Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T14:13:36.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Véronique Traverso, Décrire le français parlé en interaction. (L’Essentiel français.) Paris: Ophrys, 2016, 195 pp. 978 2 7080 1460 2 (softcover)

Review products

Véronique Traverso, Décrire le français parlé en interaction. (L’Essentiel français.) Paris: Ophrys, 2016, 195 pp. 978 2 7080 1460 2 (softcover)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2019

Kerry Mullan Open the ORCID record for Kerry Mullan [Opens in a new window]
Kerry Mullan*
Affiliation:
Global and Language StudiesRMIT UniversityGPO Box 2476 Melbourne VIC [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Journal of French Language Studies , Volume 29 , Issue 3 , November 2019 , pp. 444 - 447
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Béal, C. (2010). Les interactions quotidiennes en français et en anglais: de l’approche comparative à l’analyse des situations interculturelles. Bern: Peter Lang.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Mullan, K. (2010). Expressing Opinions in French and Australian English Discourse: A Semantic and Interactional Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A. and Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50.4: 696–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar