Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T23:06:55.821Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

REVIEWS - Narrow Syntax and Phonological Form. By Gema Chocano. (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 109.) Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 2007. Pp. x, 333. Hardcover €115. US $173.

Review products

Narrow Syntax and Phonological Form. By Gema Chocano. (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 109.) Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 2007. Pp. x, 333. Hardcover €115. US $173.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2009

Marc Richards
Marc Richards*
Affiliation:
Universität Leipzig
*
Institut für Linguistik, Universität Leipzig, Beethovenstr. 15, 04107 Leipzig, Germany, [[email protected]]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
REVIEWS
Information
Journal of Germanic Linguistics , Volume 21 , Issue 3 , September 2009 , pp. 335 - 347
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Germanic Linguistics 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anagnostopoulou, Elena. 2003. The syntax of ditransitives. Evidence from clitics. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan. 2002. A-chains at the PF-interface: Copies and “covert” movement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20.197–267.Google Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan. 2005. Re: CycLin and the role of PF in object shift. Theoretical Linguistics 31.111–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, ed. by Martin, Roger, Michaels, David, & Uriagereka, Juan, 89–156. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. Ken Hale: A life in language, ed. by Kenstowicz, Michael, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2004. Beyond explanatory adequacy. Structures and beyond. The cartography of syntactic structures, vol. 3, ed. by Belletti, Adriana, 104–131. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2007. Approaching UG from below. Interfaces + recursion = language? Chomsky's minimalism and the view from syntax-semantics, ed. by Sauerland, Uli & Gärtner, Hans-Martin, 1–30. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2008. On phases. Foundational issues in linguistic theory, ed. by Freidin, Robert, Otero, Carlos P., & Zubizarreta, Maria-Luisa, 133–166. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Kuthy, Kordula, & Detmar Meurers, W.. 2001. On partial constituent fronting in German. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 3.1–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diesing, Molly. 1992. Indefinites. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fanselow, Gisbert. 2001. Features, θ-roles, and free constituent order. Linguistic Inquiry 32.405–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fanselow, Gisbert, & Ćavar, Damir. 2002. Distributed deletion. Theoretical approaches to universals, ed. by Alexiadou, Artemis, 65–107. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Danny, & Pesetsky, David. 2005. Cyclic linearization of syntactic structure. Theoretical Linguistics31.1–46.Google Scholar
Haider, Hubert, & Rosengren, Inger. 2003. Scrambling. Non-triggered chain formation in OV languages. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 15.203–267.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders. 1999. Remarks on Holmberg's generalization. Studia Linguistica 53.1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, Gereon. 1998. Incomplete category fronting. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neeleman, Ad, & Reinhart, Tanya. 1998. Scrambling and the PF interface. The projection of arguments: Lexical and compositional factors, ed. by Butt, Miriam & Geuder, Wilhelm, 309–353. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Nespor, Marina, & Vogel, Irene. 1986. Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Richards, Marc. 2004. Object shift and scrambling in North and West Germanic: A case study in symmetrical syntax. Doctoral dissertation. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Richards, Norvin. 1999. Featural cyclicity and the ordering of multiple specifiers. Working minimalism, ed. by Epstein, Samuel David & Hornstein, Norbert, 127–158. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1995. The prosodic structure of function words. Papers in optimality theory, ed. by Beckman, Jill, Dickey, Laura Walsh, & Urbanczyk, Suzanne, 439–469. Amherst: GLSA.Google Scholar
Svenonius, Peter. 2001. On object shift, scrambling, and the PIC. A few from Building E39 . MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 39, ed. by Guerzoni, Elena & Matushansky, Ora, 267–289. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
Wiltschko, Martina. 1997. D-linking, scrambling, and superiority in German. Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanistischen Linguistik 4.107–142.Google Scholar
Wurmbrand, Susi. 2001. AGREE: The other VP-internal subject hypothesis. WCCFL 20 Proceedings, ed. by Megerdoomian, Karine & Bar-el, Leora A., 635–648. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar