Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-fr72s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-21T00:53:36.757Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Two-point statistics in non-homogeneous rotating turbulence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 October 2024

P. Beaumard
Affiliation:
Univ. Lille, CNRS, ONERA, Arts et Metiers Institute of Technology, Centrale Lille, UMR 9014 – LMFL – Laboratoire de Mécanique des Fluides de Lille, Kampé de Fériet, F-59000 Lille, France
P. Bragança
Affiliation:
Univ. Lille, CNRS, ONERA, Arts et Metiers Institute of Technology, Centrale Lille, UMR 9014 – LMFL – Laboratoire de Mécanique des Fluides de Lille, Kampé de Fériet, F-59000 Lille, France
C. Cuvier
Affiliation:
Univ. Lille, CNRS, ONERA, Arts et Metiers Institute of Technology, Centrale Lille, UMR 9014 – LMFL – Laboratoire de Mécanique des Fluides de Lille, Kampé de Fériet, F-59000 Lille, France
J.C. Vassilicos*
Affiliation:
Univ. Lille, CNRS, ONERA, Arts et Metiers Institute of Technology, Centrale Lille, UMR 9014 – LMFL – Laboratoire de Mécanique des Fluides de Lille, Kampé de Fériet, F-59000 Lille, France
*
Email address for correspondence: [email protected]

Abstract

Time-resolved two-dimensional two-component particle image velocimetry measurements with high spatial resolution are carried out in a water tank agitated by four blades rotating at constant speed. Different blade geometries and rotation speeds are tested for the purpose of modifying turbulent flow conditions. In all cases where no baffles are used to break the rotation, the Zeman length is an order of magnitude smaller than the Taylor length. Compared with the cases with baffles which break the rotation, in the unbaffled cases turbulence production and/or mean advection are significant and the turbulence nonlinearity is dramatically reduced for the horizontal (i.e. normal to the axis of rotation) two-point turbulence fluctuating velocities. This nonlinearity reduction is manifest not only in the interscale turbulent energy transfer but also in the interspace turbulent energy transfer, which nearly vanishes. However, the nonlinearity is not reduced for the vertical two-point turbulence fluctuating velocities: the corresponding interscale turbulent transfer rate is in fact intensified, and its dependence on the two-point separation distance, as well as that of the corresponding interspace turbulent transfer rate, which does not vanish, is significantly modified. Even though non-homogeneities are very different for different blades and rotation speeds in the unbaffled cases, the horizontal fluctuating velocity's second-order structure function collapses with scalings which resemble predictions for homogeneous turbulence subject to strong rotation. The vertical fluctuating velocity's second-order structure function does not collapse for different blade geometries by neither these nor the Kolmogorov predictions.

Type
JFM Papers
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Alves Portela, F., Papadakis, G. & Vassilicos, J.C. 2017 The turbulence cascade in the near wake of a square prism. J. Fluid Mech. 825, 315352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baroud, C.N., Plapp, B.B., She, Z.-S. & Swinney, H.L. 2002 Anomalous self-similarity in a turbulent rapidly rotating fluid. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (11), 114501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batchelor, G.K. 1953 The Theory of Homogeneous Turbulence. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Başbuğ, S., Papadakis, G. & Vassilicos, J.C. 2018 Reduced power consumption in stirred vessels by means of fractal impellers. AIChE J. 64 (4), 14851499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaumard, P., Braganća, P., Cuvier, C., Steiros, K. & Vassilicos, J.C. 2024 Scale-by-scale non-equilibrium with Kolmogorov-like scalings in non-homogeneous stationary turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 984, A35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellet, F., Godeferd, F.S., Scott, J.F. & Cambon, C. 2006 Wave turbulence in rapidly rotating flows. J. Fluid Mech. 562, 83121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brissaud, A., Frisch, U., Leorat, J., Lesieur, M. & Mazure, A. 1973 Helicity cascades in fully developed isotropic turbulence. Phys. Fluids 16 (8), 1366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canuto, V.M. & Dubovikov, M.S. 1997 Physical regimes and dimensional structure of rotating turbulence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 (4), 666669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, J.G. & Vassilicos, J.C. 2022 Scalings of scale-by-scale turbulence energy in non-homogeneous turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 938, A7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corrsin, S. 1958 Local isotropy in turbulent shear flow. Tech. Rep. RM 58B11. National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics.Google Scholar
Delache, A., Cambon, C. & Godeferd, F. 2014 Scale by scale anisotropy in freely decaying rotating turbulence. Phys. Fluids 26 (2), 025104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frisch, U. 1995 Turbulence: The Legacy of A. N. Kolmogorov. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galtier, S. 2003 Weak inertial-wave turbulence theory. Phys. Rev. E 68 (1), 015301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galtier, S. 2009 Exact vectorial law for homogeneous rotating turbulence. Phys. Rev. E 80 (4), 046301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galtier, S. 2022 Physics of Wave Turbulence. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godeferd, F.S. & Moisy, F. 2015 Structure and dynamics of rotating turbulence: a review of recent experimental and numerical results. Appl. Mech. Rev. 67 (3), 030802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herbert, E., Daviaud, F., Dubrulle, B., Nazarenko, S. & Naso, A. 2012 Dual non-Kolmogorov cascades in a von Kármán flow. Europhys. Lett. 100 (4), 44003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, R.J. 2001 Equations relating structure functions of all orders. J. Fluid Mech. 434, 379388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, R.J. 2002 The approach of turbulence to the locally homogeneous asymptote as studied using exact structure-function equations. arXiv:physics/0206034.Google Scholar
Kolmogorov, A.N. 1941 a Dissipation of energy in the locally isotropic turbulence. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 32 (1941), 1618.Google Scholar
Kolmogorov, A.N. 1941 b The local structure of turbulence in incompressible viscous fluid for very large Reynolds numbers. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 30 (1941), 301305.Google Scholar
Kraichnan, R.H. 1965 Inertial-range spectrum of hydromagnetic turbulence. Phys. Fluids 8 (7), 13851387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morize, C., Moisy, F. & Rabaud, M. 2005 Decaying grid-generated turbulence in a rotating tank. Phys. Fluids 17 (9), 095105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagata, S. 1975 Mixing: Principles and Applications. Halsted Press.Google Scholar
Nazarenko, S. & Laval, J.-P. 2000 Non-local two-dimensional turbulence and Batchelor's regime for passive scalars. J. Fluid Mech. 408, 301321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obukhov, A.M. 1941 On the distribution of energy in the spectrum of turbulent flow. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR. 32, 1921.Google Scholar
Pope, S.B. 2000 Turbulent Flows. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sagaut, P. & Cambon, C. 2018 Homogeneous Turbulence Dynamics. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiros, K., Bruce, P.J.K., Buxton, O.R.H. & Vassilicos, J.C. 2017 a Effect of blade modifications on the torque and flow field of radial impellers in stirred tanks. Phys. Rev. Fluids 2 (9), 094802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiros, K., Bruce, P.J.K., Buxton, O.R.H. & Vassilicos, J.C. 2017 b Power consumption and form drag of regular and fractal-shaped turbines in a stirred tank. AIChE J. 63 (2), 843854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thiele, M. & Müller, W.-C. 2009 Structure and decay of rotating homogeneous turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 637, 425442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeung, P.K. & Zhou, Y. 1998 Numerical study of rotating turbulence with external forcing. Phys. Fluids 10 (11), 28952909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeman, O. 1994 A note on the spectra and decay of rotating homogeneous turbulence. Phys. Fluids 6 (10), 32213223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Y. 1995 A phenomenological treatment of rotating turbulence. Phys. Fluids 7 (8), 20922094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar