Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T20:57:41.766Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Trapped waves on jet currents: asymptotic modal approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2013

Victor I. Shrira  and
Alexey V. Slunyaev
Victor I. Shrira*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, EPSAM, Keele University, Keele ST5 5BG, UK
Alexey V. Slunyaev
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, EPSAM, Keele University, Keele ST5 5BG, UK Department of Nonlinear Geophysical Processes, Institute of Applied Physics, 46 Ulyanova Street, N. Novgorod 603950, Russia Nizhny Novgorod State Technical University, 24 Minina Street, N. Novgorod 603950, Russia
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An asymptotic theory of surface waves trapped on vertically uniform jet currents is developed as a first step towards a systematic description of wave dynamics on oceanic jet currents. It has been shown that in a linear setting an asymptotic separation of vertical and horizontal variables, which underpins the modal description of the wave field on currents, is possible if either the current velocity is small compared to the wave celerity or the current width is large compared to the wavelength along the current. The scheme developed enables us to obtain solutions as an asymptotic series with any desired accuracy. The initially three-dimensional problem is reduced to solving one-dimensional equations with the lateral and vertical dependence being prescribed by the corresponding modal structure. To leading order in current magnitude to wave celerity, the boundary value problem specifying the modes and eigenvalues reduces to classical Sturm–Liouville type based upon the one-dimensional stationary Schrödinger equation. The modes, both trapped and ‘passing-through’, form a complete orthogonal set. This makes the modal description of waves on currents a mathematically attractive alternative to the approaches currently adopted. Properties of trapped eigenmodes and their dispersion relations are examined both for broad currents of arbitrary magnitude, where the modes are not orthogonal, and for weak currents, where the modes are orthogonal. Several model profiles for which nice analytical solutions of the leading-order boundary value problem are known were used to get an insight. The asymptotic solutions proved not only to capture qualitative behaviour well but also to provide a good quantitative description even for unrealistically strong and narrow currents. The results are discussed for various oceanic currents, with particular attention paid to the Agulhas Current, for which specific estimates were derived. For typical dominant wind waves and swell, all oceanic-jet-type currents are weak and, correspondingly, the developed asymptotic scheme based upon one-dimensional stationary Schrödinger equation for modes applies.

JFM classification

Waves/Free-surface Flows: Surface gravity waves Waves/Free-surface Flows: Waves/Free-surface Flows
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 738 , 10 January 2014 , pp. 65 - 104
Copyright
©2013 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramowitz, M. & Stegun, I. A. 1965 Handbook of Mathematical Functions. Dover.Google Scholar
Bühler, O. 2009 Waves and Mean Flows. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dalrymple, R. A., MacMahan, J. H., Reniers, A. J. H. M. & Nelko, V. 2011 Rip currents. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 43, 551–581.Google Scholar
Drazin, P. G. & Johnson, R. S. 1989 Solitons: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Galvin, C. J. 1967 Longshore current velocity: a review of theory and data. Rev. Geophys. 5 (3), 287–304.Google Scholar
Gerber, M. 1987 The Benjamin–Feir instability of a deep-water Stokes wavepacket in the presence of a non-uniform medium. J. Fluid Mech. 176, 311–332.Google Scholar
Hjelmervik, K. B. & Trulsen, K. 2009 Freak wave statistics on collinear currents. J. Fluid Mech. 637, 267–284.Google Scholar
Irvine, D. E. & Tilley, D. G. 1988 Ocean wave directional spectra and wave–current interaction in the Agulhas from the Shuttle Imaging Radar-B synthetic aperture radar. J. Geophys. Res. 93 (C12), 15389–15401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonsson, I. G. 1990 Wave–current interactions. In The Sea, 9A: Ocean Engineering Science (ed. le Méhauté, B. & Hanes, D. M.), pp. 65–120. Wiley Interscience.Google Scholar
Kenyon, K. E. 1971 Wave refraction in ocean currents. Deep-Sea Res. 18, 1023–1034.Google Scholar
Komen, G. J., Cavaleri, L., Donelan, M., Hasselmann, K., Hasselmann, S. & Janssen, P. A. E. M. 1996 Dynamics and Modelling of Ocean Waves. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kudryavtsev, V. N., Grodsky, S. A., Dulov, V. A. & Bol’shakov, A. N. 1995 Observations of wind waves in the Gulf Stream frontal zone. J. Geophys. Res. 100 (C10), 20715–20727.Google Scholar
Landau, L. D. & Lifshitz, E. M. 1977 Quantum Mechanics. Non-Relativistic Theory, vol. 3, Pergamon.Google Scholar
Lavrenov, I. 1998 The wave energy concentration at the Agulhas Current of South Africa. Nat. Hazards 17, 117–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavrenov, I. V. 2003 Wind Waves in Ocean: Dynamics and Numerical Simulations. Springer.Google Scholar
Lighthill, J. 2001 Waves in Fluids. Cambridge Mathematical Library Series, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lutjeharms, J. R. E. 2006 The Agulhas Current. Springer.Google Scholar
Mallory, J. K. 1974 Abnormal waves on the South East coast of South Africa. Intl Hydrographic Rev. 51, 99–129.Google Scholar
McKee, W. D. 1974 Waves on a shearing current: a uniformly valid asymptotic solution. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 75, 295–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mei, C. C., Stiassnie, M. & Yue, D. K.-P. 2005 Theory and Applications of Ocean Surface Waves. Part 1: Linear Aspects. World Scientific.Google Scholar
Onorato, M., Proment, D. & Toffoli, A. 2011 Triggering rogue waves in opposing currents. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 184502.Google Scholar
Orsi, A. H., Whitworth, T. & Nowlin, W. D. 1995 On the meridional extent and fronts of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current. Deep-Sea Res. 42 (5), 641–673.Google Scholar
Peregrine, D. H. 1976 Interaction of water waves and currents. Adv. Appl. Maths 16, 9–117.Google Scholar
Peregrine, D. H. & Smith, R. 1975 Stationary gravity waves on non-uniform free streams: jet-like streams. Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 77, 415–438.Google Scholar
Phillips, O. M. 1966 The Dynamics of the Upper Ocean. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rintoul, S. R., Hughes, C. W. & Olbers, D. 2001 The antarctic circumpolar current system. In International Geophysics, chap. 4.6, Ocean Circulation and Climate: Observing and Modelling the Global Ocean, vol. 77, pp. 271–302. Elsevier, XXIX–XXXVI.Google Scholar
Ruban, V. P. 2012 On the nonlinear Schrödinger equation for waves on a non-uniform current. J. Expl Theor. Phys. Lett. 95, 486–491.Google Scholar
Shrira, V. I. 1993 Surface waves on shear current: solution of the boundary-value problem. J. Fluid Mech. 252, 565–584.Google Scholar
Shrira, V. I. & Townsend, W. A. 2010 Inertia-gravity waves beyond the inertial latitude. Part 1. Inviscid singular focusing. J. Fluid Mech. 664, 478–509.Google Scholar
Simon, B. 1976 The bound state of weakly coupled Schrödinger operators in one and two dimensions. Ann. Phys. 97, 279–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. 1970 Asymptotic solutions for high-frequency trapped wave propagation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 268, 289–324.Google Scholar
Smith, R. 1975 The reflection of short gravity waves on a non-uniform current. Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 78, 517–525.Google Scholar
Smith, R. 1976 Giant waves. J. Fluid Mech. 77, 417–431.Google Scholar
Stocker, J. D. & Peregrine, D. H. 1999 The current-modified nonlinear Schrödinger equation. J. Fluid Mech. 399, 335–353.Google Scholar
Thornton, E. B. & Guza, R. T. 1986 Surf zone longshore currents and random waves: field data and models. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 16, 1165–1178.Google Scholar
Thomas, G. P. 1981 Wave-current interactions: an experimental and numerical study. Part 1. Linear waves. J. Fluid Mech. 110, 457–474.Google Scholar
Thomas, G. P. & Klopman, G. 1997 Wave-current interactions in the near-shore region. In Advances in Fluid Mechanics, pp. 255–319. Computational Mechanics Publications.Google Scholar
Toole, J. M. & Raymer, M. E. 1985 Heat and fresh water budgets of the Indian Ocean. Deep-Sea Res. A 32, 917–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turpin, F.-M., Benmoussa, C. & Mei, C. C. 1983 Effects of slowly varying depth and current on the evolution of a Stokes wavepacket. J. Fluid Mech. 132, 1–23.Google Scholar