Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T01:28:29.523Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Steepened Mach waves near supersonic jets: study of azimuthal structure and generation process using conditional averages

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 October 2019

Pierre Pineau Open the ORCID record for Pierre Pineau [Opens in a new window]  and
Christophe Bogey Open the ORCID record for Christophe Bogey [Opens in a new window]
Pierre Pineau*
Affiliation:
Univ Lyon, École Centrale de Lyon, INSA Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, CNRS, Laboratoire de Mécanique des Fluides et d’Acoustique, UMR 5509, F-69134 Ecully, France
Christophe Bogey
Affiliation:
Univ Lyon, École Centrale de Lyon, INSA Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, CNRS, Laboratoire de Mécanique des Fluides et d’Acoustique, UMR 5509, F-69134 Ecully, France
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The azimuthal structure and the generation process of steepened acoustic waves are investigated in the near field of temporal round jets at Mach numbers of 2 and 3. Initially, the shear layers of the jets are in a laminar state and display instability waves whose main properties are close to those predicted from linear temporal analysis. Then, they transition to a turbulent state and generate high-intensity Mach waves displaying sharp compressions typical of those recorded for jets producing crackle noise. These waves are first shown to be poorly reproduced when only the axisymmetric mode is considered, but to be well captured with the first five azimuthal modes. Their generation process is investigated by performing conditional averages of the flow and acoustic fields triggered by the detection of intense positive pressure peak close to the jets. No steepened waves are visible in the conditionally averaged pressure profiles when the procedure involves only one azimuthal mode at a time. However, sharp compressions are obtained based on the first five modes taken together. In that case, the steep compressions are correlated over a limited portion of the jet circumference and are steeper as more azimuthal modes are considered. Moreover, a direct link is established between the steepened waves and the supersonic convection of large-scale coherent flow structures located in the supersonic core of the jets. This indicates that these waves constitute an extreme, nonlinear case of Mach wave radiation by these structures. In addition, the capacity of flow structures to generate sharp, steepened waves is related to their shapes. More particularly, flow structures with a large extent in the radial direction are shown to produce stronger and steeper Mach waves than those that are elongated in the flow direction.

JFM classification

Acoustics: Aeroacoustics Acoustics: Jet noise
Type
JFM Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 880 , 10 December 2019 , pp. 594 - 619
Copyright
© 2019 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Antonia, R. A. 1981 Conditional sampling in turbulence measurement. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 13 (131), 131–156.Google Scholar
Arndt, R. E. A., Long, D. F. & Glauser, M. N. 1997 The proper orthogonal decomposition of pressure fluctuations surrounding a turbulent jet. J. Fluid Mech. 340, 1–33.Google Scholar
Baars, W. & Tinney, C. E. 2014 Shock-structures in the acoustic field of a Mach 3 jet with crackle. J. Sound Vib. 333, 2539–2553.Google Scholar
Baars, W., Tinney, C. E. & Hamilton, M. F. 2014 On cumulative nonlinear acoustic waveform distorsions from high-speed jets. J. Fluid Mech. 749, 331–366.Google Scholar
Baars, W., Tinney, C. E. & Hamilton, M. F. 2016 Piecewise-spreading regime model for calculating effective Gol’dberg numbers for supersonic jet noise. AIAA J. 54 (9), 2833–2841.Google Scholar
Berland, C., Bogey, C., Marsden, O. & Bailly, C. 2007 High-order, low dispersive and low dissipative explicit schemes for multiple-scale and boundary problems. J. Comput. Phys. 224, 637–662.Google Scholar
Bogey, C. 2019 On noise generation in low Reynolds number temporal round jets at a Mach number of 0.9. J. Fluid Mech. 859, 1022–1056.Google Scholar
Bogey, C. & Bailly, C. 2004 A family of low dispersive and low dissipative explicit schemes for noise computation. J. Comput. Phys. 194 (1), 194–214.Google Scholar
Bogey, C. & Bailly, C. 2006 Large eddy simulations of transitional round jets: influence of the Reynolds number on flow development and energy dissipation. Phys. Fluids 18, 065101.Google Scholar
Bogey, C. & Bailly, C. 2010 Influence of nozzle-exit boundary-layer conditions on the flow and acoustic fields of initially laminar jets. J. Fluid Mech. 663, 507–538.Google Scholar
Bogey, C., Bailly, C. & Juvé, C. 2003 Noise investigation of a high subsonic, moderate Reynolds number jet using a compressible LES. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 16 (4), 273–297.Google Scholar
Bogey, C., de Cacqueray, N. & Bailly, C. 2009 A shock-capturing methodology based on adaptative spatial filtering for high-order non-linear computations. J. Comput. Phys. 228, 1447–1465.Google Scholar
Bogey, C., Marsden, O. & Bailly, C. 2011 Finite differences for coarse azimuthal discretization and for reduction of effective resolution near origin of cylindrical flow equations. J. Comput. Phys. 230, 1134–1146.Google Scholar
Buchta, D. A. & Freund, J. B. 2017 The near-field pressure radiated by planar high-speed free-shear-flow turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 832, 383–408.Google Scholar
Buchta, D. A. & Freund, J. B. 2019 Intense sound radiation by high-speed flow: turbulence structure, gas properties, and near-field gas dynamics. Phys. Rev. Fluids 4, 044605.Google Scholar
de Cacqueray, N. & Bogey, C. 2014 Noise of an overexpanded Mach 3.3 jet: non-linear propagation effects and correlations with flow. Intl J. Aeroacoust. 13 (7–8), 607–632.Google Scholar
de Cacqueray, N., Bogey, C. & Bailly, C. 2011 Investigation of a high-Mach-number overexpanded jet using Large-Eddy simulation. AIAA J. 49 (10), 2171–2182.Google Scholar
Crighton, D. G. & Bashforth, S.1980 Nonlinear propagation of broadband jet noise. AIAA paper 1980-1039.Google Scholar
Enflo, B. O. & Hedberg, C. M. 2002 Theory of Nonlinear Acoustics in Fluids. Kluwer Academic Publisher.Google Scholar
Falco, L. E.2007 Single-point nonlinearity indicators for the propagation of high-amplitude acoustic signals. PhD thesis, Pennsylvania State University, PA.Google Scholar
Ffowcs Williams, J. E. 1963 The noise from turbulence convected at high speed. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 255 (1061), 469–503.Google Scholar
Ffowcs Williams, J. E., Simson, J. & Virchis, V. J. 1975 ‘Crackle’: an annoying component of jet noise. J. Fluid Mech. 71, 251–271.Google Scholar
Fiévet, R., Tinney, C. E., Baars, W. J. & Hamilton, M. F. 2016 Coalescence in the sound field of a laboratory-scale supersonic jet. AIAA J. 54 (1), 254–265.Google Scholar
Gallagher, J. A. & McLaughlin, D. K.1981 Experiments on the non linear propagation from low and moderate Reynolds number supersonic jets. AIAA Paper 1981-2041.Google Scholar
Gee, K. L., Sparrow, V. W., Atchley, A. & Gabrielson, T. B. 2007 On the perception of crackle in high-amplitude jet noise. AIAA J. 45 (3), 593–598.Google Scholar
Gojon, R. & Bogey, C. 2017 Numerical study of the flow and the near acoustic fields of an underexpanded round free jet generating two screech tones. Intl J. Aeroacoust. 16 (7–8), 603–625.Google Scholar
Hussain, A. K. M. F. 1983 Coherent structures: reality and myth. Phys. Fluids 26, 2816–2850.Google Scholar
Jordan, P. & Colonius, T. 2013 Wave packets and turbulent jet noise. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 45, 173–195.Google Scholar
Kearney-Fischer, M., Kim, J. H. & Samimy, M. 2011 A study of Mach wave radiation using active control. J. Fluid Mech. 681, 261–292.Google Scholar
Kleinman, R. R. & Freund, J. B. 2008 The sound from mixing layers simulated with different ranges of turbulence scales. Phys. Fluids 20 (101503), 1–12.Google Scholar
Krothapalli, A., Arakeri, V. & Greska, B.2003 Mach wave radiation: a review and an extension. AIAA Paper 2003-1200.Google Scholar
Krothapalli, A., Venkatakrishnan, L. & Lourenco, L.2000 Crackle: a dominant component of supersonic jet mixing noise. AIAA Paper 2000-2024.Google Scholar
Laufer, J., Schlinker, R. & Kaplan, R. E. 1976 Experiments on supersonic jet noise. AIAA J. 14 (4), 489–497.Google Scholar
Lowson, M. V. & Ollerhead, J. B. 1968 Visualization of noise from cold supersonic jets. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 44 (2), 624–630.Google Scholar
Martens, S., Spyropoulos, J. T. & Nagel, Z. 2011 The effects of chevrons on crackle-engine and scale model results. Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo, GT2011-46417. ASME.Google Scholar
McInerny, S. A. 1997 Launch vehicle acoustics part 2: statistics of the time domain data. J. Aircraft 33 (3), 518–523.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, D. K., Morisson, G. L. & Troutt, T. R. 1975 Experiments on the instability waves in a supersonic jet and their acoustic radiation. J. Fluid Mech. 69 (1), 73–95.Google Scholar
Mercier, B., Castelain, T. & Bailly, C. 2018 Experimental investigation of the turbulent density – far field sound correlations in compressible jets. Intl J. Aeroacoust. 17 (4–5), 521–540.Google Scholar
Mohseni, K. & Colonius 2002 Numerical treatment of polar coordinate singularities. J. Comput. Phys. 157 (10), 3593–3600.Google Scholar
Mora, P., Heeb, N., Kastner, J., Gutmark, E. J. & Kailasanath, K. 2014 Impact of heat on the pressure skewness and kurtosis in supersonic jets. AIAA J. 52 (4), 777–787.Google Scholar
Morfey, C. L. & Howell, G. P. 1980 Nonlinear propagation of aircraft noise in the atmosphere. AIAA J. 19 (8), 986–992.Google Scholar
Murray, N. E. & Lyons, G. W. 2016 On the convection velocity of source events related to supersonic jet crackle. J. Fluid Mech. 793, 477–503.Google Scholar
Nichols, J. W., Lele, S. K., Ham, F. E., Martens, S. & Spyropoulos, J. T. 2013a Crackle noise in heated supersonic jets. Trans. ASME J. Engng Gas Turbines Power 135 (5), 051202.Google Scholar
Nichols, J. W., Lele, S. K. & Spyropoulos, J. T.2013b The source of crackle noise in heated supersonic jets. AIAA Paper 2013-2197.Google Scholar
Papamoschou, D. 1995 Evidence of shocklets in a counterflow supersonic shear layer. Phys. Fluids 7, 233–235.Google Scholar
Petitjean, B. & McLaughlin, D. K.2003 Experiments on the nonlinear propagation of noise from supersonic jets. AIAA Paper 2003-3127.Google Scholar
Petitjean, B., Viswanathan, K. & McLaughlin, D. K. 2006 Acoustic pressure waveforms measured in high speed jet noise experiencing nonlinear propagation. Intl J. Aeroacoust. 5 (2), 193–215.Google Scholar
Pineau, P. & Bogey, C.2018 Study of the generation of shock waves by high-speed jets using conditional averaging. AIAA Paper 2018-3305.Google Scholar
Reichman, B. O., Gee, K. L., Neilsen, T. B., Swift, S. H., Wall, A. T., Gallagher, H. L., Downing, J. M. & James, M. M.2017 Acoustic shock formation in noise propagation during ground run-up operations of military aircraft AIAA Paper 2017-4043.Google Scholar
Ribner, H. S.1969 Eddy Mach wave noise from a simplified model of a supersonic mixing layer. Tech. Rep. UTIAS technical note no. 146.Google Scholar
Rossmann, T., Mungal, M. G. & Hanson, T. K. 2001 Evolution and growth of large-scale structures in high compressibility mixing layers. J. Turbul. 9 (3), 1–16.Google Scholar
Schmidt, O. T. & Schmid, P. J. 2019 A conditional space-time POD formalism for intermittent and rare events: example of acoustic bursts in turbulent jets. J. Fluid Mech. 867, R2.Google Scholar
Seiner, J. M., Ponton, M. K., Jansen, B. J. & Lagen, N. T. 1992 The effects ot temperature on supersonic jet noise emission. In 14th DGLR/AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference. vol. 1, pp. 295–307. AIAA, (AIAA Paper 92-2046).Google Scholar
Sinha, A., Rodriguez, D., Brès, G. & Colonius, T. 2014 Wavepacket models for supersonic jet noise. J. Fluid Mech. 742, 71–95.Google Scholar
Tam, C. K. W. & Burton, D. E. 1984a Sound generated by instability waves of supersonic flows. Part 1. Two-dimensional mixing layers. J. Fluid Mech. 138, 249–271.Google Scholar
Tam, C. K. W. & Burton, D. E. 1984b Sound generated by instability waves of supersonic flows. Part 2. Axisymmetric jets. J. Fluid Mech. 138, 273–295.Google Scholar
Tam, C. K. W., Chen, P. & Seiner, J. M. 1992 Relationship between instability waves and noise from high-speed jets. AIAA J. 30 (7), 1747–1752.Google Scholar
Tam, C. K. W. & Dong, Z. 1996 Radiation and outflow boundary conditions for direct computation of acoustic and flow disturbances in a nonuniform mean flow. J. Comput. Acoust. 4 (2), 175–201.Google Scholar
Tam, C. K. W. & Hu, F. Q. 1989 On the three families of instability waves of high-speed jets. J. Fluid Mech. 201, 447–483.Google Scholar
Tam, C. K. W. & Morris, P. J. 1980 The radiation of sound by the instability waves of a compressible plane turbulent shear layer. J. Fluid Mech. 98 (2), 349–381.Google Scholar
Troutt, T. R. & McLaughlin, D. K. 1982 Experiments on the flow and acoustic properties of a moderate-Reynolds-number supersonic jet. J. Fluid Mech. 116, 123–156.Google Scholar
Yule, A. J. 1978 Large-scale structures in the mixing layer of a round jet. J. Fluid Mech. 89 (3), 413–432.Google Scholar
Zaman, K. B. M. Q. 1985 Effect of initial condition on subsonic jet noise. AIAA J. 23 (9), 1370–1373.Google Scholar

Pineau and Bogey supplementary movie 1

Pressure fluctuations and vorticity norm for the jet at Mach~2.

Download Pineau and Bogey supplementary movie 1(Video)
Video 3.4 MB

Pineau and Bogey supplementary movie 2

Pressure fluctuations and vorticity norm for the jet at Mach 3.

Download Pineau and Bogey supplementary movie 2(Video)
Video 4.4 MB

Pineau and Bogey supplementary movie 3

Conditionally-averaged fields of radial velocity fluctuations inside the jet and pressure fluctuations outside for the jet at Mach 2.

Download Pineau and Bogey supplementary movie 3(Video)
Video 1.1 MB

Pineau and Bogey supplementary movie 4

Conditionally-averaged fields of radial velocity fluctuations inside the jet and pressure fluctuations outside for the jet at Mach 3.

Download Pineau and Bogey supplementary movie 4(Video)
Video 1.6 MB

Pineau and Bogey supplementary movie 5

Conditionally-averaged fields of pressure fluctuations. The velocity fluctuations are also represented as a vector field and the sonic line is displayed in dashed lines.

Download Pineau and Bogey supplementary movie 5(Video)
Video 1.1 MB