Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T18:54:33.913Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Input frequency and the acquisition of subject-verb agreement in number in spoken and written French

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 December 2012

MALIN ÅGREN  and
JOOST VAN DE WEIJER
MALIN ÅGREN*
Affiliation:
Centre for Languages and Literature, Lund University, Sweden
JOOST VAN DE WEIJER
Affiliation:
Centre for Languages and Literature, Lund University, Sweden
*
Address for correspondence: Malin Ågren, Centre for Languages and Literature, Lund University, Box 201, 221 00 Lund, Sweden e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present study focuses on the characteristics of subject-verb agreement in number in spoken and written French, two morphological systems that are very different. In particular, we investigate the impact of frequency of forms and morphological patterns in the input on the acquisition of number agreement in monolingual and bilingual French-speaking children (n = 32). Our results demonstrate an almost perfect fit between the partial and heterogeneous nature of number agreement in the spoken input and the errors found in the children's spoken narratives. However, the influence of a highly systematic written number-agreement on the children's written narratives is weak, mainly due to the lack of phonological cues of number agreement in written French.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of French Language Studies , Volume 23 , Issue 3 , November 2013 , pp. 311 - 333
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ågren, M. (2008). A la recherché de la morphologie silencieuse: Sur le développement du pluriel en français L2 écrit. Études Romanes de Lund 84. PhD Dissertation, Lund University.Google Scholar
Bartning, I. and Schlyter, S. (2004). Itinéraires acquisitionnels et stades de développement en français L2. Journal of French Language Studies, 14: 281–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. (2008). Usage-based grammar and second language acquisition. In: Robinson, P. and Ellis, N. (eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition. London: Routledge, pp. 216–236.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. and Hopper, P. (eds.) (2001). Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CHILDES corpus – available on http://childes.psy.cmu.edu/Google Scholar
Cresti, E. and Moneglia, M. (eds.) (2005). C-ORAL-ROM: Integrated Reference Corpora for Spoken Romance Languages. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, V. and Bassetti, B. (2005). Second Language Writing Systems. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickinson, D., Wolf, M. and Stotsky, S. (1993). Words move: The Interwoven Development of Oral and Written Language. In: Gleason, J. Berko (ed.), The Development of Language (3rd edition). New York: Macmillan, pp. 369–420.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2008a). The dynamics of language use, language change and first and second language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 41.3: 232–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2008b). Words and their usage: Commentary on the special issue on the bilingual mental lexicon. The Mental Lexicon, 3.3: 375–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fayol, M. (2003). L'acquisition/apprentissage de la morphology du nombre. Bilan et perspectives. Rééducation orthographique, 213: 151–166.Google Scholar
Fayol, M. and Jaffré, J.-P. (2008). Orthographier. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Gathercole, V. C. M. (2007). Miami and North Wales, so far and yet so near: A constructivist account of morpho-syntactic development in bilingual children. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10: 224–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granget, C. (2005). Développement de l'accord verbal avec un sujet pluriel dans les récits écrits d'apprenants germanophones scolarisés du français. In: Granfeldt, J. and Schlyter, S. (eds.), Acquisition et production de la morphologie flexionnelle, PERLES (20), Lund University, pp. 111–123.Google Scholar
Harley, B. (1992). Patterns of second language development in French immersion. Journal of French Language Studies, 2: 159–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legendre, G., Barrière, I., Goyet, L. and Nazzi, T. (2010). Comprehension of Infrequent Subject-Verb Agreement Forms: Evidence from French-learning Children. Child Development, 81: 1859–1875.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lété, B., Sprenger-Charolles, L. and Colé, P. (2004). MANULEX: A grade-level lexical database from French elementary school readers. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 36: 156–166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lexique3 – accessible on www.lexique.orgGoogle Scholar
Lieven, E. and Tomasello, M. (2008). Children's first language acquisition from a usage-based perspective. In: Robinson, P. and Ellis, N. C. (eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition. London: Routledge, pp. 168–195.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
New, B., Pallier, C., Ferrand, L. and Matos, R. (2001). Une base de données lexicales du français contemporain sur Internet: LEXIQUE. Année Psychologique, 101: 447–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prévost, P. (2009). The Acquisition of French. The Development of Inflectional Morphology and Syntax in L1 Acquisition, Bilingualism, and L2 Acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasetti, L. (2003). Optional categories in early French syntax: A developmental study of root infinitives and null arguments. PhD dissertation, University of Geneva.Google Scholar
Spencer, A. (1991). Morphological Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Totereau, C., Thevenin, M.G. and Fayol, M. (1997). Acquisition de la morphologie du nombre à l’écrit en français. In: Rieben, L., Fayol, M. and Perfetti, C. (eds.), Des Orthographies et leur acquisition. Paris: Delacroix et Niestlé, pp. 147–167.Google Scholar