Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T13:08:21.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

When Two Paths Converge: Debonding and Clipping of Dutch Reuze

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 February 2014

Kristel Van Goethem  and
Philippe Hiligsmann
Kristel Van Goethem*
Affiliation:
Research Associate F.R.S.-FNRS and Université catholique de Louvain
Philippe Hiligsmann*
Affiliation:
Université Catholique de Louvain
*
Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique–FNRS, Université catholique de Louvain, Institut Langage et Communication, Pôle Linguistique, Place Blaise Pascal 1, box L3.03.33, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium, [[email protected]]
Université catholique de Louvain, Institut Langage et Communication, Pôle Linguistique, Place Blaise Pascal 1, box L3.03.33, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium, [[email protected]]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Dutch reuze(n)(-) has a wide range of synchronic uses that form part of a broad categorical and semantic continuum. Derived from the noun reus ‘giant’, it is often used to express a comparison in nominal and adjectival compounds (for example, reuzegroot ‘as big as a giant’, lit. ‘giant-big’), but it can also have a merely intensifying function (for example, reuzeleuk ‘very nice’, lit. ‘giant-nice’). Moreover, it currently occurs as a free adjective and adverb while keeping its morphological linking morpheme -e- and intensifying value (for example, Het feestje was reuze ‘The party was great’). Drawing on synchronic and diachronic corpus data, this paper argues that the emergence of reuze as a free morpheme should be accounted for by debonding (an instance of degrammaticalization) and clipping.*

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Germanic Linguistics , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , March 2014 , pp. 31 - 64
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Germanic Linguistics 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aarts, Bas. 2007. Syntactic gradience. The nature of grammatical indeterminacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Amiot, Dany, & Van Goethem, Kristel. 2012. A constructional account of French -clé ‘key’ and Dutch sleutel- ‘key’ as in mot-clé/sleutelwoord ‘key word’. Morphology 22. 347–364.Google Scholar
Banga, Arina, Hanssen, Esther, Neijt, Anneke, & Schreuder, Rob. To appear. Preference for linking element en in Dutch noun-noun compounds: Native speakers and second language learners of Dutch. Morphology.Google Scholar
Booij, Geert. 2005. Compounding and derivation: Evidence for construction morphology. Morphology and its demarcations. Selected papers from the 11th Morphology Meeting, ed. by Dressler, Wolfgang U., Kastovsky, Dieter, Pfeiffer, Oskar E., & Rainer, Franz, 109–132. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Booij, Geert. 2009. Compounding and construction morphology. The Oxford handbook of compounding, ed. by Lieber, Rochelle & Stekauer, Pavol, 201–216. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Booij, Geert. 2010. Construction morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J., & Traugott, Elizabeth C.. 2005. Lexicalization and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bublitz, Wolfram. 1996. Semantic prosody and cohesive company: ‘Somewhat predictable’. Leuvense Bijdragen 85. 1–32.Google Scholar
Denison, David. 2001. Gradience and linguistic change. Historical linguistics 1999, ed. by Brinton, Laurel J., 119–144. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hanssen, Esther, Banga, Arina, Schreuder, Rob, & Neijt, Anneke. To appear. Semantic and prosodic effects of Dutch linking elements. Morphology.Google Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 2004. Lexicalization and grammaticization: Opposite or orthogonal? What makes grammaticalization? ed. by Bisang, Walter, Himmelmann, Nikolaus P., & Wiemer, Bjorn, 21–42. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. 1991. On some principles of grammaticization. Approaches to grammaticalization, vol. I: Focus on theoretical and methodological issues, ed. by Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Heine, Bernd, 17–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J., & Traugott, Elizabeth C.. 2003. Grammaticalization. 2nd edn.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 1985. Grammaticalization: Synchronic variation and diachronic change. Lingua e Stile 20. 303–318.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 1995. Thoughts on grammaticalization. 2nd edn.München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Leuschner, Torsten. 2010. Ausnahmepianist Fettgeschreckt-inbleich! Deutsche, Nierländische und schwedische präfixoide im Spannungsfeld von Genealogie, Kreativität und Norm. Kontrastive germanistische Linguistik (Germanistische Linguistik 206–209), ed. by Dammel, Antje, Kürsner, Sebastian, & Nübling, Damaris, 863–892. Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlag.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, Douglas J. 2005. Can the lexicalization/grammaticalization distinction be reconciled? Studies in Language 29. 583–615.Google Scholar
Meesters, Gert. 2004. Marginale morfologie in het Nederlands: Paradigmatische samenstellingen, neoklassieke composita en splintercomposita (Studies op het Gebied van de Nederlandse Taalkunde, 3). Gent, Koninklijke Academie voor Nederlandse Taal- en Letterkunde: Belgisch Interuniversitair centrum voor Neerlandistiek.Google Scholar
Norde, Muriel. 2009. Degrammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ramat, Paolo. 2001. Degrammaticalization or transcategorization? Naturally! Linguistic studies in honour of Wolfgang Ulrich Dressler presented on the occasion of his 60th birthday, ed. by Schaner-Wolles, Chris, Rennison, John, & Neubarth, Friedrich, 393–401. Torino: Rosenberg/Sellier.Google Scholar
Stevens, Christopher M. 2005. Revisiting the affixoid debate: On the grammaticalization of the word. Grammatikalisierung im Deutschen, ed. by Leuschner, Torsten, Mortelmans, Tanja, & De Groodt, Sarah, 71–83. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Van der Auwera, Johan. 2002. More thoughts on degrammaticalization. New reflections on grammaticalization, ed. by Wischer, Ilse & Diewald, Gabriele, 19–29. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Van de Velde, Freek, De Smet, Hendrik, & Ghesquière, Lobke (eds.). To appear. Multiple source constructions in language change. Thematic issue in Studies in Language.Google Scholar
Van de Velde, Freek, & Weerman, Fred. To appear. The resilient nature of adjectival inflection in Dutch. Adjectives in Germanic and Romance, ed. by Sleeman, Petra, Van de Velde, Freek, & Perridon, Harry. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Van Goethem, Kristel. 2008. Oud-leerling versus ancien élève: A comparative study of adjectives grammaticalizing into prefixes in Dutch and French. Morphology 18. 27–49.Google Scholar
Van Goethem, Kristel. 2010. The French construction ‘nouveau + past participle’ revisited. Arguments in favour of a prefixoid analysis of nouveau. Folia Linguistica 44. 163–178.Google Scholar
Van Goethem, Kristel. 2011. From adjective to affix in Dutch and French. The influence of word order patterns on grammaticalization. Studies in Language 35. 194–216.Google Scholar
Van Goethem, Kristel, & De Smet, Hendrik. To appear. How nouns turn into adjectives. The emergence of new adjectives in French, English and Dutch through debonding processes. Languages in Contrast.Google Scholar

Dictionaries and Corpora

DBNL (Digitale Bibliotheek voor de Nederlandse Letteren [Digital Library for Dutch Literature]). Available at http://www.dbnl.org.Google Scholar
KB Historische Kranten [Historical newspapers of the Royal Library]. Available at http://kranten.kb.nl/.Google Scholar

News archives on http://news.google.com

NLCOW2012 [Corpora from the Web–Dutch subcorpus]. Available at http://hpsg.fu-berlin.de/cow/colibri/.Google Scholar
WebCorp [The Web as Corpus]. Available at http://www.webcorp.org.uk/live/.Google Scholar
WNT (Woordenboek der Nederlandsche Taal [Dictionary of Dutch Language]). Available at http://gtb.inl.nl/.Google Scholar