Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T06:05:02.092Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Antarctic Ice Sheet Surface Oxygen Isotope Values

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

V. I. Morgan*
Affiliation:
Antarctic Division, Department of Science, Kingston, Tasmania, Australia 7150
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Collected data on the mean annual surface values for δ18O over Antarctica have been tabulated and also presented in map form. An additional map shows contours of constant δ18O values.

Teneurs en isotope de l’oxygène à la surface de la calotte glaciaire antarctique. Les données recueillies sur les valeurs annuelles moyennes en surface pour la teneur en δ18O dans l’ensemble de l’Antarctique ont été compilées et sont également présentées sous forme cartographique. Une carte supplémentaire montre les lignes d’égales teneurs en δ18O.

Zusammenfassung

Zusammenfassung

Werte für Sauerstoff-Isotope an der Oberfläche der antartischen Eisdecke. Datenmaterial über die mittleren jährlichen Oberflächenwerte von δ18O in Antarktika wurde tabuliert und auch in kartographischer Form dargestellt. Eine zusätzliche Karte enthält Linien konstanter δ18O-Werte.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 1982

Introduction

One of the diffigulties in interpreting oxygen-isotope data from deep cores is in making allowance for the different place of deposition of the lower layers. If the direction and velocity of the ice flow is known, a first-order correction to the core data can be made by considering the variations in the present-day surface δ 18O. For more sophisticated studies, however, changes in the surface isotope ratio which will have occurred with changes to the ice sheet also have to be considered and this presents considerable difficulty.

The prominent change in the δ 18O values found in the deep core data around 10000 years b.p. (see e.g. (Reference Johnsen, Johnsen, Dansgaard, Clausen and LangwayJohnsen and others 1972)) is rather too large to be solely due to temperature and probably also reflects a general lowering of the ice sheet surface in conjunction with a retreat of the ice margin. Both the lowering and the reduction in area will reduce the depletion of 18O in the surface snow but at present it is not easy to assign magnitudes to the changes.

The main idea behind this collection and presentation of data is to give a broad-scale picture of the surface δ 18O for comparison with core δ 18O profiles. A second use is that future examinations of the compiled data will enable a better understanding of the variations in the depletion in 18O in Antarctic precipitation in terms of the temperature, elevation, continentality, etc. of the particular location.

The experimentally observed relationship between δ 18O and temperature arises because of the decrease in the saturation vapour pressure of water with temperature. A cooling air mass must precipitate water to avoid supersaturation and as this water will be enriched (c. + 8‰) in 18O with respect to the vapour, the vapour will therefore become progressively depleted in 18O. The mechanism, complicated by non-equilibrium transfers of water vapour, is affected by the path the air mass takes for instance over land, sea, or ice, its temperature and rate of temperature change, its turbulence, and other factors most of which are climatic variables and thus presumably will have varied in the past.

It is envisaged that the data presented here in Figs 1 and 2 and Table I may be used to obtain empirical values for the fractionation processes which affect precipitation falling on different parts of Antarctica and hence can be used to adjust deep core δ 18O data for such factors as changes in ice-sheet elevation and area.

Fig. 1. Mean annual surface values of δ18O in parts per thousand obtained from measurements in Antarctica.

Fig. 2. Contours of constant mean annual surface values of δ18O in parts per thousand derived from the point values in Figure 1.

Table I. Antarctic ice sheet surface data

Table I.

Table I.

Table I.

Sample and Data Collection

The large seasonal δ 18O variability means that some form of averaging is required to obtain a value which approximates the long-term mean. Where deep bore-hole analysis data are available, this is effectively done by averaging values from the top 50 m or so of core. Where only shallow cores are obtained, e.g. by a hand auger or where pit samples are used, an even number of seasons’ accumulation will probably not be collected and, due to the relatively small number of seasons represented, the δ 18O value will be biased away from the long-term mean.

We can obtain some idea of the magnitudes involved by examining a core from the Law Dome summit for which some detailed measurements have been made. (See (Reference Budd and MorganBudd and Morgan, 1977)). This location is probably representative of one of the more difficult places to sample because the high annual accumulation and the general lack of wind (for Antarctica) allows the large seasonal δ variation to be well preserved in amplitude. The accumulation is 0.6 Mg m−2a−1 and the range of isotope values is 8‰ at 100 m depth, and probably about 12‰ near the surface. Assuming roughly equal amounts of summer and winter precipitation, the deviation in the δ value from the mean if an exactly odd number of seasons are sampled is:

To have a sample within 1‰ of the long-term in such a location requires that at least six seasons (i.e. three years) accumulation be sampled. This could cover a depth of 4 m in the near-coastal areas, but will be much less inland, where the accumulation rate is much smaller.

Some of the data used may be marginal in respect of sampling depth. Where possible the depth covered by the sample is noted in the listing of data.

The measurements are given as δ 18O with respect to SMOW, expressed as parts per mil deviation (see (Reference CraigCraig, 1961)). Where a number of measurements are closely spaced, e.g. on the Law Dome, the number of points has been reduced by averaging to give a reasonable spacing on the map (Fig. 1). The second map shows contours of constant δ 18O values (Fig. 2).

Acknowledgements

I would like to acknowledge the work done by various A.N.A.R.E. (Australian National Antarctic Research Expedition) personnel in collecting samples while on traverse and also in particular the assistance of T. H. Jacka and J. Birch in analysing samples for δ 18O and collating data.

References

Allison, I. F. 1979. The mass budget of the Lambert Glacier drainage basin, Antarctica. Journal of Glaciology. Vol. 22, No. 87, p. 22335.Google Scholar
Budd, W. F., and Morgan, V. I. 1977. Isotopes, climate, and ice sheet dynamics from core studies on Law Dome, Antarctica. [Union Géodésique et Géophysique Internationale. Association Internationale des Sciences Hydrologiques. Commission des Neiges et Glaces.] Symposium. Isotopes et impuretés dans les neiges et glaces. Actes du colloque de Grenoble, août/septembre 1975. p. 31221 (IAHS–AISH Publication No. 118.)Google Scholar
Budd, W. F., and Young, N. W. 1979. Results from the I.A.G.P. flow-line study inland of Casey, Wilkes Land, Antarctica. Journal of Glaciology. Vol. 24, No. 90, p. 89101.Google Scholar
Craig, H. 1961. Standard for reporting concentrations or deuterium and oxygen-18 in natural waters. Science. Vol. 133, No. 3467, p. 183334.Google Scholar
Dansgaard, W., and others. 1973. Stable isotope glaciology, by Dansgaard, W. Johnsen, S. J. Clausen, H. B. and Gundestrup, N.. Meddelelser om Grønland. Bd. 197, Nr. 2.Google Scholar
Dansgaard, W., and others. 1977. Stable isotope profile through the Ross Ice Shelf at Little America V, Antarctica, [by] Dansgaard, W. Johnsen, S. J. Clausen, H. B. Hammer, C. U. and Langway, C. C. Jr. [Union Géodésique et Géophysique Internationale. Association Internationale des Sciences Hydrologiques. Commission des Neiges et Glaces.] Symposium. Isotopes et impuretés dans les neiges et glaces. Actes du colloque de Grenoble, août/septembre 1975. p. 32225. (IAHS–AISH Publication No. 118.)Google Scholar
Epstein, S., and Sharp, R. P. 1967. Oxygen- and hydrogen-isotope variations in a firn core, Eights Station, western Antarctica. Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 72, No. 22, p. 559598.Google Scholar
Epstein, S., and others. 1965. Six-year record of oxygen and hydrogen isotope variation in South Pole firn, by Epstein, S., Sharp, R. P. and Gow, A. J.. Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 70, No. 8, p. 180914.Google Scholar
Gonfiantini, R., and others. 1963. Geographical variations of oxygen-18/oxygen-16 ratio in surface snow and ice from Queen Maud Land, Antarctica, by Gonfiantini, R., Togliatti, V., Tongiorgi, E., De Breuck, W., and Picciotto, E. [E.]. Nature, Vol. 197, No. 4872, p. 109698.Google Scholar
Gordiyenko, F. G., and others. 1976. Variatsii izotopnogo sostava atmosfernykh osadkov i ozernoy vody v Antarktide i Subantarktike [Variations of isotope composition of atmospheric precipitation and lake waters of Antarctica and sub-Antarctica]. [By] Gordiyenko, F. G. Barkov, N. I. Orlov., A. I. Materialy Glyatsiologicheskikh Issledovaniy. Khronika. Obsuzhdeniya, Vyp. 26. p. 15054.Google Scholar
Johnsen, S. J., and others. 1972. Oxygen isotope profiles through the Antarctic and Greenland ice sheets. |by| Johnsen, S. J. Dansgaard, W. Clausen, H. B. Langway, C. C. Jr. Nature, Vol. 235, No. 5339, p. 42934: Vol. 236, No. 5344, p. 249.Google Scholar
Katō, K. 1977. Oxygen isotopic composition and gross β-radioactivity in firn. (In Watanabe, O., ed. Glaciological research program in Mizuho Plateau—west Enderby Land. East Antarctica. Pt. 4. 1974–1975. Tokyo, National Institute of Polar Research, p. 15869. (Japanese Antarctic Research Expedition. J ARE Data Reports, No. 36 (Glaciology).)Google Scholar
Lorius, C. and Merlivat, L. 1977. Distribution of mean surface stable isotopes in East Antarctica: observed changes with depth in the coastal area. [Union Géodésique et Géophysique Internationale. Association Internationale des Sciences Hydrologiques. Commission des Neiges et Glaces.] Symposium. Isotopes et impuretés dans les neiges et glaces. Actes du colloque de Grenoble, août/septembre 1975, p. 12737. (IAHS-AISH Publication No. 118.)Google Scholar
Lorius, C., and others. 1969. Variations in the mean deuterium content of precipitation in Antarctica, by Lorius, C. Merlivat, L. and Hagemann, R. Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 74, No. 28, p. 702731.Google Scholar
Lorius, C., and others. 1979. A 30,000-yr isotope climatic record from Antarctic ice, by Lorius, C. Merlivat, L. Jouzel, J. and Pourchet, M.. Nature, Vol. 280, No. 5724, p. 64448.Google Scholar
Morgan, V. I. 1972. Oxygen isotope evidence for bottom freezing on the Amery Ice Shelf. Nature, Vol. 238, No. 5364, p. 39394.Google Scholar
Morgan, V. I., and Jacka, T. H. 1981. Mass balance studies in East Antarctica. [Union Géodésique et Géophysique Internationale. Association Internationale des Sciences Hydrologiques.] Sea level, ice, and climatic change. Proceedings of the symposium held 7–8 December 1979 during the 17th general assembly of the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics, Canberra, p. 25360. (IAHS Publication No. 131.)Google Scholar
Peel, D. A. and Clausen, H. B. 1982. Oxygen-isotope and total beta-radioactivity measurements on 10 m ice cores from the Antarctic Peninsula. Journal of Glaciolog, Vol. 28, No. 98, p. 4355.Google Scholar
Watanabe, O. 1977. Stratigraphie observations of surface snow cover. (In Watanabe, O., ed. Glaciological research program in Mizuho Plateau—west Enderby Land, East Antarctica. Pt. 4,1974–1975. Tokyo, National Institute of Polar Research, p. 61125. (Japanese Antarctic Research Expedition. JARE Data Reports, No. 36 (Glaciology).)Google Scholar
Young, N. W. 1979. Measured velocities of interior East Antarctica and the state of mass balance within the I.A.G.P. area. Journal of Glaciology, Vol. 24, No. 90, p. 7787.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Mean annual surface values of δ18O in parts per thousand obtained from measurements in Antarctica.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Contours of constant mean annual surface values of δ18O in parts per thousand derived from the point values in Figure 1.

Figure 2

Table I. Antarctic ice sheet surface data

Figure 3

Table I.

Figure 4

Table I.

Figure 5

Table I.