Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T09:35:01.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A problem in sociolinguistic methodology: investigating a rare syntactic form1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 October 2008

Janice Carruthers
Janice Carruthers
Affiliation:
School of Modern Languages, The Queen's University, Belfast BT7 1NN, e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article discusses a number of problematic issues relating to the methodology involved in investigating a rare syntactic form. Three key areas are explored, namely fieldwork technique, sampling methodology and data analysis. Although the starting-point is a particular survey of a rare French tense, the questions raised are of more general relevance. In the light of previous research, both theoretical and practical sides of the issues are discussed and debated.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of French Language Studies , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , March 1999 , pp. 1 - 24
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Armstrong, N. (1996) Variable deletion of French /l/: linguistic, social and stylistic factors. Journal of French Language Studies, 6.1: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashby, W. (1982) The drift of French syntax. Lingua, 57: 29–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayres-Bennett, W. and Carruthers, J. (1992) ‘Une regrettable et fort disgracieuse faute de français?’ The description and analysis of the French surcomposés from 1530 to the present day. Transactions of the Philological Society, 90.2: 219–57.Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. (1977) Meaning and Form. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Carruthers, J. (1992) Une étude sociolinguistique des formes surcomposées en français moderne. Actas do XIX congreso international de lingüística e filoloxía romanicas, 3: 145–62.Google Scholar
Carruthers, J. (1993a) Passé composé, passé surcomposé: marqueurs de l'antériorité en français parlé. Actes du XXème congrès international de linguistique et philologie romanes, 1: 111–22.Google Scholar
Carruthers, J. (1993b) The formes surcomposées: the discourse function and linguistic status of a rare form in contemporary spoken French. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Carruthers, J. (1994) The passé surcomposé régional: towards a definition of its function in contemporary spoken French. Journal of French Language Studies, 4.2: 171–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carruthers, J. (1996) The passé surcomposé général: on the relationship between a rare tense and discourse organization. Romance Philology, 1.2: 183–200.Google Scholar
Carruthers, J. (1998) Surcomposé général et surcomposé régional: deux formes distinctes? Actes du XXIème congrès international de linguistique et philologie romanes, vol. 2, Morphologia e sintassi delle lingue romanze. Tübingen: Niemeyer, pp. 143–154.Google Scholar
Cedergren, H. J. and Sankoff, D. (1974) Variable rules: performance as a statistical reflection of competence. Language, 50: 333–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheshire, J. (1982) Variation in an English Dialect: A Sociolinguistic Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cornu, M. (1953) Les Formes surcomposées en français. Berne: Francke.Google Scholar
Coupland, N. (1980) Style-shifting in a Cardiff Work Setting. Language in Sotiety, 9: 1–12.Google Scholar
Coveney, A. (1996) Variability in Spoken French. A Sociolinguistic Study of Interrogation and Negation. Exeter: Elm Bank Publications.Google Scholar
Damourette, J. and Pichon, E. (1911–1940) Des mots à la pensée: essai de grammaire de la langue française, 7 vols. Paris: Editions d'Artrey.Google Scholar
Engel, D. (1996) Le passé du passé. Word, 47.1: 41–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fish, S. (1970) Literature in the reader: affective stylistics. New Literary History, 2.1: 123–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foulet, L. (1925) Le développement des formes surcomposées. Romania, 51: 203–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, J. K. (1984) A la recherche de temps perdus: the double compound forms of the verb in present-day French. Word, 35.1: 89–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jolivet, R. (1984) L'acceptabilité des formes verbales surcomposées. Le Français Moderne, 52: 159–76.Google Scholar
Knecht, P. and Rubattel, C. (1984) A propos de la dimension sociolinguistique du français en Suisse romande. Le Français Moderne, 52: 138–50.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1966) The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1972) Sociolinguisitc Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Lavandera, B. (1975) Linguistic structure and sociolinguistic conditioning in the use of verbal endings in si clauses (Buenos Aires Spanish). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Milroy, L. (1980) Language and Social Networks. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Milroy, L. (1987) Observing and Analysing Natural Language. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Petiot, G. (1977) Registres de langue et manuels scolaires. Langue Française, 33: 68–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petiot, G. and Marchello-Nizia, C. (1972) La norme et les grammaires scolaires. Langue Française, 16: 99–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pooley, T. (1994) Word-final consonant devoicing in a variety of working-class French: a case of language contact? Journal of French Language Studies, 4.2: 215–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poplack, S., Sankoff, D. and Miller, C. (1988) The social correlates and linguistic processes of lexical borrowing and assimilation. Linguistics, 26.1: 47–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romaine, S. (1984) On the problem of syntactic variation and pragmatic meaning in sociolinguistic theory. Folia Linguistica, 18/3–4: 409–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sankoff, G. ed., (1980a) The Social Life of Language. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sankoff, G. (1980b) Above and beyond Phonology in Variable Rules. Sankoff (1980): 81–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sankoff, G. and Thibault, P. (1980) The alternation between the auxiliaries avoir and être in Montréal French. Sankoff (1980): 311—45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sankoff, G. and Vincent, D. (1980) The productive use of ne in spoken Montréal French. Sankoff (1980): 295–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J. (1996) Sound Evidence. Speech Communities and Social Accents in Aix-en-Provence. Berne: Lang.Google Scholar
Tuaillon, G. (1983) Matériaux pour l'étude des régionalismes du français, vol. 1: Les Régionalismes du français parlé à Vourey, village dauphinois. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Walter, H. (1981) Le surcomposé dans les usages actuels du français. Actants, voix et aspects verbaux: actes des journées d'études linguistiques des 22 et 23 mai 1979. Angers: Presses de l'Université d'Angers: 24–44.Google Scholar
Weiner, E. J. and Labov, W. (1983) Constraints on the Agentless Passive. Journal of Linguistics, 19: 29–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar