and Eaton, M. R., eds., Slavery and South Asian history, Bloomington, IN, and Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press, 2006Google Scholar; Mann, M., Sahibs, Sklaven und Soldaten. Geschichte des Menschenhandels rund um den Indischen Ozean, Darmstadt: Verlag Philipp von Zabern, 2012Google Scholar. The more economic-oriented Clio-Infra datahub, which also uses the cross-section years to map economic growth in relation to a number of key indicators of wellbeing, has given the labour relations collab an extra boost. See Van Zanden, J. L., Baten, J., d’Ercole, M. Mira, Rijpma, A., Smith, C., and Timmer, M., How was life? Global well-being since 1820, Geneva and Amsterdam: OECD Publishing and IISH, 2014Google Scholar.

12 Kessler, G., ‘Wage labor and the household economy: a Russian perspective, 1600–2000’, in M. van der Linden and L. Lucassen, eds., Working on labor: essays in honor of Jan Lucassen, Leiden: Brill, 2012, pp. 360–361Google Scholar.

13 Vos, J., ‘Work in times of slavery, colonialism, and civil war: labor relations in Angola from 1800 to 2000’, History in Africa, 41, 2014, pp. 363–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14 Lucassen, , Outlines, pp. 14–15Google Scholar.

15 ‘Contract’ is broadly defined here, including that between ‘owner’ and ‘slaves’. For other distinctions, e.g. between individual and collective strategies and remuneration, see Bosma, U., Meerkerk, E. van Nederveen, and Sarkar, A., eds., Mediating labour: worldwide labour intermediation in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, International Review of Social History, special issue, 20, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013Google Scholar; Kessler, G. and Lucassen, J., ‘Labour relations, efficiency and the Great Divergence: comparing pre-industrial brick-making across Eurasia, 1500–2000’, in Maarten Prak and Jan Luiten van Zanden, eds., Technology, skills and the pre-modern economy in the east and the west, Leiden and Boston, MA: Brill, 2013, pp. 259–322Google Scholar.

16 Think, for example, of Russian engineers in the Soviet Union in secret (defence industry) cities. See Siegelbaum, L. and Moch, L. P., Broad is my native land: repertoires and regimes of migration in Russia’s twentieth century, Ithaca, NY, and London: Cornell University Press, 2014, pp. 177–187Google Scholar.

17 Piketty, Capital.

18 Greenberg, S. B., Race and state in capitalist development: comparative perspectives, New Haven, CT, and London: Yale University Press, 1980Google Scholar; Kolchin, P., Unfree labor: American slavery and Russian serfdom, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987Google Scholar; Fredrickson, G. M., The comparative imagination: on the history of racism, nationalism, and social movements, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1997Google Scholar.

19 Fargues, P., ‘Immigration without inclusion: non-nationals in nation-building in the Gulf States’, Asian and Pacific Migration Journal, 20, 3–4, 2011, pp. 273–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Aly, G., Hitler’s beneficiaries: plunder, racial war, and the Nazi welfare state, New York: Henry Holt, 2006Google Scholar.

20 Standing, G., The precariat: the new dangerous class, London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2012Google Scholar; Weil, Fissured workplace.

21 Standing, Precariat; for a thorough critique of this work, see R. Seymour, ‘We are all precarious: on the concept of the “precariat” and its misuses’, New Left Project, 2012, http://www.newleftproject.org/index.php/site/ article_comments/ we_are_all_precarious_on_the_concept_of_the_precariat_and_its_misuses (consulted 9 November 2015), and J. Breman, ‘A bogus concept?’, New Left Review, 84, November–December 2013, pp. 130–8. See also Breman, J. and Linden, M. van der, ‘Informalizing the economy: the return of the social question at a global level’, Development and Change, 45, 5, 2014, pp. 920–940CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

22 For the subjective experience, see Hofmeester and Moll-Murata, Joy and pain of work. See also Maddison, B., ‘Labour commodification and skilled selves in late nineteenth-century Australia’, International Review of Social History, 43, 2, 1998, pp. 265–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

23 Stanziani, A., ‘The travelling panopticon: labor institutions and labor practices in Russia and Britain in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 51, 4, 2009, p. 732CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also the pioneering work of Steinfeld, R. J., The invention of free labor: the employment relation in English and American law and culture, 1350–1870, Chapel Hill, NC, University of North Carolina Press, 1991Google Scholar. In other parts of the world we similarly find many shades and modalities when it comes to the relation between labour contracts and labour relations, as is demonstrated in the case of freed persons in nineteenth- and early twentieth-century Brazil. See Lima, H. Espada, ‘Freedom, precariousness, and the law: freed persons contracting out their labour in nineteenth-century Brazil’, International Review of Social History, 54, 2009, pp. 391–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Mattos, M. Badaró, ‘Experiences in common: slavery and “freedom” in the process of Rio de Janeiro’s working-class formation (1850–1910)’, International Review of Social History, 55, 2010, pp. 193–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Chalhoub, S., ‘The precariousness of freedom in a slave society (Brazil in the nineteenth century)’, International Review of Social History, 56, 2011, pp. 405–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For colonial West Africa, see Fall, B., Social history in French West Africa: forced labor, labor market, women and politics, Amsterdam and Calcutta: Sephis-CSSSC, 2002Google Scholar.

24 Hurgobin, Y. and Basu, S., ‘“Oceans without borders”: dialectics of transcolonial labor migration from the Indian Ocean world to the Atlantic Ocean world’, International Working Class History, 87, 2015, pp. 7–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

25 Acemoglu and Robinson, Why nations fail; Morris, I., The measure of civilization: how social development decides the fate of nations, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2013CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Atkinson, A.B., Inequality: what can be done?, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar; Piketty, Capital.

26 Van Zanden, J. L., The long road to the industrial revolution: the European economy in a global perspective 1000–1800, Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2009Google Scholar; Prak and van Zanden, Technology; Austin and Sugihara, Labour-intensive industrialization; Van Lottum, J., ‘Labour migration and economic performance: London and the Randstad, c. 1600–1800’, Economic History Review, 64, 1, 2011, pp. 1–20Google Scholar; Van Lottum, J. and Van Zanden, J. L., ‘Labour productivity and human capital in the European maritime sector of the eighteenth century’, Explorations in Economic History, 53, 2014: pp. 83–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Vries, P., Escaping poverty: the origins of modern economic growth, Vienna and Göttingen: V&R Unipress/ Vienna University Press, pp. 222–225Google Scholar.

27 North, D. C., Wallis, J. J., and Weingast, B. R., Violence and social orders: a conceptual framework for interpreting recorded human history, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

28 On guilds and unions, see Prak, M., Lis, C., Lucassen, J., and Soly, H., eds., Craft guilds in the early modern Low Countries: work, power and representation, Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006Google Scholar; Lucassen, J., de Moor, T., and van Zanden, J. L., eds., The return of the guilds, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009Google Scholar; Gerteis, C., Gender struggles: wage-earning women and male-dominated unions in postwar Japan, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009Google Scholar. An interesting exception to evolutionary, deterministic, and sweeping linear global long-term narratives on inequality is the careful archaeological study of Flannery, K. and Marcus, J., The creation of inequality: how our prehistoric ancestors set the stage for monarchy, slavery, and empire, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

29 Lundh, C. and Kuroso, S., Similarity in difference: marriage in Europe and Asia, 1700–1900, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2014CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Tsuya, N.O., Wang, F., Alter, G., and Lee, James Z., Prudence and pressure: reproduction and human agency in Europe and Asia, 1700–1900, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2010Google Scholar; Ferrie, J. P., Yankees now: immigrants in the antebellum U.S. 1840–1860, New York: Oxford University Press, 1999Google Scholar.

30 I use the term ‘subalterns’ here more broadly than as defined by the (Gramscian-inspired) Indian school of subaltern studies, meaning people with very limited means to resist repression and unequal treatment from above. See Chaturvedi, V., ed., Mapping subaltern studies and the postcolonial, London and New York: Verso, 2000Google Scholar.

31 On collective action, see Tilly, C., Social movements 1768–2004, Boulder, CO, and London: Paradigm Publishers, 2004Google Scholar; Tilly, C., Trust and rule, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Tilly, C., Democracy, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Scott, J. C., Weapons of the weak: everyday forms of peasant resistance, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1985Google Scholar; Scott, J. C., Domination and the arts of resistance: hidden transcripts, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1990Google Scholar; Linden, M. van der and Price, R., eds., The rise and development of collective labour law, Bern: Peter Lang, 2000Google Scholar. On different forms of mobilization, see Esping-Andersen, G., The three worlds of welfare capitalism, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1990Google Scholar; King, D., In the name of liberalism: illiberal social policy in the USA and Britain, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Postel, C., The populist vision, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2007Google Scholar, ch. 7; Moon, Y., Populist collaborators: the Ilchinhoe and the Japanese colonization of Korea, 1896–1910, Ithaca, NY, and London: Cornell University Press, 2013CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

32 Werner, M. and Zimmermann, B., ‘Histoire croisée: penser l’histoire croisée: entre empirie et réflexivité’, Annales: économies, sociétés, civilisations, 58, 1, 2003, pp. 7–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Van der Linden, Workers of the world, ch. 14.

33 Piketty, Capital, p. 25. Piketty is not the only economist deeply concerned with social inequality who nevertheless neglects the role of labour relations (with the exception of a paragraph on slavery, pp. 158 ff.). See also e.g. Drèze, J. and Sen, A., An uncertain glory: India and its contradictions, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2013CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

34 Piketty, Capital, p. 148.

35 Wilkinson, R. and Pickett, K., The spirit level: why more equal societies almost always do better, London: Allen Lane, 2009Google Scholar.

36 Velden, S. van der, Striking numbers: new approaches to strike research, Amsterdam: IISH, 2012Google Scholar; van Leeuwen, M., ‘Historical welfare economics in the nineteenth-century: mutual aid and private insurance for burial, sickness, old age, widowhood, and unemployment in the Netherlands’, in B. Harris and P. Bridgen, eds., Historical perspectives on charity and mutual aid: European and American experiences since 1800, London: Routledge, 2007, pp. 89–130Google Scholar.

37 Measured in the year 2000. See Moatsos, M., Baten, J., Foldvari, P., van Leeuwen, B., and van Zanden, J. L., ‘Income inequality since 1820’, in J. L. van Zanden et al., eds., How was life? Global well-being since 1820, Geneva and Amsterdam: OECD and IISH, 2014, p. 206Google Scholar. See also Acemoglu, D. and Robinson, J. A., ‘The rise and fall of general laws of capitalism’, December 2014, http://economics.mit.edu/files/10302 (consulted 10 November 2015)Google Scholar.

38 Acemoglu, D. and Robinson, J. A., Economic origins of dictatorship and democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006Google Scholar; Acemoglu and Robinson, Why nations fail; North, D. C., Wallis, J., and Weingast, B., Violence and social orders: a conceptual framework for interpreting recorded human history, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Putterman, L. and Weil, D. N., ‘Post-1500 population flows and the long run determinants of economic growth and inequality’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, November 2010, pp. 1627–1682CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Fukuyama, F., Origins of political order: from pre-human times to the French Revolution, New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux, 2011Google Scholar; Morris, Measure of civilization.

39 This includes material living conditions, quality of life, and sustainability. See also van Zanden et al., How was life?

40 North, Wallis, and Weingast, Violence and social orders. On urban citizenship, see Lucassen, L., ‘Population and migration’, in P. Clark, ed., The Oxford Handbook of Cities in World History, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 664–682Google Scholar. Skill should be understood broadly and is not confined to formal training, either through guilds or education, but includes informal on-the-job training. Although such skill formation is more difficult to measure, it is far from impossible: see Benson, J., Gospel, H., and Zhu, Y. eds., Workforce development and skill formation in Asia, London and New York: Routledge, 2013Google Scholar; van Lottum and van Zanden, ‘Labour productivity’. More specifically gendered analyses have made this point forcefully: see e.g. the highly interesting studies and observations in Sangster, J., ‘Making a fur coat: women, the labouring body, and working-class history’, International Review of Social History, 52, 2007, pp. 241–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

41 Chakrabarthy, D., Provincializing Europe: postcolonial thought and historical difference, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000Google Scholar; see also the critique by Chibber, V., Postcolonial theory and the specter of capital, London and New York: Verso, 2013Google Scholar.

42 Kessler and Lucassen, ‘Labour relations’. On deep monetization, see Lucassen, J., ‘Deep monetization, commercialization and proletarianization: possible links, India 1200–1900’, in Sabyasachi Bhattacharya, ed., Towards a new history of work, New Delhi: Tulika, 2014, pp. 17–55Google Scholar.

43 An exception being Vries, Escaping poverty.

44 C. Moll-Murata, State and crafts in the Qing dynasty (1644–1911), Tübingen: Habilitationsschrift, 2008; C. Moll-Murata, ‘China, Taiwan, Japan 1500–2000’, unpublished paper for ‘IISH Collaboratory Global Labour Relations 1500–2000’ conference, Amsterdam, May 2012.

45 Ahuja, R., ‘Labour relations in an early colonial context: Madras, c. 1750–1800’, Modern Asian Studies, 36, 4, 2002, pp. 793–832CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Banaji, J., ed., Theory as history: essays on modes of production and exploitation, Leiden and Boston, MA: Brill, 2010, p. 17CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

46 Standing, Precariat.

47 Touwen, J., Coordination in transition: the Netherlands and the world economy, 1950–2010, Leiden: Brill, 2014, pp. 138Google Scholar, 329.

48 Ibid., pp. 194–5.

49 Piketty, Capital.

50 Van Rossum, M., Werkers van de wereld. Globalisering, arbeid en interculturele ontmoetingen tussen Aziatische en Europese zeelieden in dienst van de VOC, 1600–1800, Hilversum: Verloren, 2014Google Scholar.

51 Moore, B., Injustice: the social bases of obedience and revolt, London and New York: Macmillan Press, 1978CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Scott, Weapons of the weak; Scott Domination.

52 Silver, B. J., Forces of labor: workers’ movements and globalization since 1870, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also van der Velden, Striking numbers; Collaboratories in Social and Economic History, ‘Labour conflicts’, https://collab.iisg.nl/web/labourconflicts/datafiles (consulted 10 November 2015).

53 Moore, Injustice.

54 Eugenic attitudes have been demonstrated by the left as well as the right: see Lucassen, L., ‘A brave new world: the left, social engineering, and eugenics in twentieth-century Europe’, International Review of Social History, 55, 2, 2010, pp. 299–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

55 Wong, B., China transformed: historical change and the limits of European experience, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2000Google Scholar; Pomeranz, K., The Great Divergence: China, Europe, and the making of the modern world economy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000Google Scholar.

56 van Zanden, J. L., ‘The road to the Industrial Revolution: hypotheses and conjectures about the medieval origins of the “European Miracle”’, Journal of Global History, 3, 3, 2008, pp. 337–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Allen, R., Bassino, J., Ma, D., Moll-Murata, C., and van Zanden, J. L., ‘Wages, prices, and living standards in China, 1738–1925: in comparison with Europe, Japan, and India’, Economic History Review, 64, 8, 2011, pp. 8–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Li, B. and van Zanden, J. L., ‘Before the Great Divergence? Comparing the Yangzi Delta and the Netherlands at the beginning of the nineteenth century’, Journal of Economic History, 72, 4, 2012, pp. 956–989CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Vries, Escaping poverty.

57 O’Brien, P. and Deng, K., ‘Can the debate on the Great Divergence be located within the Kuznetsian paradigm for an empirical form of global history?’, Tijdschrift voor Sociale en Economische Geschiedenis, 12, 2, 2015, pp. 63–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Goldstone, J., ‘Why and where did modern economic growth begin?’, Tijdschrift voor Sociale en Economische Geschiedenis, 12, 2, 2015, pp. 17–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

58 Austin, G. and Sugihara, K., ‘Introduction’, in Austin and Sugihara, Labour-intensive industrialization, pp. 6–7Google Scholar.

59 O’Brien and Deng, ‘Can the debate’, pp. 74–7.

60 In their recent book on Russian migrations in the twentieth century (Broad is my native land), Lewis Siegelbaum and Leslie Moch use the notion of ‘regimes’ and ‘repertoires’ as an alternative to Gidden’s much more abstract ‘structure’ and ‘agency’.

61 As implied by Goldstone, ‘Why and where’.

62 P. de Zwart and J. Lucassen, ‘Poverty or prosperity in Bengal c.1700–1875? New evidence, methods and perspectives’, unpublished paper for ‘World Economic History’ conference, Kyoto, 5 August 2015. Allen, Robert C. and Roman Studer found only 120 pieces of data (‘Prices and wages in India, 1595–1930’, on the website of the Global Price and Income History Group, http://gpih.ucdavis.edu (consulted 10 November 2015))Google Scholar.

63 Studer, R., ‘India and the Great Divergence: assessing the efficiency of grain markets in eighteenth- and nineteenth-century India’, Journal of Economic History, 68, 2, 2008, pp. 393–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar; O’Brien and Deng, ‘Can the debate’, p. 74; Vries, Escaping poverty.

64 This critique by early modern historians such as Jan de Vries (The industrious revolution) has now been widely accepted for Europe, but less so for other parts of the world. For pioneering work on Japan, see Hayami, A., The historical demography of pre-modern Japan, Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press, 2004Google Scholar. For weaving in south Indian hamlets, see Mizushima, T., ‘Transformation of south Indian local society in the late pre-colonial period’, Journal of Asian Network for GIS-based Historical Studies, 1, 2013, pp. 12–16Google Scholar.

65 Pomeranz, Great Divergence, p. 8. See also Wong, China transformed; Rosenthal, J. L. and Wong, B., Before and beyond divergence: the politics of economic change in China and Europe, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

66 In a Japanese book chapter by Hayami, cited by Sugihara, K., ‘Labour-intensive industrialization in global history: an interpretation of East Asian experiences’, in Austin and Sugihara, Labour-intensive industrialization, p. 24Google Scholar.

67 On the European approach, see Allen, R., The British industrial revolution in global perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Broadberry, S. and Gupta, B., ‘The early modern great divergence: wages, prices and economic development in Europe and Asia, 1500–1800’, Economic History Review, 59, 1, 2006, pp. 2–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For a recent discussion of the ‘two paths’ approach, see Austin and Sugihara, Labour-intensive industrialization. See also Vries, Escaping poverty, p. 220, who sees the labour-intensive path in Japan more as an intermediary (small-firm) stage.

68 Sugihara, ‘Labour intensive industrialization’, p. 20.

69 Hayami , Historical demography; Saito, O., ‘Population and the peasant family economy in proto-industrial Japan’, Journal of Family History, 8, 1, 1983, pp. 30–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Saito, O., ‘Proto-industrialization and labour-intensive industrialization: reflections on Smithian growth and the role of skill intensity’, in Austin and Sugihara, Labour-intensive industrialization, pp. 85–106Google Scholar; Sugihara, K., ‘The European miracle and the East Asian miracle’, Sangyo to Keizai, 11, 2, 1996, pp. 22–47Google Scholar.

70 Although such qualifications are obviously important: J. Baten, D. Ma, S. Morgan, and Q. Wang, ‘Evolution of living standards and human capital in China in 18–20th century: evidences from real wage and anthropometrics’, LSE Working Paper 122/09, 2009.

71 Smith, T. C., ‘Peasant time and factory time in Japan’, Past & Present, 111, 1986, pp. 165–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar; van Lottum, J. and Poulsen, B., ‘Estimating levels of numeracy and literacy in the maritime sector of the North Atlantic in the late eighteenth century’, Scandinavian Economic History Review 59, 1, 2011, pp. 67–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar; de Vries, J., ‘The industrious revolutions in East and West’, in Austin and Sugihara, Labour-intensive industrialization, p. 74Google Scholar; Goldstone, ‘Why and where’, p. 21; Hau, M. and Stoskopf, N., ‘Labour-intensive industrialization: the case of nineteenth-century Alsace’, in Austin and Sugihara, Labour-intensive industrialization, p. 276Google Scholar; Saito, ‘Proto-industrialization’, p. 97.

72 Allen, British industrial revolution; Mokyr, J., The gifts of Athena: historical origins of the knowledge economy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar; Mokyr, J., The enlightened economy: an economic history of Britain, 1700–1850, New Haven, CT, and London: Yale University Press, 2009Google Scholar. For acknowledgement of the importance of workers’ skills, see van Lottum and van Zanden, ‘Labour productivity’.

73 Austin, G., ‘Labour-intensity industrialization and global economic development: reflexions’, in Austin and Sugihara, Labour-intensive industrialization, p. 291Google Scholar.

74 Hau and Stoskopf, ‘Labour-intensive industrialization’, p. 268.

75 Ibid., p. 276; see also Kok, J., ‘The family factor in migration decisions’, in J. Lucassen, L. Lucassen, and P. Manning, eds., Migration history in world history: multidisciplinary approaches, Leiden and Boston, MA: Brill, 2010, pp. 215–250Google Scholar.

76 M. Tanimoto, ‘From peasant economy to urban agglomeration: the transformation of “labour-intensive industrialization” in modern Japan’, in Austin and Sugihara, Labour-intensive industrialization, p. 172.

77 Sabel, C. and Zeitlin, J., eds., World of possibilities: flexibility and mass production in Western industrialization, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

78 Saito, ‘Proto-industrialization’, p. 97.

79 Roy, T., ‘Labour-intensity and industrialization in colonial India’, in Austin and Sugihara, Labour-intensive industrialization, p. 113Google Scholar.

80 de Haan, A., Unsettled settlers: migrant workers and industrial capitalism in Calcutta, Hilversum: VerlorenGoogle Scholar.

81 Chakrabarty, D., Rethinking working-class history: Bengal 1890–1940, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1982Google Scholar.

82 Roy, T., ‘Sardars, jobbers, kanganies: the labour contractor and Indian economic history’, Modern Asian Studies, 66, 4, 2008, p. 993Google Scholar. See also Morris, D., The emergence of an industrial labor force in India: a study of the Bombay cotton mills, 1854–1947, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1965, pp. 129–153Google Scholar.

83 Roy, ‘Labour intensity’, p. 116. See also Gupta, B., ‘Wages, unions, and labour productivity: evidence from Indian cotton mills’, Economic History Review, 64, 1, 2011, pp. 76–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

84 Kessler and Lucassen, ‘Labour relations, efficiency and the Great Divergence.’

85 The political context includes the role of the state: see Besley, T. and Burgess, R., ‘Can labour regulation hinder economic performance? Evidence from India’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119, 1, 2004, pp. 91–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

86 McKeown, A., Melancholy order: Asian migration and the globalization of borders, New York: Columbia University Press, 2008Google Scholar.

87 Austin and Sugihara, ‘Introduction’, p. 3.

88 Lewis, W. A., Growth and fluctuations, 1870–1913, London: Allen & Unwin, 1978, pp. 185–188Google Scholar; McKeown, A., ‘Global migration 1846–1940’, Journal of World History, 15, 2, 2004, pp. 155–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Sugihara, K., ‘Patterns of Chinese emigration to Southeast Asia, 1869–1939’, in K. Sugihara, ed., Japan, China, and the growth of the Asian international economy, 1850–1949, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 244–274Google Scholar.

89 Amrith, S., ‘South Indian migration, c. 1800–1950’, in J. Lucassen and L. Lucassen, eds., Globalising migration history: the Eurasian experience (16th–21st centuries), Leiden: Brill, 2014, pp. 122–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

90 Stanziani, ‘Traveling panopticon’.

91 Lucassen, Migrant labour; various chapters in Lucassen and Lucassen, Globalising migration history.

92 Berthoff, R. T., British immigrants in industrial America, 1790–1950, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1953Google Scholar; Baines, D., Migration in a mature economy: emigration and internal migration in England and Wales 1861–1900, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985Google Scholar.

93 Lucassen and Lucassen, Globalising migration history; van Lottum, ‘Labour migration’.

94 Lucassen, Outlines, p. 19.

95 Lindert, P. H., Growing public: social spending and economic growth since the eighteenth century, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009, pp. 125–126Google Scholar; Gregory, J. N., The southern diaspora: how the great migrations of black and white southerners transformed America, Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 2005Google Scholar; Perreault, T., ‘Dispossession by accumulation? Mining, water and the nature of enclosure on the Bolivian Altiplano’, Antipode, 45, 5, 2013, pp. 1050–1069Google Scholar, esp. p. 1065.

96 Including subcontracting by other migrants, as in the well-known ‘padrone system’ (McKeown, Melancholy order, pp. 113–18).

97 Lucassen, L. and Smit, A. X., ‘The repugnant other: soldiers, missionaries and aid workers as organizational migrants’, Journal of World History, 2015Google Scholar (forthcoming).

98 Jackson, P., ‘Turkish slaves on Islam’s Indian frontier’, in I. Chatterjee and R. M. Eaton, eds., Slavery and South Asian history, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 2006, pp. 63–82Google Scholar, esp. pp. 74–5.

99 Lucassen, L. and Lucassen, J., ‘The strange death of Dutch tolerance: the timing and nature of the pessimist turn in the Dutch migration debate’, Journal of Modern History, 87, 1, 2015, pp. 72–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

100 David Montgomery in Field, G. and Hanagan, M., ‘A conversation with David Montgomery’, International Working Class History, 82, 2012, pp. 16–26Google Scholar, esp. p. 20. A particularly important resource is the North Atlantic Population Project, https://www.nappdata.org/napp/ (consulted 10 November 2015). For the life-course approach, see, for example, the Historical Sample of the Netherlands, http://socialhistory.org/en/hsn, and the China multi-generational panel dataset series available at http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/ICPSR/series/265 (both consulted 10 November 2015).

101 Green, N. L., ‘The comparative method and poststructural structuralism: new perspectives for migration studies’, in J. Lucassen and L. Lucassen, eds., Migration, migration history, history: old paradigms and new perspectives, Bern: P. Lang, 1999, pp. 57–72Google Scholar.

102 Pomeranz, Great divergence, pp. 7–8. This approach also diverges from postcolonial theory, which was recently attacked by Chibber, Postcolonial theory (targeting Chakrabarty, Provincializing Europe). Although Chibber’s book, which rejects the Indian subaltern school and reinstates a – Marxist – universalism, entails an important message, Austin, G., ‘Reciprocal comparison and African history: tackling conceptual Eurocentrism in the study of Africa’s economic past’, African Studies Review, 50, 2007, pp. 1–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar, is less polemical and more useful for global historians.

103 Manning, P., Navigating world history: historians create a global past, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003, p. 156CrossRefGoogle Scholar.