Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T19:10:41.815Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Unsteady entrance flow in a 90° curved tube

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

C. C. M. Rindt ,
A. A. van Steenhoven ,
J. D. Janssen  and
G. Vossers
C. C. M. Rindt
Affiliation:
Departments of Mechanical Engineering and Physics, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
A. A. van Steenhoven
Affiliation:
Departments of Mechanical Engineering and Physics, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
J. D. Janssen
Affiliation:
Departments of Mechanical Engineering and Physics, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
G. Vossers
Affiliation:
Departments of Mechanical Engineering and Physics, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A numerical model enabling the prediction of the axial and secondary velocity fields in three-dimensional configurations at moderate Reynolds numbers and Womersley parameters is presented. Steady and unsteady entrance flows in a 90° curve tube (δ = ⅙) under various flow conditions are analysed. The good quality agreement between axial and secondary velocities for a sinusoidally varying flow rate at a Womersley parameter of α = 7.8, obtained from a finite-element calculation, and those obtained from laser-Doppler measurements justify the use of the numerical model.

Halfway into the deceleration phase for a sinusoidally varying flow rate (200 < Re < 800, α = 7.8) a strong resemblance is found to the steady flow case (Re = 700). In contrast with steady flow, near the inner wall reversed axial flow regions are found halfway into and at the end of the deceleration phase. Throughout the flow cycle the Dean-type secondary flow field highly influences axial flow resulting in a shift of the maximal axial velocity towards the outer wall, C-shaped axial isovelocity lines and an axial velocity plateau near the inner wall. Further downstream in the curved tube the Dean-type secondary vortex near the plane of symmetry is deflected towards the sidewall (’tail’–formation), as is also found for steady flow. An increase of the Womersley parameter (α = 24.7) results in a constant secondary flow field which is probably mainly determined by the steady component of the flow rate. A study on the flow phenomena occurring for a physiologically varying flow rate suggests that the diastolic phase is only of minor importance for the flow phenomena occurring in the systolic phase. Elimination of the steady flow component (− 300 < Re < 300) results in a pure Dean-type secondary flow field (no ‘tail’-formation) for α = 7.8 and in a Lyne-type secondary flow field for α = 24.7. The magnitude of the secondary velocities for α = 24.7 are of O(10−2) as compared to the secondary velocities for α = 7.8.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 226 , May 1991 , pp. 445 - 474
Copyright
© 1991 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berger, S. A., Talbot, L. & Yao, L. S., 1983 Flow in curved pipes. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 15, 461–512.Google Scholar
Bertelsen, A. F.: 1975 An experimental investigation of low Reynolds number secondary streaming effects associated with an oscillating viscous flow in a curved pipe. J. Fluid Mech. 70, 519–527.Google Scholar
Bovendeerd, P. H. M., Van Steenhoven, A. A., van de Vosse, F. N. & Vossers, G. 1987 Steady entry flow in a curved pipe. J. Fluid Mech. 177, 233–246.Google Scholar
Chandran, K. B. & Yeabwood, T. L., 1981 Experimental study of physiological pulsatile flow in a curved tube. J. Fluid Mech. 1ll, 59–85.Google Scholar
Chandran, K. B., Yearwood, T. L. & Wieting, D. W., 1979 An experimental study of pulsatile flow in a curved tube. J. Biomechanics 12, 793–805.Google Scholar
Chang, L. J. & Tarbeill, J. M., 1985 Numerical simulation of fully developed sinusoidal and pulsatile (physiological) flow in curved tubes. J. Fluid Mech. 161, 175–198.Google Scholar
Crouzkix, M. & Raviart, P. A., 1973 Conforming and nonconforming finite element methods for solving the stationary Stokes equations. RAIRO Anal. Num. R R3, 33–76.Google Scholar
Cuvelier, C., Segal, A. & Van Steenhoven, A. A.: 1986 Finite. Element Methods and Navier-Stokes Equations. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
Dean, W. R.: 1972 Note on the motion of fluid in a curved pipe. Phil. Mag. 4, 208–223.Google Scholar
Drain, L. E.: 1981 The Laser Doppler Technique. John Wiley & Sons.
Hamakiotes, C. C. & Berger, S. A., 1988 Fully developed pulsatile flow in a curved pipe. J. Fluid Much. 195, 23–55.Google Scholar
Lin, J. Y. & Tarbell, J. M., 1980 An experimental and numerical study of periodic flow in a curved tube. J. Fluid Mech. 100, 623–638.Google Scholar
Lyne, W. H.: 1970 Unsteady viscous flow in a curved pipe. J. Fluid Mech. 45, 13–31.Google Scholar
Mullin, T. & Created, C. A., 1980 Oscillatory flow in curved pipes. Part 1. The developing-flow case; Part 2. The fully developed case. J. Fluid Mech. 98, 383–416.Google Scholar
Munson, B. R.: 1975 Experimental results for oscillating flow in a curved pipe. Phys. Fluids 18, 1607–1609.Google Scholar
Olson, D. E.: 1971 Fluid mechanics relevant to respiration: flow within curved or elliptical tubes and bifurcating systems. PhD thesis, University of London.
Pelissier, M.: 1975 Resolution numérique de quelques problèmes raides en mecanique des milieux faiblement compressibles. Estratto da Calcolo 12, 275–314.Google Scholar
Perktold, K., Florian, H. & Hilbert, D., 1987 Analysis of pulsatile blood flow: a carotid siphon model. J. Biomed. Engng 9, 46–53.Google Scholar
Rindt, C. C. M., van de Vosse, F. N. Van Stebnhoven, A. A., Janssen, J. D. & Reneman, R. S. 1987 A numerical and experimental analysis of the flow field in a two-dimensional model of the human carotid artery bifurcation. J. Biomech. 20, 499–509.Google Scholar
Segal, A.: 1984 Sepran User Manual and Programmers Guide. Ingenieurs buro Sepra, Leidschendam.
Singh, M. P., Sinha, P. C. & Aggarwal, M., 1978 Flow in the entrance of the aorta. J. Fluid Mech. 87, 97–120.Google Scholar
Sloan, S. W.: 1986 An algorithm for profile and wavefront reduction of sparse matrices. Intl J. Numer. Meth. Engng 23, 239–251.Google Scholar
Smith, F. T.: 1975 Pulsatile flow in curved pipes. J. Fluid Mech. 71, 15–42.Google Scholar
Talbot, L. & Gong, K. O., 1983 Pulsatile entrance flow in a curved pipe. J. Fluid Mech. 127, 1–25.Google Scholar
Temam, R.: 1977 Navier-Stokes Equations, Theory and Numerical Analysis, 2nd edn. North Holland.
van de Vosse, F. N., Segal, A., Steenhoven, A. A. & van Janssen, J. D. 1986 A finite element approximation of the unsteady 2D-Navier-Stokes equations. Intl. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 6, 427–443.Google Scholar
van den Vosse, F. N., Steenhoven, A. A., Van Segel, A. & Janssen, J. D. 1989 A finite element analysis of the steady laminar entrance flow in a 90° curved tube. Intl. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 9, 275–287.Google Scholar
Zalosh, R. G. & Nelson, W. G., 1973 Pulsating flow in a curved tube. J. FluidMech. 59, 693–705.Google Scholar