Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T15:41:54.646Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Historical globalization and colonial legal culture: African assessors, customary law, and criminal justice in British Africa*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2009

Bonny Ibhawoh
Bonny Ibhawoh
Affiliation:
Department of History, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4L9, Canada E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The idea of globalization has helped to rehabilitate universalizing categories, such as colonialism and cosmopolitanism, criticized for their tendency to ignore the differences between local cultures and the operation of power. Drawing on the burgeoning discussion on historical globalization, and focussing on the role of African assessors, this article examines how colonial courts grappled with the tension between the aspiration toward imperial legal universalism and the ‘Othering’ of African subjects. It argues that British colonialism in Africa represented a form of globalization of English law, generating a ‘centripetal jurisprudence’ that sought to square the inequities of an engagement with local custom by holding up the values of justice, equity, and conscience. Imperial legal universalism required both the accommodation and containment of African difference. The paradox of integration and differentiation in colonial constructions of globality is that imperial power and local cultures were not always in conflict, but were sometimes complementary and mutually reinforcing.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Global History , Volume 4 , Issue 3 , November 2009 , pp. 429 - 451
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Chanock, Martin, Law, custom, and social order: the colonial experience in Malawi and Zambia, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1985, p. 4Google Scholar; Sally Merry, ‘Law and colonialism’, Law and Society Review, 25, 4, 1991, p. 890.

2 Benton, Lauren, Law and colonial cultures: legal regimes in world history, 1400–1900, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002, p. 12Google Scholar.

3 Ibid., p. 3.

4 Ibid., p. 29.

5 Roberts, Richard, Litigants and households: African disputes and colonial courts in the French Soudan, 1895–1912, Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann, 2005, p. 14Google Scholar.

6 Chanock, Martin, The making of South African legal culture, 1901–1936: fear, favour and prejudice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001, p. 31CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 A. G. Hopkins, ed., Global history: interactions between the universal and the local, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006, p. 5; Jeremy Prestholdt, ‘On the global repercussions of East African consumerism’, American Historical Review, 109, 3, 2006, pp. 755–81.

8 Dirlik, Arif, Global modernity: modernity in an age of global capitalism, Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers, 2007, p. 41Google Scholar.

9 Vaughan, Megan, Curing their ills: colonial power and African illness, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1991, p. 12Google Scholar; Anna Crozier, ‘Sensationalising Africa: British medical impressions of Sub-Saharan Africa, 1890–1939’, Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, 35, 3, 2007, p. 295.

10 Cooper, Frederick, Colonialism in question: theory, knowledge, history, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2005, p. 23Google Scholar.

11 Peter Fitzpatrick, ‘Terminal legality: imperialism and the (de)composition of law’, in Diane Kirkby and Catharine Coleborne, eds., Law, history, colonialism: the reach of empire, Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2001, p. 21.

12 Sally Falk Moore, ‘Treating law as knowledge: telling colonial officers what to say to Africans about running “their own” native courts’, Law and Society Review, 26, 1992, p. 18.

13 Kenya National Archives (henceforth KNA), AP/1/1659, ‘Proceedings of the conference of East African governors, Nairobi, 1932’.

14 Swaziland High Court Proclamation, 1938 [revised 1957], section 8.

15 Razi, Zvi, Life, marriage and death in a medieval parish, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980, p. 145Google Scholar.

16 Anthony Dickey, ‘The province and function of assessors in English courts’, Modern Law Review, 33, 5, 1970, p. 494.

17 Bernard Cohn, ‘Law and the colonial state in India’, in Bernard Cohn, ed., Colonialism and its forms of knowledge, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996, pp. 57–75; Elizabeth Kolsky, ‘Codification and the rule of colonial difference: criminal procedure in British India’, Law and History Review, 23, 3, 2005, pp. 631–84; Singha, Radhika, A despotism of law: crime and justice in early colonial India, Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

18 N. B. E. Baillie, ‘The Mohammedan law of evidence in connection with the administration of justice to foreigners’, Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland, 1834, pp. 496–8; G. Campbell, Modern India and its government, London: John Murray, 1852, pp. 472–3.

19 Henry Adolphus Byden Rattigan and Turner, Alweyne, The Bengal regulations: the acts of the Governor-General in Council, and the frontier regulations applicable to the Punjab, London: Civil and Military Gazette Press, 1897, sections 4(1) and 4(2)Google Scholar.

20 J. H. Jearey, ‘Trial by jury and trial with the aid of assessors in the superior courts of British African territories’, Journal of African Law, 5, 2, 1961, p. 95.

21 P. Duff, ‘The evolution of trial by judge and assessors in Fiji’, Journal of Pacific Studies, 21, 1997, pp. 190–1; Charles Pridham, An historical, political and statistical account of Ceylon and its dependencies, London: T. & W. Boone, 1849, p. 446; Danny Keenan, ‘Aversion to print? Maori resistance to the written word’, in Penelope Griffith, ed., A book in the hand: essays on the history of the book in New Zealand, Auckland: Auckland University Press, 2000, pp. 24–7.

22 A. E. Afigbo, The warrant chiefs: indirect rule in southeastern Nigeria, 1891–1929, New York: Humanities Press, 1972, pp. 38–9.

23 Dembour, Marie-Bénédict, Recalling the Belgian Congo: conversations and introspection, New York: Berghahn Books, 2000, p. 28Google Scholar.

24 Ruth Ginio, ‘Negotiating legal authority in French West Africa: the colonial administration and African assessors, 1903–1918’, in Benjamin N. Lawrance, Emily Lynn Osborn, and Richard L. Roberts, eds., Intermediaries, interpreters, and clerks: African employees in the making of colonial Africa, Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 2006, p. 132.

25 F. G. Gardiner and A. V. Lansdown, South African criminal law and procedure, Cape Town: Juta, 1957, vol. 1, pp. 344–9; Chanock, South African legal culture, p. 254; Leakey, Louis, Defeating Mau Mau, London: Methuen, 1955, p. 10Google Scholar; David G. Anderson, Histories of the hanged: the dirty war in Kenya and the end of empire, New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2005, p. 158.

26 Indian Evidence Act 1872, section 48, quoted in M. P. Jain, ‘Custom as source of law in India’, in Alan Dundes and Alison Dundes Renteln, eds., Folk law: essays in the theory and practice of lex non scripta, Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1995, p. 80.

27 Swaziland High Court Proclamation, section 8.

28 Ibid., sections 7 and 8.

29 Ibid., section 8.

30 Criminal procedure act of Northern Rhodesia [Revised Laws, 1939], 28, section 222.

31 Details are in the East Africa Protectorate Law Reports, Tanganyika Territory Law Reports, and the Colony and Protectorate of Kenya Law Reports.

32 KNA, AP/89, ‘Assessors 1901’; KNA, AP/1/591, ‘Jurors and assessors 1910’; KNA, AP/1/823, ‘Jurors and assessors 1913’; KNA, AP/1/1280, ‘Jurors and assessors 1922’.

33 KNA, SEC/2/1/22, ‘Magisterial powers of administrative officers’.

34 Judgment in the case of Mahlikilili Dhalamini and ors v. R, [1942] Appeal Cases 583, pp. 589ff. (henceforth, Dhalamini v. R). For this case, see Jaconelli, Joseph, Open justice: a critique of the public, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 104–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

35 L. A. A. Kyando and C. M. Peter, ‘Lay people in the administration of criminal justice: the law and practice in Tanzania’, African Journal of International and Comparative Law, 5, 1993, p. 669.

36 KNA, AP/1/1659, ‘Commission of enquiry into the administration of justice in Kenya, Uganda and Tanganyika 1933’.

37 KNA, DC/KSM/1/15/34, ‘Acting Judge of Nyeri to Chief Registrar’, 15 June 1954.

38 KNA, DC/KSM/1/15/34, ‘Criminal session cases: list of African assessors roll and letters to the Chief Justice’.

39 Ginio, ‘Negotiating legal authority’, p. 120.

40 Angwu v. Atta, (1916) Gold Coast Privy Council judgments, 1874–1928, p. 43.

41 KNA, DC/KSM/1/15/34, ‘Acting Judge of Nyeri to Chief Registrar, Supreme Court of Nairobi’, 15 June 1954.

42 KNA, SEC/2/1, ‘Colony and protectorate of Kenya: annual confidential reports 1916’; KNA, SEC/2/4, ‘Supreme Court sessions 1925’.

43 A. N. Allott, ‘The judicial ascertainment of customary law in British Africa’, Modern Law Review, 20, 1957, p. 262.

44 Merry, ‘Law and colonialism’, p. 897.

45 Martin Chanock, ‘Laws and contexts’, Law in Context, 7, 2, 1989, p. 72.

46 Terence Ranger, ‘The invention of tradition in colonial Africa’, in Eric Hobsbawm and Terence Ranger, eds., The invention of tradition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983, p. 211.

47 Moore, Sally Falk, Social facts and fabrications: ‘customary’ law on Kilimanjaro, 1880–1980, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986Google Scholar; Thomas Spear, ‘Neo-traditionalism and the limits of invention in British colonial Africa’, Journal of African History, 44, 1, 2003, pp. 3–27.

48 KNA, SEC/2/6/54, ‘Criminal records 1928’; KNA, SEC/2/1/22, ‘Magisterial powers of administrative officers’.

49 Dhalamini v. R, p. 589.

50 John Gray, ‘Opinion of assessors in criminal trials in East Africa as to native custom’, Journal of African Law, 2, 1, 1958, p. 8.

51 Jearey, ‘Trial by jury’, p. 85.

52 Habiab Kara Vesta and ors v. R, (1934) EACA 1, p. 91.

53 Colin Murray and Sanders, Peter, Medicine murder in colonial Lesotho: the anatomy of a moral crisis, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

54 Jaconelli, Joseph, Open justice: a critique of the public trial, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002, p. 104CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

55 Quoted in Hollander, Barnett, Colonial justice: the unique achievement of the Privy Council's Committee of Judges, London: Bowes and Bowes, 1961, p. 87Google Scholar.

56 Ibid., p. 87.

57 Dhalamini v. R, p. 589. See also R. Vogler, ‘The international development of the jury: the role of the British empire’, Revue Internationale de Droit Pénal, 72, 2001, pp. 525–52.

58 Dhalamini v. R, p. 589.

59 See, for example, Banyamini Pande v. R, (1951) EACA 18, p. 263.

60 Morris v. The Queen, [1979] Supreme Court of Canada, Supreme Court reports, 2, p. 1041.

61 Cheryl Johnson, ‘Class and gender: a consideration of Yoruba women during the colonial period’, in Claire Robertson and Iris Berger, eds., Women and class in Africa, New York: Africana Publishing Company, 1986, pp. 237–54; Jane L. Parpart ‘“Where is your mother?”: gender, urban marriage, and colonial discourse on the Zambian Copperbelt, 1924–1945’, International Journal of African Historical Studies, 27, 2, 1994, pp. 241–71.

62 Rex v. Ndembera, [1947] EACA, pp. 83–5.

63 Ibid., p. 85. See also Gray, ‘Opinion of assessors’, p. 10.

64 Rex v. Ndembera, p. 85.

65 Ibid., p. 86.

66 Judith Byfield, ‘Women, marriage, divorce and the emerging colonial state in Abeokuta (Nigeria)’, Canadian Journal of African Studies, 30, 1, 1996, p. 32; Tapiwa B. Zimudzi, ‘African women, violent crime and the criminal law in colonial Zimbabwe, 1900–1952’, Journal of Southern African Studies, 30, 3, 2004, pp. 499–517; Brett L. Shadle, ‘“Changing traditions to meet current altering conditions”: customary law, African courts and the rejection of codification in Kenya, 1930–60’, Journal of African History, 40, 3, 1999, pp. 411–43.

67 Rex v. Ndembera, pp. 85–6.

68 Ibid., p. 87.

69 For example, Gluckman, Max, The judicial process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1955.Google Scholar

70 Daniels, W. C. E., The common law in West Africa, London: Butterworth, 1964Google Scholar; Allott, A. N, Essays in African law, London: Butterworth, 1960Google Scholar; Robert L. Kidder, ‘Western law in India: external law and local responses’, in Harry M. Johnson, ed., Social system and legal process, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1978, pp. 159–62.

71 J. N. Matson, ‘The Supreme Court and the customary judicial process in the Gold Coast’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 2, 1, 1953, p. 48.

72 Moore, ‘Treating law as knowledge’, p. 32.

73 Adewoye, O., The judicial system in southern Nigeria, 1854–1954: law and justice in a dependency, London: Longman, 1974, p. 4Google Scholar; Allott, A. N, New essays in African law, London: Butterworths, 1970, pp. 48–65Google Scholar.

74 Tanganyika Local Government Memoranda No. 2 (Local Courts), Dar es Salaam: Government Printer, p. 2; quoted in Moore ‘Treating law as knowledge’, p. 18.

75 Gray, ‘Opinion of assessors’, p. 8.

76 Dupont, Jerry, The common law abroad: constitutional and legal legacy of the British empire, London: F. B. Rothman Publications, 2001, p. xviiGoogle Scholar.

77 Quoted in The Lagos Weekly Record, 21 April 1906.

78 Dhalamini v. R, p. 592.

79 Michael P. Cowen and Robert W. Shenton, ‘British neo-Hegelian idealism and official colonial practice in Africa: the Oluwa land case of 1921’, Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, 22, 2, 1994, p. 217. See also Michael Cowen and Robert Shenton, ‘The origin and course of Fabian colonialism in Africa’, Journal of Sociology, 4, 2, 1991, pp. 143–74.

80 R. B. Haldane, ‘Judicial Committee of the Privy Council’, in R. B. Haldane, Selected addresses and essays, Freeport, NY: Books for Libraries Press, 1970 [1928], pp. 222–5.

81 Ibid., p. 225.

82 Ibid., p. 224.

83 Hunt, Nancy Rose, Gendered colonialisms in African history, Oxford: Blackwell, 1997, p. 4Google Scholar.

84 Frederick Cooper and Ann Stoler, eds., Tensions of empire: colonial cultures in a bourgeois world, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1997.

85 Bonny Ibhawoh, ‘Stronger than the maxim gun: law, human rights and British colonial hegemony in Nigeria’, Africa: Journal of the International African Institute, 72, 1, 2002, pp. 55–6.

86 Maurice Nyamanga Amutabi, ‘Power and influence of African court clerks and translators in colonial Kenya’, in Lawrance, Osborn, and Roberts, Intermediaries, p. 203.

87 Kidder, ‘Western law’; Martin Lynn, ‘Law and imperial expansion: the Niger Delta courts of equity, c. 1850–85’, Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, 23, 1, 1995, pp. 28–39; Dupont, Common law abroad; Singha, Despotism.

88 Kristin Mann and Richard Roberts, eds., Law in colonial Africa, Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann, 1991; Chanock, Law; Moore, Social facts; Hay, Margaret Jean and Wright, Marcia, African women and the law: historical perspectives, Boston, MA: Boston University, 1982Google Scholar; Lawrance, Osborn, and Roberts, Intermediaries.

89 Benjamin N. Lawrance, Emily Lynn Osborn, and Richard L. Roberts, ‘African intermediaries and the “bargain” of collaboration’, in Lawrance, Osborn, and Roberts, Intermediaries, p. 4.

90 D. A. Westbrook, ‘Colonial discourse theory’, in Robin W. Winks, ed., The Oxford history of the British empire: volume V: historiography, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999, p. 609.

91 Brett L. Shadle, ‘African court elders in Nyanza Province, Kenya, ca. 1930–1960: from “traditional” to modern’, in Lawrance, Osborn, and Roberts, Intermediaries, p. 181.

92 For English courts, see Dickey, ‘Province and function’, pp. 494–507.

93 Allott, ‘Judicial ascertainment’, p. 250.

94 Benton, Law and colonial cultures, p. 152.

95 Rex v. Ndembera, p. 85.

96 Hyam, Ronald, Britain's declining empire: the road to decolonisation, 1918–1968, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006, p. 191Google Scholar.

97 Hopkins, Global history, p. 5.

98 Alex Mills and Tim Stephens, ‘Challenging the role of judges in Slaughter's liberal theory of international law’, Leiden Journal of International Law, 18, 2005, p. 4.

99 Laurence R. Helfer and Anne-Marie Slaughter, ‘Toward a theory of effective supranational adjudication’, Yale Law Journal, 107, 2, 1997, pp. 276–80; S. Choudhry, ‘Globalization in search of justification: towards a theory of comparative constitutional interpretation’, Indiana Law Journal, 74, 81, 1999, pp. 838–9; Kanishka Jayasuriya, ‘The rule of law in the era of globalization: globalization, law and the transformation of sovereignty; the emergence of global regulatory governance’, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 6, 425, 1999, pp. 421–683.

100 See Michael P. Scharf, ‘The politics behind U.S. opposition to the International Criminal Court’, Brown Journal of World Affairs, 6, 1, 1999, pp. 97–104.