Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T05:29:13.679Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Authority, prescriptivism and the French standard language§

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 October 2008

R. Anthony Lodge
R. Anthony Lodge
Affiliation:
Department of French, The University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE17RU.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Prescriptive attitudes to language seem to be more deeply engrained in France than in many other speech-communities. This article traces their development between the sixteenth century and the present day within the model of language standardization proposed by E. Haugen and in the light of the notion of ‘standard ideology’ proposed by J. and L. Milroy. It will be argued that early definitions of what was considered ‘the best French’ were based simply on the observed usage of ‘the best people’; later it was felt that the standard required more permanent jusitification, giving rise to the idea that the ‘best French’ was the ‘best’ because it was the variety most closely in line with clarity and reason; a third stage was reached with the French Revolution when this variety of French became mandatory for everyone wishing to be considered ‘French’ and ‘reasonable’. Powerful institutional forces are engaged in promoting and maintaining this ideology in contemporary France, but excessive rigidity in the traditional standard in the face of the alternative norms which exert countervailing pressures on speakers could lead to a sitution of diglossia.

Type
Overview article
Information
Journal of French Language Studies , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , March 1991 , pp. 93 - 111
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

§

This article is a development of a paper originally given in Bristol University on 9 March 1990, under the title ‘The development of the ideology of the standard in France, 1500–1800’. I am most greatful to Professors G. Price and J. Milroy for their valuable comments on an earlier version of what is printed here.

References

REFERENCES

Ayres, , Bennett, W. (1987). Vaugelas and the Development of the French Language. London: Modern Humanities Research Association.Google Scholar
Bédard, E. and Maurais, J. (1983). La Norme linguistique. Québec: Publications du Gouvernement du Québec.Google Scholar
Blanche-Benveniste, C. and Jeanjean, C. (1987). Le Français parlé. Paris: Didier.Google Scholar
Brunot, F. (1967). Historie de la langue française, T. VII. Paris: Colin.Google Scholar
Certeau, M. de, Julia, D. and Revel, J. (1975). Une Politique de la langue. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Descimon, R. (1989). Paris on the eve of Saint Bartholemew: taxation, privilege, and social geography. In: Benedict, P. (ed.), Cities and Social Change in Early Modern France. London: Unwin Hyman, pp. 69–104.Google Scholar
Diderot, D. and d'Alembert, J., Le, Rond (1765). Encyclopédie ou dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers par une Société de gens de letters. Paris: Le Breton.Google Scholar
Fishman, J. A. (1972). Language and Nationalism: Two Integrative Essays. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
François, A. (1959). Histoire de la langue française cultivée. Geneva: A. Jullien.Google Scholar
Garmadi, J. (1981). La Sociolinguistique. Paris: PUF.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haugen, E. (1966). Dialect, language, nation. In: Pride, J. B. and Holmes, J. (eds.), Sociolinguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1972, pp. 97–116.Google Scholar
Lancelot, Cl. and Arnauld, A. (1660). La Grammaire générale et raisonnée, ou la grammaire de Port-Royal, ed. Brekle, H. H., Stuttgart: Fromann, 1966.Google Scholar
Leith, D. (1983). A Social History of English. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Le, Page R. and Tabouret-Keller, A. (1985). Acts of Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lodge, R. A. (1989). Speakers' perceptions of non-standard vocabulary in French. Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie, 105:427–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodge, R. A. (1990). The language of Molière's peasants. In Dunkley, J. (ed.), Language of French Theatre. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Milroy, J. and Milroy, L. (1985). Authority in Language. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, B. (1985). Le Français d'aujourd'hui. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Picoche, J. and Marchello-Nizia, C. (1989). Histoire de la langue française. Paris: Nathan.Google Scholar
Quémada, B. (1972). Bibliographie des chroniques de langue publiées dans la presse française. Paris: Didier.Google Scholar
Richard, P. (1989). A History of the French Language, 2nd edn. London: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Rivarol, A. de (1784). Discours sur l'universalité de la langue française, ed. Juin, H.. Paris: Belfond, 1966.Google Scholar
Swiggers, P. (1987). A l'ombre de la clarté française. Langue française, 75:5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaugelascl, F. de (1647). Remarques sur la langue françoise, ed. Streicher, J.. Paris: Droz, 1934.Google Scholar
Wartburg, W. von (1962). Evolution et structure de la langue française, 6th edn. Berne: Franke.Google Scholar
Weinreich, U., Labov, W., and Herzog, M. (1968). Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In: Lehmann, W. and Malkiel, Y. (eds.), Directions for Historical Linguistics. Austin: University of Texas Press, pp. 97–195.Google Scholar
Yaguello, M. (1988). Catalogue des idées reçues sur la langue. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar