Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T19:33:58.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Two-layer model for shallow horizontal convective circulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2006

Dominique N. Brocard
Affiliation:
R. M. Parsons Laboratory for Water Resources and Hydrodynamics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 Present address: Alden Research Laboratory, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Holden, Massachusetts, 01520.
Donald R. F. Harleman
Affiliation:
R. M. Parsons Laboratory for Water Resources and Hydrodynamics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139

Abstract

This paper discusses experiments and a theoretical model for the convective circulation driven by a surface buoyancy flux in a horizontal layer of fluid. The layer is closed at one end and, at the other end, the buoyancy has a fixed value over a given depth. Such circulation occurs in side arms of cooling lakes used for waste-heat disposal from power generation. Some geophysical circulations, such as in the Red Sea, are also of the above type.

The experiments were done in a 35 ft long flume using heat transfer between the heated water and the atmosphere to generate the surface buoyancy flux. The observed circulation was characterized by two distinct layers flowing in opposite directions and separated by a density interface. For upper-layer depths less than about half the total depth at the open end, the downflow was observed to be concentrated near the closed end. Circulation flowrates and vertical temperature profiles were measured.

The theoretical model uses a ‘two-layer’ approach. The mass, momentum, and buoyancy conservation equations are integrated vertically on each side of the interface. Mass and buoyancy transfer across the interface are neglected. The interfacial shear stress is proportional to the square of the difference of the average layer velocities. For small layer densimetric Froude numbers, the free surface is shown to be approximately horizontal and the problem reduces to one ordinary differential equation for the thickness of the upper layer. General solutions of this interface equation are presented for horizontal and sloping bottoms. Different configurations are possible depending on the nature of the singular points which occur in the phase plan.

For the convective circulation, the interface is shown to go through a singular point. This condition leads to a simple analytical solution for the circulation flowrate in the case of constant surface buoyancy flux and horizontal bottom. This solution compares well with the experimental data and with measurements on the Red Sea circulation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1980 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brocard, D. N., Jirka, G. H. & Harleman, D. R. F. 1977 A model for the convective circulation in side arms of cooling lakes. Ralph M. Parsons Lab. for Water Resources & Hydrodyn., MIT, Rep. no. 223.Google Scholar
Chow, V. T. 1959 Open-Channel Hydraulics. McGraw-Hill.
Edinger, J. R. & Geyer, J. C. 1965 Cooling water studies for Edison Electric Institute. The Johns Hopkins University, Project no. RP-49 — Heat Exchange in the Environment.Google Scholar
Hsu, S. T. & Stolzenbach, K. D. 1975 Density currents in a canal connecting stratified reservoirs. Proc. 16th Cong. Int. Ass. for Hydraulic Res. Sao Paulo, Brasil.
Karelse, M. 1974 Vertical exchange coefficients in stratified flows. In Momentum and Mass Transfer in Stratified Flows (ed. H. N. Breusens), cha. 2. (Delft Hydraulic Lab. Rep. R880.)
Lofquist, K. 1960 Flow and stress near an interface between stratified liquids. Phys. Fluids 3, 158175.Google Scholar
Long, R. R. 1975 Circulation and density distribution in a deep, strongly stratified two-layer estuary. J. Fluid Mech. 71, 529540.Google Scholar
Massé, P. 1938 Ressaut et ligne d'eau dans les cours d'eau a pente variable. Rev. Gen. Hydraul. Paris 4, 711 and 6164.Google Scholar
Moore, M. J. & Long, R. L. 1971 An experimental investigation of turbulent stratified shearing flow. J. Fluid Mech. 49, 635655.Google Scholar
Phillips, O. M. 1966 On turbulent convection currents and the circulation of the Red Sea. Deep Sea Res. 13, 11491160.Google Scholar
Rigter, B. P. 1970 Density induced return current in outlet channels. Proc. A.S.C.E., J. Hydraul. Div. 96 (HY2), 529546.Google Scholar
Ryan, P. J., Harleman, D. R. F. & Stolzenbach, K. D. 1974 Surface heat loss from cooling ponds. Water Resources Res. 10, 930938.Google Scholar
Schijf, J. B. & Schonfeld, J. C. 1953 Theoretical considerations on the motion of salt and fresh water. Proc. Minnesota Int. Hydraulics Convention.
Sturm, T. W. 1976 An analytical and experimental investigation of density currents in side arms of cooling ponds. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Mechanics and Hydraulics, University of Iowa.
Turner, J. S. 1973 Buoyancy Effects in Fluids. Cambridge University Press.
Welander, P. 1974 Two layer exchange in an estuary with special reference to the Baltic Sea. J. Phys. Oceanog. 4, 542556.Google Scholar