Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T06:18:29.291Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Beyond obsolescence: a twenty-first century research agenda for the langues régionales

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2019

Damien Hall ,
Jonathan R. Kasstan  and
David Hornsby
Damien Hall*
Affiliation:
Newcastle University
Jonathan R. Kasstan
Affiliation:
University of Westminster
David Hornsby
Affiliation:
University of Kent
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This Special Issue of the Journal of French Language Studies celebrates a recent surge in enthusiasm for sociolinguistic studies involving the regional languages of France. Taking our cue from the contributions to the volume, which we introduce here, we argue that a changing twenty-first century landscape offers an exciting new agenda for these regional languages (and minority languages more widely), and set out what we see as six key directions for contemporary research.

Type
Article
Information
Journal of French Language Studies , Volume 29 , Issue 2: Langues régionales: models and methods , July 2019 , pp. 155 - 168
Check for updates
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Auger, J. and VIlleneuve, A.-J. (2008). Ne deletion in Picard and in regional French: Evidence for distinct grammars. In: Meyerhoff, M. and Nagy, N. (eds). Social Lives in Language: Sociolinguistics and Multilingual Speech Communities. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 223–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aurrekoetxea, G. (2010). The correlation between morphological, syntactic and phonological variation in the Basque language. In: Heselwood, B. and Upton, C. (eds). Proceedings of Methods XIII. Papers from the Thirteenth International Conference on Methods in Dialectology, 2008. Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 207–218.Google Scholar
Bell, A. (2016). Succeeding waves: Seeking sociolinguistic theory for the twenty-first century. In: Coupland, N. (ed.), Sociolinguistics: Theoretical Debates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 391–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, M. (2003). Sociolinguistic nostalgia and the authentication of identity. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 7(3): 398–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carton, F. (1981). Les parlers ruraux de la région Nord-Picardie: Situation socio-linguistique, International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 29: 15–28.Google Scholar
Cedergren, H. (1973). The Interplay of Social and Linguistic Factors in Panama. PhD thesis, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Certeau, M. de, Julia, D., and Revel, J. (1975). Une politique de la langue. La Révolution française et les patois: l’enquête de Grégoire. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Chambers, J. K. (1995). Sociolinguistic Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Chambers, J. K. and Trudgill, P. (1998). Dialectology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chirkova, K., Stanford, J. N. and Wang, D.. (2018). A long way from New York City: Socially stratified contact-induced phonological convergence in Ganluo Ersu (Sichuan China). Language Variation and Change, 30(1): 109–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1967). Current Issues in Linguistic Theory. London: Mouton.Google Scholar
Circulaire du 21 novembre 2017 relative aux règles de féminisation et de rédaction des textes publiés au Journal officiel de la République française. Available at: https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichTexte.do?cidTexte=JORFTEXT000036068906 (Accessed: 17 April 2019).Google Scholar
Cornips, L. and Corrigan, K. (eds.) (2005). Syntax and Variation: Reconciling the Biological and the Social. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology) (2013). Action IS1306 – New Speakers in a Multilingual Europe – Opportunities and Challenges. Available at: http://www.cost.eu/COST_Actions/isch/IS1306 (Accessed: 17 April 2019).Google Scholar
Costa, J. (2015). New speakers, new language: On being a legitimate speaker of a minority language in Provence. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 231: 127–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coupland, N. and Jaworski, A. (1997). Introduction. In: Coupland, N. and Jaworski, A. (eds.). Sociolinguistics: A Reader and Coursebook. Basingstoke: Palgrave. pp. 1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Detey, S., Durand, J., Laks, B., and Lyche, C. (2016). Varieties of Spoken French. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dow, M. (2014). Contrast and Markedness among Nasal(ized) Vowels: A Phonetic-Phonological Study of French and Vimeu Picard. PhD thesis, Indiana University.Google Scholar
Drapeau, L. (fc. 2020). Language endangerment and standardization: Perspectives from the Fourth World. In: Ayres-Bennett, W. and Bellamy, J. (eds.), The Handbook of Language Standardisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Durand, J., Eychenne, J. and Lyche, C. (2013). On levelling and counter-levelling in French: A phonological perspective. In: Jones, M. C. and Hornsby, D. C. (eds.), Language and Social Structure in Urban France. Oxford: Legenda, pp. 58–68.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Fishman, J. A. (1972). Language and Nationalism: Two Integrative Essays. Rowley: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Fishman, J. A. (1991). Reversing Language Shift: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations of Assistance to Threatened Languages. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, C. M. (2017). Understanding language vitality and reclamation as resilience: A framework for language endangerment and ‘loss’ (Comments on Mufwene). Language 93(4): e281–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gadet, F. (1996). Variabilité, variation, variété: le français d’Europe. Journal of French Language Studies 6(1): 75–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauchat, L. (1905). L’Unité phonétique dans le patois d’une commune. In: Aus Romanischen Sprachen und Literaturen: Festschrift Heinrich Morf. Halle: M Niemeyer, pp. 175–232.Google Scholar
Gilliéron, J. and Edmont, E. (1902–1910). Atlas linguistique de la France. Paris: Honoré Champion.Google Scholar
Guy, G. and Adli, A. (2019). Workshop on multiculturalism and multilingualism in a megacity, February 21, New York City.Google Scholar
Haddican, W. (2005). Aspects of Language Variation and Change in Contemporary Basque. PhD thesis, New York University.Google Scholar
Haddican, W. (2007). Suburbanization and language change in Basque. Language in Society, 36(5): 677–706.Google Scholar
Harrison, M. and Joubert, A. (2019). Introduction: Shifting dynamics in French language policies. In: Harrison, M. and Joubert, A. (eds.), French Language Policies and the Revitalisation of Regional Languages in the 21st Century. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haugen, E. (1966). Dialect, language, nation. American Anthropologist 68: 922–935. Reprinted in Pride, J.B. & J. Holmes (1972) Sociolinguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendrickson, R. (2013). Distinctive features and the liquids in Picard, Proceedings of the Annual Meetings on Phonology, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
Hermann, E. (1929). Lautveränderungen in den Individualsprachen einer Mundart: Charmey. Göttingen: Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, Philologisch-Historische Klasse.Google Scholar
Hewitt, S. (2017). Neo-speakers of endangered languages: Theorizing failure to learn the language properly as creative post-vernacularity. Journal of Celtic Languages, 18(1): 127–154.Google Scholar
Hildebrandt, K. A., Jany, C. & Silva, W. (2017). Introduction: Documenting variation in endangered languages. Language Documentation & Conservation, 13: 1–5.Google Scholar
Hinzelin, M.-O. (2018). Contact-induced change in Francoprovençal phonological systems caused by standard French. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 249: 49–70.Google Scholar
Hornsby, M. (2015). Revitalizing Minority Languages: New Speakers of Breton, Yiddish and Lemko. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hymes, D. (1974). The Scope of Sociolinguistics. In Foundations in Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Hymes, D. (1974).Reprinted in Coupland, N. and Jaworski, A. (eds). Sociolinguistics: A Reader and Coursebook. Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 12–22.Google Scholar
Jones, M. C. (1995). At what price language maintenance? Standardization in Modern Breton. French Studies, XLIX(3): 428–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasstan, J. R. (2017). New speakers: Challenges and opportunities for variationist sociolinguistics. Language and Linguistics Compass, 11(8): e12249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasstan, J. R. (fc 2019). Emergent sociolinguistic variation in severe language endangerment. Language in Society.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasstan, J. R. and Müller, D. (2018). (l) as a sociolinguistic variable in Francoprovençal. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 249: 99–118.Google Scholar
Kennard, H. and Lahiri, A. (2017). Mutation in Breton verbs: Pertinacity across generations. Journal of Linguistics, 53(1): 113–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. (1971). Some principles of linguistic methodology. Language in Society, 1(1): 97–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. (1994). Principles of Linguistic Change. Volume I: Internal Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (2015). The discovery of the unexpected. Asia-Pacific Language Variation, 1(1): 7–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. (2016). Afterword: Where are we now? Journal of Sociolinguistics, 20(4): 581–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W., Yaeger, M. and Steiner, R. (1972). A Quantitative Study of Sound Change in Progress. 2 vols. Philadelphia, 1972.Google Scholar
Lane, P., Costa, J. and De Korne, H. (eds.) (2018). Standardizing Minority Languages: Competing Ideologies of Authority and Authenticity in the Global Periphery. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lippi-Green, R. (1994). Accent, standard language ideology and discrimination pretext in the courts. Language in Society, 23(2): 163–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodge, R.A. (1993). French: from dialect to standard. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyerhoff, M. (2017). Writing a linguistic symphony: Analyzing variation while doing language documentation. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 62(4): 525–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milroy, J., Milroy, L., Hartley, S. and Walshaw, D. (1994). Local and supra-local change in British English: the case of glottalisation. English World-Wide, 15: 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministère de la Culture. (2018). Langues régionales. http://www.culture.gouv.fr/Thematiques/Langue-francaise-et-langues-de-France/Politiques-de-la-langue/Langues-de-France/Langues-regionales (Accessed: 17 April 2019).Google Scholar
Mooney, D. (2017). Phonetic transfer in language contact: Evidence for equivalence classification in the mid-vowels of Occitan-French bilinguals. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 44(3): 1–33.Google Scholar
Müller, D. (2011a). Approches expérimentales en langue minorisée : Le cas de l’occitan. In: Blauth-Henke, C. & Heinz, M. (eds.), Où en sont les études des langues régionales en domaine roman ? Données – méthodes – modèles de description. Tübingen: Stauffenburg Verlag, pp. 49–60.Google Scholar
Müller, D. (2011b). Developments of the lateral in Occitan dialects and their Romance and cross-linguistic context. PhD thesis, Universitat de Tolosa 2 – Lo Miralh & Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg. Available at: https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00674530/document (Accessed: 17 May 2019).Google Scholar
Nagy, N. and Meyerhoff, M. (2008). The social lives of language. In: Meyerhoff, M. and Nagy, N. (eds.), Social Lives in Language – Sociolinguistics and Multilingual Speech Communities. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
Nance, C.L. (2018). Linguistic innovation among Glasgow Gaelic new speakers. In: Smith-Christmas, C., Ó Murchada, N. P., Hornsby, M., and Moriarty, M. (eds.), New speakers of minority languages: linguistic ideologies and practices. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Oakes, L. (2017). Normative language policy and minority language rights: rethinking the case of regional languages in France. Language Policy, 16(4): 365–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ó Murchadha, N. P. (2018). Renegotiating standard language and language standards in minority contexts. Paper to ‘Global approaches to multilingualism and standardisation’ conference. University of Cambridge, 16–18 April 2018.Google Scholar
Pooley, T. (2000). Sociolinguistics, regional varieties of French and regional languages in France. Journal of French Language Studies, 10(2): 117–157.Google Scholar
Roger, G. (2019). The langues de France and the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages: Keeping Ratification at Bay Through Disinformation: 2014–2015. In: Harrison, M. and Joubert, A. (eds.), French Language Policies and the Revitalisation of Regional Languages in the 21st Century. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 309–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sankoff, D. and Labov, W. (1979). On the uses of variable rules. Language in Society 8(2): 189–222.Google Scholar
Sankoff, G. 1980. The Social Life of Language. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiffman, H. F. (1996). Linguistic Culture and Language Policy. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smakman, D. (2015). The westernising mechanism in sociolinguistics. In: Smakman, D. and Heinreich, P. (eds.), Globalising Sociolinguistics: Challenging and Expanding Theory. London: Routledge, pp. 16–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J.-C. and Maiden, M. (1995). Linguistic Theory and the Romance Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spence, N. C. W. (1957). L’assibilation de l’r intervocalique dans les parlers jersiais. Revue de linguistique romane, 21: 270–288.Google Scholar
Stanford, J. N. (2016). A call for more diverse sources of data: Variationist approaches in non-English contexts. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 20(4): 525–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanford, J. N. and Preston, D. (eds.) (2009). Variation in Indigenous Minority Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tabouret-Keller, A. (1981). Introduction. Regional Languages in France: current research in rural situations. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 29: 5–14.Google Scholar
Thiers, J. (1993). Language contact and Corsican polynomia. In: Posner, R. and Green, J. N. (eds.), Trends in Romance Linguistics and Philology. Vol 5. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 253–270.Google Scholar
Thomason, S. (2001). Language Contact: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Trudeau, D. (1992). Les Inventeurs du Bon Usage (1529–1647). Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. (1999). New-dialect formation and dedialectalisation: Embryonic and vestigial variants. Journal of English Linguistics 27(4): 319–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, P. (2011). Sociolinguistic Typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Villeneuve, A.-J. and Auger, J. (2013). ‘Chtileu qu’i m’freumereu m’bouque i n’est point coé au monne’: Grammatical variation and diglossia in Picardie. Journal of French Language Studies, 23(1): 109–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vincent, D., Laforest, M., and Martel, G. (1995). Le corpus de Montréal 1995: Adaptation de la méthode d’enquête sociolinguistique pour l’analyse conversationnelle. Dialangue, 6: 29–46.Google Scholar
Wheeler, M. (1988). Occitan. In: Harris, M. and Vincent, N. (eds.), The Romance Languages. London: Croom Helm, pp. 246–278.Google Scholar
Woolard, K. A. (1998). Introduction: Language ideology as a field of inquiry. In: Schieffelin, B. B., Woolard, K. A. and Kroskrity, P. V. (eds.), Language Ideologies: Practice and Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–47.Google Scholar