Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T10:29:20.145Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The sweeping decorrelation hypothesis and energy–inertial scale interaction in high Reynolds number flows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

Alexander A. Praskovsky
Affiliation:
Center for Turbulence Research, Bldg. 500, Stanford, CA 94305-3030, USA Central Aerohydrodynamic Institute, Zhukovsky-3, Moscow region, 140160, Russia
Evgeny B. Gledzer
Affiliation:
Institute of Atmospheric Physics, 3, Pyzhevsky, Moscow, 109017, Russia
Mikhail Yu. Karyakin
Affiliation:
Central Aerohydrodynamic Institute, Zhukovsky-3, Moscow region, 140160, Russia
And Ye Zhou
Affiliation:
Center for Turbulence Research, Bldg. 500, Stanford, CA 94305-3030, USA

Abstract

The random sweeping decorrelation hypothesis was analysed theoretically and experimentally in terms of the higher-order velocity structure functions $D_{u_i}^{(m)}(r) = \left< [u_i^m(x + r) - u_i^m(x)]^2\right>$. Measurements in two high Reynolds number laboratory shear flows were used: in the return channel (Rλ ≈ 3.2 × 103) and in the mixing layer (Rλ ≈ 2.0 × 103) of a large wind tunnel. Two velocity components (in the direction of the mean flow, u1, and in the direction of the mean shear, u2) were processed for m = 1−4. The effect of using Taylor's hypothesis was estimated by a specially developed method, and found to be insignificant. It was found that all the higher-order structure functions scale, in the inertial subrange, as r2/3. Such a scaling has been argued as supporting evidence for the sweeping hypothesis. However, our experiments also established a strong correlation between energy- and inertial-range excitation. This finding leads to the conclusion that the sweeping decorrelation hypothesis cannot be exactly valid.

The hypothesis of statistical independence of large- and small-scale excitation was directly checked with conditionally averaged moments of the velocity difference $\left< [u_i(x + r) - u_i(x)]^l\right>_{u_i^*}, l = 2-4$, at a fixed value of the large-scale parameter u*i. Clear dependence of the conditionally averaged moments on the level of averaging was found. In spite of a strong correlation between the energy-containing and the inertial-scale excitation, universality of the intrinsic structure of the inertial subrange was shown.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1993 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Batchelor, G. K. 1953 The Theory of Homogeneous Turbulence. Cambridge University Press.
Chen, S. & Kraichnan, R. H. 1989 Sweeping decorrelation in isotropic turbulence. Phys. Fluids A 1, 2019.Google Scholar
Dutton, J. A. & Deaven, D. G. 1972 Some properties of atmospheric turbulence. In Statistical Models and Turbulence (ed. M. Rosenblatt & C. W. Van Atta). Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 12, 402. Springer.
Hekestad, G. 1965 A generalized Taylor hypothesis with application for high Reynolds number turbulent shear flow. J. Appl. Mech. 32, 735.Google Scholar
Karyakin, M. Yu., Kuznetsov, V. R. & Praskovsky, A. A. 1991 Experimental check of isotropy hypothesis for small-scale turbulence. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Mekh. Zhidk. i Gaza 5, 26.Google Scholar
Kolmogorov, A. N. 1941a The local structure of turbulence in incompressible viscous fluid for very large Reynolds numbers. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 30, 301.Google Scholar
Kolmogorov, A. N. 1941b Dissipation of energy in the locally isotropic turbulence. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 32, 16.Google Scholar
Kolmogorov, A. N. 1962 A refinement of previous hypotheses concerning-the local structure of turbulence in a viscous incompressible fluid at high Reynolds numbers. J. Fluid Mech. 13, 82.Google Scholar
Kraichnan, R. H. 1965 Inertial-range spectrum of hydromagnetic turbulence. Phys. Fluids 8, 1385.Google Scholar
Kraichnan, R. H. 1974 On Kolmogorov's inertial-range theories. J. Fluid Mech. 62, 305.Google Scholar
Kuznetsov, V. R., Praskovsky, A. A. & Karyakin, M. Yu. 1992 an experimental investigation of local isotropy in high Reynolds laboratory turbulent flows. Phys. Fluids A (submitted).Google Scholar
Kuznetsov, V. R., Praskovsky, A. A. & Sabelnikov, V. A. 1992 Fine-scale turbulence structure of intermittent shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 243, 595.Google Scholar
Nelkin, M. & Tabor, M. 1990 Time correlations and random sweeping in isotropic turbulence. Phys. Fluids A 2, 81.Google Scholar
Oboukhov, A. M. 1941 Spectrum of energy of turbulent flow. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 32, 22.Google Scholar
Oboukhov, A. M. 1962 Some specific features of atmospheric turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 13, 77.Google Scholar
Tennekes, H. 1975 Eulerian and Lagrangian time microscales in isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 67, 561.Google Scholar
Van Atta, C. W. & Wyngaard, J. C. 1975 On higher-order spectra of turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 72, 673.Google Scholar
Yakhot, V., Orszag, S. A. & She, Z. S. 1989 Space-time correlation in turbulence: Kinematical versus dynamical effects. Phys. Fluids A 1, 184.Google Scholar