Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T08:55:26.983Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Trailing vortices in the wakes of surface-mounted obstacles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2006

P. J. Mason  and
B. R. Morton
P. J. Mason
Affiliation:
Meteorological Office, Bracknell, UK
B. R. Morton
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The generation of trailing vortices in the wakes of surface-mounted obstacles at moderate Reynolds numbers is examined by channel-flow experiments and numerical simulation. A skew-mounted obstacle generates a single concentrated trailing vortex, together with weak streamwise vorticity of opposite sense extending to considerable distances on either side and zero gross circulation across the whole stream. Cross-stream-symmetrical obstacles (having a streamwise plane of symmetry normal to the plane surface) generate one or more nested vortex pairs, usually of alternate sense, of which one pair is normally dominant. The sense of rotation of the dominant vortex pair depends on both the shape of the obstacle and its depth relative to that of the boundary layer. Obstacles that divide the stream laterally produce dominant vortex pairs with a central downwash, whereas those lifting the flow predominantly over their crests produce dominant vortex pairs with a central upwash. It is argued that the vorticity of the dominant trailing vortices is generated largely as a component of cross-stream vorticity at the boundary, shed as a shear layer from the body, and turned inertially by the flow to form trailing vortices. It should also be emphasized that the dominant trailing vortex or vortex pair is generally embedded in a weak distribution of trailing vorticity of opposite signs, but with net circulation comparable with that of the dominant core.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 175 , February 1987 , pp. 247 - 293
Copyright
© 1987 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, C. J. 1979 The laminar horseshoe vortex. J. Fluid Mech. 95, 347–367.Google Scholar
Baker, C. J. 1980 The turbulent horseshoe vortex. J. Wind Engng Indust. Aero. 6, 9–29.Google Scholar
Cook, N. J., Coulson, B. H. & McKay, W. 1978 Wind conditions around the Rock of Gibraltar. J. Indust. Aerodyn. 2, 289–309.Google Scholar
Gregory, N. & Walker, W. S. 1956 The effect of transition of isolated surface excrescences in the boundary layer. Aero. Res. Counc. R & M 2779, Pt 1.Google Scholar
Hansen, C. A. 1975 Vortex-containing wakes of surface obstacles. dissertation, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado.
Hunt, J. C. R. 1971 The effect of single buildings and structures. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 269, 457–467.Google Scholar
Hunt, J. C. R., Abell, C. J., Peterka, J. A. & Woo, H. 1978 Kinematical studies of the flow around free or surface mounted obstacles; applying topology to flow visualization. J. Fluid Mech. 86, 179–200.Google Scholar
Hunt, J. C. R. & Snyder, W. H. 1980 Experiments on stably and neutrally stratified flow over a model three-dimensional hill. J. Fluid Mech. 96, 671–704.Google Scholar
Jenkins, G. J., Mason, P. J., Moores, W. H. & Sykes, R. I. 1981 Measurements of the flow structure around Ailsa Craig, a steep, three-dimensional isolated hill. Q. J. R. Met. Soc. 107, 833–851.Google Scholar
Lighthill, M. J. 1963 In Laminar Boundary Layers (ed. L. Rosenhead), pp. 48–113. Oxford University Press.
Mason, P. J. & Sykes, R. I. 1979a Three-dimensional numerical integrations of the Navier-Stokes equations for flow over surface mounted obstacles. J. Fluid Mech. 91, 433–450.Google Scholar
Mason, P. J. & Sykes, R. I. 1979b Separation effects in Ekman layer flow over ridges. Q. J. R. Met. Soc. 105, 129–146.Google Scholar
Mason, P. J. & Sykes, R. I. 1981 A numerical study of rapidly rotating flow over surface mounted obstacles. J. Fluid Mech. 111, 175–195Google Scholar
Mochizuki, M. 1961 Smoke observation on boundary layer transition caused by a spherical roughness element. J. Phys. Soc. Japan 16, 995–1008.Google Scholar
Morkovin, M. V. 1972 An approach to flow engineering via functional flow modules. Beitrage zur Strommungslehre, Insbesondere Grenzschicht Theorie, Deutsche Luft and Roumfahrt, Forschungsbericht, 72–27.
Morton, B. R. 1984 The generation and decay of vorticity. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 28, 277–293.Google Scholar
Piacsek, S. A. & Williams, G. P. 1970 Conservation properties of convection difference schemes J. Comp. Phys. 6, 392–405.Google Scholar
Sedney, R. 1973 A survey of the effects of small proturberances on boundary layer flows. AIAA J. 11, 782–792.Google Scholar