Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T19:55:17.005Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Thickness noise of a propeller and its relation to blade sweep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2006

R. K. Amiet
Affiliation:
10118 Dover Road, Apple Creek, OH 44606, USA

Abstract

Linearized acoustic theory is applied to the calculation of the thickness noise produced by a supersonic propeller with sharp leading and trailing edges. The theoretical development is summarized and numerical calculations of the pressure-time waveform are presented. The erratic behaviour of previous time-domain calculations has been completely eliminated by careful numerical treatment of singular points, multiple singular points and nearly singular points that appear in the analysis. This allows a close inspection of the details of the calculated waveform and leads to the discovery of abrupt changes of slope in the pressure-time waveform, produced by singular points entering or leaving the blade at the tip. The behaviour of the pressure-time waveform is shown to be closely related to changes in the retarded rotor shape. Logarithmic singularities in the waveform are shown to be produced by regions on the blade edges that move towards the observer at sonic speed while at the same time having the edge normal to the line joining the source point and the observer. The logarithmic singularities are closely related to the shock waves produced by a swept airfoil in supersonic rectilinear motion, and they can be eliminated throughout the entire flow field by sweeping the rotor so that the Mach-number component normal to the leading and trailing edges is subsonic for all points on the rotor edges.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1988 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amiet R. K. 1977 Thickness noise of a propeller or helicopter rotor. United Technologies Research Center Rep. R77–111204.Google Scholar
Curl N. 1955 The influence of solid boundaries upon aerodynamic sound Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond.A 231, 505514.Google Scholar
Farassat F. 1983 The prediction of the noise of supersonic propellers in the time domain - new theoretical results. AIAA Paper 83–0743.Google Scholar
Farassat F. 1984 The unified acoustic and aerodynamic prediction theory of advanced propellers in the time domain. AIAA Paper 84–2303, AIAA/NASA 9th Aeroacoustics Conference, October 15–17, 1984, Williamsburg, Virginia, USA.
Farassat F. 1986 Prediction of advanced propeller noise in the time domain. AIAA J. 24, 578584.Google Scholar
Farassat, F. & Succi G. P. 1980 A review of propeller discrete noise prediction technology with emphasis on two current methods for time domain calculations. J. Sound Vib. 71, 399419.Google Scholar
Hanson D. B. 1976 Near field noise of high tip speed propellers in forward flight. AIAA Paper 76–505, AIAA 3rd Aeroacoustics Conference, July 20–23, 1976, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Hanson D. B. 1979 The aeroacoustics of advanced turbopropellers. In Mechanics of Sound Generation in Flows (ed. E.-A. Muller), IUTAM/ICA/AIAA-Symposium, Gottingen, pp. 282293.
Hanson D. B. 1980 The influence of propeller design parameters on far field harmonic noise in forward flight. AIAA J. 18, 13131319.Google Scholar
Hawkings, D. L. & Lowson M. V. 1974 Theory of open supersonic rotor noise. J. Sound Vib. 36, 120.Google Scholar
Hilton W. F. 1938 The photography of airscrew sound waves Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 169, 174190.Google Scholar
Lowson, M. V. & Jupe R. J. 1974 Wave forms for a supersonic rotor. J. Sound Vib. 37, 475489.Google Scholar
Schmitz, F. H. & Yu H. 1986 Helicopter impulsive noise: theoretical and experimental status. J. Sound Vib. 109, 361422.Google Scholar
Tam C. K. W. 1983 On linear acoustic solutions of high speed helicopter impulsive noise problems. J. Sound Vib. 89, 119134.Google Scholar