Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T20:05:18.072Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Turbulent drag reduction over curved walls

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2020

Jacopo Banchetti ,
Paolo Luchini Open the ORCID record for Paolo Luchini [Opens in a new window]  and
Maurizio Quadrio Open the ORCID record for Maurizio Quadrio [Opens in a new window]
Jacopo Banchetti
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Aerospaziali, Politecnico di Milano, via La Masa 34, 20156Milano, Italy
Paolo Luchini
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Ingegneria Industriale, Università di Salerno, 84084Fisciano, Italy
Maurizio Quadrio*
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Aerospaziali, Politecnico di Milano, via La Masa 34, 20156Milano, Italy
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This work studies the effects of skin-friction drag reduction in a turbulent flow over a curved wall, with a view to understanding the relationship between the reduction of friction and changes to the total aerodynamic drag. Direct numerical simulations are carried out for an incompressible turbulent flow in a channel where one wall has a small bump; two bump geometries are considered, that produce mildly separated and attached flows. Friction drag reduction is achieved by applying streamwise-travelling waves of spanwise velocity (StTW). The local friction reduction produced by the StTW is found to vary along the curved wall, leading to a global friction reduction that, for the cases studied, is up to 10 % larger than that obtained in the plane wall case. Moreover, the modified skin friction induces non-negligible changes of pressure drag, which is favourably affected by StTW and globally reduces by up to 10 %. The net power saving, accounting for the power required to create the StTW, is positive and, for the cases studied, is one half larger than the net saving of the planar case. The study suggests that reducing friction at the surface of a body of complex shape induces further effects, a simplistic evaluation of which might lead to underestimating the total drag reduction.

JFM classification

Flow Control: Drag reduction Turbulent Flows: Turbulence control Boundary Layers: Boundary layer control
Type
JFM Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 896 , 10 August 2020 , A10
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almeida, G. P., Durao, D. F. G. & Heitor, M. V. 1993 Wake flows behind two-dimensional model hills. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 7, 87–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atzori, M., Vinuesa, R., Fahland, G. et al. 2020 Aerodynamic effects of uniform blowing and suction on a NACA4412 airfoil. Flow Turbulence Combust. doi:10.1007/s10494-020-00135-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auteri, F., Baron, A., Belan, M., Campanardi, G. & Quadrio, M. 2010 Experimental assessment of drag reduction by traveling waves in a turbulent pipe flow. Phys. Fluids 22 (11), 115103/14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernard, A, Foucaut, J. M., Dupont, P. & Stanislas, M. 2003 Decelerating boundary layer: a new scaling and mixing model. AIAA J. 41 (2), 248–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breuer, M., Peller, N., Rapp, C. & Manhart, M. 2009 Flow over periodic hills: a numerical and experimental study in a wide range of Reynolds number. Comput. Fluids 38 (2), 433–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fournier, G., Laval, J.-P., Braud, C. & Stanislas, M. 2010 Numerical simulations of the flow in a converging-diverging channel with control through a spanwise slot. Intl J. Flow Control 2 (4), 289–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gatti, D. & Quadrio, M. 2016 Reynolds-number dependence of turbulent skin-friction drag reduction induced by spanwise forcing. J. Fluid Mech. 802, 553–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeong, J. & Hussain, F. 1995 On the identification of a vortex. J. Fluid Mech. 285, 69–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khaler, C. J., Scharnowski, S. & Cierpka, C. 2016 Highly resolved experimental results of the separated flow in a channel with streamwise periodic constrictions. J. Fluid Mech. 796, 257–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luchini, P. 2013 Linearized no-slip boundary conditions at a rough surface. J. Fluid Mech. 737, 349–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luchini, P. 2016 Immersed-boundary simulation of turbulent flow past a sinusoidally undulated river bottom. Eur. J. Mech. (B/Fluids) 55, 340–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marquillie, M., Ehrenstein, U. & Laval, J. P. 2011 Instability of streaks in wall turbulence with adverse pressure gradient. J. Fluid Mech. 681, 205–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marquillie, M., Laval, J.-P. & Dolganov, R. 2008 Direct numerical simulation of a separated channel flow with a smooth profile. J. Turbul. 9, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mele, B., Tognaccini, R. & Catalano, P. 2016 Performance assessment of a transonic wing-body configuration with riblets installed. J. Aircraft 53 (1), 129–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mollicone, J.-P., Battista, F., Gualtieri, P. & Casciola, C. M. 2017 Effect of geometry and Reynolds number on the turbulent separated flow behind a bulge in a channel. J. Fluid Mech. 823, 100–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mollicone, J.-P., Battista, F., Gualtieri, P. & Casciola, C. M. 2018 Turbulence dynamics in separated flows: the generalised kolmogorov equation for inhomogeneous anisotropic conditions. J. Fluid Mech. 841, 1012–1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mollicone, J.-P., Sharifi, M., Battista, F., Gualtieri, P. & Casciola, C. M. 2019 Particles in turbulent separated flow over a bump: effect of the Stokes number and lift force. Phys. Fluids 31 (103305), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quadrio, M., Frohnapfel, B. & Hasegawa, Y. 2016 Does the choice of the forcing term affect flow statistics in DNS of turbulent channel flow?. Eur. J. Mech. (B/Fluids) 55, 286–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quadrio, M. & Luchini, P. 2003 Integral time-space scales in turbulent wall flows. Phys. Fluids 15 (8), 2219–2227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quadrio, M. & Ricco, P. 2011 The laminar generalized Stokes layer and turbulent drag reduction. J. Fluid Mech. 667, 135–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quadrio, M., Ricco, P. & Viotti, C. 2009 Streamwise-traveling waves of spanwise wall velocity for turbulent drag reduction. J. Fluid Mech. 627, 161–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapp, C. & Manhart, M. 2011 Flow over periodic hills: an experimental study. Exp. Fluids 51 (1), 247–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, R. L., Chew, Y. T. & Shivaprasad, B. G. 1981 The structure of a separating turbulent boundary layer. Part 1. Mean flow and Reynolds stresses. J. Fluid Mech. 113, 23–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stroh, A., Hasegawa, Y., Schlatter, P. & Frohnapfel, B. 2016 Global effect of local skin friction drag reduction in spatially developing turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 805, 303–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Temmerman, L. & Leschziner, M. A. 2001 Large Eddy simulation of separated flow in a streamwise periodic channel construction. In Int. Symp. on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena, Stockholm, June 27–29, 2001.Google Scholar
Webster, D. R., Degraaff, D. B. & Eaton, J. K. 1996 Turbulence characteristics of a boundary layer over a swept bump. J. Fluid Mech. 323, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, X. & Squires, K. D. 1998 Numerical investigation of the turbulent boundary layer over a bump. J. Fluid Mech. 362, 229–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yakeno, A., Kawai, S., Nonomura, T. & Fujii, K. 2015 Separation control based on turbulence transition around a two-dimensional hump at different Reynolds numbers. Intl J. Heat Fluid Flow 55, 52–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar