Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T11:19:57.414Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Indian Nationalism and the ‘world forces’: transnational and diasporic dimensions of the Indian freedom movement on the eve of the First World War

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2007

Harald Fischer-Tiné
Harald Fischer-Tiné
Affiliation:
Jacobs University,School of Humanities and Social Sciences/History, Bremen, Germany E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present article takes a global perspective on the diasporic networks of Indian revolutionaries that were emerging on the eve of the First World War. It looks particularly at three important headquarters of their activities, namely London, New York and Tokyo. The narrative is centred on the ‘India Houses’ that were opened in these three cities and served as the institutional umbrella units for the revolutionary schemes. Finally, the political alliances forged and the ideological resources tapped in these three settings are sketched out and briefly analysed. The case study makes two points: to begin with, it is important to extend historical scrutiny beyond the geographical bounds of India to fully grasp the development of Indian nationalism in this first peak time of globalization; second, the existence of the sophisticated transnational anti-imperial propaganda networks that are the focus of this study raises doubts about the alleged watershed character of the First World War as the ‘global moment’ that decisively shook the imperial world order. The year 1905, it is argued, was at least as important in this regard.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Global History , Volume 2 , Issue 3 , November 2007 , pp. 325 - 344
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Rai, Lajpat, Young India. An interpretation and a history of the nationalist movement from within, London: Home Rule for India League, 1917, p. 183.Google Scholar

2 One would, however, probably have to exclude the Ghadar movement from this general statement. This revolutionary organization established by Indian migrants in the United States and Canada shortly before the First World War has continued to fascinate historians from various backgrounds. The more important works include: Ramnath, Maia, ‘Two revolutions: the Ghadar movement and India’s radical diaspora, 1913–1918’, Radical History Review, 92, 2005, pp. 7–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and Puri, Harish K., Ghadar movement: ideology, organisation, and strategy, Amritsar: Guru Nanak Dev University Press, 1983.Google Scholar

3 Bose, Arun Coomer, Indian revolutionaries abroad, 1905–1922: in the background of international developments, Patna: Bharati Bhawan, 1971Google Scholar; Krüger, Horst, Anfänge sozialistischen Denkens in Indien, Der Beginn der Rezeption sozialistischer Ideen in Indien vor 1914, Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1985Google Scholar; and Krüger, , Indische Nationalisten und Weltproletariat. Der nationale Befreiungskampf in Indien und die internationale Arbeiterbewegung vor 1914, Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1984.Google Scholar See also the same author’s articles ‘Indian national revolutionaries abroad before 1914’, in Ray, Nisith Ranjan et al., eds., Challenge. A saga of India’s struggle for freedom, Delhi: Peoples’ Publishing House, 1984, pp. 387–403, and ‘Indian national revolutionaries in Paris before World War I’, Archív Orientální, 45, 4, 1977, pp. 329–39; Sareen, T. R., Indian revolutionary movement abroad, (1905–1921), New Delhi: Sterling Publishers, 1979Google Scholar. Somewhat later offshoots are Sareen, T. R., Indian revolutionaries, Japan and British imperialism, New Delhi: Anmol, 1993.Google Scholar

4 See the Ghadar literature, cited above, and Dignan, Don, The Indian revolutionary problem in British diplomacy, New Delhi: Private Publishers, 1983.Google Scholar

5 Cf., for instance, Barooah, Nirode K., Chatto, the life and times of an Indian anti-imperialist in Europe, New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2004Google Scholar, and Brown, Emily, Har Dayal, Hindu revolutionary and rationalist, repr. New Delhi: Manohar, 1976.Google Scholar

6 Cf. Watt, Carey, Serving the nation. Cultures of service, association and citizenship in colonial India, New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2005, pp. 5–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7 Bayly, C. A., The birth of the modern world, 1780–1914, Oxford: Blackwell, 2004, pp. 451–87.Google Scholar See also Hopkins, A. G., ‘The history of globalization – and the globalization of history?’, in Hopkins, ed., Globalization in world history, London: Pimlico, 2002, pp. 11–46, pp. 28–9.Google Scholar

8 Adas, Michael, ‘Contested hegemony; the Great War and the Afro-Asian assault on the civilizing mission ideology’, Journal of World History, 15, 1, 2004, pp. 31–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and his earlier rendition ‘The Great War and the decline of the civilizing mission’, in Sears, Laurie, ed., Autonomous histories: particular truths, Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1993, pp. 101–22.Google Scholar Adas’s interpretation has been adopted by many other scholars, cf. Iriye, Akira, ‘Beyond imperialism: the new internationalism’, Daedalus, 134, 2, 2005, pp. 108–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and Duara, Prasenjit, ‘The discourse of civilization and Pan-Asianism’, Journal of World History, 12, 1, 2001, pp. 99–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9 Iriye, ‘Beyond imperialism’, p. 115.

10 Lahiri, Shompa, Indians in Britain. Anglo-Indian encounters, race and identity, 1880–1930, London and Portland: Frank Cass, 1999, p. 5.Google Scholar

11 See, for instance, The Times, 1 September 1908, p. 5.

12 Lawton, Lancelot, Empires of the Far East. A study of Japan and her colonial possessions, of China and Manchuria and of the political questions of Eastern Asia and the Pacific, vol. 2, London: Grant Richards Ltd., 1912, pp. 802–4.Google Scholar

13 T. R. Sareen, Indian revolutionaries, Japan, p. 8. Cf. also Karl, Rebecca, ‘Creating Asia: China in the world at the beginning of the 20th century’, AHR, 103, 4, 1998, pp. 1096–118, pp. 1110–11.Google Scholar

14 Sareen, T. R., ‘India and the War’, in Kowner, Rotem, ed., The impact of the Russo-Japanese War, London and New York: Routledge, 2007, pp. 239–50, pp. 245–6.Google Scholar

15 Prasad, Birendra, Indian nationalism and Asia (1900–1947), New Delhi: B. R. Publishing Corporation, 1979, p. 45.Google Scholar

16 Sareen, , ‘India and the War’, and Dua, R. P., The impact of the Russo-Japanese (1905) War on Indian politics, New Delhi: S. Chand, 1966.Google Scholar

17 The more important publications on the Swadeshi movement include: Goswami, Manu, Producing India: from colonial economy to national space, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 2004, pp. 244–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and Sarkar, Sumit, The Swadeshi movement in Bengal 1903–1908, New Delhi: People’s Publishing House, 1973.Google Scholar

18 Sarkar, Benoy Kumar, The futurism of young Asia. And other essays on the relations between the East and the West, Berlin: J. Springer, 1922, p. 360.Google Scholar

19 A whole set of new laws was passed to cope with the challenge of sedition. Most importantly, censorship was handled very strictly. Cf. also Rai, Lajpat, Betrachtungen über die politische Lage in Indien. Bearbeitet und herausgegeben vom Europäischen Zentralkomitee der indischen Nationalisten, Leipzig, 1917, pp. 9–13.Google Scholar

20 Ker, James Campbell, Political trouble in India, repr., Calcutta: Editions Indian, 1973 [1917], pp. 196–8.Google Scholar

21 Government of India, Report of the Sedition Committee, 1918, Calcutta, 1919, p. 6.

22 For biographical accounts of Krishnavarma, see Verma, Ganeshi Lal, Shyamji Krishna Varma, the unknown patriot, New Delhi: Govt. of India, Publications Division, 1993Google Scholar, Sarda, Har Bilas, Shyamji Krishna Varma: patriot and perfect, Ajmer: Vedic Yantralay, 1959Google Scholar, and Yajnik, Indulal, Shyamaji Krishnavarma. Life and times of an Indian revolutionary, Bombay: Lakshmi Publications, 1950.Google Scholar

23 Yajnik, Shyamaji Krishnavarma, pp. 87–105.

24 Ker, Political trouble, p. 156, and Bose, ed., Indian revolutionaries: documents, pp. 6–8.

25 The paper appeared until 1922, with a long interruption caused by the First World War. See also A. M. Shah, ‘The Indian Sociologist, 1905–14, 1920–22’, Economic and Political Weekly, August 2006, pp. 3435–9.

26 Ibid., p. 3436.

27 Shah, ‘The Indian Sociologist’.

28 Cf., for instance, the article ‘A startling scientific truth’, The Indian Sociologist [hereafter IS], 8, 2, 1912, pp. 5–7, and the discussion in Kapila, Shruti, ‘Self, Spencer and Swaraj: nationalist thought and critiques of liberalism, 1890–1920’, Modern Intellectual History, 4, 1, 2007, pp. 109–27, especially pp. 114–16.Google Scholar

29 Cf., for instance, Anonymous, British Rule in India. Condemned by the British themselves, London: The Indian National Party, 1915.

30 IS, I, 1, 1905 p. 1.

31 Ibid.

32 IS, 2, 4, 1906, p. 13.

33 IS, 1, 5, 1905, p. 17.

34 Lahiri, Indians in Britain, p. 122.

35 Yajnik, Shyamaji Krishnavarma, p. 127. Cf. also IS, 2, 3, 1906, p. 13.

36 The most detailed account of the murder and especially the ensuing trial can be found in Malwinder Jit Singh Waraich and Kuldip Puri, Tryst with martyrdom. Trial of Madan Lal Dhingra, Chandigarh: Unistar 2003.

37 Brown, Har Dayal, p. 25. Given this association of the ‘India House’ in Highgate with terrorism during the 1900s, it seems somewhat ironic that the British Government later chose to give the seat of the Indian High Commission in London – it was opened with grand éclat in 1930 – the same name.

38 Joshi, V. C., Lajpat Rai. Autobiographical writings, Jullundur and Delhi: University Publishers, 1965, pp. 103–8.Google Scholar

39 IS, 2, 8, 1906, p. 32 and 2, 9, 1906, pp. 35–6.

40 Bose, ed., Indian revolutionaries: documents, pp. 26–7.

41 Krüger, Anfänge sozialistischen Denkens, p. 71.

42 Bose, ed., Indian revolutionaries abroad, pp. 28–9.

43 Ker, Political trouble, p. 177.

44 Chowdhury-Sengupta, Indira, ‘Reconstructing Hinduism on a world platform: the world’s first parliament of religions, Chicago 1893’, in Radice, William, ed., Swami Vivekananda, and the modernisation of Hinduism, New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1998, pp. 17–35.Google Scholar

45 Ker, Political trouble, p. 197.

46 Abhedananda moved to the USA in 1896. His book India and her people, containing some of his lectures given in the United States, was proscribed in India as seditious literature.

47 Ker, Political trouble, p. 199.

48 Manjapra, Kris K., ‘The illusions of encounter: Muslim “minds” and Hindu revolutionaries in First World War Germany and after’, Journal of Global History, 1, 2, 2006, pp. 363–82, p. 371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

49 Majumdar, R. C., Struggle for freedom, Bombay, Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan, 1988, vol. 11 of The History and Culture of the Indian People, p. 207.Google Scholar

50 Cf., for instance, the article ‘Our disinterested friends’, published in IS, 2, 9, 1906, p. 35. It had appeared earlier in the Gaelic American, 26 May 1906.

51 Cited in Yajnik, Shyamaji Krishnavarma, p. 235.

52 APAC, IOR: L/PJ/6/871, File 1956, 2 June 1908, ‘House of Commons question on the Indian Sociologist, a seditious newspaper, prohibited in India but printed and published in London’. Nonetheless copies continued to flow into the country mostly through French and Portuguese enclaves in the subcontinent.

53 Ganachari, Aravind, ‘Two Indian revolutionary associations abroad: some new light on the Pan Aryan Association and the Indo-Japanese Association’, in Aravind Ganachari, Nationalism and social reform in a colonial situation, New Delhi: Kalpaz, 2005, pp. 137–47, p. 139.Google Scholar

54 Bose, Indian revolutionaries abroad, p. 39.

55 IS, 3, 3, 1907, p. 11–12.

56 On Madame Cama, cf. Yadav, B. D., and Bakshi, S. R., Madam Bhikaji Cama, New Delhi: Anmol, 1991.Google Scholar

57 Ibid., pp. 52–3, and Ganachari, ‘Two revolutionary associations’, p. 139.

58 For biographical details, see Aravind Ganachari, ‘An early American contributor to India’s struggle for freedom: Myron H. Phelps (1856–1916)’, in Aravind Ganachari, Nationalism and social reform, pp. 149–60.

59 Raucher, Alan, ‘American anti-imperialists and the pro-India movement 1900–1932’, Pacific Historical Review, 43, 1, 1974, pp. 83–110, p. 83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

60 Banerjee, Kalyan Kumar, Indian freedom movement. Revolutionaries in America, Calcutta: Jijnasa, 1969, p. 8.Google Scholar

61 Ker, Political trouble, p. 109.

62 APAC, IOR: L\P&J\12\1, file 126\13 Government of India, Political Dept., Circular No. 12 of 1912 ‘Indian agitation in America’. See also Plowman, Matthew Erin, ‘Irish republicans and the Indo-German conspiracy of World War I’, New Hibernia Review,7, 3, 2003, pp. 80–102, p. 85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

63 Most thoroughly in Ramnath, ‘Two revolutions’, Puri, Ghadar movement, and Brown, Har Dayal.

64 Cf. also Aydin, Cemil, ‘A global anti–Western moment? The Russo-Japanese War, decolonization and Asian modernity’, in Conrad, Sebastian and Sachsenmaier, Dominic, eds, Competing visions of world order. Global movements and moments, 1880s to the 1930s, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007, pp. 213–36, especially pp. 224–9.Google Scholar

65 Prasad, Indian nationalism and Asia, p. 47.

66 Friedman, Irving S., ‘Indian nationalism and the Far East’, Pacific Affairs, 13, 1, 1940, pp, 17–29, p. 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

67 Quoted in Sareen, Indian revolutionaries, Japan, p. 9.

68 Lawton, Empires of the Far East, pp. 805–9.

69 Bose, however, mentions the year 1905 in this context. Cf. Bose, Indian revolutionaries abroad, p. 67.

70 Cashman, Richard, ‘The political recruitment of God Ganapati’, Indian Economic and Social History Review,7, 3, 1970 pp. 347–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

71 Prasad, Indian nationalism and Asia, p. 45.

72 For the geo-strategic and economic background of the British relations with Japan in this phase see also Dignan, Indian revolutionary problem, pp. 6–21.

73 Karl, Rebecca E., Staging the world. Chinese nationalism at the turn of the 20th century, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2002, p. 169.Google Scholar

74 Bose, Indian revolutionaries abroad, p. 67.

75 Yajnik, Shyamaji Krishnavarma, p. 235.

76 IS, 3, 12, 1907, p. 47.

77 Cited in Krüger, Anfänge sozialistischen Denkens, p. 75.

78 Ibid., p. 76.

79 Sareen, Indian revolutionaries, Japan, p. 13, and Bose, ed., Indian revolutionaries: documents, pp. 112–13.

80 Bose, Indian revolutionaries abroad, p. 68.

81 Krüger, Anfänge sozialistischen Denkens, p. 78. Cf. also Ker, Political trouble, pp. 121–2.

82 For a brief but useful analysis of Barakatullah in the context of the Pan-Islamic movement in South Asia, see also Ansari, K. H., ‘Pan Islam and the making of the early Indian Muslim socialists’, Modern Asian Studies, 20, 3, 1986, pp. 509–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar, especially pp. 515–17.

83 Sareen, Indian revolutionaries, Japan, p. 14.

84 Bose, Indian revolutionaries abroad, p. 69.

85 Barnett, Yukiko Sumi, ‘India in Asia: Ōkawa Shūmei’s pan-Asian thought and his idea of India in early-twentieth-century-Japan’, Journal of the Oxford University History Society, 1, 2004, p. 6, http://users.ox.ac.uk/∼jouhs/hilary2004/sumi01.pdf,consulted18February2007.Google Scholar

86 Sareen, Indian revolutionaries, Japan, p. 14. He went to California, from where he moved on to Berlin and Kabul to become ‘prime minister’ in the provisional Indian Government. Indian revolutionaries had obtained with German aid in Afghanistan. For details see Hughes, Thomas L., ‘The German mission to Afghanistan’, German Studies Review, 23, 2, 2002, pp. 447–76.Google Scholar

87 This ‘Asianist’ vision of a new world order for the twentieth century is most explicit in Hyndman, Henry M., The awakening of Asia, London: Cassell & Co., 1919.Google Scholar

88 See, for instance, Hyndman, Henry M., The bankruptcy of India, London, 1886.Google Scholar

89 Hyndman, Henry M., The unrest in India. Verbatim report of a speech delivered at Chandos Hall, Maiden Lane, London on May 12th 1907, London: Twentieth Century Press, 1907, pp. 15–16.Google Scholar

90 IS, 1, 5, 1905, p. 17.

91 Hyndman, Henry M., The ruin of India by British rule, being the report of the Social Democratic Federation to the Internationalist Congress at Stuttgart, London: Twentieth Century Press, 1907, pp. 3–4.Google Scholar

92 For a general survey, see Fraser, T. G., ‘Ireland and India’, in Jeffery, Keith, ed., ‘An Irish empire’? Aspects of Ireland and the British Empire, Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1996, pp. 77–93.Google Scholar

93 Cook, Scott B., ‘The Irish Raj: social origin and careers of Irishmen in the Indian Civil Service (1855–1914), Journal of Social History, 20, 3, 1987, pp. 506–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

94 Cumpston, Mary, ‘Some early Indian nationalists and their allies in the British Parliament’, English Historical Review, 76, 1961, pp. 279–97.Google Scholar Cf. also Philip, Kavita, ‘Race, class and the imperial politics of ethnography in India, Ireland and London, 1850–1910’, Irish Studies Review, 10, 3, 2002, pp. 289–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Fascinating insights into the similarities between Irish and Indian nationalism have most recently been provided in Williams, Louise B., ‘Overcoming the contagion of mimicry: the cosmopolitan nationalism and modernist history of Rabindranath Tagore and W. B. Yeats’, American Historical Review, 112, 1, 2007, pp. 69–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

95 IS, 8, 11, November 1912, p. 41.

96 On O’Donnell and the origins of Indo-Irish co-operation in the 1870s, see also Cumpston, ‘Some early Indian nationalists’, pp. 281–6.

97 Verma, Shyamji Krishna Varma, p. 59.

98 Reprinted in IS, 7, 1, 1911, p. 4.

99 For an account of the early phase on Irish-American terrorism, see Short, K. R. M., The dynamite war: Irish-American bombers in Victorian Britain, Dublin: Gill and Macmillan 1978.Google Scholar

100 Plowman, ‘Irish republicans’, pp. 85–6. Cf. also Ward, Alan J., ‘America and the Irish problem, 1899–1921’, Irish Historical Studies, 16, 61, 1968, pp. 64–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

101 Yajnik, Shyamaji Krishnavarma, p. 170.

102 APAC, IOR: L\P&J\12\1, file 126\13 Government of India, Political Dept., Circular No. 12 of 1912, ‘Indian agitation in America’.

103 Ibid., pp. 22–3.

104 There is, by now, a substantial body of work on pan-Asianism in Japan. See, for instance, Saaler, Sven, and Koschmann, Victor, Pan-Asianism in modern Japanese history. Colonialism, regionalism and borders, New York: Routledge, 2007Google Scholar, and Sumi Barnett, ‘India in Asia’.

105 Kakuzo Okakura, The ideals of the East. With special reference to the art of Japan, London: John Murray, 1904.

106 Ibid., p. 3.

107 On the relationship between Tagore and Okakura, cf. also Bharucha, Rustom, Another Asia. Rabindranath Tagore and Okakura Tenshin, New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2006CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and Richter, Steffi and Waligora, Melitta, ‘Die Erfindung Asiens: Tagore und Okakura auf der Suche nach Identität’, Asien, Afrika, Lateinamerika, 24, 1, 1996, pp. 17–31.Google Scholar

108 Okakura, The ideals of the East, pp. 239–40.

109 Jaffrelot, Christophe, ‘India’s look east policy: an Asianist strategy in perspective’, India Review, 2, 2, 2003 pp. 35–68, p. 40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

110 See also Ker, Political trouble, p. 200.

111 Cf., for example, Duus, Peter, ‘Nagai Ryutaro and the “white peril”, 1905–1944’, Journal of Asian Studies, 31, 1, 1971, pp. 41–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

112 For a somewhat later formulation, see also Sarkar, , The futurism of young Asia, and Nripendra Chandra Banerji, Asianism and other essays, Calcutta: Arya Publishing House, 1930.Google Scholar For a useful discussion, cf. also Keenleyside, T. A., ‘Nationalist Indian attitudes towards Asia: a troublesome legacy for post-independence Indian foreign policy’, Pacific Affairs, 55, 2, 1982, pp. 210–30, especially, pp. 211–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar and Jaffrelot, ‘India’s look east policy’, pp. 38–42.

113 Ganachari, ‘Two Indian revolutionary associations’, p. 143.

114 Cf. also Bose, Indian revolutionaries abroad, p. 70.

115 Sarkar, Benoy Kumar, Dominion India in world perspectives, economic and political, Calcutta: Chuckervertty Chatterjee & Co, 1949, p. 126.Google Scholar

116 IS, 5, 4, 1909, p. 16.

117 IS, 2, 3, 1906, p. 13.

118 Hughes, ‘German mission to Afghanistan’, and Fraser, Thomas G., ‘Germany and Indian revolution, 1914–18’, Journal of Contemporary History, 12, 2, 1977, pp. 255–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

119 Perhaps most impressive is the invocation of Western barbarism during the war in Tagore, Rabindranath, Nationalism, London: Macmillan, 1917.Google Scholar