No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Copular Clauses: Specification, Predication, and Equation. By Line Mikkelsen. (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 85). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2005, Pp. iv, 210. Hardcover. €105; $126.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 September 2006
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

- Type
- REVIEWS
- Information
- Copyright
- © 2006 Society for Germanic Linguistics
References
Birner Betty 1996. The discourse function of inversion in English. New York: Garland.
Halliday Michael. 1967. Notes on transitivity and theme in English (Part 2). Journal of Linguistics 3. 199–244.Google Scholar
Heggie Lorie. 1988a. The syntax of copular structures. Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California. (Reprinted by GSIL Publications, Los Angeles: University of Southern California, 1993).
Heggie Lorie. 1988b. A unified approach to copular sentences. Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 7, ed. by Hagit Borer, 129–142. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Heycock Caroline, and Anthony Kroch. 1999. Pseudocleft connectedness: Implications for the LF interface level. Linguistic Inquiry 30. 365–397.Google Scholar
Higgins Francis. 1979. The pseudo-cleft construction in English. New York: Garland.
Moro Andrea. 1997. The raising of predicates: Predicative noun phrases and the theory of clause structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Partee Barbara. 1987. Noun phrase interpretation and type-shifting principles. Studies in discourse representation theory and the theory of generalized quantifiers, ed. by Jeroen Groenendijk, Dick de Jong, and Martin Stokhof, 115–143. Dordrecht: Foris.
Rothstein Susan. 2001. Predicates and their subjects. Dordrecht: Kluwer.