Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T19:18:17.143Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies in comparative Germanic syntax. Edited by Hubert Haider, Susan Olsen, and Sten Vikner. (Studies in natural language and linguistic theory, 31.) Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1995. Pp. v, 344. Hardcover. $96.00.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2008

Beatrice Santorini
Beatrice Santorini
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics2016 Sheridan RoadNorthwestern UniversityEvanston, IL 60208-4090 [[email protected]]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Germanic Linguistics , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , Fall 1996 , pp. 323 - 332
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Germanic Linguistics 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Benveniste, Emile. 1966. Problèmes de linguistique générale. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 1986. Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 1993. A minimalist program for linguistic theory. The view from Building 20, ed. by Hale, Kenneth and Keyser, Samuel J., 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, Janet and Sag, Ivan. 1982. Referential and quantificational indefinites. Linguistics and Philosophy 5.355–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, Anders and Platzack, Christer. 1995. The role of inflection in Scandinavian syntax. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard S. 1984. Connectedness and binary branching. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard S. 1989. Notes on English agreement. CIEFL Bulletin 1.40–67.Google Scholar
Müller, Gereon and Sternefeld, Wolfgang. 1993. Improper movement and unambiguous binding. Linguistic Inquiry 24.461–507.Google Scholar
Neeleman, Ad. 1994. Scrambling as a D-structure phenomenon. Studies on scrambling: Movement and non-movement approaches to free word-order phenomena, ed. by Corver, Norbert and Riemsdijk, Henk van, 387–429. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya and Reuland, Eric. 1993. Reflexivity. Linguistic Inquiry 24.657–720.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1986. Null objects in Italian and the theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry 17.501–57.Google Scholar
Rohrbacher, Bernhard. To appear. Morphology-driven syntax: A theory of V to I raising and pro drop. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vikner, Sten. 1995. Verb movement and expletive subjects in the Germanic languages. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar