Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T23:15:03.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Manuscript Evidence and Metrical Authenticity: A Response to Seiichi Suzuki

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2017

Rafael J. Pascual
Rafael J. Pascual*
Affiliation:
Harvard University
*
Harvard University Department of English, Barker Center, 12 Quincy Street, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA [[email protected]]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Remarks and Replies
Information
Journal of Germanic Linguistics , Volume 29 , Issue 1 , March 2017 , pp. 85 - 99
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Germanic Linguistics 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anlezark, Daniel (ed.). 2011. Old Testament narratives. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bliss, Alan Joseph. 1967. The metre of Beowulf . 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cable, Thomas. 1974. The meter and melody of Beowulf . Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Cosijn, Peter J. 1894. Anglo-Saxonica. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 19.441–461.Google Scholar
Doane, Alger N. (ed.). 2013. Genesis A: A new edition, revised. Tempe, AZ: Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies.Google Scholar
Ettmüller, Ludwig (ed.). 1850. Engla and seaxna scoˇpas and boˇceras: Anglosaxonum poetae atque scriptores prosaici. Quedlinburg and Leipzig: Gottfried Basse.Google Scholar
Fulk, Robert D. 1992. A history of Old English meter . Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Fulk, Robert D. 2002. Early Middle English evidence for Old English meter: Resolution in Poema Morale . Journal of Germanic Linguistics 14.331–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fulk, Robert D. 2004. Old English werg-, wyrg-, ‘accursed’. Historische Sprachforschung / Historical Linguistics 117.315–322.Google Scholar
Fulk, Robert. D., Bjork, Robert E., & Niles, John D. (eds.). 2008. Klaeber's Beowulf and the Fight at Finnsburg. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Graz, Friedrich. 1896. Beiträge zur Textkritik der sogenannten Caedmonschen Genesis. Festschrift zum siebzigsten Geburtstage Oskar Schade, 67–77. Königsberg: Hartung.Google Scholar
Holthausen, Ferdinand (ed.). 1914. Die ältere Genesis mit Einleitung, Anmerkungen, Glossar und der lateinischen Quelle. Heidelberg: C. Winter.Google Scholar
Hutcheson, Bellenden Rand. 1995. Old English poetic metre . Cambridge: D. S. Brewer.Google Scholar
Klaeber, Friedrich (ed.). 1913. The later Genesis and other Old English and Old Saxon texts relating to the fall of man. Heidelberg: C. Winter.Google Scholar
Kock, Ernst A. 1918. Interpretations and emendations of early English texts, IV. Anglia 42.99–124.Google Scholar
Krapp, George Philip (ed.). 1931. The Junius manuscript. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lapidge, Michael. 2000. The archetype of Beowulf . Anglo-Saxon England 29.5–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neidorf, Leonard. 2013. Scribal errors of proper names in the Beowulf manuscript. Anglo-Saxon England 42.249–269.Google Scholar
Neidorf, Leonard. 2016. Metrical criteria for the emendation of Old English poetic texts. Old English philology: Studies in honour of R. D. Fulk, ed. by Leonard Neidorf, Rafael J. Pascual, & Tom Shippey, 52–68. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neidorf, Leonard. 2017. The transmission of Beowulf . Language, culture, and scribal behavior. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, to appear.Google Scholar
Orton, Peter. 2000. The transmission of Old English poetry. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Pascual, Rafael J. 2013–2014. Three-position verses and the metrical practice of the Beowulf poet. SELIM 20.49–79.Google Scholar
Pascual, Rafael J. 2014. Ælfric's rhythmical prose and the study of Old English metre. English Studies 95.803–823.Google Scholar
Pascual, Rafael J. 2015. On a crux in Beowulf: The alliteration of finite verbs and the scribal understanding of metre. Studia Neophilologica 87.171–185.Google Scholar
Pascual, Rafael J. 2016. Old English metrical history and the composition of Widsið . Neophilologus 100.289–302.Google Scholar
Sievers, Eduard. 1885. Zur Rhythmik des germanischen Alliterationsverses, II. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur X.451–545.Google Scholar
Sievers, Eduard. 1887. Zur Rhythmik des germanischen Alliterationsverses, III. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur XII.454–482.Google Scholar
Sievers, Eduard. 1893. Altgermanische Metrik . Halle: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Sisam, Kenneth. 1953. Studies in the history of Old English literature . Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Stanley, Eric Gerald. 1986. Notes on the text of the Old English Genesis . Modes of interpretation in Old English literature: Essays in honour of Stanley B. Greenfield, ed. by Rugg Brown, Phyllis, Ronan Campton, Georgia, & Robinson, Fred C., 189–196. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Weiskott, Eric. 2013. Three-position verses in Beowulf . Notes and Queries 60.483–485.Google Scholar
Wells, David M. (ed.). 1969. A critical edition of the Old English Genesis A with a translation. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina dissertation.Google Scholar