Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T00:30:43.824Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Three Typological Differences Between the North and the West Germanic DPs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 November 2019

Dorian Roehrs
Dorian Roehrs*
Affiliation:
University of North Texas
*
Department of World Languages, Literatures, and Cultures University of North Texas 1155 Union Circle #311127 Denton, TX 76203-5017USA [[email protected]]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper discusses three typological differences between the North Germanic DP and the West Germanic DP. While North Germanic has suffixal definite articles leading to cases of double definiteness, weak adjective endings regulated by definiteness, and doubly-filled definite DPs, West Germanic does not. These three properties cluster together in that they all have to do with definiteness. It is claimed that they can be subsumed under one more general difference. Assuming various subcomponents of definiteness, it is proposed that these components originate low in the structure. North Germanic arranges these components into several individual feature bundles. Some of these bundles move to D, while others remain lower in the structure. Consequently, definiteness components are spelled out separately in different positions. In contrast, West Germanic involves one complex feature bundle containing all definiteness components. In this language family, all of the components move to D as one bundle and, as a consequence, they are all spelled out as one determiner.

Keywords

DP syntaxdefinitenesssuffixal determinersweak/strong adjective endingsdoubly-filled DPs
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Germanic Linguistics , Volume 31 , Issue 4 , December 2019 , pp. 363 - 408
Copyright
© Society for Germanic Linguistics 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I thank Marit Julien (Norwegian) and Line Mikkelsen (Danish) for help with their respective languages. In addition, I would like to thank the audience of the Germanic Linguistics Annual Conference 23, the two anonymous reviewers, and Ilana Mezhevich for many helpful questions and comments.

References

Abney, Steven. 1987. The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect. Cambridge, MA: MIT doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
Almog, Joseph, Perry, John, & Wettstein, Howard (eds.). 1989. Themes from Kaplan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Anderssen, Merete. 2005. The acquisition of compositional definiteness in Norwegian. Tromsø, Norway: University of Tromsø doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
Bayer, Josef. 2015. A note on possessor agreement. In untiring pursuit of better alternatives, ed. by Egashira, Hiroki, Kitahara, Hisatsugu, Nakazawa, Kazuo, Nomura, Tadao, Oishi, Masayuki, Saizen, Akira, & Suzuki, Motoko, 2–11. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
Börjars, Kersti, & Harries, Pauline. 2008. The clitic-affix distinction, historical change, and Scandinavian bound definiteness marking. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 20. 289–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. Minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, ed. by Martin, Roger, Micheals, David, & Uriagereka, Juan, 89–155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 2005. Deriving Greenberg’s Universal 20 and its exceptions. Linguistic Inquiry 36. 315–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corver, Norbert, & van Koppen, Marjo. 2010. Ellipsis in Dutch possessive noun phrases: A micro-comparative approach. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 13. 99–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delsing, Lars-Olof. 1993. The internal structure of noun phrases in the Scandinavian languages: A comparative study. Lund, Sweden: University of Lund doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
Delsing, Lars-Olof. 2003. Syntaktisk variation i skandinaviska nominalfraser. Dialektsyntaktiska studier av den nordiska nominalfrasen, ed. by Øystein Alexander Vangsnes, Anders Holmberg, & Lars-Olof Delsing, 11–64. Olso: Novus.Google Scholar
Dikken, Marcel den, & Tortora, Christina (eds.). 2005a. The function of function words and functional categories. Amsterdam: John BenjaminsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dikken, Marcel den, & Tortora, Christina. 2005b. The function of function words and functional categories. den Dikken & Tortora 2005a, 1–10.Google Scholar
Duden. 2007. Richtiges und gutes Deutsch, vol. 9. Mannheim: Dudenverlag.Google Scholar
Giusti, Giuliana. 1997. The categorial status of determiners. The new comparative syntax, ed. by Haegeman, Liliane, 95–123. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Giusti, Giuliana. 2002. The functional structure of noun phrases: A bare phrase structure approach. Functional structure in DP and IP: The cartography of syntactic structures, vol. 1, ed. by Cinque, Guglielmo, 54–90. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grohmann, Kleanthes K., & Haegeman, Liliane. 2003. Resuming reflexives. Proceedings of the Nineteenth Scandinavian Conference on Linguistics, ed. by Dahl, Anne, Bentzen, Kristine, & Svenonius, Peter. Nordlyd 31. 46–62.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane. 1994. Introduction to government and binding theory. 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris, & Marantz, Alec. 1994. Some key features of distributed morphology. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 21. 275–288.Google Scholar
Harbert, Wayne. 2007. The Germanic languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1999. Explaining article-possessor complementarity: Economic motivation in noun phrase syntax. Language 75. 227–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, John. 1978. Definiteness and indefiniteness: A study in reference and grammaticality prediction. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Johannessen, Janne Bondi. 2008. The pronominal psychological demonstrative in Scandinavian: Its syntax, semantics and pragmatics. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 31. 161–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Julien, Marit. 2002. Determiners and word order in Scandinavian DPs. Studia Linguistica 56. 264–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Julien, Marit. 2005a. Possessor licensing, definiteness and case in Scandinavian. den Dikken & Tortora 2005a, 217–249.Google Scholar
Julien, Marit. 2005b. Nominal phrases from a Scandinavian perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Julien, Marit. 2016. Possessive predicational vocatives in Scandinavian. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 19. 75–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, David. 1989. Demonstratives. An essay on the semantics, logic, metaphysics, and epistemology of demonstratives and other indexicals. Almog et al. 1989, 481–563.Google Scholar
Leu, Thomas. 2015. The architecture of determiners. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lohrmann, Susanne. 2010. The structure of the DP and its reflex in Scandinavian. Stuttgart, Germany: University of Stuttgart doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
Longobardi, Giuseppe. 1994. Reference and proper names: A theory of N-movement in syntax and logical form. Linguistic Inquiry 25. 609–665.Google Scholar
Lyons, Christopher. 1999. Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matushanksy, Ora. 2006. Head movement in linguistic theory. Linguistic Inquiry 37. 69–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nykiel, Jerzy. 2015. The reduced definite article th’ in late Middle English and beyond: An insight from the definiteness cycle. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 27. 105–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pesetsky, David. 1987. Wh-in-Situ: Movement and unselective binding. The representation of (in)definiteness, ed. by Eric, J. Reuland & Alice, G.B. ter Meulen, 98–129. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pfaff, Alexander. 2015. Adjectival and genitival modification in definite noun phrases in Icelandic. A tale of outsiders and inside jobs. Tromsø, Norway: University of Tromsø doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
Rijkhoff, Jan. 2002. The noun phrase. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roehrs, Dorian. 2009. Demonstratives and definite articles as nominal auxiliaries. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roehrs, Dorian. 2010. Demonstrative-reinforcer constructions. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 13. 225–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roehrs, Dorian. 2013. The inner makeup of definite determiners: The case of Germanic. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 25. 295–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roehrs, Dorian. 2015. Inflections on pre-nominal adjectives in Germanic: Main types, subtypes, and subset relations. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 18. 213–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roehrs, Dorian, & Julien, Marit. 2014. Adjectives in German and Norwegian: Differences in weak and strong inflections. Sleeman et al. 2014, 245–261.Google Scholar
Schoorlemmer, Erik. 2009. Agreement, dominance and doubling: The morphosyntax of DP. Leiden, The Netherlands: University of Leiden doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
Schoorlemmer, Erik. 2012. Definiteness marking in Germanic: Morphological variations on the same syntactic theme. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 15. 107–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharvy, Richard. 1980. A more general theory of definite descriptions. The Philosophical Review 89. 607–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sleeman, Petra, Van de Velde, Freek, & Harry, Perridon (eds.). 2014. Adjectives in Germanic and Romance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strahan, Tania E. 2008. Sjå på han mannen! On the definiteness and specificity of Scandinavian pronoun demonstratives. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 31. 193–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taraldsen, Knut Tarald. 1990. D-projections and N-projections in Norwegian. Grammar in progress. Glow essays for Henk van Riemsdijk, ed. by Mascarw, Joan & Nespor, Marina, 419–431. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 2007. The syntax of Icelandic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vangsnes, Øystein Alexander. 1999. The identification of functional architecture. Bergen, Norway: University of Bergen doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
Velde, Freek van de, & Fred, Weerman. 2014. The resilient nature of adjectival inflection in Dutch. Sleeman et al. 2014, 113–145.Google Scholar