Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T07:00:59.182Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The stress field of slender particles oriented by a non-Newtonian extensional flow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 April 2006

J. D. Goddard
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles

Abstract

An analysis is presented of the creeping motion around a flow-oriented slender particle in a material medium subject to a uniaxial extension in the far field. A general quasi-steady rheological model is adopted, of a kind representing isotropic (Noll) fluids subject to time-independent velocity gradients, or isotropic solids subject to time-independent strain fields. The analysis is based on the premise of a shear-dominated motion in the near field, which is joined asymptotically to the extension-dominated motion in the far field. For axisymmetric particles, and to the order of terms in slenderness considered here, the far-field perturbation due to the particle can be represented as a distributed coaxial line force in a transversely isotropic medium whose strength is governed by the structure of the near-field rheology.

On the basis of the results for a single particle, a formula is derived for the stress contribution due to the presence of oriented slender fibres in dilute suspension in a non-Newtonian fluid. For certain simple rheological models exhibiting a strong shear-thinning behaviour, the particle contribution to tensile stress is greatly diminished relative to the Newtonian case, as was predicted by an earlier rudimentary treatment (Goddard 1975). The present analysis is thought to be highly promising for applications to general composite materials.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1976 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Batchelor, G. K. 1970a The stress system in suspensions of force-free particles. J. Fluid Mech. 41, 545.Google Scholar
Batchelor, G. K. 1970b Slender-body theory for particles of arbitrary cross-section in Stokes flow. J. Fluid Mech. 44, 419.Google Scholar
Batchelor, G. K. 1971 The stress generated in a non-dilute suspension of elongated particles by pure straining motion. J. Fluid Mech. 46, 813.Google Scholar
Burgers, J. M. 1938 In Second Report on Viscosity and Plasticity. Kon. Ned. Akad. Wet. Verhand. (Eerste Sectie), 16, 113.
Coleman, B. D., Markowitz, H. & Noll, W. 1966 Viscometric Flows of non-Newtonian Fluids. Springer.
Coleman, B. D. & Noll, W. 1961 Foundations of linear visco-elasticity. Rev. Mod. Phys. 33, 239.Google Scholar
Cox, R. G. 1970 The motion of long slender bodies in a viscous fluid. Part 1. General theory. J. Fluid Mech. 44, 791.Google Scholar
Cox, R. G. 1971 The motion of long slender bodies in a viscous fluid. Part 2. Shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 45, 625.Google Scholar
Dodson, A. G., Townsend, P. & Walters, K. 1974 Non-Newtonian flow in pipes of non-circular section. Computers & Fluids, 2, 317.Google Scholar
Ericksen, J. L. 1958 Overdetermination of speed in rectilinear motion of non-Newtonian fluids. Quart. Appl. Math. 14, 318.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, L. E. 1969 On the method of matched asymptotic expansions. II. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 65, 233.Google Scholar
Fredrickson, A. G. 1964 Principles and Applications of Rheology. Prentice-Hall.
Green, A. E. & Rivlin, R. S. 1956 Steady flow of non-Newtonian fluids through tubes. Quart. Appl. Math. 14, 299.Google Scholar
Green, A. E. & Zerna, W. 1954 Theoretical Elasticity. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Goddard, J. D. 1967 A modified functional analysis for visco-elastic fluids. Trans. Soc. Rheol. 11, 381.Google Scholar
Goddard, J. D. 1975 Tensile stress contributions of oriented rod-like particles in non-Newtonian fluids. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. (to appear).Google Scholar
Goddard, J. D. & Miller, C. 1967 Non-linear effects in the rheology of dilute suspensions. J. Fluid Mech. 28, 657.Google Scholar
Happel, J. & Brenner, H. 1965 Low Reynolds Number Hydrodynamics. Prentice-Hall.
Ince, E. L. 1956 Ordinary Differential Equations. Dover.
Kardos, J. L. 1973 Structure property relationships in short-fiber reinforced plastics. Crit. Rev. Solid State Sci. 3, 419.Google Scholar
Lamb, H. 1945 Hydrodynamics, 6th ed. Dover.
Leal, L. G. 1975 The slow motion of slender road-like particles in a second-order fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 69, 305.Google Scholar
Love, A. E. H. 1944 A Treatise on the Mathematical Theory of Elasticity, 4th ed. Dover.
Mewis, J. & Metzner, A. B. 1974 The rheological properties of suspensions of fibres in Newtonian fluids subjected to extensional deformations. J. Fluid Mech. 62, 593.Google Scholar
Pipkin, A. C. 1972 Lectures on Viscoelasticity Theory. Springer.
Russel, W. R. & Acrivos, A. 1972 On the effective moduli of composite materials. J. Appl. Math. Phys. 23, 434. (See also 1973, 24, 582–600, 838–852.)Google Scholar
Synge, J. L. 1957 The Hypercircle in Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press.
Tillet, J. P. K. 1970 Axial and transverse stokes flow past slender axisymmetric bodies. J. Fluid Mech. 44, 401.Google Scholar
Truesdell, C. 1966 The Elements of Continuum Mechanics. Springer.
Weinberger, C. B. & Goddard, J. D. 1974 Extensional flow behaviour of polymer solutions and particle suspensions in a spinning motion. Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 1, 465.Google Scholar
Willis, J. R. 1965 The elastic interaction energy of dislocation loops in anisotropic media. Quart. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 18, 419.Google Scholar