Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-rvxtl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-20T06:47:35.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Transition to turbulence in hypersonic flow over a compression ramp due to upstream forcing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 November 2024

Shibin Cao*
Affiliation:
Department of Aeronautical and Aviation Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong
Jiaao Hao
Affiliation:
Department of Aeronautical and Aviation Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong
Peixu Guo
Affiliation:
Department of Aeronautical and Aviation Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong
*
Email address for correspondence: [email protected]

Abstract

Several transition scenarios are present in a hypersonic compression-ramp flow. In our previous work (Cao et al., J. Fluid Mech., vol. 941, 2022, p. A8), a complete transition process induced by the global instability of a compression-ramp flow was revealed. In a globally stable flow, however, the transition to turbulence can be promoted by convective instabilities, which is the focus of this work. The same flow conditions as in our previous work (Mach number 7.7, Reynolds number $8.6\times 10^5$ based on the flat-plate length) are considered here. Owing to a smaller ramp angle, a weakly separated flow forms on the compression ramp, which supports no global instability. Resolvent analysis identifies low-frequency streamwise streaks as the optimal response of base flow to upstream forcing. Local stability analysis reveals Mack's second mode in the boundary layer downstream of reattachment. By introducing random disturbances upstream of separation in direct numerical simulations, we observe breakdown to turbulence downstream of reattachment. Two transition scenarios are revealed, and they are highly dependent on the amplitude of upstream disturbances. For a large amplitude, strong streamwise streaks develop near the reattachment region, which break down to turbulence quickly. However, when the disturbance amplitude is reduced, the second-mode instability dominates the transition to turbulence.

Type
JFM Papers
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Benay, R., Chanetz, B., Mangin, B., Vandomme, L. & Perraud, J. 2006 Shock wave/transitional boundary-layer interactions in hypersonic flow. AIAA J. 44 (6), 12431254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benitez, E.K., Borg, M.P., Paredes, P., Schneider, S.P. & Jewell, J.S. 2023 a Measurements of an axisymmetric hypersonic shear-layer instability on a cone-cylinder-flare in quiet flow. Phys. Rev. Fluids 8 (8), 083903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benitez, E.K., Borg, M.P., Scholten, A., Paredes, P., McDaniel, Z. & Jewell, J.S. 2023 b Instability and transition onset downstream of a laminar separation bubble at Mach 6. J. Fluid Mech. 969, A11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benitez, E.K., Caillaud, C., Mcdaniel, Z., Lugrin, M., Borg, M., Jewell, J., Scholten, A., Paredes, P., Li, F. & Choudhari, M.M. 2024 Separation and transition on a cone-cylinder-flare: experimental campaigns. In AIAA SCITECH 2024 Forum, p. 0496. AIAA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bugeat, B., Robinet, J.-C., Chassaing, J.-C. & Sagaut, P. 2022 Low-frequency resolvent analysis of the laminar oblique shock wave/boundary layer interaction. J. Fluid Mech. 942, A43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caillaud, C., et al. 2024 Separation and transition on a cone-cylinder-flare: computational investigations. In AIAA SCITECH 2024 Forum, p. 0497. AIAA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cao, S. 2021 Streamwise vortices in hypersonic flow on a compression ramp. PhD thesis, Universitätsbibliothek der RWTH Aachen.Google Scholar
Cao, S., Hao, J., Guo, P., Wen, C.-Y. & Klioutchnikov, I. 2023 Stability of hypersonic flow over a curved compression ramp. J. Fluid Mech. 957, A8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cao, S., Hao, J., Klioutchnikov, I., Olivier, H., Heufer, K.A. & Wen, C.-Y. 2021 a Leading-edge bluntness effects on hypersonic three-dimensional flows over a compression ramp. J. Fluid Mech. 923, A27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cao, S., Hao, J., Klioutchnikov, I., Olivier, H. & Wen, C.-Y. 2021 b Unsteady effects in a hypersonic compression ramp flow with laminar separation. J. Fluid Mech. 912, A3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cao, S., Hao, J., Klioutchnikov, I., Wen, C.-Y., Olivier, H. & Heufer, K.A. 2022 Transition to turbulence in hypersonic flow over a compression ramp due to intrinsic instability. J. Fluid Mech. 941, A8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cao, S., Klioutchnikov, I. & Olivier, H. 2020 Görtler number evaluation for laminar separated hypersonic compression ramp flow. AIAA J. 58 (8), 37063710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X., Zhu, Y. & Lee, C. 2017 Interactions between second mode and low-frequency waves in a hypersonic boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 820, 693735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chu, B.-T. 1965 On the energy transfer to small disturbances in fluid flow. Part I. Acta Mech. 1 (3), 215234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chuvakhov, P.V., Borovoy, V.Y., Egorov, I.V., Radchenko, V.N., Olivier, H. & Roghelia, A. 2017 Effect of small bluntness on formation of Görtler vortices in a supersonic compression corner flow. J. Appl. Mech. Tech. Phys. 58 (6), 975989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chuvakhov, P.V. & Radchenko, V.N. 2020 Effect of Görtler-like vortices of various intensity on heat transfer in supersonic compression corner flows. Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer 150, 119310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currao, G.M., Choudhury, R., Gai, S.L., Neely, A.J. & Buttsworth, D.R. 2020 Hypersonic transitional shock-wave–boundary-layer interaction on a flat plate. AIAA J. 58 (2), 814829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davami, J., Juliano, T.J., Scholten, A. & Paredes, P. 2023 Hypersonic shock-wave/boundary-layer interactions on the ROTEX-T cone/flare. In AIAA SCITECH 2023 Forum, p. 1436. AIAA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dwivedi, A., Sidharth, G.S. & Jovanović, M.R. 2022 Oblique transition in hypersonic double-wedge flow. J. Fluid Mech. 948, A37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dwivedi, A., Sidharth, G.S., Nichols, J.W., Candler, G.V. & Jovanović, M.R. 2019 Reattachment streaks in hypersonic compression ramp flow: an input–output analysis. J. Fluid Mech. 880, 113135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaitonde, D.V. 2015 Progress in shock wave/boundary layer interactions. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 72, 8099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, P., Hao, J. & Wen, C.-Y. 2023 Interaction and breakdown induced by multiple optimal disturbances in hypersonic boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 974, A50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hader, C. & Fasel, H. 2018 Towards simulating natural transition in hypersonic boundary layers via random inflow disturbances. J. Fluid Mech. 847, R3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hao, J., Cao, S., Guo, P. & Wen, C.-Y. 2023 Response of hypersonic compression corner flow to upstream disturbances. J. Fluid Mech. 964, A25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hao, J., Cao, S., Wen, C.-Y. & Olivier, H. 2021 Occurrence of global instability in hypersonic compression corner flow. J. Fluid Mech. 919, A4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hao, J., Fan, J., Cao, S. & Wen, C.-Y. 2022 Three-dimensionality of hypersonic laminar flow over a double cone. J. Fluid Mech. 935, A8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hildebrand, N., Dwivedi, A., Nichols, J.W., Jovanović, M.R. & Candler, G.V. 2018 Simulation and stability analysis of oblique shock-wave/boundary-layer interactions at Mach 5.92. Phys. Rev. Fluids 3 (1), 013906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, C. & Hao, J. 2023 Global stability of supersonic flow over a hollow cylinder/flare. J. Fluid Mech. 975, A40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lugrin, M., Beneddine, S., Garnier, E. & Bur, R. 2021 a Multi-scale study of the transitional shock-wave boundary layer interaction in hypersonic flow. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 36, 277–302.Google Scholar
Lugrin, M., Beneddine, S., Leclercq, C., Garnier, E. & Bur, R. 2021 b Transition scenario in hypersonic axisymmetrical compression ramp flow. J. Fluid Mech. 907, A6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lugrin, M., Nicolas, F., Severac, N., Tobeli, J.-P., Beneddine, S., Garnier, E., Esquieu, S. & Bur, R. 2022 Transitional shockwave/boundary layer interaction experiments in the R2Ch blowdown wind tunnel. Exp. Fluids 63, 46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paredes, P., Choudhari, M.M. & Li, F. 2019 Instability wave–streak interactions in a high Mach number boundary layer at flight conditions. J. Fluid Mech. 858, 474499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paredes, P., Scholten, A., Choudhari, M.M., Li, F., Benitez, E.K. & Jewell, J.S. 2022 Boundary-layer instabilities over a cone–cylinder–flare model at Mach 6. AIAA J. 60 (10), 56525661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinet, J. 2007 Bifurcations in shock-wave/laminar-boundary-layer interaction: global instability approach. J. Fluid Mech. 579, 85112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandham, N.D., Schülein, E., Wagner, A., Willems, S. & Steelant, J. 2014 Transitional shock-wave/boundary-layer interactions in hypersonic flow. J. Fluid Mech. 752, 349382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidharth, G.S., Dwivedi, A., Candler, G.V. & Nichols, J.W. 2018 Onset of three-dimensionality in supersonic flow over a slender double wedge. Phys. Rev. Fluids 3 (9), 093901.Google Scholar
Simeonides, G. & Haase, W. 1995 Experimental and computational investigations of hypersonic flow about compression ramps. J. Fluid Mech. 283, 1742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theofilis, V. 2011 Global linear instability. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 43, 319352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Threadgill, J.A., Hader, C., Singh, A., Tsakagiannis, V., Fasel, H.F., Little, J.C., Lugrin, M., Bur, R., Chiapparino, G. & Stemmer, C. 2024 Scaling and transition effects on hollow-cylinder/flare SBLIs in wind tunnel environments. In AIAA SCITECH 2024 Forum, p. 0498. AIAA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar