Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T21:51:41.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Triadic scale interactions in a turbulent boundary layer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2015

Subrahmanyam Duvvuri  and
Beverley J. McKeon
Subrahmanyam Duvvuri*
Affiliation:
Graduate Aerospace Laboratories, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
Beverley J. McKeon
Affiliation:
Graduate Aerospace Laboratories, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A formal relationship between the skewness and the correlation coefficient of large and small scales, termed the amplitude modulation coefficient, is established for a general statistically stationary signal and is analysed in the context of a turbulent velocity signal. Both the quantities are seen to be measures of phase in triadically consistent interactions between scales of turbulence. The naturally existing phase relationships between large and small scales in a turbulent boundary layer are then manipulated by exciting a synthetic large-scale motion in the flow using a spatially impulsive dynamic wall roughness perturbation. The synthetic scale is seen to alter the phase relationships, or the degree of modulation, in a quasi-deterministic manner by exhibiting a phase-organizing influence on the small scales. The results presented provide encouragement for the development of a practical framework for favourable manipulation of energetic small-scale turbulence through large-scale inputs in a wall-bounded turbulent flow.

JFM classification

Boundary Layers: Boundary Layers Turbulent Flows: Turbulent boundary layers
Type
Rapids
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 767 , 25 March 2015 , R4
Check for updates
Copyright
© 2015 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bandyopadhyay, P. R. & Hussain, A. K. M. F. 1984 The coupling between scales in shear flows. Phys. Fluids 27 (9), 2221–2228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, G. L. & Thomas, A. S. W. 1977 Large structure in a turbulent boundary layer. Phys. Fluids 20 (10), S243–S252.Google Scholar
Chung, D. & McKeon, B. J. 2010 Large-eddy simulation of large-scale structures in long channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 661, 341–364.Google Scholar
Duvvuri, S. & McKeon, B. J.2014 Phase relationships in presence of a synthetic large-scale in a turbulent boundary layer. In 44th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference, Atlanta, GA, June 2014. AIAA Paper 2014-2883.Google Scholar
Hussain, A. K. M. F. & Reynolds, W. C. 1970 The mechanics of an organized wave in turbulent shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 41, 241–258.Google Scholar
Hutchins, N. & Marusic, I. 2007 Large-scale influences in near-wall turbulence. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 365, 647–664.Google Scholar
Jacobi, I. & McKeon, B. J. 2011 Dynamic roughness perturbation of a turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 688, 258–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobi, I. & McKeon, B. J. 2013 Phase relationships between large and small scales in the turbulent boundary layer. Exp. Fluids 54, 1481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marusic, I., Mathis, R. & Hutchins, N. 2010 Predictive model for wall-bounded turbulent flow. Science 329, 193–196.Google Scholar
Mathis, R., Hutchins, N. & Marusic, I. 2009 Large-scale amplitude modulation of the small-scale structures in turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 628, 311–337.Google Scholar
Mathis, R., Marusic, I., Hutchins, N. & Sreenivasan, K. R. 2011 The relationship between the velocity skewness and the amplitude modulation of the small scale by the large scale in turbulent boundary layers. Phys. Fluids 23, 121702.Google Scholar
Rao, K. N., Narasimha, R. & Narayanan, M. A. B. 1971 The ‘bursting’ phenomenon in a turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 48, 339–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlatter, P. & Örlu, R. 2010 Quantifying the interaction between large and small scales in wall-bounded turbulent flows: a note of caution. Phys. Fluids 22, 051704.Google Scholar
Sharma, A. S. & McKeon, B. J. 2013 On coherent structure in wall turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 728, 196–238.Google Scholar
Talluru, K. M., Baidya, R., Hutchins, N. & Marusic, I. 2014 Amplitude modulation of all three velocity components in turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 746, R1.Google Scholar