Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T19:40:11.817Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The global/local tension in the history of anthropology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2019

Gustavo Lins Ribeiro
Gustavo Lins Ribeiro*
Affiliation:
Department of Cultural Studies, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Lerma, Mexico
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the early days of anthropology as a discipline in the nineteenth century, evolutionism and diffusionism supplied anthropologists with ‘global’ visions. Anthropologists have always been involved with all-encompassing cosmopolitan notions such as humankind and culture. Many have thus endeavoured to explain the world as a whole, and how humans have developed in different historical moments. In the 1980s and 1990s, when the new label ‘globalization’ generated a field of scholarly preoccupations, anthropologists started to contribute to this growing body of literature. Their most valuable contributions are related to the tensions between local and global forces, and between forces of heterogeneity and homogeneity, as well as to the use of ethnography as a methodological tool. Anthropologists have borrowed notions from other related disciplines such as sociology, history, and geography. This paper situates the anthropological production on ‘the global’ within this diverse history of borrowings, internal disciplinary debates, and wider historical junctures.

Keywords

diffusionismethnographyevolutionismlocal/globalMarxism
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Global History , Volume 14 , Special Issue 3: Historicizing the global: an interdisciplinary perspective , November 2019 , pp. 375 - 394
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Gunder Frank, Andre, ReOrient: global economy in the Asian age, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1998 Google Scholar; Wallerstein, Immanuel, The modern world-system: capitalist agriculture and the origins of the European world economy in the sixteenth century, New York: Academic Press, 1974 Google Scholar.

2 Harvey, David, The condition of postmodernity, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1989 Google Scholar.

3 Hannerz, Ulf, ‘Cosmopolitans and locals in world culture’, in Hannerz, Ulf, Transnational connections: cultures, peoples, places, London: Routledge, 1996, pp. 102–11.Google Scholar

4 Lins Ribeiro, Gustavo, ‘World anthropologies: anthropological cosmopolitanisms and cosmopolitics’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 43, 2014, p. 483 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Lins Ribeiro, Gustavo, ‘World anthropologies: cosmopolitics for a new global scenario in anthropology’, Critique of Anthropology, 26, 4, 2006, p. 365.Google Scholar

6 Palerm, Ángel, Historia de la etnología 2, México: Universidad Iberoamericana/Instituto Tecnológico de Estudios Superiores de Occidente, 2005 (first published 1976).Google Scholar

7 Wolf, Eric R., ‘Anthropology among the powers’, in Wolf, Eric R. with Silverman, Sydel, eds., Pathways of power: building an anthropology of the modern world, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2001 (first published 1956), p. 67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8 Asad, Talal, ed., Anthropology and the colonial encounter, London: Ithaca Press, 1973 Google Scholar; Stocking, George, ed., Colonial situations: essays on the contextualization of ethnographic knowledge, Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1991 Google Scholar; de L’Estoile, Benoît, ‘Rationalizing colonial domination? Anthropology and native policy in French-ruled Africa’, in de L’Estoile, Benoît, Sigaud, Lygia, and Neiburg, Federico, eds., Empire, nations, and natives: anthropology and state-making, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2005, p. 30–57 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 Price, David H., Weaponizing anthropology: social science in service of the militarized state, Petrolia, CA: CounterPunch / Oakland, CA: AK Press, 2011 Google Scholar; González, Roberto, ‘We must fight the militarization of anthropology’, Chronicle of Higher Education, 2 February 2007.Google Scholar

10 Frazer, James, The scope of social anthropology: lecture delivered before the University of Liverpool, May 14th, 1908, London: Macmillan and Co., 1908 Google Scholar.

11 Tylor, Edward B., Primitive culture: researches into the development of mythology, philosophy, religion, language, art, and custom, 6th edition, London: John Murray, 1920 (first published 1871), p. 7 Google Scholar.

12 Carneiro, Robert L., ‘Evolutionism’, in Callan, Hilary, ed., The international encyclopedia of anthropology, 12 vols., Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell, 2018, vol. 4, pp. 2146–58.Google Scholar

13 Ibid ., p. 2149.

14 Harris, Marvin, El desarrollo de la teoría antropológica: historia de las teorías de cultura, 12th edition, México: Siglo Veintiuno Editores, 1996, pp. 22–5Google Scholar.

15 Durkheim, Émile and Mauss, Marcel, ‘De quelques formes primitives de classification: contributions à l’étude des representations collectives’, Année Sociologique, 6, 1903, pp. 1–72 Google Scholar; Durkheim, Émile, Les formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse, 5th edition, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2003 (first published 1912)Google Scholar.

16 Carneiro, ‘Evolutionism’, p. 2152.

17 Ibid ., pp. 2153–4.

18 Ibid ., pp. 2146–58.

19 Rohatynskyj, Marta, ‘Diffusionism’, in Callan, International encyclopedia of anthropology, vol. 3, pp. 1580–7.Google Scholar

20 Castro, Celso, ‘Apresentação (Presentation)’, in Castro, Celso, ed., Franz Boas: antropologia cultural (Franz Boas: cultural anthropology), 2nd edition, Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar Editor, 2005, p. 17Google Scholar.

21 Boas, Franz, ‘The limitations of the comparative method of anthropology’, Science, 4, 1896, pp. 901–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

22 Castro, ‘Apresentação’, p. 16.

23 Malinowski, Bronislaw, Argonauts of the western Pacific, London: G. Routledge & Sons, 1922 Google Scholar.

24 Mauss, Marcel, ‘Essai sur le don: forme et raison de l’échange dans les sociétés archaïques’, in Mauss, Marcel, Sociologie et anthropologie, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1973, pp. 145–279 (first published 1925 in Année Sociologique)Google Scholar.

25 Robertson, Roland, Globalization: social theory and global culture, London: Sage, 1992 Google Scholar.

26 Nugent, David, ‘Social science knowledge and military intelligence: global conflict, territorial control and the birth of area studies during WWII’, in Anuário antropológico (Anthropological yearbook) 2006, Rio de Janeiro: Tempo Brasileiro, 2008, pp. 33–68.Google Scholar

27 Ibid ., p. 62.

28 See Katja Naumann, ‘Long-term and decentred trajectories of doing history from a global perspective: institutionalization, post-colonial critique, and empiricist approaches, before and after the 1970s’.

29 Stocking, George W., ‘“Do good young man”: Sol Tax and the world mission of liberal democratic anthropology’, in Handler, Richard, ed., Excluded ancestors, inventible traditions: essays toward a more inclusive history of anthropology, Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 2000, pp. 171–264 Google Scholar; Silverman, Sydel, ‘The first 50 years: a social experiment: Sol Tax, Paul Fejos, and the origins of Current Anthropology’, Current Anthropology , 50, 6, 2009, p. 949Google Scholar.

30 Steward, Julian H., ‘Levels of sociocultural integration: an operational concept’, in Theory of culture change: the methodology of multilinear evolution, Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1972 (first published 1955), pp. 46–8, 51.Google Scholar

31 Eric R. Wolf, ‘Aspects of group relations in a complex society: Mexico’, in Wolf with Silverman, Pathways of power, pp. 124, 136, 138.

32 See Romain Lecler, ‘What makes globalization really new? Sociological views on our current globalization’.

33 Price, David H., Threatening anthropology: McCarthyism and the FBI’s surveillance of activist anthropologists, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2004, p. 345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

34 Friedman, Jonathan, ‘Global systems, globalization, and anthropological theory’, in Rossi, Ino, ed., Frontiers of globalization research: theoretical and methodological approaches, New York: Springer, 2007, pp. 109–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

35 Wallerstein, Modern world-system.

36 Lenin, Vladimir, Imperialism, the highest stage of capitalism: a popular outline, New York: International Publishers, 1984 (first published in Russian in 1939)Google Scholar; Luxemburg, Rosa, The accumulation of capital: a contribution to an economic explanation of imperialism, New York: Monthly Review Press, 1951 (first published in German in 1913).Google Scholar

37 Bueno Castellanos, Carmen, ‘World-systems theory’, in Callan, International encyclopedia of anthropology, vol. 12, pp. 6525–6Google Scholar.

38 Palerm, Ángel, ‘La formación colonial mexicana y el primer sistema económico mundial’, in Antropología y Marxismo, México: Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios Superiores en Antropología Social, 2000 (first published 1980), p. 163Google Scholar.

39 Mintz, Sidney, Sweetness and power: the place of sugar in modern history, New York: Viking, 1985 Google Scholar.

40 Warman, Arturo, La historia de un bastardo: maíz y capitalismo, México: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1988, p. 253.Google Scholar

41 Kearney, Michael, ‘The local and the global: the anthropology of globalisation and transnationalism’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 1995, p. 551Google Scholar; Friedman, ‘Global systems’, p. 110; Hylland Eriksen, Thomas, Globalization: the key concepts, 2nd edition, London: Bloomsbury, 2014, pp. 3, 78Google Scholar.

42 Hart, Keith, ‘Anthropology’, in Fine, Ben, Saad Filho, Alfredo, and Boffo, Marco, eds., The Elgar companion to Marxist economics, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2012, p. 24Google Scholar.

43 Wolf, Eric R., Europe and the people without history, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1982, p. 100Google Scholar.

44 Ibid ., p. 383.

45 Harvey, Condition of postmodernity.

46 Sassen, Saskia, The global city: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1991 Google Scholar.

47 Kearney, ‘The local and the global’, pp. 556–7.

48 Appadurai, Arjun, ‘Disjuncture and difference in the global cultural economy’, Public Culture, 2, 2, 1990, pp. 1–24 Google Scholar.

49 McC, Josiah. Heyman and Howard Campbell, ‘The anthropology of global flows: a critical reading of Appadurai’s “Disjuncture and difference in the global cultural economy”’, Anthropological Theory, 9, 2, 2009, pp. 131–48.Google Scholar

50 Marcus, George, ‘Identidades passadas, presentes e emergentes: requisitos para etnografias sobre a modernidade no final do século XX ao nível mundial’, Revista de Antropologia, 34, 1991, pp. 197–221 Google Scholar; Marcus, George, ‘Ethnography in/of the world system: the emergence of multi-sited ethnography’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 1995, pp. 95–117 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

51 Forte, Maximilian C., ‘Ethnography, multisited’, in Callan, International encyclopedia of anthropology, vol. 4, pp. 2045–6Google Scholar.

52 Marcus, ‘Ethnography in/of the world system’, p. 105.

53 Lapegna, Pablo, ‘Ethnographers of the world … united? Current debates on the ethnographic study of “globalization”’, Journal of World-Systems Research, 15, 1, 2009, p. 9, emphasis in originalCrossRefGoogle Scholar.

54 Hannerz, Ulf, ‘Fluxos, fronteiras, híbridos: palavras-chave da antropologia transnacional’, Mana, 3, 1, 1997, pp. 7–39 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

55 Lapegna, ‘Ethnographers of the world’, p. 5.

56 Lins Ribeiro, Gustavo, ‘Economic globalization from below’, Etnográfica, 10, , 2006, pp. 233–49.Google Scholar

57 Lins Ribeiro, Gustavo, ‘Conclusion: globalization from below and the non-hegemonic world-system’, in Mathews, Gordon, Lins Ribeiro, Gustavo, and Alba Vega, Carlos, eds., Globalization from below: the world’s other economy, Abingdon: Routledge, 2012, pp. 221–35Google Scholar. For other views on economic globalization from below, see Lecler, ‘What makes globalization really new?’.

58 García Canclini, Néstor, A globalização imaginada (The imagined globalization), São Paulo: Editora Iluminuras, 2003, p. 42Google Scholar.

59 Basch, Linda, Glick Schiller, Nina, and Szanton Blanc, Cristina, Nations unbound: transnational projects, postcolonial predicaments and deterritorialized nation-states, Langhorne, PA: Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, 1994, p. 7Google Scholar.

60 Kearney, Michael, Reconceptualizing the peasantry: anthropology in global perspective, Boulder, CO: Westview, 1996 Google Scholar.

61 Besserer, Federico and Nieto, Raúl, ‘La ciudad transnacional comparada: derroteros conceptuales’, in Besserer, Federico and Nieto, Raúl, eds., La ciudad transnacional comparada: modos de vida, gubernamentalidad y desposesión, México: Juan Pablos Editor, 2015, p. 24Google Scholar.

62 Hannerz, Transnational connections, p. 107.

63 Lins Ribeiro, Gustavo, ‘Planeta banco: diversidad étnica, cosmopolitismo y transnacionalismo en el Banco Mundial’, in Lins Ribeiro, Gustavo, Postimperialismo: cultura y política en el mundo contemporáneo, Barcelona: Gedisa, 2003, pp. 125–41Google Scholar.

64 Lins Ribeiro, Gustavo, Transnational capitalism and hydropolitics in Argentina, Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida, 1994 Google Scholar.

65 Escobar, Arturo, Encountering development: the making and unmaking of the Third World, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995 Google Scholar; Ferguson, James, The anti-politics machine: ‘development’, depoliticization and bureaucratic power in Lesotho, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1994 Google Scholar.

66 Cernea, Michael M., ed., Putting people first: sociological variables in rural development, New York: Oxford University Press, 1991 Google Scholar.

67 Trouillot, Michel-Rolph, ‘Anthropology and the savage slot: the poetics and politics of otherness’, in Global transformations: anthropology and the modern world, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003, pp. 7–28 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

68 Ho, Karen, Liquidated: an ethnography of Wall Street, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

69 Ibid ., p. 4.

70 Ibid ., p. 327.

71 Hannerz, Ulf, Foreign news: exploring the world of foreign correspondents, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2004, p. 2Google Scholar.

72 Abélès, Marc, Anthropologie de la globalisation, Paris: Payot, 2008 Google Scholar.

73 ‘Anthropology of the World Trade Organization’, 2008, http://www.iiac.cnrs.fr/article1249.html (consulted 30 October 2018).

74 Bellier, Irène, ‘La reconnaissance internationale des peuples autochtones’, in Bellier, Irène, ed., Peuples autochtones dans le monde: les enjeux de la reconnaissance, Paris: L’Harmattan, 2013, pp. 13–37 Google Scholar.

75 Irène Bellier, ‘Identité globalisée, territoires contestés: les enjeux des peuples autochtones dans la constellation onusienne’, 2006, https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00258382/fr/ (consulted 30 October 2018).

76 Manuel Castells, The rise of the network society, vol. 1 of The information age: economy, society, and culture, Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers, 1996.

77 Escobar, Arturo, ‘Welcome to Cyberia: notes on the anthropology of cyberculture’, Current Anthropology, 35, 3, 1994, pp. 211–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

78 Manuel Castells, End of millennium, vol. 3 of The information age: economy, society, and culture, Oxford: Blackwell, 1998, p. 336, cited in Eriksen, Globalization, p. 14.

79 Bueno Castellanos, ‘World-systems theory’, p. 6530.

80 Anderson, Benedict, Imagined communities: reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism, London: Verso, 2006 (first published 1983)Google Scholar.

81 Lins Ribeiro, Gustavo, ‘Cybercultural politics: political activism at a distance in a transnational world’, in Alvarez, Sonia E., Dagnino, Evelina, and Escobar, Arturo, eds., Cultures of politics, politics of cultures: re-visioning Latin American social movements, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1998, pp. 325–52Google Scholar.

82 Lins Ribeiro, Gustavo, ‘El precio de la palabra: la hegemonía del capitalismo electrónico-informático y el googleísmo’, Desacatos: Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 56, 2018, pp. 16–33 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

83 Boellstorff, Tom, Coming of age in second life: an anthropologist explores the virtually human, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2008 Google Scholar.

84 Boellstorff, Tom, Nardi, Bonnie, Pierce, Celia, and Taylor, T. L. , Ethnography and virtual worlds: a handbook of method, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Boellstorff, Tom and Maurer, Bill, eds., Data, now bigger and better!, Chicago, IL: Prickly Paradigm Press, 2015 Google Scholar.

85 Comaroff, Jean and Comaroff, John, Theory from the South: or, how Euro-America is evolving toward Africa, New York: Routledge, 2011 Google Scholar.

86 Kuwayama, Takami, Native anthropology: the Japanese challenge to Western academic hegemony, Melbourne: Trans Pacific Press, 2004.Google Scholar

87 Ribeiro, ‘World anthropologies: anthropological cosmopolitanisms’, pp. 483–98; Restrepo, Eduardo and Escobar, Arturo, ‘Other anthropologies and anthropologies otherwise: steps to a world anthropologies framework’, Critique of Anthropology, 25, 2, 2005, pp. 99–129 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

88 Lins Ribeiro, Gustavo and Escobar, Arturo, eds., World anthropologies: disciplinary transformations within systems of power, Oxford: Berg Publishers, 2006 Google Scholar.

89 Krotz, Esteban, ‘Anthropologies of the South: their rise, their silencing, their characteristics’, Critique of Anthropology, 17, 3, 1997, pp. 237–51 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

90 Ribeiro, ‘World anthropologies: cosmopolitics’, pp. 363–86.

91 Reuter, Thomas, ‘World Council of Anthropological Associations (WCAA)’, in Callan, International encyclopedia of anthropology, vol. 12, p. 6513, pp. 6506–14 Google Scholar.

92 Fabian, Johannes, ‘Comments on changing global flows in anthropological knowledge’, Focaal: Journal of Historical and Global Anthropology, 63, 2012, pp. 62–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

93 Ribeiro, ‘World anthropologies: cosmopolitanisms’, p. 489.

94 Keith Hart, ‘An anthropology of the internet’, 2010, http://thememorybank.co.uk/2010/02/06/an-anthropology-of-the-internet-2/ (consulted 25 July 2017).

95 Abélès, Anthropologie de la globalisation, p. 244.

96 Ulf Hannerz, review of Global assemblages: technology, politics, and ethics as anthropological problems, American Anthropologist, 108, 1, 2006, p. 254.

97 Gustavo Lins Ribeiro, ‘Giro global a la derecha y la relevancia de la antropología’, Encartes Antropológicos, 1, 1, 2018, pp. 5–26, https://www.encartesantropologicos.mx/giro-global-a-la-derecha-y-la-relevancia-de-la-antropologia/ (consulted 31 October 2018).

98 Polish Anthropologists, ‘Anti-discrimination manifesto of Polish anthropologists and ethnologists’, http://zjazd.weebly.com/english.html (consulted 2 November 2016).

99 Strathern, Marilyn, ed., Audit cultures: anthropological studies in accountability, ethics and the academy, London: Routledge, 2000 Google Scholar.

100 Shore, Cris and Wright, Susan, ‘Neoliberalisation and the death of the public university’, Anuac, 5, 1, 2016, p. 41Google Scholar.

101 Alan Smart and Josephine Smart, Posthumanism: anthropological insights, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2017; Philippe Descola, ‘Humano, demasiado humano?’, Desacatos, 54, 2017, pp. 16–27; Thomas Hylland Eriksen, Overheating: an anthropology of accelerated change, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2016; Susan A. Crate, ed., Anthropology and climate change: from encounters to actions, New York: Routledge, 2009.